切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (03) : 200 -207. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2026.03.004

所属专题: 指南共识

专家共识

胎儿生物学参数超声参考值专家共识——脐动脉、子宫动脉、大脑中动脉多普勒参数及脑胎盘比
中华预防医学会出生缺陷预防与控制专业委员会产前超声诊断学组, 中华医学会超声医学分会妇产超声学组   
  1. 1. 610041 成都,四川大学华西第二医院全国妇幼卫生监测办公室/中国出生缺陷监测中心 出生缺陷与相关妇儿疾病教育部重点实验室
    2. 518028 深圳,深圳市妇幼保健院超声科
    3. 510150 广州,广州医科大学附属第三医院胎儿医学中心
  • 收稿日期:2026-03-04 出版日期:2026-03-01
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(2022YFC2704700,2022YFC2704701)

Expert consensus on reference ranges for fetal Doppler indices: umbilical artery, uterine artery, middle cerebral artery, and cerebroplacental ratio

Group of Prenatal Ultrasound Diagnostics, Birth Defect Prevention and Control, Chinese Preventive Medicine Association, Group of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ultrasound Branch of Chinese Medical Association   

  • Received:2026-03-04 Published:2026-03-01
引用本文:

中华预防医学会出生缺陷预防与控制专业委员会产前超声诊断学组, 中华医学会超声医学分会妇产超声学组. 胎儿生物学参数超声参考值专家共识——脐动脉、子宫动脉、大脑中动脉多普勒参数及脑胎盘比[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2026, 23(03): 200-207.

Group of Prenatal Ultrasound Diagnostics, Birth Defect Prevention and Control, Chinese Preventive Medicine Association, Group of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ultrasound Branch of Chinese Medical Association. Expert consensus on reference ranges for fetal Doppler indices: umbilical artery, uterine artery, middle cerebral artery, and cerebroplacental ratio[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2026, 23(03): 200-207.

