2023 , Vol. 20 >Issue 11: 1158 - 1163
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2023.11.009
超声子宫动脉及子宫内膜血流参数对不明原因复发性流产患者妊娠结局的影响
Copy editor: 吴春凤
收稿日期: 2022-09-20
网络出版日期: 2024-01-15
版权
Application of ultrasonic uterine artery and endometrial blood flow parameters in predicting pregnancy outcome in patients with unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion
Received date: 2022-09-20
Online published: 2024-01-15
Copyright
探讨超声子宫动脉及子宫内膜血流参数对不明原因复发性流产(URSA)患者妊娠结局的影响。
回顾性收集杭州市中医院(浙江中医药大学附属杭州市中医院)2020年1月至2021年12月收治的112例URSA患者作为研究对象,根据妊娠结局的不同分为已孕组(n=55)与未孕组(n=57),采集备孕期子宫内膜容受性指标(超声子宫动脉、子宫内膜形态和血流参数),并采用χ2检验或Fisher精确概率法或独立样本t检验比较2组间差异,采用多因素条件Logistic回归分析超声参数与妊娠结局的关系。
已孕组的子宫动脉搏动指数(PI)水平低于未孕组[(2.06±0.42) vs (2.41±0.69)],差异具有统计学意义(t=4.669,P<0.001)。已孕组子宫内膜厚度高于未孕组组[(8.56±1.42)mm vs(8.19±2.41)mm],已孕组的子宫内膜回声B型、内膜血流Ⅱ级和内膜连续者占比高于未孕组(67.27% vs 47.37%、74.55% vs 50.88%和90.91% vs 0),差异均具有统计学意义(χ2=12.151、7.408、93.607,P均<0.001)。多因素条件Logistic回归分析显示,子宫动脉PI升高是URSA患者妊娠的高危因素(β=-0.922,OR=0.924,P=0.004),内膜厚度(β=0.514,OR=1.147,P=0.007)、内膜回声B型(β=0.425,OR=1.502,P=0.001)、内膜血流Ⅱ级(β=0.337,OR=1.655,P=0.002)和内膜连续(β=0.437,OR=2.715,P=0.022)是URSA患者妊娠成功的保护性因素。
彩色多普勒超声检测子宫动脉血流参数、子宫内膜形态和血流参数可较为准确地评估URSA患者的子宫内膜容受性。
何雪威 , 谷美玉 , 吴亭亭 . 超声子宫动脉及子宫内膜血流参数对不明原因复发性流产患者妊娠结局的影响[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023 , 20(11) : 1158 -1163 . DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2023.11.009
To evaluate the predictive value of ultrasound uterine artery and endometrial blood flow parameters for pregnancy outcome in patients with unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion (URSA).
One hundred and twelve patients with URSA were collected retrospectively at Hangzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from January 2020 to December 2021 as the study subjects. According to different pregnancy outcomes, they were divided into a pregnant group (n=55) and a non-pregnant group (n=57). Comparative analysis was conducted on endometrial receptivity indicators (ultrasound uterine artery and endometrial blood flow parameters) of the two groups of patients during pregnancy preparation, using the χ2 test or Fisher's exact test or independent sample t-test, and multivariate conditional Logistic regression was used to analyze the relationship between ultrasound parameters and pregnancy outcome.
The pulsatility index of the uterine artery in the pregnant group was significantly lower than that of the non-pregnant group [(2.06±0.42) vs (2.41±0.69), t=4.669, P<0.001]. The endometrial thickness of the pregnant group was significantly higher than that of the non-pregnant group [(8.56±1.42) mm vs (8.19±2.41) mm]. The proportions of patients with endometrial echo type B, endometrial blood flow grade II, and endometrial continuity in the pregnant group were 67.27%, 74.55%, and 90.91%, respectively, which were significantly higher than those of the non-pregnant group (47.37%, 50.88%, and 0, respectively; χ2=12.151, 7.408, and 93.607, respectively; P<0.001 for all). Multivariate conditional Logistic regression analysis showed that elevated uterine artery PI was a high risk factor for pregnancy failure in URSA patients (β=-0.922, odds ratio [OR]=0.924, P=0.004), while endometrial thickness (β=0.514, OR=1.147, P=0.007), endometrial echo type B (β=0.425, OR=1.502, P=0.001), endometrial blood flow grade II (β=0.337, OR=1.655, P=0.002), and endometrial continuity (β=0.437, OR=2.715, P=0.022) were protective factors for successful pregnancy in URSA patients.
The detection of uterine artery blood flow parameters, endometrial morphology, and blood flow parameters by color Doppler ultrasound can accurately evaluate the endometrial receptivity of URSA patients to provide a basis for clinical prediction of successful pregnancy.
