切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华医学超声杂志（电子版）

中华医学超声杂志（电子版） ›› 2017, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (06) : 433 -440. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2017.06.008

所属专题： 文献；

头颈部超声影像学

大脑中动脉重度狭窄或闭塞性病变脑膜支代偿对颅外段颈内动脉血流动力学的影响
李响1, 杨洁1, 贾凌云1, 赵新宇1, 华扬1,†()   
  1. 1. 100053　北京，首都医科大学宣武医院血管超声诊断科
  • 收稿日期:2017-01-14 出版日期:2017-06-01
  • 通信作者: 华扬

The effect of leptomeningealanastomoseson hemodynamic changes of extracranial internal carotid artery in middle cerebral artery severe stenosis and occlusion disease

Xiang Li1, Jie Yang1, Lingyun Jia1, Xinyu Zhao1, yang Hua1,†()   

  1. 1. Department of Vascular Ultrasonography, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China
  • Received:2017-01-14 Published:2017-06-01
  • Corresponding author: yang Hua
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Hua Yang, Email:
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

李响, 杨洁, 贾凌云, 赵新宇, 华扬. 大脑中动脉重度狭窄或闭塞性病变脑膜支代偿对颅外段颈内动脉血流动力学的影响[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2017, 14(06): 433-440.

Xiang Li, Jie Yang, Lingyun Jia, Xinyu Zhao, yang Hua. The effect of leptomeningealanastomoseson hemodynamic changes of extracranial internal carotid artery in middle cerebral artery severe stenosis and occlusion disease[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2017, 14(06): 433-440.

目的

探讨大脑中动脉（MCA）重度狭窄或慢性闭塞性病变患侧大脑前动脉（ACA）软脑膜动脉吻合对于颅外段颈内动脉（ICA）血流动力学的影响。

方法

选取2015年1月至12月颅多普勒超声（TCD）或经颅彩色多普勒超声（TCCS）诊断为一侧MCA重度狭窄或慢性闭塞并经数字减影血管造影（DSA）证实，且对侧MCA正常及双侧颅外段ICA管径正常或狭窄率<50%的患者186例，其中，MCA重度狭窄组患者88例，MCA慢性闭塞组患者98例，根据DSA检测结果，ACA存在软脑膜动脉吻合者72例，无软脑膜动脉吻合者114例。采用TCD和（或）TCCS及颈动脉彩色多普勒超声测量并记录患侧、健侧ACA的收缩期峰值流速（PSV）、舒张期末流速（EDV）、血管阻力指数（RI）测值，患侧、健侧颅外段ICA的PSV、EDV及RI测值，采用独立样本t检验及配对t检验比较2组患侧、健侧ACA与ICA的血流动力学参数，以及软脑膜动脉吻合患侧建立与否与ACA及ICA的血流动力学参数的差异。采用线性回归分析患侧ICA及ACA血流参数间的相关性。

