2023 , Vol. 20 >Issue 12: 1231 - 1236
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2023.12.002
左心室压力-应变环联合Tei指数评价慢性中重度主动脉瓣反流患者左心功能的初步研究
Copy editor: 汪荣
收稿日期: 2023-05-29
网络出版日期: 2024-03-05
基金资助
浙江省自然科学基金项目(LSD19H180002)
版权
Evaluation of left ventricular function in patients with chronic moderate and severe aortic regurgitation by left ventricular pressure-strain loop combined with Tei index: a preliminary study
Received date: 2023-05-29
Online published: 2024-03-05
Copyright
探讨左心室压力-应变环(PSL)及Tei指数联合在评价左心室射血分数(LVEF)保留的慢性中重度主动脉瓣反流(AR)患者左心室功能及心肌做功变化中的应用价值。
这是一项前瞻性研究。选取自2022年1月至2023年2月于浙江大学医学院附属第一医院就诊的慢性中重度AR患者40例,选取健康体检者40例作为正常对照组。应用PSL获取左心室心肌做功参数,包括左心室整体心肌做功指数(GWI)、整体有效做功(GCW)、整体无效做功(GWW)、整体做功效率(GWE),并计算Tei指数,比较AR组与对照组之间各参数的差异,采用ROC曲线分析各项参数及PSL联合Tei指数对慢性中重度AR患者早期左心室心肌功能受损的诊断效能。
与对照组相比,AR组的舒张压、左心室整体纵向应变(GLS)、GWI、GWE减低,脉压差、GWW、Tei指数升高,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。ROC曲线结果显示,PSL联合Tei指数诊断AR患者早期左心室心肌功能受损的ROC曲线下面积最大,为0.922(95%CI:0.86~0.98),其敏感度为85.0%,特异度为87.6%,约登指数为0.725。
PSL和Tei指数两种技术联合,可以更好评价LVEF保留的慢性AR患者左心室功能的改变情况,有助于为手术时机的选择提供参考。
陈佳易 , 袁帅 , 胡胜男 , 步笑辉 , 牟芸 , 郑哲岚 . 左心室压力-应变环联合Tei指数评价慢性中重度主动脉瓣反流患者左心功能的初步研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023 , 20(12) : 1231 -1236 . DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2023.12.002
To investigate the clinical value of the combination of left ventricular pressure strain loop (PSL) and Tei index in evaluating left ventricular function and myocardial work changes in patients with chronic moderate to severe aortic regurgitation (AR) with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).
This is a prospective study in which 40 patients with chronic moderate to severe AR who visited the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine from January 2022 to February 2023, and 40 healthy individuals (normal controls) were included. PSL was used to obtain left ventricular myocardial work parameters, including left ventricular global myocardial work index (GWI), global myocardial constructive work (GCW), global myocardial wasted work (GWW), and global myocardial work efficiency (GWE), and Tei index was calculated. The differences in various parameters were compared between the AR group and the control group. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to assess the diagnostic efficacy of various parameters and PSL combined with Tei index for early left ventricular myocardial dysfunction in chronic moderate to severe AR patients.
Compared with the control group, the diastolic blood pressure, global longitudinal strain (GLS), GWI, and GWE of the AR group decreased significantly, while the pulse pressure difference, GWW, and Tei index increased significantly (P<0.05). ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the ROC curve of PSL combined with Tei index for diagnosing early left ventricular myocardial dysfunction in AR patients was the largest (0.922; 95% confidence interval: 0.86-0.98), with a sensitivity of 85.0%, specificity of 87.6%, and Yoden index of 0.725.
The combination of PSL and Tei index can better evaluate the changes in left ventricular function in chronic AR patients with preserved LVEF, and provide reference for the selection of proper surgical timing.