图1 动脉多普勒频谱模式图 注:PSV为收缩期最大峰值流速;EDV为舒张末期流速;TAMX为时间平均最高流速
图2 脐动脉多普勒频谱图 注:Umb为脐带;PS为收缩期最大峰值流速;ED为舒张末期速度;S/D为收缩期最大峰值流速与舒张末期速度比值;PI为搏动指数;RI为阻力指数;MD为平均舒张期流速;TAmax为时间平均最高流速;HR为心率
图3 子宫动脉多普勒频谱图 注:Ut为子宫动脉;PS为收缩期最大峰值流速;ED为舒张末期速度;S/D为收缩期最大峰值流速与舒张末期速度比值;PI为搏动指数;RI为阻力指数;MD为平均舒张期流速;TAmax为时间平均最高流速;HR为心率
图4 大脑中动脉多普勒频谱图 注:MCA为大脑中动脉;PS为收缩期最大峰值流速;ED为舒张末期速度;S/D为收缩期最大峰值流速与舒张末期速度比值;PI为搏动指数;RI为阻力指数;MD为平均舒张期流速;TAmax为时间平均最高流速;HR为心率
表1 UA、UtA和MCA多普勒检测质控要点[11-12]
表2 单胎妊娠UA多普勒指标超声参考值[15]
表3 单胎妊娠UtA多普勒超声参考值(PI,左右侧平均值)[23]
表4 单胎妊娠MCA多普勒超声参考值[29]
孕周 收缩期峰值流速(PSV,cm/s) 搏动指数(PI) 脑胎盘比(CPR)
5th 10th 50th 90th 95th 5th 10th 50th 90th 95th 5th 10th 50th 90th 95th
19 15.9 16.9 21.2 26.5 28.1 1.05 1.12 1.43 1.83 1.96 0.74 0.83 1.20 1.69 1.85
20 17.0 18.1 22.6 28.1 29.9 1.11 1.19 1.52 1.94 2.08 0.82 0.91 1.30 1.81 1.98
21 18.1 19.3 24.1 29.9 31.8 1.18 1.26 1.60 2.04 2.19 0.90 1.00 1.41 1.94 2.11
22 19.4 20.6 25.7 31.8 33.8 1.25 1.33 1.69 2.15 2.30 0.98 1.09 1.52 2.07 2.25
23 20.7 22.1 27.4 33.9 36.0 1.32 1.41 1.78 2.25 2.41 1.07 1.18 1.63 2.20 2.39
24 22.2 23.6 29.3 36.1 38.3 1.38 1.47 1.86 2.35 2.52 1.16 1.27 1.74 2.33 2.52
25 23.7 25.2 31.2 38.5 40.8 1.44 1.54 1.94 2.45 2.62 1.24 1.36 1.85 2.46 2.65
26 25.2 26.8 33.2 41.0 43.4 1.50 1.60 2.01 2.53 2.71 1.32 1.45 1.95 2.58 2.78
27 26.8 28.5 35.3 43.6 46.2 1.55 1.65 2.06 2.60 2.78 1.40 1.53 2.05 2.69 2.9
28 28.5 30.3 37.5 46.3 49.1 1.58 1.69 2.11 2.66 2.84 1.47 1.60 2.14 2.79 3.00
29 30.1 32.0 39.7 49.1 52.0 1.61 1.71 2.15 2.70 2.88 1.53 1.67 2.21 2.88 3.09
30 31.7 33.8 42.0 51.9 55.1 1.62 1.73 2.16 2.72 2.90 1.58 1.72 2.28 2.95 3.17
31 33.3 35.5 44.2 54.8 58.2 1.62 1.73 2.16 2.71 2.90 1.62 1.76 2.32 3.01 3.23
32 34.7 37.0 46.3 57.7 61.3 1.61 1.71 2.14 2.69 2.87 1.64 1.78 2.35 3.05 3.27
33 36.0 38.5 48.4 60.5 64.4 1.58 1.68 2.10 2.64 2.82 1.65 1.79 2.36 3.07 3.29
34 37.2 39.8 50.3 63.2 67.4 1.53 1.63 2.04 2.57 2.74 1.63 1.78 2.35 3.06 3.29
35 38.1 40.8 52.0 65.8 70.3 1.47 1.56 1.96 2.47 2.64 1.6 1.74 2.32 3.03 3.26
36 38.7 41.6 53.4 68.2 73.0 1.39 1.48 1.86 2.36 2.52 1.55 1.69 2.27 2.97 3.2
37 39.0 42.0 54.6 70.3 75.5 1.3 1.39 1.75 2.22 2.38 1.48 1.62 2.19 2.89 3.12
38 38.9 42.1 55.3 72.1 77.6 1.2 1.29 1.63 2.07 2.22 1.40 1.53 2.09 2.79 3.01
39 38.5 41.8 55.7 73.5 79.4 1.1 1.18 1.49 1.91 2.05 1.29 1.43 1.97 2.66 2.88
1
Stuart B, Drumm J, FitzGerald DE, et al. Fetal blood velocity waveforms in normal pregnancy[J]. Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 1980, 87(9): 780-785.
2
Bhide A, Acharya G, Baschat A, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): use of Doppler velocimetry in obstetrics[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2021, 58(2): 331-339.
3
Hendee WR, Marc Edwards F. ALARA and an integrated approach to radiation protection[J]. Seminars in Nuclear Medicine, 1986, 16(2): 142-150.
4
Alfirevic Z, Stampalija T, Medley N. Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in normal pregnancy[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2015, 2015(4): CD001450.
5
Melamed N, Baschat A, Yinon Y, et al. FIGO (international Federation of Gynecology and obstetrics) initiative on fetal growth: best practice advice for screening, diagnosis, and management of fetal growth restriction[J]. Int J Gynecol Obstet, 2021, 152(Suppl 1): 3-57.
6
Mulcahy C, McAuliffe FM. Routine Doppler ultrasound in twin pregnancy[J]. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 2022, 84: 43-54.
7
Khalil A, Sotiriadis A, Baschat A, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): role of ultrasound in twin pregnancy[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2025, 65(2): 253-276.
8
Poon LC, Shennan A, Hyett JA, et al. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) initiative on pre-eclampsia: a pragmatic guide for first-trimester screening and prevention[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2019, 145(Suppl 1): 1-33.
9
Sotiriadis A, Hernandez-Andrade E, da Silva Costa F, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: role of ultrasound in screening for and follow-up of pre-eclampsia[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2019, 53(1): 7-22.
10
Khalil A, Sotiriadis A, D'Antonio F, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: performance of third-trimester obstetric ultrasound scan[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2024, 63(1): 131-147.
11
Molloholli M, Napolitano R, Ohuma EO, et al. Image-scoring system for umbilical and uterine artery pulsed-wave Doppler ultrasound measurement[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2019, 53(2): 251-255.
12
Rial-Crestelo M, Morales-Roselló J, Hernández-Andrade E, et al. Quality assessment of fetal middle cerebral and umbilical artery Doppler images using an objective scale within an international randomized controlled trial[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2020, 56(2): 182-186.
13
Acharya G, Wilsgaard T, Berntsen GK, et al. Reference ranges for serial measurements of umbilical artery Doppler indices in the second half of pregnancy[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2005, 192(3): 937-944.
14
Ayoola OO, Bulus P, Loto OM, et al. Normogram of umbilical artery Doppler indices in singleton pregnancies in south-western Nigerian women[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2016, 42(12): 1694-1698.
15
Rizzo G, Mappa I, Rizzo G, et al. International gestational age-specific centiles for umbilical artery Doppler indices: a longitudinal prospective cohort study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2021, 224(2): 248-249.
16
Konje JC, Abrams KR, Taylor DJ. Normative values of Doppler velocimetry of five major fetal arteries as determined by color power angiography[J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2005, 84(3): 230-237.
17
Owen P, Ogston S. Standards for the quantification of serial changes in Doppler resistance indices from the umbilical arteries[J]. Early Hum Dev, 1997, 49(1): 39-47.
18
Dilmen G, Aytaç S, Toppare MF, et al. Umbilical artery blood flow characteristics in normal pregnancies[J]. Gynecol Obstet Invest, 1994, 38(2): 96-99.
19
Pattinson RC, Theron GB, Thompson ML, et al. Doppler ultrasonography of the fetoplacental circulation--normal reference values[J]. S Afr Med J, 1989, 76(11): 623-625.
20
Arström K, Eliasson A, Hareide JH, et al. Fetal blood velocity waveforms in normal pregnancies. A longitudinal study[J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 1989, 68(2): 171-178.
21
Fogarty P, Beattie B, Harper A, et al. Continuous wave Doppler flow velocity waveforms from the umbilical artery in normal pregnancy[J]. J Perinat Med, 1990, 18(1): 51-57.
22
Ferrazzi E, Gementi P, Bellotti M, et al. Doppler velocimetry: critical analysis of umbilical, cerebral and aortic reference values[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 1991, 38(3): 189-196.
23
Gómez O, Figueras F, Fernández S, et al. Reference ranges for uterine artery mean pulsatility index at 11-41 weeks of gestation[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2008, 32(2): 128-132.
24
Flo K, Wilsgaard T, Acharya G. A new non-invasive method for measuring uterine vascular resistance and its relationship to uterine artery Doppler indices: a longitudinal study[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2011, 37(5): 538-542.
25
Takahashi K, Ohkuchi A, Hirashima C, et al. Establishing reference values for mean notch depth index, pulsatility index and resistance index in the uterine artery at 16-23 weeks' gestation[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2012, 38(11): 1275-1285.
26
Bahlmann F, Fittschen M, Reinhard I, et al. Reference values for blood flow velocity in the uterine artery in normal pregnancies from 18 weeks to 42 weeks of gestation calculated by automatic Doppler waveform analysis[J]. Ultraschall Med, 2012, 33(3): 258-264.
27
Weichert A, Hagen A, Tchirikov M, et al. Reference Curve for the Mean Uterine Artery Pulsatility Index in Singleton Pregnancies[J]. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd, 2017, 77(5): 516-523.
