切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (06) : 411 -416. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2017.06.004

所属专题: 文献

腹部超声影像学

经直肠超声检查在直肠癌新辅助放化疗后术前评估中的应用价值
刘小银1, 刘广健1,(), 文艳玲1, 覃斯1, 曹飞1, 余俊丽1, 陈瑶1, 程文捷1, 张文静1, 蒋清凌1, 王仪梅1, 陈丽梅1   
  1. 1. 510655 广州,中山大学附属第六医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2017-03-23 出版日期:2017-06-01
  • 通信作者: 刘广健

Value of endorectalultrasonography in preoperative assessment of rectal cancer post neoadjuvantchemoradiation therapy

Xiaoyin Liu1, Guangjian Liu1,(), Yanling Wen1, Si Qin1, Fei Cao1, Junli Yu1, Yao Chen1, Wenjie Cheng1, Wenjing Zhang1, Qingling Jiang1, Yimin Wang1, Limei Chen1   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasonography, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510655, China
  • Received:2017-03-23 Published:2017-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Guangjian Liu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Liu Guangjian, Email:
引用本文:

刘小银, 刘广健, 文艳玲, 覃斯, 曹飞, 余俊丽, 陈瑶, 程文捷, 张文静, 蒋清凌, 王仪梅, 陈丽梅. 经直肠超声检查在直肠癌新辅助放化疗后术前评估中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2017, 14(06): 411-416.

Xiaoyin Liu, Guangjian Liu, Yanling Wen, Si Qin, Fei Cao, Junli Yu, Yao Chen, Wenjie Cheng, Wenjing Zhang, Qingling Jiang, Yimin Wang, Limei Chen. Value of endorectalultrasonography in preoperative assessment of rectal cancer post neoadjuvantchemoradiation therapy[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2017, 14(06): 411-416.

目的

探讨经直肠超声检查(ERUS)在直肠癌新辅助放化疗后术前评估中的应用价值。

方法

选择2016年1至12月中山大学附属第六医院收治的90例直肠癌患者。所有患者均接受了新辅助放化疗,并于全直肠系膜切除术(TME)前进行了ERUS,其中64例患者在新辅助放化疗前后均接受了ERUS,26例患者仅于新辅助放化疗后接受了ERUS。应用配对样本比较的Wilcoxon秩和检验比较直肠癌患者新辅助化疗前后肿瘤距肛缘距离、厚度及累及肠管长度差异。以术后病理分期诊断结果作为金标准,计算ERUS评估直肠癌新辅助放化疗后直肠癌T分期的准确性。

结果

与新辅助放化疗前比较,新辅助放化疗后患者肿瘤下缘距肛缘的距离增加[(51.68±19.81)mm vs (58.63±21.71)mm],肿瘤厚度减小[(14.92±5.30)mm vs (9.73±2.50)mm],肿瘤累及肠管长度缩短[(40.82±9.18)mm vs (26.10±10.07)mm],且差异均有统计学意义(Z=4.996、6.153、6.076,P均<0.01)。90例患者术后病理诊断为完全缓解pT0期15例,pT1期3例,pT2期30例,pT3期42例。术前ERUS诊断为完全缓解uT0期9例,uT1期1例,uT2期18例,uT3期59例,uT4期3例。ERUS对直肠癌新辅助放化疗后T分期的诊断准确性分别为uT0期82.2%(74/90)、uT1期96.7%(87/90)、uT2期66.7%(60/90)、uT3期67.8%(61/90)和uT4期96.7%(87/90),T分期总的诊断准确性为82.2%(74/90)。

结论

ERUS能够有效记录直肠癌新辅助放化疗前后肿瘤形态学变化,有助于对肿瘤距肛缘距离、肿瘤累及范围及浸润深度进行术前再评估。

Objective

To investigate the value of endorectal ultrasonography (ERUS) in preoperative assessment of rectal cancer post neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy.

Methods

From Jan. 2016 to Dec. 2016, 90 rectal cancer patients who underwent preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy and total mesorectal excision surgery in the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University were retrospectively analyzed, and all patients underwent ERUS examination post neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy. Of these, 64 patients were evaluated by ERUS pre and post neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy and 26 patients were evaluated only post neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy. Wilcoxon rank sum test for paired sample was performed to compare the distance from inferior margin of tumor to anal margin, the length and thickness of the tumor pre and post neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy respectively in rectal cancer. Taken pathologic findings as golden standard, the accuracy of T staging assessed by ERUS post neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy was evaluated.

