Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited
Obstetric and Gynecologic Ultrasound

Ultrasound diagnosis of fetal single umbilical artery at 11~13+6 weeks of pregnancy and its correlation with chromosome abnormality

  • Shuang Liu 1 ,
  • Hongmei Dong 1 ,
  • Xiaohang Zhang 1 ,
  • Qian Ran 1 ,
  • Suzhen Ran , 1,
Expand
  • 1.Department of Ultrasound, Chongqing Health Center for Women and Children/Women and Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 401147, China
Ran Suzhen, Email:

Received date: 2020-11-18

  Online published: 2022-11-03

Copyright

Copyright by Chinese Medical Association No content published by the journals of Chinese Medical Association may be reproduced or abridged without authorization. Please do not use or copy the layout and design of the journals without permission. All articles published represent the opinions of the authors, and do not reflect the official policy of the Chinese Medical Association or the Editorial Board, unless this is clearly specified.

Abstract

Objective

To explore the feasibility of prenatal ultrasound in the diagnosis of single umbilical artery (SUA) in early pregnancy and its relationship with fetal chromosome abnormality.

Methods

The general information, ultrasonic characteristics, chromosome karyotype or microarray analysis results, and follow-up data of SUA fetuses diagnosed by ultrasound examination at 11~13+6 weeks at Chongqing Health Center for Women and Children/Women and Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from April 2017 to April 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. According to other ultrasound structural abnormalities combined, the patients were divided into either an isolated SUA group or a non-isolated SUA group. Enumeration data between the two groups were compared by the t test, and measurement data were compared by the χ2 test.

Results

Among 433 cases diagnosed with SUA by ultrasound at 11~13+6 weeks, those who did not conform to the SUA diagnosis by later review (n=31) and those who were lost to follow-up (n=42) were excluded, and a total of 360 patients met the SUA diagnosis, with a diagnostic accuracy of 92.1% (360/391). And 271 cases whose chromosome results were obtained were finally included. There were 202 (74.54%) cases of isolated SUA and 69 (25.46%) cases of non-isolated SUA; there was no statistical difference in general data between the two groups (P>0.05). There were 4 cases (1.98%, 4/202) of isolated SUA and 9 (13.04%, 9/69) cases of non-isolated SUA in the 13 fetuses with chromosomal abnormalities, and the latter group contained 1 (5.88%, 1/17) case with other abnormal soft indicators, 4 (11.43%, 4/35) cases with single malformation, and 4 (23.53%, 4/17) cases with multiple malformations; the differences between the 4 groups were statistically significant (χ2=19.99, P=0.002). Combined malformations were mainly malformations of the cardiovascular system, genitourinary system, and nervous system.

Conclusion

The accuracy of prenatal ultrasound in the diagnosis of single umbilical artery in early pregnancy is high. SUA is associated with chromosomal abnormalities in the fetus. The proportion of chromosomal abnormalities in isolated SUA is low. Non-solitary SUA chromosome abnormality has a high incidence, and the possibility of chromosome abnormality in fetuses with more complicated malformations is greater. When single umbilical artery is found by prenatal ultrasound in early pregnancy, doctors should be cautious of other soft indicators and malformation.

Cite this article

Shuang Liu , Hongmei Dong , Xiaohang Zhang , Qian Ran , Suzhen Ran . Ultrasound diagnosis of fetal single umbilical artery at 11~13+6 weeks of pregnancy and its correlation with chromosome abnormality[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2022 , 19(09) : 908 -914 . DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2022.09.007

目前单脐动脉被认为是提示胎儿结构畸形、染色体异常、宫内生长受限及不良妊娠结局的超声软指标1,主要的结构异常是心血管系统畸形,但所有器官系统都可能受到影响2。因此,在产前超声诊断中,尽早准确获得脐动脉数量的结果以及有无合并结构异常尤为重要。本文在妊娠11~13+6周即开始对胎儿脐动脉数量以及各系统结构进行检查,并随访整个孕期的超声检查结果,尽可能获得更多例数的染色体检查结果,旨在分析妊娠11~13+6周超声诊断单脐动脉及其与胎儿染色体检查结果的关系,为孕中、晚期检查方式的选择及产前咨询提供依据。

资料与方法

一、对象

检索2017年4月至2019年4月重庆市妇幼保健院/重庆医科大学附属妇女儿童医院超声科影像和传输系统中早孕期(妊娠11~13+6周)产前超声检查被诊断为单脐动脉的433例胎儿,排除后期复查否定单脐动脉诊断者、染色体检查结果缺失及失访病例,最终共纳入研究271例胎儿。孕妇年龄为(30.05±4.60)岁(范围19~44岁)。

二、仪器与方法

超声仪器:GE Voluson E8型号的彩色多普勒超声诊断仪,腹部探头,探头频率为2~5 MHz;阴道探头,探头频率为5~7 MHz。超声检查主要采用经腹部扫查,选择产前超声检查模式,如孕妇腹壁脂肪较厚或瘢痕遮挡等原因导致图像显示不满意,则可行经阴道超声辅助检查3。在早孕期(妊娠11~13+6周)孕妇行胎儿颈后透明层厚度(nuchal translucency,NT)检查时,常规筛查胎儿脐动脉数目及是否合并其他结构异常。发现胎儿合并其他软指标异常或畸形时,由另一名超声医师会诊后再出具报告。

三、单脐动脉胎儿分组及超声软指标

根据胎儿产前超声检查有无合并其他结构异常,分为孤立型单脐动脉(isolated single umbilical artery,iSUA)和非孤立型单脐动脉(non-isolated single umbilical artery,niSUA),niSUA又可分为单脐动脉合并其他软指标异常、单脐动脉合并单一畸形及单脐动脉合并多发畸形4。iSUA是指除单脐动脉外,胎儿2次以上产前超声检查未发现其他结构异常。niSUA以出生后影像学资料或尸检结果为准,若无则汇总胎儿产前超声检出的所有畸形。因胎儿发育是个动态变化的过程,结构异常没有发展到一定的阶段或程度,超声是无法发现的,所以在后续的随访过程中,如有新发现的结构异常,均纳入统计。其他超声软指标异常包括NT或者颈后皮肤皱褶增厚5、早孕期三尖瓣反流6、早孕期静脉导管频谱异常7、胆囊未显示8、巨膀胱9、侧脑室增宽10、迷走右锁骨下动脉11、永存左上腔静脉12、永存右脐静脉13、右位主动脉弓14、鼻骨缺失、颈部水囊瘤、脉络膜丛囊肿、心内强光斑、肠管回声增强、后颅窝池增宽、肱骨/股骨短小、肾盂分离15

四、纳入标准及排除标准

为了结果的可靠性,减少单次检查带来的漏误诊,告知所有在早孕期超声诊断单脐动脉的孕妇,需在4周后复查并预约孕中期胎儿系统超声及超声心动图检查。孕期至少进行2次产前超声检查且由至少2位超声医师(其中1位职称为副主任医师或以上)诊断为单脐动脉,则可认为是超声确诊单脐动脉。若孕妇仅行早孕期1次超声检查后失访则排除入组,仅行早孕期1次超声检查后自然流产或引产,脐动脉数目则以病理检查结果为准,若未行病理检查亦排除入组。

五、染色体检查

建议所有早孕期诊断单脐动脉的孕妇到本院产前遗传咨询门诊就诊,临床医师根据产前超声检查结果、孕妇年龄、身体状况、经济状况及自身意愿等因素综合考虑,给出孕妇染色体检查方式的建议。建议iSUA孕妇选择无创DNA产前检测技术,无创DNA检测高风险者及niSUA孕妇建议行羊水穿刺、脐血流穿刺、绒毛膜穿刺等确诊手段16。本文中染色体检查者共271例,包括引产或流产胎儿16例。无创DNA产前检查161例,羊水穿刺109例,引产后胎儿皮肤基因检测1例。

六、统计学分析

采用SPSS 26.0软件进行统计学分析。孕龄为符合正态分布的计量资料,以
x¯
±s表示,组间比较采用t检验;孕次、有无吸烟史、受孕方式、有无不良孕产史、各组染色体结果异常情况为计数资料,以例数(%)表示,组间比较采用χ2检验。采用Pearson相关分析单脐动脉各组与异常染色体结果的相关性,双侧检验。P<0.05则表示差异具有统计学意义。

