切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (03) : 215 -223. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2025.03.005

介入超声影像学

超声引导下医用无水乙醇硬化治疗卵巢子宫内膜异位囊肿疗效的影响因素分析
朱晓璐1, 孙希希2, 柴佳园2, 董泽洋1, 赵梦瑶1, 黄斌2,()   
  1. 1. 310053 浙江杭州,浙江中医药大学第二临床医学院
    2. 310013 浙江杭州,浙江大学附属浙江医院超声医学中心
  • 收稿日期:2024-12-31 出版日期:2025-03-01
  • 通信作者: 黄斌

Analysis of factors associated with ineffectiveness of ultrasound-guided medical anhydrous ethanol sclerotherapy for ovarian endometriotic cysts

Xiaolu Zhu1, Xixi Sun2, Jiayuan Chai2, Zeyang Dong1, Mengyao Zhao1, Bin Huang2,()   

  1. 1. The Second Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University,Hangzhou 310053, China
    2. Department of Ultrasound, Zhejiang Hospital, Hangzhou 310013, China
  • Received:2024-12-31 Published:2025-03-01
  • Corresponding author: Bin Huang
引用本文:

朱晓璐, 孙希希, 柴佳园, 董泽洋, 赵梦瑶, 黄斌. 超声引导下医用无水乙醇硬化治疗卵巢子宫内膜异位囊肿疗效的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2025, 22(03): 215-223.

Xiaolu Zhu, Xixi Sun, Jiayuan Chai, Zeyang Dong, Mengyao Zhao, Bin Huang. Analysis of factors associated with ineffectiveness of ultrasound-guided medical anhydrous ethanol sclerotherapy for ovarian endometriotic cysts[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2025, 22(03): 215-223.

目的

探讨影响超声引导下医用无水乙醇硬化治疗卵巢子宫内膜异位囊肿疗效的相关因素。

方法

回顾性纳入2022年6月至2023年11月浙江大学附属浙江医院超声医学中心接受超声引导下医用无水乙醇硬化治疗的42个卵巢子宫内膜异位囊肿。根据术后12个月超声随访测量结果,计算囊肿体积缩小率(VRR),随后将患者分为疗效欠佳组(VRR≤50%)和有效组(VRR>50%)。采用χ2检验和t检验分析比较2组年龄、病程、血清癌抗原12-5(CA12-5)水平、术前囊肿最大径、囊肿基线体积、囊壁厚度、内部回声及是否存在单发的纤细分隔方面的差异,探讨2组间疗效差异可能的影响因素。最终,通过多因素Logistic回归分析构建疗效欠佳的列线图预测模型,并采用受试者操作特征曲线、Hosmer-Lemeshow检验、校准曲线及临床决策曲线对列线图模型效能进行系统验证。

结果

42个囊肿包括疗效欠佳组9个(9/42,21.4%)与有效组33个(33/42,78.6%),囊肿终末体积为分别为(177.64±28.66)cm3、(29.07±4.94)cm3,平均VRR分别为48.09%、85.98%。疗效欠佳组术前囊肿最大径及基线体积大于有效组[(9.43±2.07)cm vs (7.50±1.34)cm;(342.97±165.25)cm³ vs (176.46±88.52)cm³],血清CA12-5水平亦较高[(71.69±12.78)U/ml vs(56.06±16.11)U/ml],差异具有统计学意义(t=-3.706,P=0.001;t=-4.326,P<0.001;t=-2.682,P=0.011)。同时,2组在病程、囊肿内部回声和囊壁厚度方面差异也具有统计学意义(P<0.05),而2组年龄和囊内分隔比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。进一步多因素Logistic回归分析显示,术前囊肿最大径和囊壁厚度≥3 mm是影响疗效的2个独立危险因素(回归系数=0.817、2.149,OR=2.263、8.575,P=0.021、0.033)。基于此构建的列线图模型具有良好的区分度、准确性及临床应用价值。

结论

术前囊肿最大径、囊壁厚度≥3 mm是影响超声引导下医用无水乙醇硬化治疗卵巢子宫内膜异位囊肿疗效的2个独立危险因素。基于此构建的列线图模型可以识别预期疗效欠佳的高风险人群,为临床决策提供参考。

Objective

To identify the factors associated with the ineffectiveness of ultrasoundguided medical anhydrous ethanol sclerotherapy for ovarian endometrial cysts.