Results

Compared with pre neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy, the distance from inferior margin of tumor to anal margin significantly increased after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy [(58.63±21.71) mm vs (51.68±19.81) mm], and the length [(26.10±10.07) mm vs (40.82±9.18) mm] and thickness [(9.73±2.50) mm vs (14.92±5.30) mm] of tumor also evidently decreased post neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy, respectively (Z were 4.996, 6.153 and 6.076, all P<0.01). The final pathological T stage was pathologic complete response (pCR) or pT0 in 15 patients, pT1 in 3 patients, pT2 in 30 patients and pT3 in 42 patients. The diagnostic accuracy of T staging of rectal cancer post neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy for ERUS was uT0 82.2% (74/90), uT1 96.7% (87/90), uT2 66.7% (60/90), uT3 67.8% (61/90) and uT4 96.7% (87/90), and the overall accuracy was 82.2% (74/90).

Conclusion

ERUS could effectively record the morphological changes of rectal cancer pre and post neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy, which may contribute to the re-evaluation of the distance from inferior tumor margin to anal margin and the range and depth of tumor involvement pre surgical resection.

表1 新辅助放化疗前后患者肿瘤距肛缘距离、厚度及累及肠管长度比较(mm,±s
表2 ERUS对新辅助放化疗后直肠癌的T分期与病理分期对比(例)
表3 ERUS对新辅助放化疗后直肠癌T分期的诊断效能(例)
图1~6 直肠癌新辅助放化疗前后肿瘤变化。图1~3为新辅助放化疗前直肠癌uT3期,图1和图2分别为直肠双平面探头和360°环扫探头显示肿瘤突破固有肌层,侵犯直肠周围脂肪组织,图3为能量多普勒显示肿瘤内丰富血流信号;图4~6为新辅助放化疗后肿瘤完全缓解,图4和图5分别为直肠双平面探头和360°环扫探头显示肿瘤完全退缩,肠壁层次清晰,图6为能量多普勒显示血流信号较放新辅助化疗前明显减少
图7~10 直肠癌新辅助放化疗后肿瘤组织纤维化。图7为直肠癌uT3期新辅助放化疗前肿瘤组织突破固有肌层;图8为彩色多普勒血流成像示肿瘤内丰富的血流信号;图9为新辅助放化疗后肿瘤明显缩小,肌层增厚,层次欠清,经直肠超声检查诊断为uT2期,术后病理诊断为完全缓解pT0期,纤维组织增生明显;图10为彩色多普勒血流成像示新辅助化疗后肿瘤内血流信号减少
[1]
Lee JW, Lee JH, Kim JG, et al. Comparison between preoperative and postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer:an institutional analysis [J]. Radiat Oncol J, 2013, 31(3):155-161.
[2]
Belluco C, Forlin M, Olivieri M, et al. Long-Term Outcome of Rectal Cancer With Clinically (EUS/ MRI) Metastatic Mesorectal Lymph Nodes Treated by NeoadjuvantChemoradiation: Role of Organ Preservation Strategies in Relation to Pathologic Response [J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2016, 23(13):4302-4309.
[3]
Maas M, Beets-Tan RG, Lambregts DM. Wait-and-see policy for clinical complete responders after chemoradiation for rectal cancer [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2011, 29(35):4633-4640.
[4]
Issa N, Murninkas A, Powsner E, et al. Long-term outcome of local excision after complete pathological response to neoadjuvantchemoradiation therapy for rectal cancer [J]. World J Surg, 2012, 36(10):2481-2487.
[5]
Fábián A, Bor R, Bálint A, et al. Neoadjuvant treatment as a limiting factor to rectal ultrasonography [J]. Orv Hetil, 2016, 157(30):1193-1197.
[6]
刘小银,刘广健,周智洋, 等. 经直肠超声与体部线圈磁共振检查对直肠癌T分期的比较研究 [J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2015, 31(3):420-424.
[7]
de Jong EA, ten Berge JC, Dwarkasing RS, et al. The accuracy of MRI, endorectal ultrasonography, and computed tomography in predicting the response of locally advanced rectal cancer after preoperative therapy: A meta analysis [J]. Surgery, 2016, 159(3):688-699.
[8]
