Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited
Abdominal Ultrasound

Transesophageal ultrasound for evaluation of effect of dexmedetomidine on cardiac output in patients with laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia at different ages

  • Hu Liu ,
  • Ruiting Wang ,
  • Jingjing Lyu ,
  • Bin Wang
Expand
  • 1. Department of Anesthesiology, Anhui Medical University Affiliated Provincial Hospital, Hefei 230001, China
    2. Department of Anesthesiology, Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu 241001, China
Wang Ruiting, Email:

Received date: 2020-09-11

  Online published: 2021-02-01

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the value of ransesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in evaluating the effect of dexmedetomidine (Dex) on cardiac output and cardiovascular response in patients with laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia at different age groups.

Methods

A total of 120 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia at our hospital from June 2017 to June 2019 were selected, and according to age, they were divided into a youth group (20-39 years old, 37 patients), middle-aged group (40-59 years old, 41 patients), and elderly group (≥60 years old, 42 patients). All patients were given Dex when hemodynamics stabilized after induction of anesthesia. Before Dex injection after induction of anesthesia (T0) and at Dex injection for 10 min (T1), 30 min, and Dex injection for 60 min (T3) after induction of anesthesia, TEE was used to measure patients' heart rate, mean arterial pressure (MAP), blood oxygen saturation (SpO2), velocity time integral (VTI), stroke volume (SV), cardiac output, visual analog scale (VAS) score, and Ramsay sedation score. Plasma cortisol and blood sugar and epinephrine at each time point were measured. Cardiovascular adverse reactions and the occurrence of agitation were recorded. The paired t-test or chi square test was used for between-group comparisons, and one-way ANOVA and repeated measures ANOVA were used for comparisons among three groups.

Results

The heart rate, MAP, and SV at T3 and the cardiac output at T2 and T3 were significantly lower than those at T0 in the youth group and middle-aged group (P<0.05). The heart rate, MAP, and SV at T1, T2, and T3 and the cardiac output at T2 and T3 were significantly lower than those at T0 in the elderly group (P<0.05). The heart rate, MAP, SV, and cardiac output at T2 and T3 in the elderly group were significantly lower than those of the youth group and middle-aged group at the same time points (P<0.05). Plasma cortisol and blood sugar at T3 and plasma epinephrine at T2 and T3 were significantly higher than those at T0 in the youth group and middle-aged group (P<0.05). Plasma cortisol and blood sugar at T2 and T3 and plasma epinephrine at T1, T2, and T3 were significantly higher than those at T0 in the elderly group (P<0.05). Plasma cortisol at T3, blood sugar at T2 and T3, and plasma epinephrine at T1, T2, and T3 in the elderly group were all significantly higher than those of the young and middle-aged groups at the same time points (P<0.05). The VAS scores and Ramsay sedation scores at T1, T2, and T3 in the young, middle-aged, and elderly groups were all significantly lower than those at T0 (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the scores between the groups (P>0.05). The incidence of hypotension and bradycardia in the elderly group was significantly higher than that in the young group and middle-aged group (χ2=4.702, 5.194, 6.766, and 4.822, P=0.030, 0.023, 0.009, and 0.028, respectively).

Conclusion

Dex at the same dose has significantly different cardiovascular response in general anesthesia patients of different ages, and it has a more obvious impact on the hemodynamics and cardiac output of elderly patients. Elderly patients are more likely to have cardiovascular adverse reactions such as hypotension and bradycardia.

Cite this article

Hu Liu , Ruiting Wang , Jingjing Lyu , Bin Wang . Transesophageal ultrasound for evaluation of effect of dexmedetomidine on cardiac output in patients with laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia at different ages[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2021 , 18(02) : 199 -206 . DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2021.02.014

References

1
Chilkoti GT, Karthik G, Rautela R. Evaluation of postoperative analgesic efficacy and perioperative hemodynamic changes with low dose intravenous dexmedetomidine infusion in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy-a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial [J]. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol, 2020, 36(1): 72-77.
2
赵歆, 高鸿, 王竹梅, 等. 妇科腹腔镜手术二氧化碳气腹合并体位改变对心脏电生理稳定性的影响 [J]. 实用医学杂志, 2017, 33(9): 1461-1463.
3
Sen O, Erdogan DY. Effects of different levels of end-expiratory pressure on hemodynamic, respiratory mechanics and systemic stress response during laparoscopic cholecystectomy [J]. Braz J Anesthesiol, 2017, 67(1): 28-34.
4
张晋峰, 郭浩, 王治, 等. 围术期 Flotrac/Vigileo 与经食管超声心动图监测心输出量相关性比较 [J]. 中国基层医药, 2016, 23(17): 2605-2608.
5
Panchgar V, Shetti AN, Sunitha HB, et al. The Effectiveness of intravenous dexmedetomidine on perioperative hemodynamics, analgesic requirement, and side effects profile in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia [J]. Anesth Essays Res, 2017, 11(1): 72-77.
6
邓彩英. 麻醉诱导前负荷剂量右美托咪定静注及术中持续泵注对冠心病择期非心脏手术患者血清cTnI、GP-BB水平的影响 [J]. 现代中西医结合杂志, 2019, 28(11): 1220-1224.
7
曾庆玲, 唐培佳, 陈敬祥. 右美托咪定和丙泊酚静脉镇静对心脏瓣膜置换患者血流动力学和术后谵妄影响的比较 [J]. 岭南心血管病杂志, 2020, 26(3): 297-301.
8
周志鹏, 宋歌, 王航, 等. 不同剂量右美托咪定对全身麻醉诱导期血流动力学及心血管反应的影响 [J]. 现代中西医结合杂志, 2017, 26(35): 3975-3979.
9
唐红. 经食管超声心动图检查规范解读 [J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2017, 33(3): 323-324.
10
Mohammadzade AR, Esmaili F. Comparing hemodynamic symptoms and the level of abdominal pain in high- versus low-pressure carbon dioxide in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy [J]. Indian J Surg, 2018, 80(1): 30-35.
11
唐小兵, 张超, 周涛, 等. 不同CO2压力对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术患者术中应激反应及胃肠功能的影响 [J]. 局解手术学杂志, 2020, 29(4): 308-312.
12
Trivedi S, Kumar R, Tripathi AK, et al. A Comparative study of dexmedetomidine and midazolam in reducing delirium caused by ketamine [J]. J Clin Diagn Res, 2016, 10(8): 1-4.
13
Du J, Li JW, Jin J, et al. Intraoperative and postoperative infusion of dexmedetomidine combined with intravenous butorphanol patient-controlled analgesia following total hysterectomy under laparoscopy [J]. Exp Ther Med, 2018, 16(5): 4063-4069.
14
Kamali A, Taghizadeh M, Esfandiar M, et al. A Comparison of the effects of dexmedetomidine and propofol in controlling the hemodynamic responses after intubation: a double-blind, randomized, clinical trial study [J]. Open Access Maced J Med Sci, 2018, 6(11): 2045-2050.
15
柳金强, 肖开玉. 静脉泵注右美托咪定对老年患者心血管事件及血管活性药物使用的影响 [J]. 世界临床药物, 2020, 41(2): 128-132.
16
许瑞, 吕洁萍. 不同负荷剂量右美托咪定对老年后腹腔镜患者心率变异性及血流动力学的影响 [J]. 山西医科大学学报, 2017, 48(11): 1186-1190.
17
李依麦. 不同剂量右美托咪定对老年LC患者围术期血流动力学及心率变异性的影响 [J]. 医学临床研究, 2017, 34(7): 1420-1422.
18
Zhao XN, Ran JH, Bajracharya AR, et al. Effect of different doses of dexmedetomidine on median effective concentration of propofol for anesthesia induction: a randomized controlled trial [J]. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 2016, 20(14): 3134-3143.
19
陈斌, 曹东航, 朱利君. 右美托咪定对妇科腹腔镜手术患者血流动力学、炎性因子及免疫功能的影响 [J]. 中国基层医药, 2017, 24(12): 1793-1797.
20
谢桂英. 预注右美托咪定对腹腔镜子宫切除术患者术中循环稳定的影响 [J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2020, 35(6): 1035-1038.
21
Kim MH, Lee KY, Bae SJ, et al. Intraoperative dexmedetomidine attenuates stress responses in patients undergoing major spine surgery [J]. Minerva Anestesiol, 2019, 85(5): 468-477.
22
徐一刚, 吴艳, 顾玲玲, 等. 不同剂量右美托咪定联合瑞芬太尼应用于腹部手术患者术后的效果观察 [J]. 实用医院临床杂志, 2020, 17(3): 204-207.
23
Cho JS, Kim SH, Shin S, et al. Effects of dexmedetomidine on changes in heart rate variability and hemodynamics during tracheal intubation [J]. Am J Ther, 2016, 23(2): 369-376.
24
王伟, 包晓航, 张瑗, 等. 右美托咪定持续泵注对不同年龄全麻患者镇静效果及血流动力学影响 [J]. 局解手术学杂志, 2016, 25(9): 673-676.
Outlines

/

Copyright © Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 010-51322630、2632、2628 Fax: 010-51322630 E-mail: csbjb@cma.org.cn
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd