切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (10) : 1139 -1142. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2022.10.022

综述

压力对超声弹性成像诊断价值的影响
王阿晨1, 孙佳威1, 周显礼1,()   
  1. 1. 150000 哈尔滨医科大学附属第二医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2021-03-06 出版日期:2022-10-01
  • 通信作者: 周显礼

Effect of precompression on diagnostic value of ultrasound elastography

Achen Wang1, Jiawei Sun1, Xianli Zhou1()   

  • Received:2021-03-06 Published:2022-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Xianli Zhou
引用本文:

王阿晨, 孙佳威, 周显礼. 压力对超声弹性成像诊断价值的影响[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(10): 1139-1142.

Achen Wang, Jiawei Sun, Xianli Zhou. Effect of precompression on diagnostic value of ultrasound elastography[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2022, 19(10): 1139-1142.

1
Zaleska-Dorobisz U, Kaczorowski K, Pawluś A, et al. Ultrasound elastography-review of techniques and its clinical applications [J]. Adv Clin Exp Med, 2014, 23(4): 645-655.
2
Ozturk A, Grajo JR, Dhyani M, et al. Principles of ultrasound elastography [J]. Abdom Radiol, 2018, 43(4): 773-785.
3
Inoue Y, Kokudo N. Elastography for hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery [J]. Surg Today, 2014, 44(10): 1793-1800.
4
Carlsen J, Ewertsen C, Sletting S, et al. Ultrasound elastography in breast cancer diagnosis [J]. Ultraschall Med, 2015, 36(6): 550-565.
5
Barr RG, Zhang Z. Effects of precompression on elasticity imaging of the breast: development of a clinically useful semiquantitative method of precompression assessment [J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2012, 31(6): 895‐902.
6
Barr RG, Nakashima K, Amy D, et al. WFUMB guidelines and recommendations for clinical use of ultrasound elastography: Part 2: breast [J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2015, 41(5): 1148‐1160.
7
Barr RG. Future of breast elastography [J]. Ultrasonography, 2019, 38(2): 93-105.
8
Lacout A, Figl A, Thariat J, et al. Intra-and interobserver variability of US elastography: how does it affect quality? [J]. Radiology, 2011, 260(2): 610.
9
Krouskop TA, Wheeler TM, Kallel F, et al. Elastic moduli of breast and prostate tissues under compression [J]. Ultrason Imaging, 1998, 20(4): 260-274.
10
Varghese T, Ophir J, Krouskop TA. Nonlinear stress-strain relationships in tissue and their effect on the contrast-to-noise ratio in elastograms [J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2000, 26(5): 839-851.
11
Chee C, Lombardo P, Schneider M, et al. Comparison of the fat-to-lesion strain ratio and the gland-to-lesion strain ratio with controlled precompression in characterizing indeterminate and suspicious breast lesions on ultrasound imaging [J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2019, 38(12): 3257-3266.
12
Kim MH, Luo S, Ko SH, et al. Thyroid nodule parameters influencing performance of ultrasound elastography using intrinsic compression [J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2015, 41(9): 2333-2339.
13
Barr RG, Nikolov SI. Use of a real-time stress map for assessment of applied stress for strain elastography: utility in training and computation of strain ratios [J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2019, 38(11): 2999-3005.
14
Sun JW, Wang XL, Zhao Q, et al. Virtual touch tissue imaging and quantification (VTIQ) in the evaluation of breast lesions: The associated factors leading to misdiagnosis [J]. Eur J Radiol, 2019, 110: 97-104.
15
Wojcinski S, Brandhorst K, Sadigh G, et al. Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging with virtual touch tissue quantification: measurements of normal breast tissue and dependence on the degree of pre-compression [J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2013, 39(12): 2226-2232.
16
Zheng XY, Huang YN, Liu YB, et al. Shear-wave elastography of the breast: added value of a quality map in diagnosis and prediction of the biological characteristics of breast cancer [J]. Korean J Radiol, 2020, 21(2): 172-180.
17
佟文娟, 罗佳, 梁瑾瑜, 等. 乳腺局灶性病变三维剪切波弹性成像图像质量影响因素 [J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2019, 35(7): 1017-1021.
18
Chamming's F, Hangard C, Gennisson JL, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of four levels of manual compression applied in supersonic shear wave elastography of the breast [J]. Acad Radiol, 2021, 28(4): 481-486.
19
Lam AC, Pang SW, Ahuja AT, et al. The influence of precompression on elasticity of thyroid nodules estimated by ultrasound shear wave elastography [J]. Eur Radiol, 2016, 26(8): 2845-2852.
20
Bhatia KS, Lam AC, Pang SW, et al. Feasibility study of texture analysis using ultrasound shear wave elastography to predict malignancy in thyroid nodules [J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2016, 42(7): 1671-1680.
21
崔智飞, 张波涛, 李蒙迪, 等. 超声探头压力对甲状腺实时剪切波弹性成像杨氏模量值的影响 [J]. 放射学实践, 2018, 33(5): 520-524.
22
Gennisson JL, Deffieux T, Macé E, et al. Viscoelastic and anisotropic mechanical properties of in vivo muscle tissue assessed by supersonic shear imaging [J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2010, 36(5): 789-801.
23
Taljanovic MS, Gimber LH, Becker GW, et al. Shear-wave elastography: basic physics and musculoskeletal applications [J]. Radiographics, 2017, 37: 855-870.
24
Kot BC, Zhang ZJ, Lee AW, et al. Elastic modulus of muscle and tendon with shear wave ultrasound elastography: variations with different technical settings [J]. PLoS One, 2012, 7(8): e44348.
25
Wang XM, Hu Y, Zhu JA, et al. Effect of acquisition depth and precompression from probe and couplant on shear wave elastography in soft tissue: an in vitro and in vivo study [J]. Quant Imaging Med Surg, 2020, 10(3): 754-765.
26
Mantsopoulos K, Klintworth N, Iro H, et al. Applicability of shear wave elastography of the major salivary glands: values in healthy patients and effects of gender, smoking and pre-compression [J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2015, 41(9): 2310-2318.
27
Byenfeldt M, Elvin A, Fransson P. Influence of probe pressure on ultrasound-based shear wave elastography of the liver using comb-push 2-D technology [J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2019, 45(2): 411-428.
28
Imaizumi A, Sasaki Y, Sakamoto J, et al. Effects of compression force on elasticity index and elasticity ratio in ultrasound elastography [J]. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 2014, 43(4): 20130392.
29
Skerl K, Eichhorn B, Poltorjanoks R, et al. Introduction of a measurement setup to monitor the pressure applied during handheld ultrasound elastography [J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2020, 46(9): 2556-2559.
30
Paluch Ł, Nawrocka-Laskus E, Wieczorek J, et al. Use of ultrasound elastography in the assessment of the musculoskeletal system [J]. Pol J Radiol, 2016, 81: 240-246.
No related articles found!
阅读次数
全文


摘要