切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (12) : 1342 -1348. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2022.12.005

心血管超声影像学

负荷超声心动图联合心肌声学造影评估缺血性心脏病患者临床预后的价值
彭冠华1, 张建琴1, 钟龙和1, 李莎莎1, 唐颖1, 刘俭1, 吴爵非1,()   
  1. 1. 510515 广州,南方医科大学南方医院心血管内科
  • 收稿日期:2021-08-08 出版日期:2022-12-01
  • 通信作者: 吴爵非

Value of stress echocardiography combined with myocardial contrast echocardiography in evaluating prognosis of patients with ischemic heart disease

Guanhua Peng1, Jianqin Zhang1, Longhe Zhong1, Shasha Li1, Ying Tang1, Jian Liu1, Juefei Wu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Cardiology, Nangfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
  • Received:2021-08-08 Published:2022-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Juefei Wu
引用本文:

彭冠华, 张建琴, 钟龙和, 李莎莎, 唐颖, 刘俭, 吴爵非. 负荷超声心动图联合心肌声学造影评估缺血性心脏病患者临床预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(12): 1342-1348.

Guanhua Peng, Jianqin Zhang, Longhe Zhong, Shasha Li, Ying Tang, Jian Liu, Juefei Wu. Value of stress echocardiography combined with myocardial contrast echocardiography in evaluating prognosis of patients with ischemic heart disease[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2022, 19(12): 1342-1348.

目的

探讨负荷超声心动图联合心肌声学造影评估疑诊或确诊冠心病患者发生不良心血管事件的价值。

方法

回顾性连续纳入南方医科大学南方医院心内科2014年2月至2020年9月进行负荷超声心动图联合心肌声学造影的疑诊或确诊冠心病患者共361例。根据负荷超声心动图结果将患者分为正常组(260例)和异常组(101例)。随访不良心血管终点事件(主要终点事件包括全因性死亡、心血管死亡和非致死性心肌梗死,次要终点事件包括心绞痛住院、血运重建),比较负荷超声异常组与负荷超声正常组不良事件发生率;应用Cox回归分析及KM生存曲线分析终点事件发生的预测因素及2年、5年无主要心血管不良事件生存率。

结果

361例患者完成随访,平均随访时间(41.05±22.50)个月。7例患者出现主要终点事件,39例患者发生心绞痛住院事件,55例患者进行了血运重建。其中,负荷超声正常组2例发生主要终点事件,36例发生次要终点事件,负荷超声异常组5例发生主要终点事件,41例发生次要终点事件,负荷超声异常组与正常组不良事件发生率差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。Cox比例风险模型多因素分析结果显示,负荷超声心动图结果(HR=0.354,95%CI:0.221~0.569,P<0.001)是终点事件的预测因素之一。KM生存曲线分析提示负荷超声正常组2年、5年无主要心血管不良事件生存率分别为96.2%、84.9%,而负荷超声异常组2年、5年无主要心血管不良事件生存率分别为93.8%、66.2%,2组患者的生存率曲线差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。

结论

负荷超声心动图检查在诊断冠状动脉疾病、风险分层和血运重建指导方面发挥着重要作用,可作为冠心病或疑诊冠心病患者预后评估的重要手段。

Objective

To assess the value of stress echocardiography combined with myocardial contrast echocardiography in evaluating adverse cardiovascular events in patients with suspected or diagnosed coronary heart disease.

Methods

A total of 361 patients with suspected or confirmed coronary heart disease who underwent stress echocardiography combined with myocardial contrast echocardiography from February 2014 to September 2020 at the Department of Cardiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University were retrospectively included. According to the results of stress echocardiography, the patients were divided into either a normal group (260 cases) or an abnormal group (101 cases). Adverse cardiovascular endpoints (the primary endpoints included all-cause death, cardiovascular death, and nonfatal myocardial infarction, and the secondary endpoints included hospitalization for angina pectoris and revascularization) were followed, and the incidence of adverse events was compared between the abnormal group and normal group. Cox regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were used performed to indentify the predictors of endpoint events and calculate the 2-year and 5-year survival rates without major cardiovascular adverse events, respectively.

Results

The 361 patients were followed up for an average of (41.05±22.50) months. The primary endpoint event occurred in 7 patients, hospitalization for angina pectoris occurred in 39, and revascularization was performed in 55. Two patients in the normal group had a primary endpoint event, and 36 had a secondary endpoint event; 5 patients in the abnormal group had a primary endpoint event, and 41 patients had a secondary endpoint event. There was a statistically significant difference in the incidence of adverse events between the two groups (P<0.001). Multivariate analysis using a Cox proportional hazard model showed that stress echocardiography (hazard ratio=0.354, 95% confidence interval: 0.221~0.569, P<0.001) was one of the predictors of the endpoints. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the 2-year and 5-year survival rates without major adverse cardiovascular events were 96.2% and 84.9% in the normal group, and 93.8% and 66.2% in the abnormal group, respectively. The difference in survival curves between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.001).

Conclusion

Stress echocardiography plays an important role in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease, risk stratification, and guidance of revascularization, and can be used as an important means for prognosis evaluation of patients with suspected or confirmed coronary heart disease.

