切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高帧频超声影像学

高帧频超声造影在胆囊息肉样病变中的鉴别诊断价值

  • 朱连华 ,
  • 费翔 ,
  • 韩鹏 ,
  • 姜波 ,
  • 李楠 ,
  • 罗渝昆 ,
展开
  • 100853 北京,解放军总医院第一医学中心超声诊断科
通信作者:罗渝昆,Email:

Copy editor: 吴春凤

收稿日期: 2023-05-30

  网络出版日期: 2023-12-11

版权

未经授权,不得转载、摘编本刊文章,不得使用本刊的版式设计,除非特别声明,本刊刊出的所有文章不代表中华医学会和本刊编委会的观点。本刊为电子期刊,以网刊形式出版。

Value of high frame rate contrast-enhanced ultrasound in differential diagnosis of gallbladder polyp lesions

  • Lianhua Zhu ,
  • Xiang Fei ,
  • Peng Han ,
  • Bo Jiang ,
  • Nan Li ,
  • Yukun Luo ,
Expand
  • Department of Ultrasound, the First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
Corresponding author: Luo Yukun, Email:

Received date: 2023-05-30

  Online published: 2023-12-11

Copyright

Copyright by Chinese Medical Association No content published by the journals of Chinese Medical Association may be reproduced or abridged without authorization. Please do not use or copy the layout and design of the journals without permission. All articles published represent the opinions of the authors, and do not reflect the official policy of the Chinese Medical Association or the Editorial Board, unless this is clearly specified.

摘要

目的

探讨高帧频超声造影(H-CEUS)对最大径为1.0~1.5 cm胆囊腺瘤性息肉和胆固醇性息肉的鉴别诊断价值。

方法

回顾性分析2021年8月至2023年4月解放军总医院第一医学中心76例最大径为1.0~1.5 cm胆囊息肉样病变患者的临床资料,所有患者均于胆囊切除术前行常规超声和H-CEUS检查。采用单因素分析(χ2检验和U检验)比较腺瘤性息肉和胆固醇性息肉患者的临床资料、常规超声图像特征和H-CEUS图像特征的差异。采用二元Logistic回归筛选腺瘤性息肉的独立危险指标。绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线比较常规超声和H-CEUS鉴别腺瘤性息肉的诊断效能。

结果

胆囊腺瘤性息肉23例,胆固醇性息肉53例。常规超声图像上腺瘤性息肉和胆固醇性息肉在息肉的纵横比、数量(多发)、点状强回声(有)和血流信号(有)方面比较[0.8(0.7,1.4) vs 1.8(1.3,2.1),60.87% vs 33.96%,30.43% vs 69.81%,82.61% vs 39.62%],差异具有统计学意义(Z=-3.892,P<0.001;χ2=4.764,P=0.029;χ2=10.202,P=0.001;χ2=11.888,P=0.001)。H-CEUS发现开始增强时间(早于胆囊壁)、增强强度(高增强)、血管形态(点状+线状)、血管性基底宽度和胆囊壁完整性(完整)在腺瘤性息肉和胆固醇性息肉间的差异具有统计学意义[30.43% vs 3.77%,χ2=10.921,P=0.003;86.96% vs 9.43%,χ2=43.668,P<0.001;21.74% vs 92.45%,χ2=39.697,P<0.001;3.2(2.5,4.0)mm vs 1.9(1.7,2.1)mm,Z=-5.682,P<0.001;82.61% vs 98.11%,χ2=6.273,P=0.027]。Logistic回归分析显示,仅息肉的增强强度(OR=2.213,95%CI:1.249~55.890,P=0.029)、血管形态(OR=4.121,95%CI:1.224~13.873,P=0.022)和血管性基底宽度(OR=3.524,95%CI:1.089~11.405,P=0.036)是腺瘤性息肉的独立危险指标。H-CEUS鉴别诊断腺瘤性息肉的敏感度、特异度和准确性分别是91.30%、88.68%和92.11%,曲线下面积为0.918,常规超声鉴别诊断腺瘤性息肉的敏感度、特异度和准确性分别是73.91%、79.25%和77.63%,曲线下面积为0.766,H-CEUS较常规超声具有更高的诊断效能(Z=2.510,P=0.012)。

结论

H-CEUS能准确鉴别最大径为1.0~1.5 cm的腺瘤性息肉和胆固醇性息肉,为息肉患者选择合适治疗方式提供了更准确的超声诊断依据。

本文引用格式

朱连华 , 费翔 , 韩鹏 , 姜波 , 李楠 , 罗渝昆 . 高帧频超声造影在胆囊息肉样病变中的鉴别诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023 , 20(09) : 904 -910 . DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2023.09.003

Abstract

Objective

To assess the value of high frame rate contrast-enhanced ultrasound (H-CEUS) in the differential diagnosis of gallbladder adenomatous polyps and cholesterol polyps with a maximum size from 1.0 to 1.5 cm.

Methods

From August 2021 to April 2023, 76 patients with gallbladder polyp lesions with a maximum size from 1.0 to 1.5 cm in the First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent conventional ultrasound and H-CEUS examination before cholecystectomy. The clinical information and conventional ultrasound and H-CEUS image characteristics were compared between adenomatous polyps and cholesterol polyps by univariate analysis (chi-square test and U test). The independent risk predictors of adenomatous polyps were identified by logistic regression analysis. The diagnostic performance of conventional ultrasound and H-CEUS in distinguishing adenomatous polyps from cholesterol polyps was compared by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

Results

There were 23 cases of adenomatous polyps and 53 cases of cholesterol polyps. The height/width ratio, number (multiple), hyperechoic spot, and blood flow signal on conventional ultrasound were significantly different between adenomatous polyps and cholesterol polyps [0.8 (0.7, 1.4) vs 1.8 (1.3, 2.1), Z=-3.892, P<0.001; 60.87% vs 33.96%, χ2=4.764, P=0.029; 30.43% vs 69.81%, χ2=10.202, P=0.001; 82.61% vs 39.62%, χ2=11.888, P=0.001, respectively]. On H-CEUS, enhancement time (prior to the gallbladder wall), enhancement intensity (high enhancement), vascular morphology (petechial+linear), vascular stalk width, and gallbladder wall integrity (intact) of adenomatous polyps were significantly different from those of cholesterol polyps [30.43% vs 3.77%, χ2=10.921, P=0.003; 86.96% vs 9.43%, χ2=43.668, P<0.001; 21.74% vs 92.45 %, χ2=39.697, P<0.001; 3.2 (2.5, 4.0) mm vs 1.9 (1.7, 2.1) mm, Z=-5.682, P<0.001; 82.61% vs 98.11%, χ2=6.273, P=0.027, respectively]. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that enhancement intensity (odds ratio [OR]=2.213, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.249-55.890, P=0.029), vascular morphology (OR=4.121, 95%CI: 1.224-13.873, P=0.022), and vascular stalk width (OR=3.524, 95%CI: 1.089-11.405, P=0.036) were independent risk predictors of adenomatous polyps. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of H-CEUS in distinguishing adenomatous polyps from cholesterol polyps were 91.30%, 88.68%, and 92.11%, respectively, and the area under the curve was 0.918. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of conventional ultrasound in distinguishing adenomatous polyps from cholesterol polyps were 73.91%, 79.25%, and 77.63%, respectively, and the area under the curve was 0.766. H-CEUS had higher diagnostic performance than conventional ultrasound (Z=2.510, P=0.012).

Conclusion

H-CEUS can accurately distinguish adenomatous polyps and cholesterol polyps with a maximum size from 1.0 to 1.5 cm, providing more accurate ultrasound diagnostic evidence for patients with gallbladder polyp lesions to help them choose appropriate treatment means.

1
Xu A, Hu H. The gallbladder polypoid-lesions conundrum: moving forward with controversy by looking back [J]. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2017, 11(11): 1071-1080.

2
Han JW, Choi YH, Lee IS, et al. Gallbladder polyps growth rate is an independent risk factor for neoplastic polyps [J]. United European Gastroenterol J, 2022, 10(7): 651-656.

