切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (04) : 287 -293. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2018.04.010

所属专题: 文献

浅表器官超声影像学

经皮射频消融治疗甲状腺良性结节的疗效及影响因素
张颖1, 罗渝昆1,(), 广旸1, 谢芳1, 张明博1, 张艳1, 陈为1, 唐杰1   
  1. 1. 100853 北京,解放军总医院超声诊断科
  • 收稿日期:2018-01-18 出版日期:2018-04-01
  • 通信作者: 罗渝昆
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81471681、81771834)

The effect and influencing factors of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of benign thyroid nodules

Ying Zhang1, Yukun Luo1,(), Yang Guang1, Fang Xie1, Mingbo Zhang1, Yan Zhang1, Wei Chen1, Jie Tang1   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, Chinese People′s Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
  • Received:2018-01-18 Published:2018-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Yukun Luo
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Luo Yukun, Email:
引用本文:

张颖, 罗渝昆, 广旸, 谢芳, 张明博, 张艳, 陈为, 唐杰. 经皮射频消融治疗甲状腺良性结节的疗效及影响因素[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2018, 15(04): 287-293.

Ying Zhang, Yukun Luo, Yang Guang, Fang Xie, Mingbo Zhang, Yan Zhang, Wei Chen, Jie Tang. The effect and influencing factors of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of benign thyroid nodules[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2018, 15(04): 287-293.

目的

探讨甲状腺良性结节射频消融治疗的疗效及影响因素,以提高甲状腺良性结节消融治疗的效果。

方法

选取2013年4月至2016年6月在解放军总医院就诊的甲状腺结节患者468例,甲状腺良性结节482个,其中,女性356个,男性126个,年龄14~82岁,结节最大径0.7~9.2 cm;实性结节258个,囊实性结节224个,甲状腺结节合并桥本氏甲状腺炎96个。甲状腺结节经皮穿刺射频消融术后即刻、1个月、3个月、6个月、12个月、18个月及24个月行常规超声及超声造影检查,观察局部疼痛、红肿、皮肤感染、声音嘶哑等并发症的发生率,同时计算结节的体积缩小率,将结节按照囊实性比例、大小、是否有桥本病背景、性别、年龄进行分组,结节大小、有无桥本、性别、年龄大小分组组间比较采用独立样本t检验,甲状腺结节囊实性比例组间甲状腺结节体积缩小率比较采用方差分析。

结果

甲状腺良性结节射频消融术后体积明显缩小,术后1个月、3个月、6个月、12个月、18个月及24个月结节体积缩小率分别为:(51.2±5.7)%、(69.7±4.3)%、(84.6±3.7)%、(89.3±2.9)%、(93.7±1.6)%、(94.9±1.4)%;甲状腺结节囊性成分<20%、囊性成分20%~80%、囊性成分>80% 3组,术后1、3、6、12、18及24个月组间缩小率比较,差异均有统计学意义(F=66.858、69.101、19.410、49.559、146.653、309.950,P均<0.001),囊性成分比例越高,消融灶缩小越快;将囊性成分<20%的结节,按照最大径≤3 cm及>3 cm、是否有桥本病背景进行分组,术后1、3、6、12、18及24个月组间缩小率比较,差异均有统计学意义(不同大小分组:t=9.710、8.925、9.899、12.734、17.226、42.580;是否有桥本背景分组:t=5.529、7.981、4.843、6.558、17.976、28.906,P均<0.001),3 cm以下、无桥本氏甲状腺炎的结节射频消融后体积缩小更为显著;最大径≤3 cm且囊性成分<20%的结节在性别(男性、女性)、年龄(≤40岁、>40岁)组间,同一随访时间结节的体积缩小率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。

结论

经皮射频消融治疗甲状腺良性结节是一种安全、有效的微创治疗方法。

Objective

To explore the curative effect and influencing factors of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (PRFA) for benign thyroid nodules in order to improve the effect of thyroid benign nodule ablation treatment.

Methods

The study included 482 benign thyroid nodules. The largest diameter of benign thyroid nodules ranges from 0.7 to 9.2 cm. Two hundred and fifty-eight nodules were solid nodules, 224 nodules were cystic-solid nodules, and 96 thyroid nodules combined with the background of Hashimoto′s thyroiditis. The patients of this study included 356 females and 126 males, the ages of the study population ranged from 14 to 82 years old. In order to observe the local pain, swelling, skin infection, hoarseness and other complications of the thyroid nodules with PRFA, we conducted conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound immediately and followed up in 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after the treatment. Besides, the nodule volume reduction ratio was calculated , and the effects of gender, age, nodule size, cystic proportion, and the background of Hashimoto′s thyroiditis on the treatment were analyzed.