Methods

This retrospective study included 42 ovarian endometrial cysts that underwent ultrasound-guided medical anhydrous ethanol sclerotherapy at the Ultrasound Medical Center of Zhejiang Hospital from June 2022 to November 2023.The volume reduction rate (VRR%) of the cysts was calculated based on the ultrasound measurements at the 12-month follow-up. The patients were then divided into an ineffective group (VRR% ≤ 50%) and an effective group (VRR% > 50%). The χ² test and t-test were employed to compare intergroup differences in age, disease duration, serum cancer antigen 12-5 (CA12-5) levels, initial maximum diameter and volume,cyst wall thickness, internal echogenicity, and presence of fine septa. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for the ineffectiveness of ultrasound-guided medical anhydrous ethanol sclerotherapy to construct a nomogram model, which was validated by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, Hosmer-Lemeshow test, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis.

Results

Among the 42 cysts, 9 were in the ineffective group (9/42, 21.4%) and 33 in the effective group (33/42, 78.6%). Final cyst volumes were (177.64±28.66) cm³ versus (29.07±4.94) cm³ in the ineffective group and effective group, with a mean VRR of 48.09% and 85.98%, respectively. The ineffective group exhibited significantly larger initial maximum diameter [(9.43±2.07) cm vs (7.50±1.34) cm, t=-3.706, P=0.001], greater initial volume [(342.97±165.25) cm³ vs (176.46±88.52) cm³, t=-4.326, P<0.001], and higher CA12-5 levels[(71.69±12.78) U/ml vs (56.06±16.11) U/ml, t=-2.682, P=0.011]. Significant intergroup differences were observed in disease duration, internal echogenicity, and cyst wall thickness (P<0.05) between the two groups, though there was no statistically significant difference in age or intracystic septation (P>0.05).Multivariate logistic regression identified initial maximum diameter (odds ratio [OR]=2.263, P=0.021) and cyst wall thickness ≥ 3 mm (OR=8.575, P=0.033) as independent risk factors. The constructed nomogram demonstrated excellent discrimination (AUC=0.891), calibration, and clinical applicability.

Conclusion

The initial maximum diameter and cyst wall thickness ≥ 3 mm are independent risk factors for the ineffectiveness of ultrasound-guided medical anhydrous ethanol sclerotherapy of ovarian endometrial cysts. The nomogram model constructed based on these factors can help physicians early identify high-risk patients with poor efficacy.