结果

（1）MCA慢性闭塞组患侧ICA的PSV及EDV均较重度狭窄组明显减低，RI值明显升高[（71.27±17.84）cm/s vs（78.07±14.69）cm/s，（27.00±8.38）cm/s vs（32.01±7.83）cm/s，0.625±0.056 vs 0.591±0.057]，差异均有统计学意义（t=2.820、4.243、4.099，P均<0.01）。2组患者患侧ICA的PSV及EDV测值均显著低于健侧[PSV：（78.07±14.69）cm/s vs（85.26±17.42）cm/s，（71.27±17.84）cm/s vs（83.80±22.11）cm/s；EDV：（32.01±7.83）cm/s vs （34.50±7.36）cm/s，（27.00±8.38）cm/s vs （33.22±9.97）cm/s]，差异均有统计学意义（t=2.847、5.209、2.058、5.626，P均<0.05），慢性闭塞组患侧的RI值显著高于健侧（0.625±0.056 vs 0.601±0.076），差异有统计学意义（t=2.601，P<0.05），重度狭窄组两侧的RI值比较，差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。（2）存在软脑膜动脉吻合时，2组患者患侧ACA的PSV及EDV均较无软脑膜动脉吻合时明显升高，RI值明显减低[PSV：（164.19±22.64）cm/s vs（97.56±19.17）cm/s，（168.95±28.03）cm/s vs（96.72±21.57）cm/s；EDV：（75.68±12.53）cm/s vs（42.65±10.03）cm/s，（79.93±13.73）cm/s vs（42.30±11.95）cm/s；RI：0.540±0.036 vs 0.564±0.043，0.526±0.037 vs 0.566±0.051]，差异均有统计学意义（t=14.604、14.416、13.492、14.444、2.727、4.250，P均<0.01）。2组内患、健侧比较，存在软脑膜动脉吻合时患侧ACA的PSV及EDV均较健侧明显升高，RI值较健侧明显减低[PSV：（164.19±22.64）cm/s vs（105.19±26.95）cm/s，（168.95±28.03）cm/s vs（97.90±24.18）cm/s；EDV：（75.68±12.53）cm/s vs（44.10±13.87）cm/s，（79.93±13.73）cm/s vs（41.83±10.88）cm/s；RI：0.540±0.036 vs 0.583±0.050，0.526±0.037 vs 0.572±0.037]，差异均有统计学意义（t=10.049、15.906、10.313、16.864、4.083、6.145，P均<0.01），无软脑膜动脉吻合时，患侧ACA血流参数与健侧比较，差异均无统计学意义（P均>0.05）。（3）MCA重度狭窄患者无软脑膜动脉吻合组患侧ICA的PSV、EDV及RI与软脑膜动脉吻合组比较，差异均无统计学意义（P均>0.05）。MCA慢性闭塞患者无软脑膜动脉吻合组患侧ICA的PSV及EDV较软脑膜动脉吻合组显著降低，RI值明显升高[（65.93±13.34）cm/s vs（78.68±20.64）cm/s，（23.98±6.30）cm/s vs（31.20±9.08）cm/s，0.638±0.055 vs 0.605±0.053]，差异均有统计学意义（t=3.713、4.647、2.925，P均<0.01）。（4）MCA重度狭窄组患侧ICA与ACA的血流参数间均无相关关系（P>0.05）。慢性闭塞组中患侧ICA的PSV与患侧ACA的PSV、EDV呈线性正相关（r=0.350、0.367，P均<0.01），患侧ICA的RI值与患侧ACA的PSV及EDV呈线性负相关（r=-0.550、-0.531，P均<0.01）。

结论

MCA重度狭窄或闭塞TCD或TCCS检测患侧ACA流速升高可提示软脑膜动脉吻合存在，软脑膜动脉吻合可导致慢性闭塞患者同侧颅外段ICA流速明显下降而阻力升高，而重度狭窄患者同侧颅外段ICA血流动力学无明显改变。

关键词: 大脑中动脉, 超声检查，多普勒，彩色, 颈内动脉, 血流动力学
Objective

To investigate the influence of anterior cerebral artery (ACA) leptomeningealanastomoseson the hemodynamic changes of extracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) in patients with severe stenosis and chronic occlusion of middle cerebral artery (MCA) disease.

Methods

One hundred and eighty six cases with severe stenosis and chronic occlusion of MCA diagnosed by transcranial color-coded sonography (TCCS) and confirmed by digital subtraction angiography (DSA) were consecutively enrolled during January 2015 to December 2015. All cases were divided into two groups, including 88 cases of severe stenosis and 98 cases with chronic occlusion. According to DSA results, there were 72 cases with leptomeningeal anastomoses (LMA) and 114 cases without LMA. Transcranial Doppler (TCD) and TCCS were performed to measure and record the peak systolic velocity (PSV), end diastolic velocity (EDV), and resistance index (RI) of bilateral ACA, color Doppler ultrasound was used to measure and record PSV, EDV and RI of bilateral ICA. The ipsilateral and contralateralhemodynamic parameters of ICA and ACA were compared betweenthe two groups by means of independent-samples t test and paired-samples t test. The difference ofhemodynamic parameters between patients with LMA and without LMA were also compared. Linear regression was used to analyze the relevance between ipsilateral ICA and ACA parameters.