Results

The volume of benign thyroid nodules after the PRFA treatment was significantly reduced after 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months, and their nodule volume reduction ratio (VRR) was (51.2±5.7)% (1 months), (69.7±4.3)% (3 months), (84.6±3.7)% (6 months), (89.3±2.9)% (12 months), (93.7±1.6)% (18 months) and (94.9±1.4)% (24 months), respectively. The thyroid nodules were divided into 3 groups according to the cystic portion, significant differences were found in the volume reduction rate at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after PRFA (F=66.858, 69.101, 19.410, 49.559, 146.653 and 309.950 respectively, all P<0.001), the more cystic portion was, the faster the lesion shrinked. The nodules with the cystic portion<20% were grouped according to the maximum diameter (≤3 cm />3 cm), and the background of Hashimoto′s disease; and significant differences were found in the volume reduction rate at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after PRFA (the t values for different size groups were 9.710, 8.925, 9.899, 12.734, 17.226 and 42.580, respectively, the t values for whether there is a background of Hashimoto′s disease were 66.858, 69.101, 19.410, 49.559, 146.653, 309.950, respectively, all P<0.001). The VRR of nodules of which the maximum diameter≤3 cm, or without Hashimoto′s thyroiditis was larger after radiofrequency ablation. The nodules of which the maximum diameter≤3 cm and with the cystic portion <20% were grouped according to different genders (male or female) and different ages (≤40 or>40 years old), and the mean VRR of the nodules between different gender and age groups are not significantly different (P>0.05).

Conclusions

Ultrasound guided PRFA is a safe and effective minimally invasive therapy for benign thyroid nodules.