图1 卵巢子宫内膜异位囊肿医用无水乙醇硬化治疗疗效欠佳组病灶超声图像。图a:术后即刻扫查示囊腔消失,囊内微量空气形成伪像(箭头)。图b:术后12个月超声随访发现囊腔未闭合,囊肿体积缩小率<50%
表1 卵巢子宫内膜异位囊肿术后不同疗效组间影响因素差异比较
图2 卵巢子宫内膜异位囊肿的不同超声影像学特征。图a:单纯囊肿型薄壁囊肿。图b:混合回声型厚壁囊肿,黄线示应测量囊壁最厚处厚度。图c、d:囊内单发的纤细分隔(箭头所示),仅于超声造影检查中可见
表2 卵巢子宫内膜异位囊肿术后疗效影响因素Logistic回归分析赋值表
表3 卵巢子宫内膜异位囊肿医用无水乙醇硬化治疗术后疗效影响因素的Logistic逐步回归分析结果
图3 卵巢子宫内膜异位囊肿超声引导下医用无水乙醇硬化治疗后疗效欠佳的预测模型列线图。将囊肿最大径线、囊壁厚度≥3 mm(1表示是,2表示否)横轴对应点分别作垂线至得分线,相加后作垂线至总分线,再作垂线至风险线即可得出该患者术后疗效欠佳概率
图4 卵巢子宫内膜异位囊肿术后疗效欠佳的列线图模型的受试者操作特征曲线
图5 卵巢子宫内膜异位囊肿术后疗效欠佳预测模型的校准曲线。理想曲线为45°对角线,表示该模型对每一个体预测概率完全符合实际结果。校正预测曲线表示对模型数据重复1000次抽样后的预测概率与实际结果的一致性,两者绝对误差为0.044,两者越贴近,表明模型校准度越好
图6 卵巢子宫内膜异位囊肿术后疗效欠佳预测模型的临床决策曲线
1
Guo SW. How do women get endometriosis? [J]. Reprod Biomed Online, 2024, 48(2): 103696.
2
Warzecha D, Szymusik I, Wielgos M, et al. The impact of endometriosis on the quality of life and the incidence of depression-a cohort study [J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2020, 17(10): 3641.3 Allaire C, Bedaiwy MA, Yong PJ. Diagnosis and management of endometriosis [J]. CMAJ, 2023, 195(10): E363-E371.
4
França PRC, Lontra ACP, Fernandes PD. Endometriosis: a disease with few direct treatment options [J]. Molecules, 2022, 27(13): 4034.
5
Becker CM, Bokor A, Heikinheimo O, et al. ESHRE guideline:endometriosis [J]. Hum Reprod Open, 2022, 2022(2): hoac009.
6
Koninckx PR, Fernandes R, Ussia A, et al. Pathogenesis based diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis [J]. Front Endocrinol(Lausanne), 2021, 12: 745548.
7
Casalechi M, Di Stefano G, Fornelli G, et al. Impact of endometriosis on the ovarian follicles [J]. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 2024,92: 102430.
8
Skrivankova VW, Richmond RC, Woolf BAR, et al. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology using mendelian randomisation (STROBE-MR): explanation and elaboration [J]. BMJ,2021, 375: n2233.
9
国家放射与治疗临床医学研究中心, 中华医学会超声分会超声介入学组, 中国医师协会介入医师分会超声介入委员会, 等. 卵巢子宫内膜异位囊肿超声引导穿刺硬化治疗专家共识 [J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2020, 29(12): 1013-1024.
10
马晓欣, 向阳, 狄文, 等. 卵巢囊肿诊治中国专家共识(2022年版)[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2022, 38(8): 814-819.
11
Koo JH, Lee I, Han K, et al. Comparison of the therapeutic efficacy and ovarian reserve between catheter-directed sclerotherapy and surgical excision for ovarian endometrioma [J]. Eur Radiol, 2021,31(1): 543-548.
12
Lee JK, Han K, Choi E, et al. Effect of catheter-directed ethanol sclerotherapy on ovarian reserve in patients with recurrent endometrioma: comparative analysis with primary endometriosis [J].Eur Radiol, 2024, 34(5): 3298-3308.
13
Azizova A, Ciftci TT, Gultekin M, et al. Ethanol sclerotherapy in the management of ovarian endometrioma: technical considerations for catheter- and needle-directed sclerotherapy [J]. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2024, 47(7): 891-900.
14
Miquel L, Liotta J, Pivano A, et al. Ethanol endometrioma sclerotherapy: safety through 8 years of experience [J]. Hum Reprod,2024, 39(4): 733-741.
15
李圆圆, 董晓秋. 超声引导下医用乙醇联合聚桂醇硬化治疗卵巢子宫内膜异位囊肿 [J/CD]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2019,16(6): 438-444.
16
Frankowska K, Dymanowska-Dyjak I, Abramiuk M, et al. The efficacy and safety of transvaginal ethanol sclerotherapy in the treatment of endometrial cysts-a systematic review [J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2024, 25(2):1337.
17
Kim GH, Kim PH, Shin JH, et al. Ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy for the treatment of ovarian endometrioma: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Eur Radiol, 2022, 32(3): 1726-1737.
18