28
Stridsklev S, Salvesen Ø, Salvesen KA, et al. Uterine artery Doppler measurements during first and second trimesters of normal pregnancy[J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2017, 96(3): 366-371.
29
Ebbing C, Rasmussen S, Kiserud T. Middle cerebral artery blood flow velocities and pulsatility index and the cerebroplacental pulsatility ratio: longitudinal reference ranges and terms for serial measurements[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2007, 30(3): 287-296.
30
Morales-Roselló J, Khalil A, Morlando M, et al. Doppler reference values of the fetal vertebral and middle cerebral arteries, at 19-41 weeks gestation[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2015, 28(3): 338-343.
31
Ioannou C, Talbot K, Ohuma E, et al. Systematic review of methodology used in ultrasound studies aimed at creating charts of fetal size[J]. BJOG, 2012, 119(12): 1425-1439.
32
中华预防医学会出生缺陷预防与控制专业委员会产前超声诊断学组, 中华医学会超声医学分会妇产学组. 胎儿生物学参数超声参考值专家共识——总论[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(8): 753-756.
33
Caradeux J, Martinez-Portilla R, Basuki TR, et al. Risk of fetal death in growth-restricted fetuses with umbilical and/or ductus venosus absent or reversed end-diastolic velocities before 34 weeks of gestation: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2018, 218(2S): S774-S782. e21.
34
Van Wassenaer‐Leemhuis AG, Marlow N, Lees C, et al. The association of neonatal morbidity with long‐term neurological outcome in infants who were growth restricted and preterm at birth: secondary analyses from TRUFFLE (Trial of Randomized Umbilical and Fetal Flow in Europe)[J]. BJOG, 2017, 124(7): 1072-1078.
35
Sotiriadis A, Hernandez‐Andrade E, da Silva Costa F, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: role of ultrasound in screening for and follow‐up of pre‐eclampsia[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2019, 53(1): 7-22.
36
Yu CK, Smith GC, Papageorghiou AT, et al. An integrated model for the prediction of preeclampsia using maternal factors and uterine artery Doppler velocimetry in unselected low-risk women[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2005, 193(2): 429-436.
37
Bonacina E, Del Barco E, Farràs A, et al. Role of routine uterine artery Doppler at 18–22 and 24–28 weeks' gestation following routine first-trimester screening for pre-eclampsia[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2025, 65(1): 63-70.
38
Oros D, Figueras F, Cruz‐Martinez R, et al. Longitudinal changes in uterine, umbilical and fetal cerebral Doppler indices in late‐onset small‐for‐gestational age fetuses[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2011, 37(2): 191-195.
39
Cruz-Martínez R, Figueras F, Hernandez-Andrade E, et al. Fetal brain Doppler to predict cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal status in term small-for-gestational-age fetuses[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2011, 117(3): 618-626.
40
Slaghekke F, Pasman S, Veujoz M, et al. Middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocity to predict fetal hemoglobin levels in twin anemia-polycythemia sequence[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2015, 46(4): 432-436.
41
Vollgraff Heidweiller‐Schreurs C, van Osch IR, Heymans MW, et al. Cerebroplacental ratio in predicting adverse perinatal outcome: a meta‐analysis of individual participant data[J]. BJOG, 2021, 128(2): 226-235.
42
Lees CC, Stampalija T, Baschat AA, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: diagnosis and management of small-for-gestational-age fetus and fetal growth restriction[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2020, 56(2): 298-312.
43
Devore GR. The importance of the cerebroplacental ratio in the evaluation of fetal well-being in SGA and AGA fetuses[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2015, 213(1): 5-15.
No related articles found!
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?