3
Dilek ON, Karasu S, Dilek FH. Diagnosis and treatment of gallbladder polyps: current perspectives [J]. Euroasian J Hepatogastroenterol, 2019, 9(1): 40-48.

4
中华医学会外科学分会胆道外科学组, 中国医师协会外科医师分会胆道外科专业委员会. 胆囊癌诊断和治疗指南(2019版) [J]. 中华外科杂志, 2020, 58(4): 243-251.

5
Foley KG, Lahaye MJ, Thoeni RF, et al. Management and follow-up of gallbladder polyps: updated joint guidelines between the ESGAR, EAES, EFISDS and ESGE [J]. Eur Radiol, 2022, 32(5): 3358-3368.

6
Nagino M, Hirano S, Yoshitomi H, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of biliary tract cancers 2019: the 3rd English edition [J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2021, 28(1): 26-54.

7
朱连华, 韩鹏, 姜波, 等. 常规超声图像特征对胆囊息肉样病变的鉴别诊断价值 [J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(8): 807-812.

8
Zhang X, Wang J, Wu B, et al. A nomogram-based model and ultrasonic radiomic features for gallbladder polyp classification [J]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2022, 37(7): 1380-1388.

9
Kamaya A, Fung C, Szpakowski JL, et al. Management of incidentally detected gallbladder polyps: society of radiologists in ultrasound consensus conference recommendations [J]. Radiology, 2022, 305(2): 277-289.

10
Zhu L, Han P, Jiang B, et al. Value of conventional ultrasound-based scoring system in distinguishing adenomatous polyps from cholesterol polyps [J]. J Clin Gastroenterol, 2022, 56(10): 895-901.

11
韩鹏, 费翔, 罗渝昆, 等. 高帧频超声造影在鉴别诊断胆囊腺瘤性息肉与胆固醇性息肉中的临床应用 [J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2020, 17(9): 815-820.

12
Fei X, Li N, Zhu L, et al. Value of high frame rate contrast-enhanced ultrasound in distinguishing gallbladder adenoma from cholesterol polyp lesion [J]. Eur Radiol, 2021, 31(9): 6717-6725.

13
Zhang X, Wang J, Wu B, et al. A nomogram-based model to predict neoplastic risk for patients with gallbladder polyps [J]. J Clin Transl Hepatol, 2022, 10(2): 263-272.

14
朱连华, 韩鹏, 姜波, 等. 微血流成像能准确鉴别和诊断胆囊息肉样病变 [J]. 南方医科大学学报, 2022, 42(6): 922-928.

15
Fei X, Han P, Jiang B, et al. High frame rate contrast-enhanced ultrasound helps differentiate malignant and benign focal liver lesions [J]. J Clin Transl Hepatol, 2022, 10(1): 26-33.

16
Zhu L, Han P, Jiang B, et al. Value of micro flow imaging in the prediction of adenomatous polyps [J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2023, 49(7): 1586-1594.

17
朱连华, 费翔, 韩鹏, 等. 超声造影在胆固醇性息肉和胆囊腺瘤中的鉴别诊断价值 [J]. 中国医学科学院学报, 2021, 43(3): 350-356.

18
Zhu L, Han P, Lee R, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound to assess gallbladder polyps [J]. Clin Imaging, 2021, 78: 8-13.

19
Liu XS, Chen T, Gu LH, et al. Ultrasound-based scoring system for differential diagnosis of polypoid lesions of the gallbladder [J]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2018, 33(6): 1295-1299.

20
Wang X, Zhu JA, Liu YJ, et al. Conventional ultrasound combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasound in differential diagnosis of gallbladder cholesterol and adenomatous polyps (1-2 cm) [J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2022, 41(3): 617-626.

21
Zhang D, Li Q, Zhang X, et al. Establishment of a nomogram prediction model for long diameter 10-15 mm gallbladder polyps with malignant tendency [J]. Surgery, 2021, 170(3): 664-672.

Options
文章导航

/