表示,组间比较采用独立样本t检验。不符合正态分布的计量资料以M(QR)表示,组间比较采用非参数检验。计数资料以例(%)表示,组间比较采用x2检验。采用ROC曲线分析各项参数及PSL联合Tei指数对慢性中重度AR患者早期左心室心肌功能受损的诊断效能。观察者间重复性检验采用组内相关性系数(intraclass correlation coefficient,ICC)的方法。以P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。表1 AR组与对照组基本资料比较( |
| 组别 | 例数 | 男性[例(%)] | 年龄(岁) | BMI(kg/m2) | 收缩压(mmHg) | 舒张压(mmHg) | 脉压差(mmHg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AR组 | 40 | 30(75) | 60.90±12.10 | 22.90±3.33 | 122.73±3.33 | 66.35±11.33 | 56.40±12.85 |
| 对照组 | 40 | 22(55) | 61.70±10.60 | 22.11±3.67 | 118.35±13.81 | 74.68±8.06 | 43.70±9.80 |
| 统计值 | χ2=3.516 | t=-0.139 | t=1.011 | t=1.469 | t=-3.786 | t=4.970 | |
| P值 | 0.061 | 0.707 | 0.315 | 0.146 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
注:BMI为体质量指数;AR为主动脉瓣反流;1 mmHg=0.133 kPa |
表2 AR组与对照组常规超声心动图及心肌应变参数比较 |
| 组别 | 例数 | LVEF(%, ) | LVEDV[ml,M(QR)] | LVESV[ml,M(QR)] | GLS绝对值(%, ) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AR组 | 40 | 59.53±6.09 | 89.08(64.50) | 32.75(31.25) | 17.50±2.06 |
| 对照组 | 40 | 67.28±1.83 | 94.5(21.50) | 30.00(7.50) | 20.36±1.95 |
| 统计值 | t=-7.706 | Z=-0.529 | Z=-0.814 | t=6.371 | |
| P值 | <0.001 | 0.597 | 0.416 | <0.001 |
注:AR为主动脉瓣反流;LVEF为左心室射血分数;LVEDV为左心室舒张末期容积;LVESV为左心室收缩末期容积;GLS为整体纵向应变 |
表3 AR组与对照组心肌做功参数及Tei指数比较 |
| 组别 | 例数 | GWI(mmHg%, ) | GCW(mmHg%, ) | GWW[mmHg%,M(QR)] | GWE(mmHg%, ) | Tei指数( ) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AR组 | 40 | 1675.68±267.25 | 2077.20±288.81 | 143.00(146.50) | 91.43±4.34 | 0.66±0.19 |
| 对照组 | 40 | 1841.73±285.68 | 2193.00±269.05 | 74.00(31.25) | 95.90±1.53 | 0.47±0.08 |
| 统计值 | t=-2.685 | t=-1.871 | Z=-5.059 | t=-6.152 | t=6.079 | |
| P值 | 0.009 | 0.065 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
注:GLS为整体纵向应变;GWI为整体做功指数;GCW为整体有效做功;GWW为整体无效做功;GWE为整体做功效率;1 mmHg=0.133 kPa |
图2 心肌做功参数及Tei指数诊断主动脉瓣反流患者左心室心肌功能受损的ROC曲线注:GLS为整体纵向应变值;GWI为整体做功指数;GCW为整体有效做功;GWW为整体无效做功;GWE为整体做功效率;两种技术联合为心肌做功参数与Tei指数联合 |
表4 GLS、心肌做功参数和Tei指数诊断AR患者左心室心肌功能受损的ROC曲线结果 |
| 参数 | AUC | 95%CI | 敏感度(%) | 特异度(%) | 截断值 | 约登指数 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLS | 0.853 | 0.77~0.94 | 72.5 | 90.0 | -18.05 | 0.625 |
| GWI | 0.680 | 0.56~0.79 | 82.5 | 50.0 | 1628.50 | 0.325 |
| GCW | 0.630 | 0.51~0.76 | 80.0 | 50.0 | 2041.00 | 0.300 |
| GWW | 0.828 | 0.73~0.92 | 65.0 | 92.5 | 125.00 | 0.575 |
| GWE | 0.844 | 0.76~0.93 | 87.5 | 70.0 | 94.50 | 0.575 |
| Tei指数 | 0.820 | 0.73~0.91 | 70.0 | 87.5 | 0.55 | 0.575 |
| 两种技术联合 | 0.922 | 0.86~0.98 | 85.0 | 87.6 | — | 0.725 |
注:AR为主动脉瓣反流;GLS为整体纵向应变;GWI为整体做功指数;GCW为整体有效做功;GWW为整体无效做功;GWE为整体做功效率;-表示无相关数据 |
| 1 |
|
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
中国医师协会超声医师分会心脏超声专业委员会. 二维斑点追踪超声心动图心肌纵向应变规范化检查中国专家共识(2023版)[J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2023, 32(4): 277-287.
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
唐莎, 李华, 宋磊, 等.左室压力-应变环评价乳腺癌患者化疗后左室局部心肌做功改变的研究[J].中国超声医学杂志, 2022, 38(9): 1004-1007.
|
| 12 |
孙世杰, 刘冲, 田家玮. 左室压力-应变环评价心肌做功在射血分数保留型心衰中的应用价值[J].中国超声医学杂志, 2022, 38(7): 779-782.
|
| 13 |
秦芸芸, 李一丹, 吴小朋, 等.左心室压力-应变环对非ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征的诊断价值[J].中华超声影像学杂志, 2020, 29(11): 927-933.
|
| 14 |
刘瑞中, 王飞, 吴宇诗, 等.无创性左心室压力-应变环评估左心室功能不全的应用价值[J/OL].中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2020, 17(12): 1261-1263.
|
| 15 |
李庆, 李小燕, 牟芸, 等.压力-应变环评估血液透析患者左心室做功的临床价值[J].浙江医学, 2022, 44(18): 1956-1961.
|
| 16 |
陈爱, 郑哲岚, 张生光. Tei指数评价冠心病患者冠状动脉支架置入术前后的左心室功能[J].中国临床医学影像杂志, 2009, 20(12): 919-921.
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
马腾, 王建华, 尹洪宁, 等.超声新技术评价慢性心力衰竭患者左心室功能的临床研究[J/CD].中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2007, 4(6): 338-341.
|
| 19 |
罗银丽, 陶方依, 陈小维, 等.组织多普勒Tei指数评价蒽环类药物对乳腺癌患者左室功能的影响[J].温州医科大学学报, 2022, 52(1): 47-50,56.
|
| 20 |
田婧, 袁建军. 组织多普勒成像测定Tei指数及E/(Ea×Sa)评价系统性红斑狼疮活动期患者左心室功能变化[J/CD].中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2009, 6(3): 488-494.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |