|
||||
|
|
Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition) >
2021 , Vol. 18 >Issue 08: 782 - 787
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2021.08.013
Value of gastric wall thickness in ultrasonic screening of gastric lesions
Received date: 2020-07-09
Online published: 2021-09-09
To probe into the value of gastric wall thickness measured by oral contrast trans abdominal gastric ultrasonography in evaluating gastric lesions.
From January 2015 to December 2018, 3573 patients underwent gastroscopic examination and gastric ultrasonography at the Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University. The stomach cavity, gastric wall, and perigastric structure were observed by gastric ultrasonography, and the thickness of the gastric wall was measured. The results of gastric ultrasonography and gastroscopy were analyzed. The ROC curve of gastric wall thickness was plotted and the area under the ROC curve, the best cutoff value, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated. Consistency analysis was performed on the results of gastric wall thickness measured by gastric ultrasonography and gastroscopy in the diagnosis of gastric lesions using linear weighted Kappa test.
Twenty patients were confirmed with gastric cancer by postoperative pathology. Gastric ultrasonography screening revealed 18 cases of gastric cancer, which were proved to be gastric adenocarcinoma by pathology. Gastric ultrasonography missed and misdiagnosed two cases of gastric cancer each. Gastroscopy missed one case. The diagnostic criteria were surgical pathology, pathological results of gastroscopic biopsy, and combined gastroscopic clinical follow-up results. The ROC curves of normal and diseased gastric wall thickness were plotted according to the pathological results of gastroscopic biopsy and clinical follow-up results. The area under the ROC curve was 0.946 (95% CI: 0.930-0.962), the best cutoff value was 5.5 mm, and the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 97.5% and 98.3%, respectively. Gastric mass and non-mass were judged according to the results of gastroscopy and pathology, and the ROC curves of gastric mass and non-mass were plotted. The area under the ROC curve was 0.829 (95% CI: 0.758-0.900), the best cutoff value was 9.5 mm, and the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 79.7% and 75.9%, respectively. Based on the results of ROC curve analysis, different lesions were diagnosed according to the thickness of the gastric wall. Gastric wall thickness<6 mm was determined as normal or non-erosive gastritis, 6 mm≤gastric wall thickness≤9 mm was determined as erosive gastritis, and gastric wall thickness>9 mm was determined as mass. The consistency between the results of gastric wall thickness evaluation and endoscopic examination was analyzed. The Kappa value was 0.792 (P<0.001).
Evaluation of gastric wall thickness is consistent with the results of gastroscopy. Gastric ultrasonography, as a simple and rapid screening method for gastric diseases, is of great significance for screening gastric cancer and other gastric diseases. It is worth popularizing in people with routine physical examination.
Key words: Ultrasonography; Gastric cancer; Mass screening; Oral contrast agent
Sainan Guan , Xi Zhou , Cuiling Jian , Weiqiang Chen , Juan Fu , Changlin Song , Fan Yuan , Erjiao Xu . Value of gastric wall thickness in ultrasonic screening of gastric lesions[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2021 , 18(08) : 782 -787 . DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2021.08.013
| 1 | Khazaei S, Rezaeian S, Soheylizad M, et al. Global incidence and mortality rates of stomach cancer and the human development index: an ecological study [J]. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 2016, 17(4): 1701-1704. |
| 2 | GBD 2017 Stomach Cancer Collaborators. The global, regional, and national burden of stomach cancer in 195 countries, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2017 [J]. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2020, 5(1): 42-54. |
| 3 | 王静雷, 杨一兵, 耿云霞, 等. 1990-2017 年中国胃癌发病、患病及死亡状况趋势分析 [J]. 中国慢性病预防与控制, 2020, 28(5): 321-325. |
| 4 | Sugano K. Screening of gastric cancer in Asia [J]. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol, 2015, 29(6): 895-905. |
| 5 | Hamashima C. Systematic Review Group and Guideline Development Group for Gastric Cancer Screening Guidelines. Update version of the Japanese guidelines for gastric cancer screening [J]. Jpn J Clin Oncol, 2018, 48(7): 673-683. |
| 6 | Quach DT, Hiyama T, Gotoda T. Identifying high-risk individuals for gastric cancer surveillance from western and eastern perspectives: lessons to learn and possibility to develop an integrated approach for daily practice [J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2019, 25(27): 3546-3562. |
| 7 | 杜奕奇, 蔡全才, 廖专, 等. 中国早期胃癌筛查流程专家共识意见 (草案)(2017年, 上海) [J]. 胃肠病学, 2018, 23(2): 92-97. |
| 8 | 沈理, 章建全, 顾新刚, 等. 口服造影剂胃超声检查规范操作专家共识意见(草案)(2020年, 上海) [J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2020, 17(10): 933-952. |
| 9 | 胃癌诊疗规范(2018年版) [J/CD]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2019, 9(3): 118-144. |
| 10 | Shen L, Zhou C, Liu L, et al. Application of oral contrast trans-abdominal ultrasonography for initial screening of gastric cancer in rural areas of China [J]. Dig Liver Dis, 2017, 49(8): 918-923. |
| 11 | 郭心璋, 张武. 口服胃肠超声造影的临床应用 [J/CD]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2010, 7(3): 334-365. |
| 12 | 刘勇. 口服胃肠造影剂后超声在筛查小儿上消化道疾病中的应用研究 [J]. 现代消化及介入诊疗, 2015, 20(1): 16-18. |
| 13 | 庞书科, 王广鹏, 牛振利. 胃肠超声造影诊断胃十二指肠疾病的价值研究 [J]. 现代消化及介入诊疗, 2015, 20(1): 39-41. |
| 14 | Yazar FM, Baykara M, Karaa?a? M, et al. The role of conventional ultrasonography in the evaluation of antrum wall thickness in obese patients [J]. Obes Surg, 2016, 26(12): 2995-3000. |
| 15 | Liu Z, Ren W, Guo J, et al. Preliminary opinion on assessment categories of stomach ultrasound report and data system (Su-RADS) [J]. Gastric Cancer, 2018, 21(5): 879-888. |
| 16 | Raftopoulos SC, Kumarasinghe P, de Boer B, et al. Gastric intraepithelial neoplasia in a western population [J]. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2012, 24(1): 48-54. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
|
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved. Tel: 010-51322630、2632、2628 Fax: 010-51322630 E-mail: csbjb@cma.org.cn Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd |