切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (01) : 39 -45. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2025.01.006

妇产科超声影像学

实时动态三维无痛输卵管超声造影在临床中的应用价值
何雪威1, 廉华1, 王宁1, 方晓红1,()   
  1. 1. 310007 杭州市中医院(浙江省中医药大学附属杭州市中医院)超声医学科
  • 收稿日期:2024-08-24 出版日期:2025-01-01
  • 通信作者: 方晓红

Clinical application of real-time dynamic three-dimensional painless tubal contrast-enhanced ultrasonography

Xuewei He1, Hua Lian1, Ning Wang1, Xiaohong Fang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasonography,Hangzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhejiang University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Hangzhou 310007, China
  • Received:2024-08-24 Published:2025-01-01
  • Corresponding author: Xiaohong Fang
引用本文:

何雪威, 廉华, 王宁, 方晓红. 实时动态三维无痛输卵管超声造影在临床中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2025, 22(01): 39-45.

Xuewei He, Hua Lian, Ning Wang, Xiaohong Fang. Clinical application of real-time dynamic three-dimensional painless tubal contrast-enhanced ultrasonography[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2025, 22(01): 39-45.

目的

探讨实时动态三维无痛输卵管超声造影在临床中的应用价值。

方法

前瞻性选取2021 年6 月至2024 年3 月于杭州市中医院接受疑似输卵管原因导致不孕的163 例女性作为研究对象,按照随机数字表法分为对照组、试验组和观察组,对照组59 例117 条输卵管,试验组54 例103条输卵管,观察组50 例100 条输卵管。对照组采用X 线子宫输卵管造影,试验组采用实时动态三维无痛(于麻醉状态下进行)输卵管超声造影,观察组采用实时动态三维输卵管超声造影进行输卵管通畅性的检查及诊断。统计3 组患者造影图像的优良率、输卵管通畅性诊断准确率和不良反应发生率,采用χ2 检验对比组间差异。

结果

诊断后试验组的造影图像优良率高于对照组(91.26% vs 81.20%),差异具有统计学意义(χ2=4.585,P<0.001)。输卵管通畅性诊断方面,试验组诊断阻塞率高于对照组和观察组(89.32% vs 77.00% vs 76.92%),差异具有统计学意义(χ2=5.892、5.523,P=0.015、0.019)。不良反应发生情况,对照组和观察组疼痛发生概率高于试验组(20.34% vs 20.00% vs 0),差异具有统计学意义(χ2=12.288、11.949,P 均<0.001);对照组和观察组恶心呕吐发生概率高于试验组(11.86% vs 10.00% vs 0),差异具有统计学意义(χ2=4.941、5.673,P=0.026、0.023)。

结论

实时动态三维无痛输卵管超声造影在诊断输卵管通畅性中效果更好,图像更清晰,诊断准确率高,可有效降低患者的不良反应。

Objective

To evaluate the clinical value of real-time dynamic three-dimensional painless tubal contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.

Methods

One hundred and sixty-three women who had suspected tubal infertility at Hangzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from June 2021 to March 2024 were selected as the study subjects.They were divided into a control group, an experimental group,and an observation group by the random number table method, involving 59 women in the control group with 117 fallopian tubes, 54 women in the experimental group with 103 fallopian tubes, and 50 women in the observation group with 100 fallopian tubes.The control group underwent X-ray hysterosalpingography,and real-time dynamic three-dimensional painless (performed under anesthesia) tubal contrast-enhanced ultrasonography was used in the experimental group.Real-time dynamic three-dimensional tubal contrastenhanced ultrasonography was used in the observation group.The three groups of patients were statistically analyzed for the excellent rate of contrast images obtained, the accuracy of diagnosis of tubal patency, and the rate of adverse reactions.The comparison of continuous variables within the group was performed using multifactorial repeated-measures analysis of variance, and categorical variables between groups were compared using the χ2 test.

Results

The excellent rate of contrast images in the experimental group was higher than that of the control group (91.26% vs 81.2%; χ2=4.585, P<0.001).In terms of the diagnosis of tubal patency,the rate of impatency in the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group and the observation group (89.32% vs 77.00%, χ2=5.892, P=0.015; 89.32% vs 76.92%, χ2=5.523, P=0.019).In terms of adverse reactions, the rate of pain in the control group and observation group was significantly higher than that of the experimental group (20.34% vs 0, χ2=12.288, P<0.001; 20.00% vs 0, χ2=11.949, P<0.001),and the rate of nausea and vomiting in the control group and observation group was significantly higher than that of the experimental group (11.86% vs 0, χ2=4.941, P=0.026;10.00% vs 0, χ2=5.673, P=0.023).

Conclusion

Real-time dynamic three-dimensional painless tubal contrast-enhanced ultrasonography is more effective in asessing tubal patency, with images having higher quatlity, and it can improve the diagnostic accuracy and effectively reduce the rate of adverse reactions.

图1 X 线子宫输卵管造影图像。图a:即时图像显示输卵管在盆腔内的走行,图b:延迟图像显示造影剂在盆腔的涂布情况
图2 采用声诺维普通及无痛实时动态三维超声造影。图a:在盆腔水造影的状态下,清晰显示左侧输卵管伞的结构(红色箭头所示结构),图b:在盆腔水造影的状态下,清晰显示右侧输卵管伞的结构(红色箭头所示结构),这在X 线子宫输卵管造影中是无法观察到的,图c:实时造影显示造影剂在输卵管内的流动,图d:图a 的造影剂在盆腔弥散图像,显示造影剂通过输卵管伞在盆腔的弥散情况,可见图c、d 的清晰度更高。
表1 3 组疑似输卵管堵塞不孕患者造影图像质量对比[条(%)]
表2 3 组疑似输卵管堵塞不孕患者输卵管通畅性诊断结果对比(条)
表3 3 组疑似输卵管堵塞不孕患者造影检查不良反应发生率对比[例(%)]
1
Briceag I, Costache A, Purcarea VL, et al.Fallopian tubes--literature review of anatomy and etiology in female infertility [J].J Med Life,2015, 8(2): 129-131.
2
羊冬梅, 李宁宁, 牛国昌, 等.X 线透视下子宫输卵管造影术在女性不孕症患者中诊断和治疗中的应用价值研究 [J].中国性科学,2017, 26(5): 121-124.
3
杨超, 姜立杰, 李亚萍, 等.X 线透视下子宫输卵管造影术对不孕症的临床应用价值 [J].河北医学, 2014, 20(7): 1153-1155.
4
Groszmann YS, Benacerraf BR.Complete evaluation of anatomy and morphology of the infertile patient in a single visit; the modern infertility pelvic ultrasound examination [J].Fertil Steril, 2016, 105(6):1381-1393.
5
贺丽荣, 周力学, 张莘, 等.经阴道子宫输卵管声诺维三维超声造影诊断输卵管性不孕症的初步探讨——附36 例检测报告 [J].新医学, 2011, 42(6): 397-399.
6
刘新华, 刘柯杉.X 线碘油造影和超声造影对子宫输卵管堵塞诊断价值的对比研究 [J].医药与保健, 2014(6): 144.
7
李英.X 线子宫输卵管造影在诊断输卵管不孕中的应用价值 [J].影像研究与医学应用, 2020, 4(16): 146-147.
8
Alcázar JL, Martinez-Astorquiza Corral T, Orozco R, et al.Threedimensional hysterosalpingo-contrast-sonography for the assessment of tubal patency in women with infertility: a systematic review with meta-analysis [J].Gynecol Obstet Invest, 2016, 81(4): 289-295.
9
苗蔚, 唐毅辉.子宫输卵管堵塞三维超声造影与X 线碘油造影比较 [J].临床医学研究与实践, 2017, 2(10): 134-136.
10
Carrascosa P, Capuñay C, Vallejos J, et al.Two-dimensional and threedimensional imaging of uterus and fallopian tubes in female infertility[J].Fertil Steril, 2016, 105(6): 1403-1420.e7.
11
Ling H, Luo L, Dai X, et al.Fallopian tubal infertility: the result of Chlamydia trachomatis-induced fallopian tubal fibrosis [J].Mol Cell Biochem, 2022, 477(1): 205-212.
12
Li C, Huang Y, Xie L, et al.The diagnostic value of hysterosalpingocontrast sonography in female infertility of the fallopian tube [J].Pak J Med Sci, 2023, 39(4): 931-935.
13
Melcer Y, Zilberman Sharon N, Nimrodi M, et al.Hysterosalpingofoam sonography for the diagnosis of tubal occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].J Ultrasound Med, 2021, 40(10): 2031-2037.
14
李引弟, 白东昱, 岳红云.子宫输卵管声学造影和子宫输卵管造影在输卵管堵塞性不孕检测中的相关性分析 [J].中国性科学, 2018,27(1): 97-100.
15