Results

(1) The PSV and EDV of ipsilateral ICA in MCA chronic occlusion group were significantly lower than those in MCA severe stenosis group [(71.27±17.84) cm/s vs (78.07±14.69) cm/s, (27.00±8.38) cm/s vs (32.01±7.83) cm/s, 0.625±0.056 vs 0.591±0.057; t=2.820, 4.243, 4.099, all P<0.01]. The PSV and EDV of ipsilateral ICA were significantly lower than the contralateral side in both two group [PSV: (78.07±14.69) cm/s vs (85.26±17.42) cm/s, (71.27±17.84) cm/s vs (83.80±22.11) cm/s; EDV: (32.01±7.83) cm/s vs (34.50±7.36) cm/s, (27.00±8.38) cm/s vs (33.22±9.97) cm/s; t=2.847, 5.209, 2.058, 5.626, all P<0.05]. The RI of ipsilateral ICA was higher than that of contralateral side in MCA chronic occlusion group (0.625±0.056 vs 0.601±0.076, t=2.601, P<0.05), no significantly differenceexist between the RI of two sides were in MCA severe stenosis group (P>0.05). (2) In two groups, the PSV and EDV of ipsilateral ICA with LMA were significantly higher than those without LMA, while the RI was lower [PSV: (164.19±22.64) cm/s vs (97.56±19.17) cm/s, (168.95±28.03) cm/s vs (96.72±21.57) cm/s; EDV: (75.68±12.53) cm/s vs (42.65±10.03) cm/s, (79.93±13.73) cm/s vs (42.30±11.95) cm/s; RI: 0.540±0.036 vs 0.564±0.043, 0.526±0.037 vs 0.566±0.051; t=14.604, 14.416, 13.492, 14.444, 2.727, 4.250, all P<0.01]. The PSV and EDV of ipsilateral ACA with LMA were higher than the contralateral side, and RI was lower [PSV: (164.19±22.64) cm/s vs (105.19±26.95) cm/s, (168.95±28.03) cm/s vs (97.90±24.18) cm/s; EDV: (75.68±12.53) cm/s vs (44.10±13.87) cm/s, (79.93±13.73) cm/s vs (41.83±10.88) cm/s; RI: 0.540±0.036 vs 0.583±0.050, 0.526±0.037 vs 0.572±0.037; t=10.049, 15.906, 10.313, 16.864, 4.083, 6.145, all P<0.01]. For the parameters of ACA without LMA, there was no difference between two sides (P>0.05). (3) In MCA with severestenosis group, the parameters of ipsilateral ICA between with and without LMA groupswere not significantly different (P>0.05). In MCA with chronicocclusion group, the PSV and EDV of ipsilateral ICA without LMA were significantly lower than those with LMA, and RI was higher [(65.93±13.34) cm/s vs (78.68±20.64) cm/s, (23.98±6.30) cm/s vs (31.20±9.08) cm/s, 0.638±0.055 vs 0.605±0.053; t=3.713, 4.647, 2.925, all P<0.01]. (4) In MCA with severestenosis group, no obviously correlation was found in the hemodynamic parameters of ipsilateral ICA and ACA (P>0.05). In MCA with chronicocclusion group, PSV, EDV of ipsilateral ACA had positive linear correlation with PSV of ipsilateral ICA (r=0.350, 0.367, P<0.01), and had negative linear correlation with RI of ipsilateral ICA (r=-0.550, -0.531, P<0.01).

Conclusions

In MCA with severestenosis and chronicocclusinpatients, TCD or TCCS can be used for detecting increased velocity of ACA with LMA. The hemodynamic parameters of ipsilateral ICA could beinfluenced by LMA withdecreased velocity and increased PI when MCA was occluded, but could not be influenced by LMA when MCA was severe stenosis.