De Nardi P, Carvello M. How reliable is current imaging in restaging rectal cancer after neoadjuvanttherapy? [J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2013, 19(36):5964-5972.
[9]
Du C, Xue W, Li J, et al. Morphology and prognostic value of tumor budding in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant radiotherapy [J]. Hum Pathol, 2012, 43(7):1061-1067.
[10]
Martellucci J, Scheiterle M, Lorenzi B, et al. Accuracy of transrectal ultrasound after preoperative radiochemotherapy compared to computed tomography and magnetic resonance in locally advanced rectal cancer [J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2012, 27(7):967-973.
[11]
Lee CT, Chow NH, Liu YS,et al. Computed tomography with histological correlation for evaluating tumor regression of rectal carcinoma after preoperative chemoradiation therapy [J]. Hepatogastroenterology, 2012, 59(120):2484-2489.
[12]
Wheeler JM, Warren BF, Mortensen NJ, et al. Quantification of histologic regression of rectal cancer after irradiation: a proposal for a modified staging system [J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2002, 45(8):1051-1056.
[13]
Capirci C, Valentini V, Cionini L, et al. Prognostic value of pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: long-term analysis of 566 ypCR patients [J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2008, 72(1):99-107.
[14]
Habr-Gama A, Perez RO. The surgical signicance of residual mucosal abnormalities in rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (Br J Surg 2012; 99: 993-1001) [J]. Br J Surg, 2012, 99(11):1601; author reply 1601-1602.
[15]
仲光熙,吕珂,戴晴, 等. 直肠腔内弹性成像对直肠癌新辅助治疗后肿瘤浸润深度降期的评估 [J/CD]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2016, 13(1):51-55.
[1] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[2] 吴晖, 佴永军, 施雪松, 魏晓为. 两种解剖入路下行直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 40-43.
[3] 周世振, 朱兴亚, 袁庆港, 刘理想, 王凯, 缪骥, 丁超, 汪灏, 管文贤. 吲哚菁绿荧光成像技术在腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫中的应用效果分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 44-47.
[4] 徐逸男. 不同术式治疗梗阻性左半结直肠癌的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 72-75.
[5] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[6] 郑民华, 蒋天宇, 赵轩, 马君俊. 中国腹腔镜直肠癌根治术30年发展历程与未来[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 591-595.
[7] 池畔, 黄胜辉. 中国腹腔镜直肠癌根治术30年来的巨大进步[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 596-600.
[8] 李明, 屠松, 闫鹏, 钱军, 高鹏程, 许文山, 杨发英, 胡振涛, 单永玮. 应用前列腺电切镜引导置管治疗直肠低位吻合口漏研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 603-606.
[9] 李玲, 刘亚, 李培玲, 张秀敏, 李萍. 直肠癌患者术后肠道菌群的变化与抑郁症相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 607-610.
[10] 赵梓竣, 兰运升. 改良一针法末端回肠造口术对低位直肠癌保肛术后应激反应及安全性的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 611-614.
[11] 吴胜伟, 王志伟, 陈贵进, 刘序, 吴晓翔. 系膜肥厚低位直肠癌患者改良NOSES Ⅰ式手术的临床效果评价[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 615-618.
[12] 韩加刚, 王振军. 梗阻性左半结肠癌的治疗策略[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 450-458.
[13] 梁轩豪, 李小荣, 李亮, 林昌伟. 肠梗阻支架置入术联合新辅助化疗治疗结直肠癌急性肠梗阻的疗效及其预后的Meta 分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 472-482.
[14] 严虹霞, 王晓娟, 张毅勋. 2 型糖尿病对结直肠癌患者肿瘤标记物、临床病理及预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 483-487.
[15] 赵磊, 刘文志, 林峰, 于剑, 孙铭骏, 崔佑刚, 张旭, 衣宇鹏, 于宝胜, 冯宁. 深部热疗在改善结直肠癌术后辅助化疗副反应及生活质量中的作用研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 488-493.
阅读次数
全文


摘要