切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (11) : 827 -831. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2019.11.006

所属专题: 文献

肌肉骨骼超声影像学

肌肉骨骼超声在长管状骨骨折骨不连冲击波治疗中的应用价值
孙丽1, 张纳1, 屠宏亮1, 李培1,()   
  1. 1. 110024 沈阳医学院附属中心医院电诊科
  • 收稿日期:2019-07-03 出版日期:2019-11-01
  • 通信作者: 李培

Value of musculoskeletal ultrasound in shock wave therapy of long tubular bone fracture nonunions

Li Sun1, Na Zhang1, Hongliang Tu1, Pei Li1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Electrical Diagnosis, Central Hospital Affiliated to Shenyang Medical College, Shenyang 110024, China.
  • Received:2019-07-03 Published:2019-11-01
  • Corresponding author: Pei Li
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Li Pei, Email:
引用本文:

孙丽, 张纳, 屠宏亮, 李培. 肌肉骨骼超声在长管状骨骨折骨不连冲击波治疗中的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2019, 16(11): 827-831.

Li Sun, Na Zhang, Hongliang Tu, Pei Li. Value of musculoskeletal ultrasound in shock wave therapy of long tubular bone fracture nonunions[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2019, 16(11): 827-831.

目的

探讨肌骨超声在长管状骨骨折骨不连体外冲击波治疗(ESWT)中的应用价值。

方法

选取2017年10月至2019年3月因长管状骨骨折诊断骨不连拟接受ESWT的患者共41例,45处骨折不愈合部位,所有患者均在ESWT前超声评估骨折间隙,断端有无软组织嵌顿及异物,断端附近血流情况,标记拟治疗区域的断端、大血管、神经及固定物在体表投影;ESWT后每隔2个月复查超声,评估治疗处骨折间隙,骨折间隙回声是否增高,断端附近血流情况,同时复查正侧位X线平片,评估断端愈合情况。

结果

1例胫骨骨折患者发现拇长伸肌腱嵌顿转为手术治疗,所有肌骨超声定位ESWT患者均未发生神经血管并发症,5例患者ESWT后断端附近血流明显增多,24例患者临床查体及X线诊断骨折愈合,超声显示6例患者骨折线愈合,28例骨折间隙小于2 mm,18例骨折间隙回声增高,以骨折间隙小于2.1 mm且回声增高或骨折线消失为诊断骨折愈合的标准,超声诊断骨折愈合的准确性95.5%,敏感度91.7%,特异度100.0%。

结论

肌肉骨骼超声可以作为ESWT术前评估适应症,术中定位,术后检测治疗效果的有效方法。

Objective

To assess the value of musculoskeletal ultrasound in extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) of long tubular bone fracture nonunions.

Methods

A total of 41 patients with 45 fracture nonunions were enrolled. Fracture gap distance, soft tissue incarceration, foreign body in the gap, and blood flow near the fracture gap were assessed by ultrasound before ESWT. Fracture gap, large blood vessels, nerves, and fixations on the body surface were marked. After ESWT, ultrasonic examination was performed every two months for detecting the distance of nonunion gap, echogenicity of the gap, and blood flow near the fracture gap. Anteroposterior and lateral projection X-ray films were used to assess the healing of the fractures.

Results

One patient with tibia fracture accepted surgical operation for incarceration of the extensor digitorum longus. No neurovascular complication was found in the patients treated with musculoskeletal ultrasound-guided ESWT. Significantly increased blood flow near the fracture gap was found in five patients, and 24 patients were diagnosed with fracture healing according to clinical and X-ray examinations. Ultrasonography showed fracture line healing in six cases, fractured gap less than 2 mm in 28 cases, and hyperechoic fractured gap in 22 cases. Using fracture gap less than 2.1 mm with hyperechogenicity or fracture line disappearance as the ultrasonic criteria of diagnosing fracture healing, the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 95.5%, 91.7%, and 100.0%, respectively.

Conclusion

Musculoskeletal ultrasound may be used as an effective method for preoperative evaluation of indications of ESWT, intraoperative localization, and postoperative evaluation of therapeutic effects.