Key words: Middle cerebral artery, Ultrasonography, Doppler, color, Carotid artery, internal, Hemodynamic
表1 MCA重度狭窄组与慢性狭窄组患者一般临床资料比较
组别 例数 年龄（岁，±s） 性别（例，男性/女性） 病变侧别[例（%）] 糖尿病[例（%）] 高血压[例（%）]
左侧 右侧
MCA重度狭窄组 88 56±13 74/14 40（45.5%） 48（54.5%） 22（25.0%） 51（58.0%）
MCA慢性闭塞组 98 57±12 81/17 51（52.0%） 47（48.0%） 17（17.3%） 60（61.2%）
统计值 ? t=0.825 χ2=0.069 χ2=0.805 χ2=1.639 χ2=0.206
P值 ? 0.411 0.793 0.370 0.200 0.650
组别 例数 冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病[例（%）] 高血脂[例（%）] 吸烟[例（%）] 临床症状[例（%）]
无症状 TIA 脑卒中
MAC重度狭窄组 88 8（9.1%） 38（43.2%） 58（65.9%） 4（4.5%） 10（11.4%） 74（84.1%）
MAC慢性闭塞组 98 12（12.2%） 40（40.8%） 67（68.3%） 7（7.1%） 13（13.3%） 78（79.6%）
统计值 ? χ2=0.515 χ2=0.107 χ2=0.127 χ2=0.779
P值 ? 0.473 0.744 0.721 0.677
表2 MCA重度狭窄组与慢性闭塞组患侧ICA血流动力学参数比较（±s）
组别 例数 PSV（cm/s） EDV（cm/s） RI
患侧 健侧 患侧 健侧 患侧 健侧
MAC重度狭窄组 88 78.07±14.69a 85.26±17.42 32.01±7.83b 34.50±7.36 0.591±0.057 0.594±0.047
MAC慢性闭塞组 98 71.27±17.84a 83.80±22.11 27.00±8.38a 33.22±9.97 0.625±0.056b 0.601±0.076
t值 ? 2.820 0.498 4.243 0.983 4.099 0.820
P值 ? 0.005 0.619 <0.001 0.327 <0.001 0.413
表3 MCA重度狭窄组软脑膜动脉吻合对ACA的血流参数影响（±s）
组别 例数 PSV（cm/s） EDV（cm/s） RI
患侧 健侧 患侧 健侧 患侧 健侧
软脑膜动脉吻合 31 164.19±22.64a 105.19±26.95 75.68±12.53a 44.10±13.87 0.540±0.036a 0.583±0.050
无软脑膜动脉吻合 57 97.56±19.17 95.04±27.30 42.65±10.03 41.72±15.68 0.564±0.043 0.570±0.070
t值 ? 14.604 1.675 13.492 0.707 2.727 0.930
P值 ? <0.001 0.098 <0.001 0.482 0.008 0.355
表4 MCA慢性闭塞组软脑膜动脉吻合对ACA的血流参数影响（±s）
组别 例数 PSV（cm/s） EDV（cm/s） RI
患侧 健侧 患侧 健侧 患侧 健侧
软脑膜动脉吻合 41 168.95±28.03a 97.90±24.18 79.93±13.73a 41.83±10.88 0.526±0.037a 0.572±0.037
无软脑膜动脉吻合 57 96.72±21.57 95.39±29.42 42.30±11.95 41.49±14.88 0.566±0.051 0.567±0.045
t值 ? 14.416 0.449 14.444 0.124 4.250 0.545
P值 ? <0.001 0.654 <0.001 0.902 <0.001 0.587
图3 大脑前动脉脑膜支代偿的多普勒图像。频谱多普勒超声测量左侧大脑前动脉流速代偿增快，PSV=165 cm/s，EDV=62 cm/s
表5 MCA重度狭窄组软脑膜动脉吻合对ICA的血流参数影响（±s）
组别 例数 PSV（cm/s） EDV（cm/s） RI
患侧 健侧 患侧 健侧 患侧 健侧
软脑膜动脉吻合 31 79.39±9.11a 84.87±17.85 32.81±4.80a 34.32±6.58 0.586±0.044a 0.591±0.050
无软脑膜动脉吻合 57 77.35±17.00 85.47±17.34 31.58±9.07a 34.60±7.81 0.594±0.063a 0.595±0.046
t值 ? 0.619 0.154 0.701 0.166 0.648 0.355
P值 ? 0.538 0.878 0.485 0.869 0.518 0.739
表6 MCA慢性闭塞组软脑膜动脉吻合对ICA的血流参数影响（±s）
组别 例数 PSV（cm/s） EDV（cm/s） RI
患侧 健侧 患侧 健侧 患侧 健侧
软脑膜动脉吻合 41 78.68±20.64a 84.10±22.51 31.20±9.08a 32.85±9.83 0.605±0.053a 0.605±0.084
无软脑膜动脉吻合 57 65.93±13.34 83.58±22.02 23.98±6.30 33.49±10.15 0.638±0.055 0.598±0.070
t值 ? 3.713 0.114 4.647 0.311 2.925 0.437
P值 ? <0.001 0.910 <0.001 0.757 0.004 0.663
图4 颅外段颈内动脉的多普勒图像。颈动脉超声频谱多普勒测量左侧ICA流速在正常范围，PSV=119 cm/s，EDV=45 cm/s，RI=0.62
图5~8 大脑中动脉慢性闭塞组患侧ACA血流参数与患侧ICA血流参数的线性回归图像。图5为ACA的PSV与颅外段ICA的PSV的线性回归图像；图6为ACA的EDV与颅外段ICA的PSV的线性回归图像；图7为ACA的PSV与颅外段ICA的RI值的线性回归图像；图8为ACA的EDV与颅外段ICA的RI值的线性回归图像
[1]
Van Seeters T, Biessels GJ, Kappelle LJ, et al. Determinants of leptomeningeal collateral flow in stroke patients with a middle cerebral artery occlusion [J]. Neuroradiology, 2016, 58(10):969-977.
[2]
杜利勇，华扬，张璟, 等. 大脑中动脉中重度狭窄患者大脑前和大脑后动脉的血流动力学变化 [J]. 中国脑血管病杂志, 2010, 7(6):290-293.
[3]
贾凌云，刘慧玲，华扬, 等. 经颅多普勒超声评价大脑中动脉慢性闭塞患者颅内侧支循环的血流动力学改变 [J]. 中国脑血管病杂志, 2010, 7(6):294-297.
[4]
段春，华扬，贾凌云, 等. 大脑中动脉慢性闭塞后脑膜支代偿对颅外段颈内动脉血流动力学的影响 [J]. 中国脑血管病杂志, 2010, 7(6):298-301.
[5]
Kim JJ, Fischbein NJ, Lu Y, et al. Regional angiographic grading system for collateral flow: correlation with cerebral infarction in patients with middle cerebral artery occlusion [J]. Stroke, 2004, 35(6):1340-1344.
[6]
Nowacki P, Zywica A, Podbielski J, et al. Middle cerebral artery flow after angioplasty and stenting of symptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis [J]. Neurol Neurochir Pol, 2009, 43(1):9-15.
[7]
Takase K, Kashihara M, Hashimoto T. Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography in patients with moyamoya disease [J]. Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 1997, 99 Suppl 2:S101-S105.
[8]
Lagunju I, Sodeinde O, Brown B, et al. Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography in children with sickle cell anemia: Clinical and laboratory correlates for elevated blood flow velocities [J]. J Clin Ultrasound, 2014, 42(2):89-95.
[9]
华扬. 实用颈动脉与颅脑血管超声诊断学 [M]. 北京, 科学出版社, 2002: 29-44.
[10]
孟秀峰，华扬，刘蓓蓓，等. 经颅多普勒超声诊断大脑中动脉狭窄准确性的研究 [J]. 中国脑血管病杂志, 2010, 7(6):284-289.
[11]
Burgin WS, Malkoff M, Felberg RA, et al. Transcranial Doppler ultrasound criteria for recanalization after thrombolysis for middle cerebral artery stroke [J]. Stroke, 2000, 31(5):1128-1132.
[12]
Brozici M, van der Zwan A, Hillen B. Anatomy and functionality of leptomeningeal anastomoses: a review [J]. Stroke, 2003, 34(11):2750-2762.
[13]
罗语嫣，郭鹏，许斌, 等. 大脑中动脉M1段闭塞患者软脑膜侧支循环与脑梗死体积及其分布的关系 [J]. 中国脑血管病杂志, 2012, 9(2):77-81.
[14]
Tan TY, Schminke U, Lien LM, et al. Extracranial internal carotid artery occlusion: the role of common carotid artery volume flow [J]. J Neuroimaging, 2002, 12(2):144-147.
[15]
AbuRahma AF, Srivastava M, Stone PA, et al. Critical appraisal of the Carotid Duplex Consensus criteria in the diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis [J]. J Vasc Surg, 2011, 53(1):53-59.
[16]
韩冰，华扬，凌晨, 等. 颈内动脉中重度狭窄或闭塞患者同侧颈总动脉血流动力学的观察 [J]. 中国脑血管病杂志, 2008, 5(12):536-540.
[17]
Braun T, Juenemann M, Gündüz D, et al. Diagnosing moyamoya syndrome using ultrasound – a case report [J]. BMC Neurol, 2015, 15:263.
[18]
Tanaka M, Sakaguchi M, Kitagawa K. Mechanism of moyamoya vessels secondary to intracranial atherosclerotic disease: angiographic findings in patients with middle cerebral artery occlusion [J]. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2012, 21(5):373-378.
[19]