表1 2组不明原因复发性流产患者的基线临床资料比较 |
组别 | 例数 | 年龄(岁,![]() | 月经周期(d,![]() | 备孕时间(月,![]() | 生育史[例(%)] | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
有 | 无 | |||||
已孕组 | 55 | 31.58±5.62 | 30.30±3.01 | 6.53±2.48 | 11(20.00) | 44(80.00) |
未孕组 | 57 | 30.58±6.30 | 31.17±5.26 | 6.71±1.96 | 14(24.56) | 43(75.44) |
统计值 | t=0.885 | t=1.069 | t=0.427 | χ2=0.600 | ||
P值 | 0.378 | 0.284 | 0.670 | 0.438 |
表2 2组不明原因复发性流产患者的子宫内膜超声参数比较 |
超声参数 | 已孕组(n=55) | 未孕组(n=57) | 统计值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|
内膜厚度(mm,![]() | 8.56±1.42 | 8.02±1.01 | t=2.326 | 0.022 |
内膜容积(ml,![]() | 3.37±0.72 | 3.53±0.96 | t=0.995 | 0.322 |
内膜回声类型 | χ2=12.151 | <0.001 | ||
A型 | 6(10.91) | 1(1.75) | ||
B型 | 37(67.27) | 27(47.37) | ||
C型 | 12(21.82) | 29(50.88) | ||
内膜血流分级 | χ2=7.408 | <0.001 | ||
0级 | 1(1.82) | 3(5.26) | ||
Ⅰ级 | 10(18.18) | 16(28.07) | ||
Ⅱ级 | 41(74.55) | 29(50.88) | ||
Ⅲ级 | 3(5.45) | 9(15.79) | ||
内膜波动 | χ2=2.947 | 0.086 | ||
有 | 47(85.45) | 53(92.98) | ||
无 | 8(14.55) | 4(7.02) | ||
内膜连续性 | χ2=93.607 | <0.001 | ||
连续 | 50(90.91) | 0(0) | ||
中断/粘连 | 5(9.09) | 57(100) | ||
子宫动脉PI(![]() | 2.06±0.42 | 2.41±0.69 | t=4.669 | <0.001 |
注:PI为搏动指数 |
表3 影响不明原因复发性流产患者妊娠成功的多因素分析 |
变量 | β值 | SE值 | Wald值 | P值 | OR值 | 95%CI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
子宫动脉PI | -0.922 | 0.305 | 8.496 | 0.004 | 0.924 | 0.798~0.966 |
内膜厚度 | 0.514 | 0.125 | 7.221 | 0.007 | 1.147 | 1.057~3.664 |
内膜血流分级 | ||||||
Ⅰ级 | 0.411 | 0.101 | 0.190 | 0.121 | 1.045 | 0.847~1.119 |
Ⅱ级 | 0.337 | 0.065 | 8.905 | 0.002 | 1.655 | 1.065~2.365 |
Ⅲ级 | 0.290 | 0.108 | 2.241 | 0.051 | 1.058 | 0.899~2.174 |
内膜回声类型 | ||||||
B型 | 0.425 | 0.139 | 11.258 | 0.001 | 1.502 | 1.065~3.574 |
C型 | -0.844 | 0.068 | 1.332 | 0.077 | 0.988 | 0.824~1.991 |
内膜连续性 | ||||||
连续 | 0.437 | 0.071 | 6.947 | 0.022 | 2.715 | 1.149~4.957 |
注:PI为搏动指数;内膜血流分型以0级为参照,内膜回声类型以A型为参照,内膜连续性以中断/粘连为参照 |
1 |
石玉姣, 谢京红. 不明原因复发性流产的中西医发病机制及治疗研究进展 [J]. 北京中医药, 2020, 39(7): 771-776.
|
2 |
汪希鹏. 复发性流产与反复种植失败的病因和治疗新观点 [J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2019, 54(12): 793-796.
|
3 |
张硕, 金志春. 子宫动脉血流异常与不明原因复发性流产的中西医研究进展 [J]. 现代中西医结合杂志, 2019, 28(20): 114-118.
|
4 |
|
5 |
|
6 |
赵爱民. 自然流产诊治中国专家共识(2020年版) [J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2020, 36(11): 1082-1090.
|
7 |
卡伦. 妇产科超声学 [M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2010: 66-71.
|
8 |
|
9 |
国家人口计生委科技司. 妇科超声检查指南 [M]. 北京: 中国人口出版社, 2010: 68-80.
|
10 |
|
11 |
|
12 |
马淳, 田莉. 排卵期宫腔灌注hCG对复发性流产患者子宫内膜胞饮突及临床妊娠率的影响 [J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2016, 20(21): 69-71, 75.
|
13 |
余彩茶, 水旭娟, 焦岩, 等. 子宫动脉及内膜血流在评估子宫内膜容受性及预测妊娠结局中的应用价值 [J]. 医学研究杂志, 2022, 51(3): 75-79.
|
14 |
张娇, 谭友慧, 高静, 等. 子宫动脉及内膜血流参数与人工周期冻融胚胎移植结局的关系 [J]. 安徽医药, 2020, 24(2): 323-326.
|
15 |
刘慧, 田葱, 马明霞. 经阴道超声在AIH-IUI中对子宫内膜容受性的应用价值 [J]. 甘肃医药, 2019, 38(1): 38-39, 58.
|
16 |
张旋, 杨钦涵. 经阴道超声测量子宫内膜形态与试管婴儿临床妊娠成功率的关系研究 [J]. 实用妇科内分泌电子杂志, 2021, 8(6): 78-80.
|
17 |
焦岩, 水旭娟, 余彩茶, 等. 超声多模态评分在复发性自然流产患者子宫内膜容受性评价中的应用研究 [J]. 中国全科医学, 2020, 23(3): 299-304.
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |