切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (06) : 571 -579. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2024.06.004

浅表器官超声影像学

超声影像组学联合临床病理特征预测乳腺癌新辅助化疗完全病理缓解的价值
洪玮1, 叶细容1,(), 刘枝红1, 杨银凤1, 吕志红1   
  1. 1. 435002 黄石市中心医院(湖北理工学院附属医院)超声影像科
  • 收稿日期:2024-03-07 出版日期:2024-06-01
  • 通信作者: 叶细容
  • 基金资助:
    湖北省自然科学基金联合基金项目(2022CFD066)

Value of ultrasound radiomics combined with clinicopathological features in predicting complete pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer

Wei Hong1, Xirong Ye1,(), Zhihong Liu1, Yinfeng Yang1, Zhihong Lyu1   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, Huangshi Central Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Hubei Polytechnic University, Huangshi 435002, China
  • Received:2024-03-07 Published:2024-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Xirong Ye
引用本文:

洪玮, 叶细容, 刘枝红, 杨银凤, 吕志红. 超声影像组学联合临床病理特征预测乳腺癌新辅助化疗完全病理缓解的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 571-579.

Wei Hong, Xirong Ye, Zhihong Liu, Yinfeng Yang, Zhihong Lyu. Value of ultrasound radiomics combined with clinicopathological features in predicting complete pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2024, 21(06): 571-579.

目的

基于乳腺癌患者新辅助化疗(NAC)前临床病理特征和超声影像组学特征构建预测病理完全缓解(pCR)的临床模型、影像组学模型及两者联合模型,探讨3种模型预测NAC疗效的临床价值。

方法

回顾性收集2019年1月至2024年1月在黄石市中心医院行乳腺癌NAC并有疗效病理评估结果的女性患者202例,将两个不同院区的病例分为训练集(107例)和验证集(95例)。训练集中,采用单因素和多因素Logistic回归筛选有统计学意义的临床病理特征并构建临床模型;采用最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)回归筛选影像组学特征建立影像组学模型,并根据特征参数及其回归系数计算每例患者的影像组学评分(Radscore);采用多因素Logistic回归构建临床病理特征和Radscore的联合预测模型。采用ROC曲线及决策曲线评价并验证3种模型的预测效能及临床应用价值。

结果

训练集中,激素受体(HR)状态和人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)状态纳入多因素Logistic回归建立临床模型;LASSO回归筛选出对比度、相关度、熵、灰度不均匀性、游程百分比这5个最佳影像组学特征建立影像组学模型;单因素Logistic回归显示Radscore有统计学意义。纳入HR状态(OR值:0.31,95%CI:0.15~0.64,P < 0.01)、HER2状态(OR值:2.96,95%CI:1.43~6.12,P < 0.01)和Radscore(OR值:1.19,95%CI:1.07~1.33,P < 0.01)这3个指标构建联合模型。训练集中临床模型、影像组学模型、联合模型预测pCR的AUC分别为0.68、0.75、0.82,验证集中临床模型、影像组学模型、联合模型预测pCR的AUC分别为0.68、0.72、0.79。联合模型的决策曲线净获益最高,影像组学模型次之,临床模型最低。

结论

临床模型、影像组学模型和联合模型对乳腺癌NAC疗效(是否pCR)预测均有一定的临床价值,其中联合模型的效能最优,具有最佳的预测性能和临床适用性。

Objective

To construct a clinical model, an imaging model, and a combined model for predicting pathological complete response (pCR) based on the clinicopathological characteristics and ultrasound imaging characteristics of breast cancer patients before neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), and to compare the clinical value of the three models in predicting the efficacy of NAC.

Methods

A total of 202 female patients who underwent NAC for breast cancer at Huangshi Central Hospital from January 2019 to January 2024 and had the results of pathologic evaluation were retrospectively collected. The cases from two different hospital districts were classified into a training set (107 cases) and a validation set (95 cases). In the training set, univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify clinically significant features and construct a clinical model. The minimum absolute contraction and selection operator regression were used to screen the radiomics features and establish a radiomics model. The Radscore of each patient was calculated according to the characteristic parameters and their regression coefficients. Multivariate logistic regression was then used to construct a combined prediction model based on statistically significant clinicopathological features and Radscore. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and decision curve were used to evaluate and verify the predictive efficacy and clinical value of the three models.

Results

In the training set, hormone receptor (HR) status and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status were included in the multivariate logistic regression to establish a clinical model. Lasso regression was used to select five best radiomics features, namely, contrast, correlation, entropy, gray unevenness, and percentage of run, to establish a radiomics model. Univariate logistic regression showed that Radscore was significantly different between patients with and without pCR. HR status (odds ratio [OR]: 0.31, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.15-0.64, P < 0.01), HER2 status (OR: 2.96, 95%CI: 1.43-6.12, P < 0.01), and Radscore (OR: 1.19, 95%CI: 1.07-1.33, P < 0.01) were included to build a combined model. In the training set, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the clinical model, radiomics model, and combined model in predicting pCR was 0.68, 0.75, and 0.82, respectively. In the validation set, the AUC of the clinical model, radiomics model, and combined model in predicting pCR was 0.68, 0.72, and 0.79, respectively. The combined model had the highest net benefit value in the decision curve analysis, followed by the radiomics model and the clinical model.

Conclusion

The clinical model, radiomics model, and combined model are all clinically valuable for predicting NAC efficacy in breast cancer, with the combined model having the best efficacy, predictive performance, and clinical applicability.

图1 患者女性,41岁,右侧乳腺浸润性导管癌。图a为原始灰阶超声图像;图b为勾画病灶感兴趣区示意图
图2 患者女性,43岁,右侧乳腺浸润性导管癌。图a为原始灰阶超声图像;图b为勾画病灶感兴趣区示意图
表1 训练集与验证集患者的临床病理资料[例(%)]
图3 森林图展示训练集各临床病理特征及影像组学评分的单因素Logistics回归分析结果注:Characteristics为特征;Age为年龄;Menopausal stage为绝经状态;Pre-NAC clinical T stage为临床T分期;Pre-NAC clinical N stage为临床N分期;HR status为激素受体状态;HER2 status为人类表皮生长因子受体2状态;Ki-67 index为增殖细胞核抗原水平;Molecular type为分子分型;HER2 overexpression为HER2过表达型;Triple negative为三阴型;Radscore为影像组学评分;OR为比值比;95%CI为95%置信区间;P value为P
图4 三种模型预测病理完全缓解的ROC曲线。图a为训练集;图b为验证集
图5 三种模型的决策曲线。图a为训练集;图b为验证集
图6 联合模型的校准曲线。图a为训练集;图b为验证集
图7 联合模型预测乳腺癌患者新辅助化疗后病理完全缓解的列线图注:HR为激素受体状态(1代表阳性,0代表阴性);HER2为人类表皮生长因子受体2状态(1代表阳性,0代表阴性);Radscore为影像组学评分
表2 3种模型在训练集和验证集的预测性能
图8 联合模型对28例化疗联合内分泌治疗和(或)靶向治疗患者的临床结局预测分布图注:pCR为完全病理缓解;non-pCR为非完全病理缓解
1
Korde LA, Somerfield MR, Carey LA, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, and targeted therapy for breast cancer: ASCO guideline [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2021, 39(13): 1485-1505.
2
Spring LM, Fell G, Arfe A, et al. Pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and impact on breast cancer recurrence and survival: A comprehensive meta-analysis [J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2020, 26(12): 2838-2848.
3
《中国乳腺癌新辅助治疗专家共识(2022年版)》专家组. 中国乳腺癌新辅助治疗专家共识(2022年版) [J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2022, 32 (1): 80-89.
4
Croshaw R, Shapiro-Wright H, Svensson E, et al. Accuracy of clinical examination, digital mammogram, ultrasound, and MRI in determining postneoadjuvant pathologic tumor response in operable breast cancer patients [J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2011, 18(11): 3160-3163.
5
Shi Z, Huang X, Cheng Z, et al. MRI-based quantification of intratumoral heterogeneity for predicting treatment response to Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer [J]. Radiology, 2023, 308(1): e222830.
6
Pesapane F, Agazzi GM, Rotili A, et al. Prediction of the pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients with MRI-radiomics: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Curr Probl Cancer, 2022, 46(5): 100883.
7
Granzier RWY, van Nijnatten TJA, Woodruff HC, et al. Exploring breast cancer response prediction to neoadjuvant systemic therapy using MRI-based radiomics: A systematic review [J]. Eur J Radiol, 2019, 121: 108736.
8
Fayanju OM, Ren Y, Thomas SM, et al. The clinical significance of breastonly and node-only pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT): a review of 20,000 breast cancer patients in the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) [J]. Ann Surg, 2018, 268(4): 591-601.
9
Romeo V, Accardo G, Perillo T, et al. Assessment and prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: A comparison of imaging modalities and future perspectives [J]. Cancers (Basel), 2021, 13(14): 3521.
10
Zardavas D, Irrthum A, Swanton C, et al. Clinical management of breast cancer heterogeneity [J]. Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 2015, 12(7): 381-394.
11
Lüönd F, Tiede S, Christofori G. Breast cancer as an example of tumour heterogeneity and tumour cell plasticity during malignant progression [J]. Br J Cancer, 2021, 125(2): 164-175.
12
Wu J, Cao G, Sun X, et al. Intratumoral spatial heterogeneity at perfusion MR imaging predicts recurrence-free survival in locally advanced breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy [J]. Radiology, 2018, 288 (1): 26-35.
13
Su GH, Xiao Y, You C, et al. Radiogenomic-based multiomic analysis reveals imaging intratumor heterogeneity phenotypes and therapeutic targets [J]. Sci Adv, 2023, 9(40): eadf0837.
14
Mayerhoefer ME, Materka A, Langs G, et al. Introduction to radiomics [J]. J Nucl Med, 2020, 61(4): 488-495.
15
陈瑾, 王海屹, 叶慧义. 纹理分析在肿瘤影像学中的研究进展 [J].中华放射学杂, 2017, 51(12): 979-982.
16
Choi HJ, Ryu JM, Kim I, et al. Nomogram for accurate prediction of breast and axillary pathologic response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in node positive patients with breast cancer [J]. Ann Surg Treat Res, 2019, 96(4): 169-176.
17
Jiang M, Li CL, Luo XM, et al. Ultrasound-based deep learning radiomics in the assessment of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer [J]. Eur J Cancer, 2021, 147: 95-105.
[1] 章建全, 程杰, 陈红琼, 闫磊. 采用ACR-TIRADS评估甲状腺消融区的调查研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 966-971.
[2] 罗辉, 方晔. 品管圈在提高甲状腺结节细针穿刺检出率中的应用[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 972-977.
[3] 杨忠, 时敬业, 邓学东, 姜纬, 殷林亮, 潘琦, 梁泓, 马建芳, 王珍奇, 张俊, 董姗姗. 产前超声在胎儿22q11.2 微缺失综合征中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 852-858.
[4] 孙佳丽, 金琳, 沈崔琴, 陈晴晴, 林艳萍, 李朝军, 徐栋. 机器人辅助超声引导下经皮穿刺的体外实验研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 884-889.
[5] 史学兵, 谢迎东, 谢霓, 徐超丽, 杨斌, 孙帼. 声辐射力弹性成像对不可切除肝细胞癌门静脉癌栓患者放射治疗效果的评价[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 778-784.
[6] 奚玲, 仝瀚文, 缪骥, 毛永欢, 沈晓菲, 杜峻峰, 刘晔. 基于肌少症构建的造口旁疝危险因素预测模型[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 48-51.
[7] 韩加刚, 王振军. 梗阻性左半结肠癌的治疗策略[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 450-458.
[8] 石阳, 于剑锋, 曹可, 翟志伟, 叶春祥, 王振军, 韩加刚. 可扩张金属支架置入联合新辅助化疗治疗完全梗阻性左半结肠癌围手术期并发症分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 464-471.
[9] 王贝贝, 崔振义, 王静, 王晗妍, 吕红芝, 李秀婷. 老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者术后贫血预测模型的构建与验证[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 355-362.
[10] 刘琦, 王守凯, 王帅, 苏雨晴, 马壮, 陈海军, 司丕蕾. 乳腺癌肿瘤内微生物组的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 841-845.
[11] 韦巧玲, 黄妍, 赵昌, 宋庆峰, 陈祖毅, 黄莹, 蒙嫦, 黄靖. 肝癌微波消融术后中重度疼痛风险预测列线图模型构建及验证[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 715-721.
[12] 蔡晓雯, 李慧景, 丘婕, 杨翼帆, 吴素贤, 林玉彤, 何秋娜. 肝癌患者肝动脉化疗栓塞术后疼痛风险预测模型的构建及验证[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 722-728.
[13] 崔军威, 蔡华丽, 胡艺冰, 胡慧. 亚甲蓝联合金属定位夹及定位钩针标记在乳腺癌辅助化疗后评估腋窝转移淋巴结的临床应用价值探究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 625-632.
[14] 王誉英, 刘世伟, 王睿, 曾娅玲, 涂禧慧, 张蒲蓉. 老年乳腺癌新辅助治疗病理完全缓解的预测因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 641-646.
[15] 王帅, 张志远, 苏雨晴, 李雯雯, 王守凯, 刘琦, 李文涛. 孟德尔随机化及其在乳腺癌研究中的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 671-676.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?