切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2016, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (01) : 51 -55. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2016.01.013

所属专题: 文献

腹部超声影像学

直肠腔内弹性成像对直肠癌新辅助治疗后肿瘤浸润深度降期的评估
仲光熙1, 吕珂1, 戴晴1, 李建初1, 姜玉新1,()   
  1. 1. 100730 中国医学科学院 北京协和医学院 北京协和医院超声医学科
  • 收稿日期:2015-09-07 出版日期:2016-01-01
  • 通信作者: 姜玉新

Value of endorectal elastography for predicting the downstage of infiltration depth in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy

Guangxi Zhong1, Ke Lyu1, Qing Dai1, Jianchu Li1, Yuxin Jiang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasonography, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
  • Received:2015-09-07 Published:2016-01-01
  • Corresponding author: Yuxin Jiang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Jiang Yuxin, Email:
引用本文:

仲光熙, 吕珂, 戴晴, 李建初, 姜玉新. 直肠腔内弹性成像对直肠癌新辅助治疗后肿瘤浸润深度降期的评估[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2016, 13(01): 51-55.

Guangxi Zhong, Ke Lyu, Qing Dai, Jianchu Li, Yuxin Jiang. Value of endorectal elastography for predicting the downstage of infiltration depth in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2016, 13(01): 51-55.

目的

评估直肠腔内弹性成像应变比值(SR)判断直肠癌新辅助治疗后肿瘤浸润深度(T分期)降期的临床应用价值。

方法

收集北京协和医院收治的进展期直肠癌(T3期)患者62例,在新辅助放化疗前后,分别行常规直肠腔内超声(ERUS)和直肠腔内弹性成像检查。计算放化疗前后病灶SR差值及SR降幅,以SR降幅判断T分期降期。比较常规ERUS与弹性成像判断T分期降期的准确性。

结果

放化疗后,58例(58/62,94%)直肠癌病灶的SR值呈明显下降(t=2.823,P<0.01),另有4例(7%)SR值升高。pT0~2期的SR平均值为2.20±0.85,pT3期的SR平均值为3.19±0.90,两者差异具有统计学意义(t=3.684,P<0.01)。以SR降幅≥33.80%判断放化疗后T分期降期的准确性为69%(40/58),高于常规ERUS的准确性45%(28/62),但两者差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结合SR降幅,常规ERUS准确诊断降期由14例升高至28例,较好地提高了常规ERUS对T分期降期的诊断准确性。

结论

应用SR降幅可较好地辅助常规ERUS,提高直肠癌放化疗后T分期降期诊断准确性,为直肠癌新辅助放化疗疗效及预后评估提供一种新型的较为可靠、无创而又简便的影像学方法。

Objective

To evaluate the value of endorectal elastography with strain ratio measurements for predicting the downstage of T stage in locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy.

Methods

62 patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy had twice examinations of conventional endorectal ultrasound (ERUS) and endorectal elastography before radiochemotherapy and surgery. The difference and decreasing amplitude of SR were calculated , the downstage of T stage was predicted by decreasing amplitude of SR. The accuracy of conventional ERUS and endorectal elastography predicting the downstage were compared.

Results

58 patients (94%) demonstrated a significant decrease in strain ratios (t=2.823, P<0.01), and 4 patients (6.5%) demonstrated a increase in strain ration. The strain ratios of pT3 rectal cancer were significantly higher than that of pT0-2 rectal cancer (3.19±0.90 vs 2.20±0.85, t=3.684, P<0.01). When the cut-off point of the decreasing amplitude of SR≥33.80%, the accuracy of diagnosis of the downstage of pT stage after chemoradiotherapy by endorectal elastography was 69% (40/58), which is higher than that of the conventional ERUS (45.1%, 28/62), but the difference was not statistically significant (P<0.05). The conventional ERUS can correctly diagnosis 28 cases of the downstage increasing from 14 cases with the decreasing amplitude of SR.

Conclusions

The endorectal elastography with the decreasing amplitude of SR can assist the conventional ERUS, improve the diagnostic accuracy of the downstage of T stage in the rectal cancer after chemoradiotherapy, thereby providing a new reliable, noninvasive and convenient imaging methods for the assessment of the efficacy and prognosis of the rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

图1 弹性成像示直肠癌病灶内部颜色为蓝色,正常肠壁为红绿色,在常规ERUS图像上勾画腺瘤病灶区域(A),正常肠壁组织区域(B),获得应变比值为5.98
表1 常规ERUS与病理判断直肠癌病灶T分期降期比较
表2 病理降期与未降期直肠癌病灶的SR差值及SR降幅
图2 以直肠癌弹性应变比值降幅构建ROC曲线,获得曲线下面积为0.737
表3 不同SR降幅诊断直肠癌病灶的敏感度、特异度、准确性
[1]
Issa N, Murninkas A, Powsner E, et al. Long-term outcome of local excision after complete pathological response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy for rectal cancer [J]. World J Surg, 2012, 36(10): 2481-2487.
[2]
Perez RO, Habr-Gama A, Lynn PB, et al. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for residual rectal cancer (ypT0-2) following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy: another word of caution [J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2013, 56(1): 6-13.
[3]
Lambregts DM, Maas M, Bakers FC, et al. Long-term follow-up features on rectal MRI during a wait-and-see approach after a clinical complete response in patients with rectal cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy [J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2011, 54(12): 1521-1528.
[4]
Maas M, Beets-Tan RG, Lambregts DM. Wait-and-see policy for clinical complete responders after chemoradiation for rectal cancer [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2011, 29(35): 4633-4640.
[5]
Huh JW, Kim HC, Lee SJ, et al. Diagnostic accuracy and prognostic impact of restaging by magnetic resonance imaging afterpreoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer [J]. Radiother Oncol, 2014, 113(1): 24-28.
[6]
Zhao RS, Wang H, Zhou ZY, et al. Restaging of locally advanced rectal cancer with magnetic resonance imaging and endoluminal ultrasound after preoperative chemoradiotherapy: a systemic review and meta-analysis [J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2014, 57(3): 388-395.
[7]
Dickman R, Kundel Y, Levy-Drummer R, et al. Restaging locally advanced rectal cancer by different imaging modalities after preoperative chemoradiation: a comparative study [J]. Radiat Oncol, 2013, 8: 278.
[8]
Hötker AM, Garcia-Aguilar J, Gollub MJ. Multiparametric MRI of rectal cancer in the assessment of response to therapy: a systematic review [J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2014, 57(6): 790-799.
[9]
Rau B, Hunerbein M, Barth C, et al. Accuracy of endorectal ultrasound after preoperative radiochemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer [J]. Surg Endosc, 1999, 13(10): 980-984.
[10]
Vanagunas A, Lin DE, Stryker SJ. Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound for restaging rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy [J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2004, 99(1): 109-112.
[11]
Souchon R, Rouvière O, Gelet A, et al. Visualisation of HIFU lesions using elastography of the human prostate in vivo: preliminary results [J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2003, 29(7): 1007-1015
[12]
Kolokythas O, Gauthier T, Fernandez AT, et al. Ultrasound-based elastography: a novel approach to assess radio frequency ablation of liver masses performed with expandable ablation probes: a feasibility study [J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2008, 27(6): 935-946.
[13]
Varghese T, Zagzebski JA, Lee FT Jr. Elastographic imaging of thermal lesions in the liver in vivo following radiofrequency ablation: preliminary results [J] .Ultrasound Med Biol, 2002, 28(11-12): 1467-1473.
[14]
Mueller MM, Fusenig NE. Friends or foes-bipolar effects of the tumour stroma in cancer [J]. Nat Rev Cancer, 2004, 4(11): 839-849.
[15]
Schedin P, O′Brien J, Rudolph M, et al. Microenvironment of the involuting mammary gland mediates mammary cancer progression [J]. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia, 2007, 12(1): 71-82.
[16]
Waage JE, Havre RF, Odegaard S, et al. Endorectal elastography in the evaluation of rectal tumours [J]. Colorectal Dis, 2011, 13(10): 1130-1137.
[17]
Hildebrandt U, Feifel G, Schwarz HP, et al. Endorectal ultrasound: instrumentation and clinical aspects [J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 1986, 1(4): 203-207.
[18]
Harewood GC, Wiersema MJ. Cost-effectiveness of endoscopic ultrasonography in the evaluation of proximal rectal cancer[J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2002, 97(4): 874- 882.
[19]
Gualdi GF, Casciani E, Guadalaxara A, et al. Local staging of rectal cancer with transrectal ultrasound and endorectal magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with histologic findings [J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2000, 43(3): 338-345.
[1] 康夏, 田浩, 钱进, 高源, 缪洪明, 齐晓伟. 骨织素抑制破骨细胞分化改善肿瘤骨转移中骨溶解的机制研究[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 329-339.
[2] 代莉, 邓恢伟, 郭华静, 黄芙蓉. 术中持续输注艾司氯胺酮对腹腔镜结直肠癌手术患者术后睡眠质量的影响[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 408-412.
[3] 王得晨, 杨康, 杨自杰, 归明彬, 屈莲平, 张小凤, 高峰. 结直肠癌微卫星稳定状态和程序性死亡、吲哚胺2,3-双加氧酶关系的研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 462-465.
[4] 唐旭, 韩冰, 刘威, 陈茹星. 结直肠癌根治术后隐匿性肝转移危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 16-20.
[5] 张生军, 赵阿静, 李守博, 郝祥宏, 刘敏丽. 高糖通过HGF/c-met通路促进结直肠癌侵袭和迁移的实验研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 21-24.
[6] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[7] 李婷, 张琳. 血清脂肪酸代谢物及维生素D水平与结直肠癌发生的关系研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 661-665.
[8] 付振保, 曹万龙, 刘富红. 腹腔镜直肠癌低位前切除术中不同缝合方法的回肠双腔造口术临床效果研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 684-687.
[9] 关旭, 王锡山. 基于外科与免疫视角思考结直肠癌区域淋巴结处理的功与过[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 448-452.
[10] 顾睿祈, 方洪生, 蔡国响. 循环肿瘤DNA检测在结直肠癌诊治中的应用与进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 453-459.
[11] 卢艳军, 马健, 白鹏宇, 郭凌宏, 刘海义, 江波, 白文启, 张毅勋. 纳米碳在腹腔镜直肠癌根治术中253组淋巴结清扫的临床效果[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 473-477.
[12] 倪文凯, 齐翀, 许小丹, 周燮程, 殷庆章, 蔡元坤. 结直肠癌患者术后发生延迟性肠麻痹的影响因素分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 484-489.
[13] 范小彧, 孙司正, 鄂一民, 喻春钊. 梗阻性左半结肠癌不同手术治疗方案的选择应用[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 500-504.
[14] 杨红杰, 张智春, 孙轶. 直肠癌淋巴结转移诊断研究进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 512-518.
[15] 马慧颖, 凡新苓, 覃仕瑞, 陈佳赟, 曹莹, 徐源, 金晶, 唐源. 磁共振加速器治疗局部晚期直肠癌的初步经验[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 519-523.
阅读次数
全文


摘要