图1 胫骨骨折超声图像,拇长伸肌腱嵌顿于断端。图a为矢状断面;图b为横断面,箭头所示为嵌顿的拇长伸肌腱
图2 肱骨骨折患者X线与超声检查图像。图a为肱骨骨折X线表现为线状低密度;图b为超声骨折间隙表现为骨皮质连续性中断,断端间为低回声,箭头所示为骨折线和骨折间隙
图3 桡骨骨折患者体外冲击波治疗治疗前、后超声图像与X线图像。图a为桡骨骨折体外冲击波治疗治疗前,骨折间隙显示清晰;图b为体外冲击波治疗治疗35次后骨皮质显示连续,骨折间隙消失;图c为桡骨骨折体外冲击波治疗治疗后X线显示骨折线模糊;图d为桡骨骨折体外冲击波治疗治疗后同时期超声显示骨皮质不连续,骨折间隙宽约1.7 mm,回声增强(箭头所示)
图4 桡骨骨折患者体外冲击波治疗治疗前超声图像。图a为体外冲击波治疗治疗前,骨折间隙为低回声(箭头所示) ;图b为体外冲击波治疗治疗21次后,骨折间隙回声明显增强(箭头所示)
图5 超声检查评估体外冲击波治疗治疗骨不连受试者工作特征曲线。图a为通过超声骨折间隙测值得到的曲线下面积为0.954;图b为以骨折间隙≤2.1 mm与骨折间隙回声增高分别做串联和并联实验,得到的曲线下面积分别为0.958、0.850。
图6 桡骨骨折患者体外冲击波治疗治疗4次后超声图像。图a显示断端血流较治疗前(图b)明显增多(箭头所示)
1
Beyaty JH原著, 王岩主译, 坎贝尔骨科学 [M]. 11版. 北京:人民军医出版社, 2009: 2768-2782
2
Kertzman P, Császár NBM, Furia JP, et al. Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy is efficient and safe in the treatment of fracture nonunions of superficial bones: a retrospective case series [J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2017, 12(1): 164.
3
Willems A, van der Jagt OP, Meuffels DE. Extracorporeal Shock Wave Treatment for Delayed Union and Nonunion Fractures: A Systematic Review [J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2019, 33(2):97-103.
4
Petrisor B, Lisson S, Sprague S. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy: A systematic review of its use in fracture management [J]. Indian J Orthop, 2009, 43(2): 161-167.
5
Zelle BA, Gollwitzer H, Zlowodzki M, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy: current evidence [J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2010, 24 Suppl 1: S66-S70.
6
Elster EA, Stojadinovic A, Forsberg J, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for nonunion of the tibia [J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2010, 24(3): 133-141.
7
Zelle BA, Gollwitzer H, Zlowodzki M, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy: current evidence [J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2010, 24 Suppl 1: S66-S70.
8
程俊华. 冲击波促进骨折愈合原理及其临床研究 [J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2012, 20(22): 2051-2053
9
Chaar-Alvarez FM, Warkentine F, Cross K, et al. Bedside ultrasound diagnosis of nonangulated distal forearm fractures in the pediatric emergency department [J]. Pediatr Emerg Care, 2011, 27(11): 1027-1032.
10
Patel DD, Blumberg SM, Crain EF. The utility of bedside ultrasonography in identifying fractures and guiding fracture reduction in children [J]. Pediatr Emerg Care, 2009, 25(4): 221-225.
11
黄晶焕,李晓林. 超声技术预测体外冲击波疗法治疗骨不连的疗效 [J]. 国际骨科学杂志, 2018, 39(2): 109-113.
[1] 吴俊贤, 曾俊杰, 许有银, 苑博. 体外冲击波疗法辅助治疗肩袖修补术后关节僵硬[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 571-576.
[2] 邬春虎, 马玉海, 陈长松, 尹华东, 朱晓峰, 何剑星, 刘彧. 冲击波联合富血小板血浆对骨关节炎软骨损伤的疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 334-339.
[3] 王素凯, 邵季超, 仲亮, 李静, 李军勇, 宁翠利. 发散式与聚焦式冲击波治疗肩周炎合并糖尿病的疗效比较[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 406-411.
[4] 刘俊利, 曾一平, 崔京钦, 金正. 布洛芬联合体外冲击波治疗膝骨关节炎的随机对照研究[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 261-266.
[5] 李沅隆, 潘海, 袁霆, 张志杰, 周宏宇, 张纳, 屠宏亮, 李佳卉, 李培. 体外冲击波联合富血小板血浆治疗骨不连[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(02): 246-249.
[6] 徐慧新, 刘波, 唐立钧. 体外冲击波治疗>1 cm输尿管上段结石失败的预测模型建立[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 506-511.
[7] 木彬, 邓志强, 刘一萍, 高云茂, 陈天祥, 罗永朴, 湛海伦. 高密度肾输尿管上段结石经皮肾镜与体外冲击波碎石的比较[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(06): 516-519.
[8] 廖国龙, 刘颖, 唐嘉妮, 熊海云, 庞俊, 江东根. 中药田七治疗体外冲击波碎石术后早期肾损伤的前瞻性随机对照研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(05): 415-418.
[9] 章璟, 吕涛, 张鹤, 胡传义, 崔心刚, 姜宁. 腔镜时代体外冲击波碎石患者的选择[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(04): 354-357.
[10] 侯祺, 相洋, 吴娜珊, 肖月, 肖龙, 李潇, 王锐, 孙中义. 机器学习算法模型预测体外冲击波碎石治疗输尿管结石的疗效[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(04): 280-284.
[11] 徐红莉, 杨钰琳, 薛清, 张茜, 马丽虹, 邱振刚. 体外冲击波治疗非特异性腰痛疗效的系统评价和Meta分析[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 307-314.
[12] 赵清斌, 殷剑, 肖伟, 孙俊刚, 周文正. 异体皮质骨板结合髂骨植骨辅助钢板治疗肱骨干骨折骨不连的短期临床疗效[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 152-156.
[13] 廖家权, 吴波, 唐昌敏. 体外冲击波联合肌电生物反馈对脑卒中后足下垂的影响[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 286-292.
[14] 张绍龙, 曾俊杰, 苑博. 体外冲击波治疗膝关节炎伴屈曲畸形的疗效分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(10): 925-929.
[15] 杨冰, 潘东亮, 晋连超, 周哲, 高鹏飞, 周赜, 张志宏, 李宁忱. 体外冲击波碎石对高密度输尿管结石治疗效果的影响因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 308-311.
阅读次数
全文


摘要