2024 , Vol. 21 >Issue 09: 899 - 903
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2024.09.010
超声医学科人文素养教育提升医患沟通能力的调查分析
Copy editor: 吴春凤
收稿日期: 2024-01-01
网络出版日期: 2024-10-16
版权
Potential of humanistic literacy training in ultrasound department to enhance doctor-patient communication
Received date: 2024-01-01
Online published: 2024-10-16
Copyright
目的
调查北京协和医院超声医学科医务人员的人文素养及医患沟通情况,发掘人文素养教育提升医患沟通的能力。
方法
2023 年6 月采用问卷星在线问卷调查形式,获得北京协和医院超声医学科医务人员人文素养得分与医患沟通自信心和沟通能力自评得分,应用t 检验和方差分析计算人文素养得分的组间差异及医患沟通自信心和沟通能力自评得分的不同人员类别、不同学历、不同职称等的组间差异,了解医务人员的人文素养及医患沟通情况。采用Spearman 相关分析医患沟通自信心和沟通能力自评得分与人文素养得分、学历、职称的相关性。
结果
共获得92 份有效问卷。55.4%(51/92)的医务人员曾经获得过医患沟通方面的正向经历,12.0%(11/92)的医务人员曾经遇到负面经历。人文素养得分:医师高于医辅人员[(10.0±1.2)分 vs (8.5±1.8)分];博士研究生学历医务人员高于硕士、本科与专科及以下学历者[(10.3±1.1)分 vs (9.8±1.2)分 vs (9.0±1.7)分 vs (8.5±1.7)分];高级职称医务人员高于中级、初级者[(11.0±1.0)分 vs (10.2±1.1)分 vs (9.8±1.2)分];未经历过医患沟通负面事件医务人员高于经历过者的得分[(9.8±1.3)分 vs(9.2±1.3)分],差异均具有统计学意义(t=4.459,P=0.001;F=6.117,P=0.001;F=4.904,P=0.010;t=-2.173,P=0.032)。医患沟通自信心和沟通能力自评得分:博士研究生学历医务人员高于硕士、本科与专科及以下学历者[(8.0±1.1)分 vs (7.2±1.2)分 vs (7.1±1.2)分 vs (7.1±1.2)分];高级职称医务人员高于中、初级职称者[(8.4±1.2)分 vs (7.4±1.0)分 vs (7.3±1.2)分],差异均具有统计学意义(F=3.796,P=0.013;F=3.607,P=0.031)。医患沟通自信心和沟通能力自评得分与人文素养得分(r=0.441,P <0.001)、学历(r=0.300,P=0.004)、职称(r=0.266,P=0.044)呈正相关。
结论
医患沟通教育对超声科医务人员非常重要,通过提高医学人文素养和协和精神传承,有助于提高医务人员医患沟通能力。
张晓燕 , 武玺宁 , 张一休 , 刘真真 , 孝梦甦 , 李建初 . 超声医学科人文素养教育提升医患沟通能力的调查分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024 , 21(09) : 899 -903 . DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2024.09.010
Objective
To investigate the status of humanistic literacy and doctor-patient communication in the Ultrasound Department of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, and explore the potential of humanistic literacy education to enhance doctor-patient communication competence.
Methods
In June 2023, an online questionnaire survey was conducted to obtain the scores of humanistic literacy and the self-evaluation scores of doctor-patient communication confidence and communication ability among the medical staff in the Ultrasound Department of Peking Union Medical College Hospital.The t-test and analysis of variance were used to calculate intergroup differences in humanistic literacy scores and in self-evaluation scores of doctor-patient communication confidence and communication ability, to investigate the current status of humanistic literacy and doctor-patient communication among the medical staff.
Results
A total of 92 valid questionnaires were obtained. About 55.4% of medical staff had positive experiences in doctor-patient communication, and 12.0% had experienced negative events. Doctors scored higher on humanistic literacy than medical assistants (10.0±1.2 vs 8.5±1.8, t=4.459, P=0.001). Medical personnel with a doctoral degree scored higher in humanistic literacy than those with a master, undergraduate,or associate degree or below (10.3±1.1 vs 9.8±1.2 vs 9.0±1.7 vs 8.5±1.7, F=6.117, P=0.001). The scores of humanistic literacy were higher in medical personnel with senior professional titles than in those with intermediate and junior titles (11.0±1.0 vs 10.2±1.1 vs 9.8±1.2, F=4.904, P=0.010). Medical personnel who had not experienced negative events in doctor-patient communication had higher humanistic literacy scores than those who had experienced (9.8±1.3 vs 9.2±1.3, t=-2.173, P=0.032). The self-evaluation scores of doctor-patient communication confidence and communication ability of medical personnel with a doctoral degree were higher than those with a master, undergraduate, or associate degree or below (8.0±1.1 vs 7.2±1.2 vs 7.1±1.2 vs 7.1±1.2, F=3.796, P=0.013). The self-evaluation scores of doctor-patient communication confidence and communication ability were higher in medical personnel with senior professional titles than in those with intermediate and junior professional titles (8.4±1.2 vs 7.4±1.0 vs 7.3±1.2, F=3.607, P=0.031).The self-evaluation scores of doctor-patient communication confidence and communication ability were positively correlated with the scores of humanistic literacy (r=0.441, P<0.001), educational background(r=0.300, P=0.004), and professional title (r=0.266, P=0.044).
Conclusion
Doctor-patient communication education is very important for medical personnel in ultrasound department. Improving medical humanistic literacy and inheriting the spirit of harmony may help improve the doctor-patient communication competence among medical personnel.
表1 超声医学科医患沟通经历及医患沟通自评情况(n=92) |
项目 | 分类 | 人数(%) | |
---|---|---|---|
是否认同协和办院理念、协和精神 | 完全不同意 | 1(1.1) | |
不同意 | 1(1.1) | ||
中立 | 2(2.2) | ||
同意 | 34(36.9) | ||
强烈同意 | 54(58.7) | ||
获得过医患沟通方面的正向经历 | 是 | 51(55.4) | |
否 | 41(44.6) | ||
遭遇负面医患沟通经历的频率 | 几乎从不 | 26(28.2) | |
很少 | 55(59.8) | ||
有时 | 10(10.9) | ||
经常 | 1(1.1) | ||
几乎所有时间 | 0(0) | ||
负面经历对生活和工作是否造成影响 | 完全不同意 | 6(6.5) | |
不同意 | 14(15.2) | ||
中立 | 36(39.2) | ||
同意 | 35(38.0) | ||
强烈同意 | 1(1.1) | ||
对建立和谐医患关系的自信心 | 完全不自信 | 0(0) | |
略微自信 | 5(5.4) | ||
中等自信 | 40(43.5) | ||
相当自信 | 27(29.4) | ||
非常自信 | 20(21.7) | ||
对自己医患沟通表现评价 | 非常不足 | 0(0) | |
稍显不足 | 4(4.3) | ||
中立 | 26(28.3) | ||
中等优秀 | 42(45.7) | ||
非常优秀 | 20(21.7) |
表2 人文素养得分与医患沟通自评情况(分, |
项目 | 人数 | 人文素养 | 医患沟通自信心和沟通能力自评 |
---|---|---|---|
人员类别 | |||
医师 | 58 | 10.0±1.2 | 7.6±1.2 |
医辅人员 | 34 | 8.5±1.8 | 7.2±1.2 |
t值 | 4.459 | 1.603 | |
P值 | 0.001 | 0.112 | |
工作年限 | |||
<5年 | 45 | 9.5±1.6 | 7.2±1.1 |
5~10年 | 30 | 9.0±1.7 | 7.4±1.3 |
>10年 | 17 | 10.1±1.3 | 7.9±1.2 |
F值 | 2.724 | 1.851 | |
P值 | 0.071 | 0.163 | |
医师职称 | |||
初级 | 36 | 9.8±1.2 | 7.3±1.2 |
中级 | 11 | 10.2±1.1 | 7.4±1.0 |
高级 | 11 | 11.0±1.0 | 8.4±1.2 |
F值 | 4.904 | 3.607 | |
P值 | 0.01 | 0.031 | |
学历 | |||
专科及以下 | 31 | 8.5±1.7 | 7.1±1.2 |
本科 | 10 | 9.0±1.7 | 7.1±1.2 |
硕士 | 38 | 9.8±1.2 | 7.2±1.2 |
博士 | 13 | 10.3±1.1 | 8.0±1.1 |
F值 | 6.117 | 3.796 | |
P值 | 0.001 | 0.013 | |
是否经历医患沟通负面事件 | |||
是 | 66 | 9.2±1.3 | 7.4±1.2 |
否 | 26 | 9.8±1.3 | 7.6±1.3 |
t值 | -2.173 | 0.725 | |
P值 | 0.032 | 0.47 |
1 |
Grassi L, Caruso R, Costantini A. Communication with patients suffering from serious physical illness [J]. Adv Psychosom Med, 2015,34: 10-23.
|
2 |
Pollard N, Lincoln M, Nisbet G, et al. Patient perceptions of communication with diagnostic radiographers [J]. Radiography (Lond),2019, 25(4): 333-338.
|
3 |
Aminololama-Shakeri S, Soo MS, Grimm LJ, et al. Radiologist-patient communication: current practices and barriers to communication in breast imaging [J]. J Am Coll Radiol, 2019, 16(5): 709-716.
|
4 |
Rockall AG, Justich C, Helbich T, et al. Patient communication in radiology: moving up the agenda [J]. Eur J Radiol, 2022, 155: 110464.
|
5 |
Doyle C, Lennox L, Bell D. A systematic review of evidence on the links between patient experience and clinical safety and effectiveness[J]. BMJ Open, 2013, 3(1): e001570.
|
6 |
史丽丽, 赵晓晖, 姜忆南, 等. 医学生临床沟通技能课程设置及效果自评 [J]. 基础医学与临床, 2012, 32(11): 1367-1370.
|
7 |
林霖, 张一休, 陈程, 等. 基于需求分析的超声医学科住院医师晨课建设及优化 [J]. 基础医学与临床, 2022, 40(2): 261-264.
|
8 |
张一休, 欧阳云淑, 郭为衡, 等. 超声医学科医患沟通现状及培训需求调查 [J]. 基础医学与临床, 2015, 35(4): 572-575.
|
9 |
Cämmerer J, Martin O, Rockenbauch K. Learning Doctor-Patient Communication-Evaluating the effectiveness of the communication training course at Leipzig University from the students' point of view[J]. GMS J Med Educ, 2016, 33(3): Doc43.
|
10 |
沙悦, 方卫纲, 黄晓明, 等. 北京协和医院内科住院医师医患沟通负面经历调查 [J]. 医学与哲学, 2011, 32(13): 41-42, 50.
|
11 |
段文利. “协和精神”指引医院科学发展 [J]. 医学与哲学: 人文社会医学版, 2014, 35(2A): 64-65.
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |