|
||||
|
|
Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition) >
2020 , Vol. 17 >Issue 02: 131 - 135
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2020.02.007
Hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography for assessment of uterine malformations and patency of fallopian tube
Received date: 2019-07-01
Online published: 2020-02-22
To investigate the practical value of real-time three-dimensional hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography(RT-3D-HyCoSy) in fertile patients with uterine malformation.
Thirty-four patients with uterine malformations diagnosed by RT-3D-HyCoSy were selected at the West China Second University Hospital from January 2015 to April 2019. The patients were examined by RT-3D-HyCoSy to evaluate uterine malformations and the patency of fallopian tubes. The types of uterine malformations and the causes of failure to evaluate the patency of fallopian tubes were analyzed.
A total of 34 patients were diagnosed withuterine malformations, including 13 (38.2%) cases of septate uterus, 12 (35.3%) cases of unicornuate uterus, 6 (17.7%) cases of didelphus, and 3 (8.8%) cases of arcuate uterus. Among the 34 cases included, there were 4 missing fallopian tubes, 34 unobstructed fallopian tubes, 6 partially obstructed fallopian tubes, and 9 obstructed fallopian tubes; 15 fallopian tubes could not be evaluated, of which 8 were unicornuate uterus with residual horn uterus, 4 were didelphus, and 3 were complete septate uterus with one fallopian unevaluable. The main reason for not being evaluable was the failure of uterine catheterization.
For infertility patients with uterine malformation, RT-3D-HyCoSy can not only identify the types of uterine malformation, but also accurately assess the patency of fallopian tubes, representing an important and effective means to screen the causes of infertility. However, some fallopian tubes can not be evaluated due to the failure of uterine catheterization
Xin Chen , Hong Luo . Hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography for assessment of uterine malformations and patency of fallopian tube[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2020 , 17(02) : 131 -135 . DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2020.02.007
| 1 | 华克勤，丰有吉. 实用妇产科学 [M]. 3版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2013: 633. |
| 2 | 韩文莉，马乐. 子宫畸形与妊娠结局的关系及处理 [J]. 医学综述, 2017, 23(2): 286-289. |
| 3 | Marana R, Ferrari S, Merola A, et al. Role of a mini-invasive approach in the diagnosis and treatment of tubo-peritoneal infertility as an altenative to IVF [J]. Minerva Ginecol, 2011, 63(1): 1-10. |
| 4 | 张新玲，古健，黄泽萍, 等. 经阴道实时三维超声造影评价输卵管通畅性的初步研究 [J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2013, 22(11): 970-973. |
| 5 | The American Fertility Society. The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion， tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, müllerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions [J]. Fertil Steril, 1988, 49(6): 944-955. |
| 6 | Ludwin A, Pityński K, Ludwin I, et al. Two- and three-dimensional ultrasonography and sonohysterography versus hysteroscopy with laparoscopy in the differential diagnosis of septate, bicornuate, and arcuate uteri [J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 20(1): 90-99. |
| 7 | Ludwin A, Ludwin I, Kudla M, et al. Reliability of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology/European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy and American Society for Reproductive Medicine classification systems for congenital uterine anomalies detected using three-dimensional ultrasonography [J]. Fertil Steril. 2015, 104(3): 688-697. |
| 8 | Grimbizis GF, Camus M, Tarlatzis BC, et al. Clinical implications of uterine malformations and hysteroscopic treatment results [J]. Hum Reprod Update, 2001, 7(2): 161-174. |
| 9 | Yuna Z, Yuhuab S, Zijiangb C, et al. Effect of Mullerian duct abnormalities on fertility outcomes and mutation of HOXA13 gene [J]. Prog Obstet Gynecol, 2012, 21 (3): 197-199, 204. |
| 10 | 朱兰，郎景和. 子宫发育异常的病因学研究 [J]. 国外医学妇产科学分册, 2003, 30(5): 287-289. |
| 11 | Chan YY, Jayaprakasan K, Zamora J, et al. The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review [J]. Hum Reprod Update, 2011, 17(6): 761-771. |
| 12 | 蔡爱露，刘炜，赵丹, 等. 三维超声成像技术与子宫输卵管碘油造影术诊断先天性子宫畸形的比较 [J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2008, 24(8): 745-748. |
| 13 | 梁娜，吴青青，高凤云, 等. 经阴道三维子宫输卵管超声造影诊断先天性子宫畸形的应用价值 [J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2015, 31(6): 543-545. |
| 14 | Lo Monte G, Capobianco G, PivaI, et al. Hysterosalpingo contrast sonography (HyCoSy): let's make the point! [J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2015, 291(1): 19-30. |
| 15 | Liang N, Wu QQ, Li JH, et al. Causes of misdiagnosis in assessing tubal patency by transvaginal real-time three-dimensional hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography [J]. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992), 2019, 65(8): 1055-1060. |
| 16 | Gao YB, Yan JH, Yang YD, et al. Diagnostic value of transvaginal four-dimensional hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography combined with recanalization in patients with tubal infertility [J]. Niger J Clin Pract, 2019, 22(1): 46-50. |
| 17 | Wang W, Zhou Q, Gong Y, et al. Assessment of Fallopian Tube Fimbria Patency With 4-Dimensional Hysterosalpingo-Contrast Sonography in Infertile Women [J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2017, 36(10): 2061-2069. |
| 18 | 石富文，杨敏，顾小宁, 等. 经阴道四维超声子宫输卵管造影评估不孕症患者输卵管通畅性 [J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2019, 35(5): 730-734. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
|
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved. Tel: 010-51322630、2632、2628 Fax: 010-51322630 E-mail: csbjb@cma.org.cn Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd |