切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (06) : 411 -416. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2017.06.004

所属专题: 文献

腹部超声影像学

经直肠超声检查在直肠癌新辅助放化疗后术前评估中的应用价值
刘小银1, 刘广健1,(), 文艳玲1, 覃斯1, 曹飞1, 余俊丽1, 陈瑶1, 程文捷1, 张文静1, 蒋清凌1, 王仪梅1, 陈丽梅1   
  1. 1. 510655 广州,中山大学附属第六医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2017-03-23 出版日期:2017-06-01
  • 通信作者: 刘广健

Value of endorectalultrasonography in preoperative assessment of rectal cancer post neoadjuvantchemoradiation therapy

Xiaoyin Liu1, Guangjian Liu1,(), Yanling Wen1, Si Qin1, Fei Cao1, Junli Yu1, Yao Chen1, Wenjie Cheng1, Wenjing Zhang1, Qingling Jiang1, Yimin Wang1, Limei Chen1   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasonography, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510655, China
  • Received:2017-03-23 Published:2017-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Guangjian Liu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Liu Guangjian, Email:
引用本文:

刘小银, 刘广健, 文艳玲, 覃斯, 曹飞, 余俊丽, 陈瑶, 程文捷, 张文静, 蒋清凌, 王仪梅, 陈丽梅. 经直肠超声检查在直肠癌新辅助放化疗后术前评估中的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2017, 14(06): 411-416.

Xiaoyin Liu, Guangjian Liu, Yanling Wen, Si Qin, Fei Cao, Junli Yu, Yao Chen, Wenjie Cheng, Wenjing Zhang, Qingling Jiang, Yimin Wang, Limei Chen. Value of endorectalultrasonography in preoperative assessment of rectal cancer post neoadjuvantchemoradiation therapy[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2017, 14(06): 411-416.

目的

探讨经直肠超声检查(ERUS)在直肠癌新辅助放化疗后术前评估中的应用价值。

方法

选择2016年1至12月中山大学附属第六医院收治的90例直肠癌患者。所有患者均接受了新辅助放化疗,并于全直肠系膜切除术(TME)前进行了ERUS,其中64例患者在新辅助放化疗前后均接受了ERUS,26例患者仅于新辅助放化疗后接受了ERUS。应用配对样本比较的Wilcoxon秩和检验比较直肠癌患者新辅助化疗前后肿瘤距肛缘距离、厚度及累及肠管长度差异。以术后病理分期诊断结果作为金标准,计算ERUS评估直肠癌新辅助放化疗后直肠癌T分期的准确性。

结果

与新辅助放化疗前比较,新辅助放化疗后患者肿瘤下缘距肛缘的距离增加[(51.68±19.81)mm vs (58.63±21.71)mm],肿瘤厚度减小[(14.92±5.30)mm vs (9.73±2.50)mm],肿瘤累及肠管长度缩短[(40.82±9.18)mm vs (26.10±10.07)mm],且差异均有统计学意义(Z=4.996、6.153、6.076,P均<0.01)。90例患者术后病理诊断为完全缓解pT0期15例,pT1期3例,pT2期30例,pT3期42例。术前ERUS诊断为完全缓解uT0期9例,uT1期1例,uT2期18例,uT3期59例,uT4期3例。ERUS对直肠癌新辅助放化疗后T分期的诊断准确性分别为uT0期82.2%(74/90)、uT1期96.7%(87/90)、uT2期66.7%(60/90)、uT3期67.8%(61/90)和uT4期96.7%(87/90),T分期总的诊断准确性为82.2%(74/90)。

结论

ERUS能够有效记录直肠癌新辅助放化疗前后肿瘤形态学变化,有助于对肿瘤距肛缘距离、肿瘤累及范围及浸润深度进行术前再评估。

Objective

To investigate the value of endorectal ultrasonography (ERUS) in preoperative assessment of rectal cancer post neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy.

Methods

From Jan. 2016 to Dec. 2016, 90 rectal cancer patients who underwent preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy and total mesorectal excision surgery in the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University were retrospectively analyzed, and all patients underwent ERUS examination post neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy. Of these, 64 patients were evaluated by ERUS pre and post neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy and 26 patients were evaluated only post neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy. Wilcoxon rank sum test for paired sample was performed to compare the distance from inferior margin of tumor to anal margin, the length and thickness of the tumor pre and post neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy respectively in rectal cancer. Taken pathologic findings as golden standard, the accuracy of T staging assessed by ERUS post neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy was evaluated.

Results

Compared with pre neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy, the distance from inferior margin of tumor to anal margin significantly increased after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy [(58.63±21.71) mm vs (51.68±19.81) mm], and the length [(26.10±10.07) mm vs (40.82±9.18) mm] and thickness [(9.73±2.50) mm vs (14.92±5.30) mm] of tumor also evidently decreased post neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy, respectively (Z were 4.996, 6.153 and 6.076, all P<0.01). The final pathological T stage was pathologic complete response (pCR) or pT0 in 15 patients, pT1 in 3 patients, pT2 in 30 patients and pT3 in 42 patients. The diagnostic accuracy of T staging of rectal cancer post neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy for ERUS was uT0 82.2% (74/90), uT1 96.7% (87/90), uT2 66.7% (60/90), uT3 67.8% (61/90) and uT4 96.7% (87/90), and the overall accuracy was 82.2% (74/90).

Conclusion

ERUS could effectively record the morphological changes of rectal cancer pre and post neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy, which may contribute to the re-evaluation of the distance from inferior tumor margin to anal margin and the range and depth of tumor involvement pre surgical resection.

表1 新辅助放化疗前后患者肿瘤距肛缘距离、厚度及累及肠管长度比较(mm,±s
表2 ERUS对新辅助放化疗后直肠癌的T分期与病理分期对比(例)
表3 ERUS对新辅助放化疗后直肠癌T分期的诊断效能(例)
图1~6 直肠癌新辅助放化疗前后肿瘤变化。图1~3为新辅助放化疗前直肠癌uT3期,图1和图2分别为直肠双平面探头和360°环扫探头显示肿瘤突破固有肌层,侵犯直肠周围脂肪组织,图3为能量多普勒显示肿瘤内丰富血流信号;图4~6为新辅助放化疗后肿瘤完全缓解,图4和图5分别为直肠双平面探头和360°环扫探头显示肿瘤完全退缩,肠壁层次清晰,图6为能量多普勒显示血流信号较放新辅助化疗前明显减少
图7~10 直肠癌新辅助放化疗后肿瘤组织纤维化。图7为直肠癌uT3期新辅助放化疗前肿瘤组织突破固有肌层;图8为彩色多普勒血流成像示肿瘤内丰富的血流信号;图9为新辅助放化疗后肿瘤明显缩小,肌层增厚,层次欠清,经直肠超声检查诊断为uT2期,术后病理诊断为完全缓解pT0期,纤维组织增生明显;图10为彩色多普勒血流成像示新辅助化疗后肿瘤内血流信号减少
[1]
Lee JW, Lee JH, Kim JG, et al. Comparison between preoperative and postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer:an institutional analysis [J]. Radiat Oncol J, 2013, 31(3):155-161.
[2]
Belluco C, Forlin M, Olivieri M, et al. Long-Term Outcome of Rectal Cancer With Clinically (EUS/ MRI) Metastatic Mesorectal Lymph Nodes Treated by NeoadjuvantChemoradiation: Role of Organ Preservation Strategies in Relation to Pathologic Response [J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2016, 23(13):4302-4309.
[3]
Maas M, Beets-Tan RG, Lambregts DM. Wait-and-see policy for clinical complete responders after chemoradiation for rectal cancer [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2011, 29(35):4633-4640.
[4]
Issa N, Murninkas A, Powsner E, et al. Long-term outcome of local excision after complete pathological response to neoadjuvantchemoradiation therapy for rectal cancer [J]. World J Surg, 2012, 36(10):2481-2487.
[5]
Fábián A, Bor R, Bálint A, et al. Neoadjuvant treatment as a limiting factor to rectal ultrasonography [J]. Orv Hetil, 2016, 157(30):1193-1197.
[6]
刘小银,刘广健,周智洋, 等. 经直肠超声与体部线圈磁共振检查对直肠癌T分期的比较研究 [J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2015, 31(3):420-424.
[7]
de Jong EA, ten Berge JC, Dwarkasing RS, et al. The accuracy of MRI, endorectal ultrasonography, and computed tomography in predicting the response of locally advanced rectal cancer after preoperative therapy: A meta analysis [J]. Surgery, 2016, 159(3):688-699.
[8]
De Nardi P, Carvello M. How reliable is current imaging in restaging rectal cancer after neoadjuvanttherapy? [J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2013, 19(36):5964-5972.
[9]
Du C, Xue W, Li J, et al. Morphology and prognostic value of tumor budding in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant radiotherapy [J]. Hum Pathol, 2012, 43(7):1061-1067.
[10]
Martellucci J, Scheiterle M, Lorenzi B, et al. Accuracy of transrectal ultrasound after preoperative radiochemotherapy compared to computed tomography and magnetic resonance in locally advanced rectal cancer [J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2012, 27(7):967-973.
[11]
Lee CT, Chow NH, Liu YS,et al. Computed tomography with histological correlation for evaluating tumor regression of rectal carcinoma after preoperative chemoradiation therapy [J]. Hepatogastroenterology, 2012, 59(120):2484-2489.
[12]
Wheeler JM, Warren BF, Mortensen NJ, et al. Quantification of histologic regression of rectal cancer after irradiation: a proposal for a modified staging system [J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2002, 45(8):1051-1056.
[13]
Capirci C, Valentini V, Cionini L, et al. Prognostic value of pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: long-term analysis of 566 ypCR patients [J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2008, 72(1):99-107.
[14]
Habr-Gama A, Perez RO. The surgical signicance of residual mucosal abnormalities in rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (Br J Surg 2012; 99: 993-1001) [J]. Br J Surg, 2012, 99(11):1601; author reply 1601-1602.
[15]
仲光熙,吕珂,戴晴, 等. 直肠腔内弹性成像对直肠癌新辅助治疗后肿瘤浸润深度降期的评估 [J/CD]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2016, 13(1):51-55.
[1] 康夏, 田浩, 钱进, 高源, 缪洪明, 齐晓伟. 骨织素抑制破骨细胞分化改善肿瘤骨转移中骨溶解的机制研究[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 329-339.
[2] 代莉, 邓恢伟, 郭华静, 黄芙蓉. 术中持续输注艾司氯胺酮对腹腔镜结直肠癌手术患者术后睡眠质量的影响[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 408-412.
[3] 唐旭, 韩冰, 刘威, 陈茹星. 结直肠癌根治术后隐匿性肝转移危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 16-20.
[4] 张生军, 赵阿静, 李守博, 郝祥宏, 刘敏丽. 高糖通过HGF/c-met通路促进结直肠癌侵袭和迁移的实验研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 21-24.
[5] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[6] 李婷, 张琳. 血清脂肪酸代谢物及维生素D水平与结直肠癌发生的关系研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 661-665.
[7] 付振保, 曹万龙, 刘富红. 腹腔镜直肠癌低位前切除术中不同缝合方法的回肠双腔造口术临床效果研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 684-687.
[8] 贺亮, 王松林, 周业江. 两种预防性回肠造口在腹腔镜ISR术治疗超低位直肠癌的效果对比研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 697-700.
[9] 关旭, 王锡山. 基于外科与免疫视角思考结直肠癌区域淋巴结处理的功与过[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 448-452.
[10] 顾睿祈, 方洪生, 蔡国响. 循环肿瘤DNA检测在结直肠癌诊治中的应用与进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 453-459.
[11] 卢艳军, 马健, 白鹏宇, 郭凌宏, 刘海义, 江波, 白文启, 张毅勋. 纳米碳在腹腔镜直肠癌根治术中253组淋巴结清扫的临床效果[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 473-477.
[12] 倪文凯, 齐翀, 许小丹, 周燮程, 殷庆章, 蔡元坤. 结直肠癌患者术后发生延迟性肠麻痹的影响因素分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 484-489.
[13] 范小彧, 孙司正, 鄂一民, 喻春钊. 梗阻性左半结肠癌不同手术治疗方案的选择应用[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 500-504.
[14] 杨红杰, 张智春, 孙轶. 直肠癌淋巴结转移诊断研究进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 512-518.
[15] 马慧颖, 凡新苓, 覃仕瑞, 陈佳赟, 曹莹, 徐源, 金晶, 唐源. 磁共振加速器治疗局部晚期直肠癌的初步经验[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 519-523.
阅读次数
全文


摘要