图1 负荷超声联合心肌声学造影及冠脉造影结果异常图像。图a、b为负荷超声心动图联合心肌声学造影图像,图a、b左图分别显示静息状态下四腔心、两腔心切面心肌灌注良好,室壁运动正常,图a、b右图显示负荷后峰值状态下室间隔心尖段、前壁心尖段及心尖部室壁运动减弱,心肌灌注缺损;图c为冠脉造影图像,显示左冠状动脉前降支(LAD)开口狭窄50%,左冠状动脉回旋支(LCX)开口狭窄40%,右冠状动脉(RCA)全程弥漫病变,近段最狭窄处阻塞70%,中段最狭窄处阻塞60%,远段最狭窄处阻塞80%
表1 负荷超声异常组与负荷超声正常组临床资料比较[例(%)]
表2 负荷超声异常组与负荷超声正常组药物服用情况比较[例(%)]
表3 负荷超声异常组与负荷超声正常组不良事件发生率的比较[例(%)]
表4 终点事件相关因素的Cox比例风险模型多因素分析结果
图2 主要终点事件相关因素的KM生存曲线分析注:MCE为负荷超声心动图
1
宋雨微, 井玲. 负荷超声心动图在缺血性心脏病中的临床应用进展[J]. 心血管病学进展, 2021, 42(1): 47-51.
2
吴志霞, 李春梅, 苏叶. 心肌声学造影与心肌造影负荷超声心动图在冠心病中的临床应用进展[J]. 心血管病学进展, 2019, 40(2): 252-256.
3
Li DL, Kronenberg MW. Myocardial perfusion and viability imaging in coronary artery disease: clinical value in diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic guidance[J]. Am J Med, 2021, 134(8): 968-975.
4
刘晓聪, 冯颖青, 陈纪言. 心血管疾病风险评估模型研究进展[J]. 中国实用内科杂志, 2021, 41(5): 428-433.
5
Khamis RY, Ammari T, Mikhail GW. Gender differences in coronary heart disease[J]. Heart, 2016, 102(14): 1142-1149.
6
Coyl M, Flaherty G, Jennings C. A critical review of chronic kidney disease as a risk factor for coronary artery disease[J]. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc, 2021, 35: 100822.
7
Chow BJ, Small G, Yam Y, et al, Prognostic and therapeutic implications of statin and aspirin therapy in individuals with nonobstructive coronary artery disease: results from the CONFIRM (COronary CT Angiography EvaluatioN For Clinical Outcomes: An InteRnational Multicenter registry) registry[J]. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, 2015, 35(4): 981-989.
8
Hwang IC, Jeon JY, Kim Y, et al. Association between aspirin therapy and clinical outcomes in patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease: a cohort study[J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(6): e0129584.
9
Saraste A, Barbato E, Capodanno D, et al. Imaging in ESC clinical guidelines: chronic coronary syndromes[J]. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2019, 20(11): 1187-1197.
10
Neglia D, Liga R, Caselli C, et al. Anatomical and functional coronary imaging to predict long-term outcome in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: the EVINCI-outcome study[J]. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2020, 21(11): 1273-1282.
11
Rachwan RJ, Mshelbwala FS, Bou Chaaya RG, et al. Long-term prognosis and predictors of outcomes after negative stress echocardiography[J]. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2020, 36(10): 1953-1962.
12
Xiu J, Cui K, Wang Y, et al. Prognostic value of myocardial perfusion analysis in patients with coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis[J]. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2017, 30(3): 270-281.
13
Dawson D, Kaul S, Peters D, et al. Prognostic value of dipyridamole stress myocardial contrast echocardiography: comparison with single photon emission computed tomography[J]. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2009, 22(8): 954-960.
[1] 张晓宇, 殷雨来, 张银旭. 阿帕替尼联合新辅助化疗对三阴性乳腺癌的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 346-352.
[2] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[3] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[4] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[5] 梁孟杰, 朱欢欢, 王行舟, 江航, 艾世超, 孙锋, 宋鹏, 王萌, 刘颂, 夏雪峰, 杜峻峰, 傅双, 陆晓峰, 沈晓菲, 管文贤. 联合免疫治疗的胃癌转化治疗患者预后及术后并发症分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 619-623.
[6] 张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[7] 屈翔宇, 张懿刚, 李浩令, 邱天, 谈燚. USP24及其共表达肿瘤代谢基因在肝细胞癌中的诊断和预后预测作用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 659-662.
[8] 顾雯, 凌守鑫, 唐海利, 甘雪梅. 两种不同手术入路在甲状腺乳头状癌患者开放性根治性术中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 687-690.
[9] 付成旺, 杨大刚, 王榕, 李福堂. 营养与炎症指标在可切除胰腺癌中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 704-708.
[10] 李伟, 宋子健, 赖衍成, 周睿, 吴涵, 邓龙昕, 陈锐. 人工智能应用于前列腺癌患者预后预测的研究现状及展望[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 541-546.
[11] 陈樽, 王平, 金华, 周美玲, 李青青, 黄永刚. 肌肉减少症预测结直肠癌术后切口疝发生的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 639-644.
[12] 韩加刚, 王振军. 梗阻性左半结肠癌的治疗策略[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 450-458.
[13] 董佳, 王坤, 张莉. 预后营养指数结合免疫球蛋白、血糖及甲胎蛋白对HBV 相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者治疗后预后不良的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 555-559.
[14] 王景明, 王磊, 许小多, 邢文强, 张兆岩, 黄伟敏. 腰椎椎旁肌的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 846-852.
[15] 张家珺, 张海涛, 苏菲菲. 径向壁应变分析在冠心病诊疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 687-691.
阅读次数
全文


摘要