刘萍.经阴道四维超声造影与X 线造影在诊断输卵管性不孕的对比分析 [J].齐齐哈尔医学院报, 2019, 40(4): 440-441.
16
孙丽英, 钱鲁航, 王传堂.480 例不孕症女性X 线子宫输卵管造影检查结果分析 [J].妇儿健康导刊, 2024, 3(1): 121-123.
17
黄冬花, 李向红.用声诺维超声造影检查诊断输卵管堵塞的准确性评价 [J].当代医药论丛, 2016, 14(9): 42-43.
18
Devine K, Dolitsky S, Ludwin I, et al.Modern assessment of the uterine cavity and fallopian tubes in the era of high-efficacy assisted reproductive technology [J].Fertil Steril, 2022, 118(1): 19-28.
19
肖晓青, 邱思花, 谢芳, 等.多模态子宫输卵管超声造影评估输卵管堵塞性病变的诊断价值 [J].中国医学物理学杂志, 2023, 40(10):1246-1250.
20
殷茵, 朱代玉, 袁超燕.经阴道三维超声输卵管造影和X 线子宫输卵管造影在输卵管通畅性评价中的应用 [J].湖北民族大学学报(医学版), 2023, 40(3): 49-52.
21
王丹, 王杰, 范建军, 等.苯磺酸瑞马唑仑复合小剂量丙泊酚用于无痛输卵管造影的效果研究 [J].中文科技期刊数据库(全文版)医药卫生, 2024(9): 133-138.
22
卿朝辉, 萧肖兰, 彭少琴, 等.单次不同诱导剂量环泊酚在无痛四维子宫输卵管超声造影术中有效性和安全性 [J].实用医学杂志,2024, 40(22): 3221-3225.
[1] 于爽, 王茜, 方昀, 陈敏, 王立臣, 朱江. 富血供子宫肌瘤超声造影特征及其组织病理学相关性[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2025, 22(01): 15-24.
[2] 周梦琦, 郑燕, 宋颖, 朱琳, 后利珠, 刘瑾瑾, 董凤林. 高帧频超声造影对乳腺BI-RADS 4 类小结节的鉴别诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2025, 22(01): 46-54.
[3] 刘源鑫, 何丽莉, 孙颖华. 儿童排泄性尿路超声造影改良方法的初步探讨[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(12): 1111-1117.
[4] 王瑞, 陈炜, 王金萍, 李保启. 多模态超声联合血清学肿瘤标志物在肺周围型病变良恶性鉴别中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(11): 1048-1056.
[5] 汪洪斌, 张红霞, 何文, 杜丽娟, 程令刚, 张雨康, 张萌. 低级别阑尾黏液性肿瘤与阑尾黏液腺癌超声及超声造影特征分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 865-871.
[6] 宋勇, 李东炫, 王翔, 李锐. 基于数据挖掘法分析3 种超声造影剂不良反应信号[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 890-898.
[7] 王博冉, 乔春梅, 李春歌, 王欣, 王晓磊. 超声造影评估类风湿关节炎亚临床滑膜炎疾病进展的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 802-808.
[8] 马晓菊, 梁潇, 段云友, 袁丽君, 赵萍. NBAV脂质纳泡对ApoE -/-小鼠动脉粥样硬化病变的评估和干预[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 608-616.
[9] 周松, 蒋湘勇, 康海, 杨科, 危安, 唐振华, 李铁求. 超声造影诊断前列腺癌的应用价值:一项荟萃分析[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 159-166.
[10] 吴玥琳, 石巍, 李飞燕, 靳冬冬, 薛阳, 贾梦玲, 阴倩阁, 杨立. 经脐单孔与传统腹腔镜治疗输卵管妊娠的疗效及生育结局对比研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(01): 55-61.
[11] 中华预防医学会肝胆胰疾病预防与控制专业委员会, 中国医疗保健国际交流促进会肝脏肿瘤学分会. 精准制导技术应用于肝脏肿瘤诊断与治疗中国专家共识(2024 版)[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 145-157.
[12] 谭雷, 王等娣, 张浩, 丹增卓玛, 龙怡, 吴泽倩. 超声造影在肝破裂诊断中的应用:一例西藏地区肝破裂引发的思考[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 113-117.
[13] 郑大雯, 王健东. 胆囊癌辅助诊断研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 769-773.
[14] 杨艳, 邢长洋, 杨瑞静, 苏小佩, 周永刚, 金京兰. 经皮超声造影引导下导丝定位在早期乳腺癌前哨淋巴结的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(11): 993-999.
[15] 谭娅, 鲁力. 不孕症女性四维子宫输卵管超声造影检查后自然妊娠相关因素的Cox 回归分析[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2025, 13(01): 26-31.
阅读次数
全文


摘要