Kim Y, Sin DS, Park HY, et al. Relationship between flow diversion on transcranial Doppler sonography and leptomeningeal collateral circulation in patients with middle cerebral artery occlusive disorder [J]. J Neuroimaging, 2009, 19(1):23-26.
[20]
Zareie H, Quain DA, Parsons M, et al. The influence of anterior cerebral artery flow diversion measured by transcranial Doppler on acute infarct volume and clinical outcome in anterior circulation stroke [J]. Int J Stroke, 2013, 8(4):228-234.
[21]
Defazio RA, Levy S, Morales CL, et al. A protocol for characterizing the impact of collateral flow after distal middle cerebral artery occlusion [J]. Transl Stroke Res, 2011, 2(1):112-127.
[22]
Winship IR. Cerebral collaterals and collateral therapeutics for acute ischemic stroke [J]. Microcirculation, 2015, 22(3):228-236.
[1] 丁兴欢, 王小永, 李风志, 梁博, 冯恩山. 颅内外血管搭桥联合贴敷治疗慢性颈内动脉闭塞的人类免疫缺陷病毒感染者一例及文献复习[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 314-319.
[2] 丁荷蓓, 王珣, 陈为国. 七氟烷吸入麻醉与异丙酚静脉麻醉在儿童腹股沟斜疝手术中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 570-574.
[3] 李先锋, 何懿, 程贞永, 邓国魁, 胡波, 谢红, 王莉, 王小燕, 李晓明. 右美托咪定对腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术患者血流动力学及麻醉复苏效果的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 437-441.
[4] 彭敏敏, 杨晓斌, 芮亚楠. 羟考酮复合舒芬太尼在腹腔镜疝修补术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 218-222.
[5] 郭建丽, 珠娜, 宋飞, 柴国东. 七氟烷吸入复合瑞芬太尼麻醉在小儿腹腔镜疝修补术中的效果[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 223-227.
[6] 潘忠军, 戎国祥, 丁明, 殷优宏, 张双龙. 非气管插管麻醉下单孔胸腔镜手术对肺结节及血流动力学、炎性指标的影响[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 272-275.
[7] 谢井伟, 王森, 王非, 郭永坤. STA-MCA血管搭桥术治疗烟雾病[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 318-320.
[8] 王守森, 傅世龙, 鲜亮, 林珑. 深入理解控制性减压技术对创伤性颅脑损伤术中脑膨出的预防机制与效果[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 257-262.
[9] 张艺, 任秀君, 郭孟玮, 赵雅芳, 李一凡, 李佳阳, 任晓暄, 邬继红, 卢海洋. 电针预处理对脑缺血再灌注大鼠行为学及外周血内皮祖细胞的影响[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(02): 71-77.
[10] 谢浩文, 丁建英, 刘小霞, 冯毅, 姚婧. 椎旁神经阻滞对微创胃切除肥胖患者术中血流、术后应激及康复质量的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 569-573.
[11] 梁铭垚, 袁健瑜, 关雨霏, 左思程, 阳新明, 陈巧燕. 多壳扩散磁共振成像在缺血性卒中模型的应用[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 362-368.
[12] 刘聪辉, 何浩然, 黄一诺, 张凤, 王凡月, 郝翰. 膳食铜补充对大鼠心肌梗死后心肌基质金属蛋白酶2表达水平及血流动力学的影响[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 166-172.
[13] 芦乙滨, 李梦蝶, 许明. PDCA（计划、执行、检查和处理）循环教学在内科住院医师重症超声指导血流动力学评估培训中的效果评价[J/OL]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 224-228.
[14] 程娅雯, 韩香凝, 朱宁, 何彩莲, 张润宁, 于嘉, 韩建峰, 刘福德. 双路途指导下血管内治疗症状性非急性颈内动脉颅内段闭塞的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 330-337.
[15] 于乐林, 尚海龙, 杜红娣, 王莺, 王一超, 徐长贺, 叶娟, 赵世伟, 郑芳慧, 沈慧, 沈海林. 基于CT平扫的影像组学特征预测急性大脑中动脉闭塞机械取栓术后造影剂外渗的价值[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 215-223.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号