Xu X, Chen Y, Yu Q, et al. The presence of living endometrial cells in ovarian endometriotic cyst fluid may contribute to the recurrence of endometriosis after surgical excision of endometriomas [J]. J Ovarian Res, 2022, 15(1): 89.
19
Jiang D, Zhang X, Shi J, et al. Risk factors for ovarian endometrioma recurrence following surgical excision: a systematic review and meta analysis [J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2021, 304(3): 589-598.
20
Zhang M, Cheng S, Jin Y, et al. Roles of CA125 in diagnosis,prediction, and oncogenesis of ovarian cancer [J]. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer, 2021, 1875(2): 188503.
21
Küçükbaş M, Kurek Eken M, İlhan G, et al. Which factors are associated with the recurrence of endometrioma after cystectomy? [J].J Obstet Gynaecol, 2018, 38(3): 372-376.
22
Anvari Aliabad R, Ghasemzadeh A, Hamdi K, et al. Investigating the efficacy of ultrasound-guided ethanol retention technique for endometrioma sclerotherapy and its effect on pro-inflammatory cytokine levels: a single-arm clinical trial [J]. Clinics (Sao Paulo),2023, 78: 100224.
23
Wang LL, Dong XQ, Shao XH, et al. Ultrasound-guided interventional therapy for recurrent ovarian chocolate cysts [J]. Ultrasound Med Biol,2011, 37(10): 1596-602.
24
余力, 蒋天安, 杨性安. 无水乙醇和聚桂醇不同使用方式对卵巢子宫内膜异位囊肿疗效的对比研究 [J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2021,30(5): 426-431.
25
Davenport S, Smith D, Green DJ. Barriers to a timely diagnosis of endometriosis: a qualitative systematic review [J]. Obstet Gynecol,2023, 142(3): 571-583.
26
Sasaran V, Alexa Bad CM, Muresan D, et al. Ultrasound pattern and diagnostic accuracy of primary ovarian endometrioma and its recurrence: a pictorial essay [J]. Med Ultrason, 2020, 22(2): 230-235.
27
景文达, 张宇晴, 黄瑛. 乙醇硬化治疗卵巢子宫内膜异位囊肿疗效的影响因素分析 [J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志, 2022, 33(10): 724-728.
[1] 李培真, 刘海亮, 李大伟, 贾昊, 张泽瑾, 刘力维, 申传安. 重度烧伤患者发生早期急性肾损伤危险因素分析及预测模型建立[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2025, 20(03): 199-205.
[2] 钱小梅, 罗洪, 李智慧, 周代君, 李东. 76例乙型肝炎肝硬化并发原发性肝癌的高危因素Logistic分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 251-253.
[3] 朱宗恒, 张志火. 甲状腺乳头状癌对侧中央区淋巴结转移的危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 337-340.
[4] 吉林霞, 范小春, 梁琴. 胃癌常见术后并发症类型及危险因素研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 220-223.
[5] 杨培容, 潘刚, 周春霞. 胰腺癌术后胰瘘的危险因素及治疗进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 228-230.
[6] 华小玲, 高梦昕, 陈媛, 蔡超, 刘永达, 孙红玲. 良性输尿管狭窄修复重建术研究进展及再手术现状[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 377-383.
[7] 林宇腾, 延敏博, 许家榕, 黄子豪, 汤育新. 输尿管软镜手术术后住院时间的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 41-46.
[8] 范高祥, 邓利文, 宋伟, 赵渝, 王学虎. 复发性腹股沟疝再次手术出血相关因素及临床处理策略[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 160-166.
[9] 符凤妹, 方锋凯, 符妹垂, 谢五菊, 许振良, 胡燕燊. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病经胸超声弹性成像特征与病情相关性分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(02): 256-260.
[10] 朱丹丹, 杨云, 胡忠, 韩明丽, 彭广艳, 郝钊. 类鼻疽菌感染重症肺炎临床特征及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(02): 289-294.
[11] 韩莉, 王启源, 蒙洁, 杨新亮, 刘侠, 贺晨艳. 糖尿病并发肺结核患者继发肺部真菌感染危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(02): 304-309.
[12] 宋然, 郑雅各. 仑伐替尼联合肝动脉插管化疗栓塞术治疗不可切除晚期肝癌的疗效及生存率影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(02): 120-124.
[13] 闫玉, 张建新, 李宏伟, 卫元, 丁燕子, 付梦宇, 张雪薇, 阚玫麟, 袁恩武. 基于机器学习法构建子痫前期患者不良妊娠结局的临床预测模型[J/OL]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2025, 13(01): 17-26.
[14] 游雨禾, 薛洪省, 曹文军, 王亮, 马钰杰, 朴哲, 吴妍颖, 赵志龙. 肺切除术后支气管胸膜瘘诊疗经验[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2025, 12(01): 33-38.
[15] 李雯婷, 高聪, 廖晓凌. 卒中后认知障碍的危险因素及临床预测模型的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 81-86.
阅读次数
全文


摘要