图1~4 甲状腺良性结节射频消融术前与术后即刻常规超声及超声造影图像。图1,2为常规超声示结节大小2.2 cm×1.5 cm×2.4 cm,超声造影示结节呈等增强表现;图3,4为结节消融术后即刻,超声造影示结节未见增强
图5~14 甲状腺良性结节射频消融术后常规超声及超声造影图像。图5~12为射频消融术后1个月、3个月、6个月、12个月随访,常规超声及超声造影显示结节逐渐缩小,常规超声示消融缩小率分别为38%、52%、71%、84%,超声造影示消融灶缩小率分别为37%、67%、80%、86%;图13,14为消融术后18个月、24个月随访,常规超声示缩小率分别为88%、94%
表1 甲状腺结节囊实性比例对消融术后不同时间点结节体积缩小率的影响(%,±s
表2 甲状腺实性结节大小对消融术后不同时间点结节体积缩小率的影响(%,±s
表3 桥本氏甲状腺炎对甲状腺实性结节消融后术后不同时间点结节体积缩小率的影响(%,±s
表4 性别对甲状腺结节消融术后不同时间点结节体积缩小率的影响(最大径≤3 cm的实性结节,%,±s
表5 年龄对甲状腺结节消融术后不同时间点结节体积缩小率的影响(最大径≤3 cm的实性结节,%,±s
[1]
Gharib H,Papini ER,Duick DS, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, Associazione Medici Endocrinologi, and European Thyroid Association medical guidelines for clinical practice for the diagnosis and management of thyroid nodules: Executive Summary of recommendations[J]. Endocr Pract, 2010, 33(5): 287-291.
[2]
Choi Y,Ji HL,Kim YH, et al. Impact of postthyroidectomy scar on the quality of life of thyroid cancer patients[J]. Ann Dermatol, 2014, 26(6): 693-699.
[3]
Cervelli R,Mazzeo S,De Napoli L, et al. Radiofrequency Ablation in the Treatment of Benign Thyroid Nodules: An Efficient and Safe Alternative to Surgery[J]. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2017, 28(10): 1400-1408.
[4]
Tang X,Cui D,Chi J, et al. Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of radiofrequency ablation for treating benign thyroid nodules[J]. J Cancer, 2017, 8(5): 754-760.
[5]
Baek JH,Lee JH,Valcavi R, et al. Thermal ablation for benign thyroid nodules: radiofrequency and laser[J]. Korean J Radiol, 2011, 12(5): 525-540.
[6]
Dupuy DE,Monchik JM,Decrea C, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of regional recurrence from well-differentiated thyroid malignancy[J]. Surgery, 2001, 130(6): 971-977.
[7]
Kim YS,Rhim H,Tae K, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of benign cold thyroid nodules: initial clinical experience[J]. Thyroid, 2006, 16(4): 361-367.
[8]
Lim HK,Lee JH,Ha EJ, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of benign non-functioning thyroid nodules: 4-year follow-up results for 111 patients[J]. Eur Radiol, 2013, 23(4): 1044-1049.
[9]
Sung JY,Baek JH,Jung SL, et al. Radiofrequency ablation for autonomously functioning thyroid nodules: a multicenter study[J]. Thyroid, 2015, 25(1): 112-117.
[10]
Bernardi S,Stacul F,Zecchin M, et al. Radiofrequency ablation for benign thyroid nodules[J]. J Endocrinol Invest, 2016, 39(9): 1003-1013.
[11]
Baek JH,Kim YS,Lee D, et al. Benign predominantly solid thyroid nodules: prospective study of efficacy of sonographically guided radiofrequency ablation versus control condition[J]. Ajr Am J Roentgenol, 2010, 194(4): 1137-1142.
[12]
Jang SW,Baek JH,Kim JK, et al. How to manage the patients with unsatisfactory results after ethanol ablation for thyroid nodules: role of radiofrequency ablation[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2012, 81(5): 905-910.
[13]
Park HS,Baek JH,Choi YJ, et al. Innovative Techniques for Image-Guided Ablation of Benign Thyroid Nodules: Combined Ethanol and Radiofrequency Ablation[J]. Korean J Radiol, 2017, 18(3): 461-469.
[14]
Baretić, M. [100 years of Hashimoto thyroiditis, still an intriguing disease][J]. Acta Med Croatica, 2011, 65(5): 453-457.
[15]
Huang BY,Hseuh C,Chao TC, et al. Well-differentiated thyroid carcinoma with concomitant Hashimoto′s thyroiditis present with less aggressive clinical stage and low recurrence[J]. Endocr Pathol, 2011, 22(3): 144-149.
[16]
Souza SL,Lv MDA,Ward LS. Impact of previous thyroid autoimmune diseases on prognosis of patients with well-differentiated thyroid cancer[J]. Thyroid, 2003, 13(5): 491-495.
[1] 张启龙, 柳亿, 卢会丽, 罗慧, 李成林, 王菁, 王辉. 奥妥珠单抗治疗磷脂酶A2受体相关膜性肾病的疗效与安全性:单中心回顾性分析[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 379-384.
[2] 王杰, 袁泉, 王玥琦, 乔佳君, 谭春丽, 夏仲元, 刘守尧. 溃疡油在糖尿病足溃疡治疗中的应用效果及安全性观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 480-484.
[3] 杨建波, 马欢, 黄小梅, 刘华柱. 结肠镜辅助下EMR、CSP和RFA术治疗直径<1cm结直肠息肉的疗效和安全性比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 76-79.
[4] 谢田伟, 庞于樊, 吴丽. 超声引导下不同消融术对甲状腺良性结节体积缩减率、复发率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 80-83.
[5] 莫淇舟, 苏劲, 黄健, 李健维, 李思宁, 柳建军. 智能控压输尿管软镜碎石吸引取石术在直径10~25 mm上尿路结石中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 497-502.
[6] 臧宇, 姚胜, 朱新勇, 戎世捧, 田智超. 低温等离子射频消融治疗腹壁疝术后补片感染的临床效果[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 687-692.
[7] 李义亮, 苏拉依曼·牙库甫, 麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 机器人与腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术联合Nissen 胃底折叠术短期疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 512-517.
[8] 周艳, 李盈, 周小兵, 程发辉, 何恒正. 不同类型补片联合Nissen 胃底折叠术修补食管裂孔疝的疗效及复发潜在危险因素[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 528-533.
[9] 王小琴, 汪丽, 崔建英. 无张力疝修补术治疗慢性肾功能衰竭合并腹股沟疝患者的疗效[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 538-542.
[10] 王亚岚, 倪婧, 余世庆, 陶银花, 张荣. 尼达尼布抗纤维化治疗特发性肺纤维化的耐受性和疗效预测因素分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 750-755.
[11] 梁艳娉, 列诗韵, 王艺穗, 吴晓瑛, 林颖. 基于内镜操作细节记录系统构建胃底静脉曲张内镜下组织胶注射术的标准化管理方案[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 705-709.
[12] 陈杰, 武明胜, 李一金, 李虎, 向源楚, 荣新奇, 彭健. 低位直肠癌冷冻治疗临床初步分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 494-498.
[13] 史彬, 司远. 益气和络方联合缬沙坦治疗气阴两虚兼血瘀证IgA 肾病的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 306-312.
[14] 韩俊岭, 王刚, 马厉英, 连颖, 徐慧. 维生素D 联合匹维溴铵治疗腹泻型肠易激综合征患者疗效及对肠道屏障功能指标的影响研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 560-564.
[15] 阳跃, 庹晓晔, 崔子豪, 欧阳四民, 林海阳, 胡景宇, 胡银, 李涛, 赵景峰, 郝岱峰, 冯光. 改良“阅读者”皮瓣修复骶尾部压疮的疗效[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 751-755.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?