结果

一、iSUA和niSUA病例的一般临床资料对比

271例入组单脐动脉病例中,超声共检出合并其他结构异常者69例(25.46%,69/271),即niSUA。iSUA组(202例)与niSUA组一般临床资料对比,差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05,表1)。
表1 iSUA及niSUA病例的一般临床资料对比
项目 iSUA组(n=202) niSUA组(n=69) 统计值 P
孕龄(岁,
x¯
±s
30.64±4.79 30.23±4.24 t=0.688 0.432
孕次 χ2=0.0035 0.953
1次 71 24
2次或更多 125 43
未知 6 2
有无吸烟史 χ2=0.0747 0.785
10 4
186 63
未知 6 2
受孕方式 χ2=0.0317 0.859
自然受孕 177 61
辅助生殖 19 6
未知 6 2
有无不良孕产史 χ2=0.0227 0.880
8 3
154 52
未知 40 14

注:iSUA为孤立型单脐动脉,niSUA为非孤立型单脐动脉;统计检验剔除了未知病例

二、niSUA组胎儿的结构异常分布

niSUA组69例病例中23例合并多发结构异常,46例合并单一结构异常。结构异常共计97个部位,其中以心血管系统异常最多见,占比50.5%(49/97),其余系统结构异常的占比分别为:泌尿生殖系统20.6%(20/97),四肢骨骼系统14.4%(14/97)、神经系统10.3%(10/97)以及其他4.1%(4/97)。结构异常检出时间大部分病例(81.2%,56/69)在孕16周后超声复查时,少部分病例(18.8%,13/69)由早孕期超声检出或尸检得出。

三、入组单脐动脉病例的染色体异常统计及结果分布

271例单脐动脉病例中,共有13例染色体异常,畸变率为4.80%(13/271),iSUA组畸变率为1.98%(4/202),niSUA组畸变率为13.04%(9/69)。其中2例(15.38%,2/13)为染色体数目异常(1例为13号染色体数目3条,1例为18号染色体数目3/2条),10例染色体结构异常(染色体重复5例,缺失3例,倒位1例,突变1例),1例染色体异常类型不明。
为分析单脐动脉合并结构异常与染色体异常的关系,将niSUA再分为3组(niSUA合并软指标异常、niSUA合并单一畸形和niSUA合并多发畸形),结果显示染色体异常发生率随合并异常的增多而升高,组间差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01,表2)。
表2 各组单脐动脉胎儿染色体结果异常分布情况
分组 获得染色体结果(例) 染色体异常[例(%)] 染色体异常种类
iSUA 202 4(1.98) 5号、10号染色体微重复各1例,6号染色体微缺失1例,4号、21号染色体倒位1例
niSUA合并软指标异常 17 1(5.88) 7q11.23微重复综合征1例
niSUA合并单一畸形 35 4(11.43) 1号染色体微重复1例,15号染色体约有50%的比例重复一个拷贝数1例,18号染色体数目3/2条1例,9号或11号染色体异常(具体不详)1例
niSUA合并多发畸形 17 4(23.53) 13号染色体数目3条1例,Rubinstein-Taybi综合征Ⅰ型相关基因CREBBP存在一处杂合突变1例,2号、4号染色体微缺失各1例

注:各组染色体异常发生率比较,差异具有统计学意义(χ2=19.99,P=0.002);iSUA为孤立型单脐动脉,niSUA为非孤立型单脐动脉

四、染色体结果异常的胎儿合并畸形部位的分布

13例染色体结果异常的胎儿中,有4例超声检查提示iSUA,1例合并软指标异常,8例合并多发或单一畸形。畸形部位中:心血管畸形6例(46.15%,6/13),泌尿生殖系统5例(38.46%,5/13),神经系统3例(23.07%,3/13),颜面部、消化系统各2例(15.4%,2/13),软指标异常1例(7.7%,1/13)。

五、各组单脐动脉与异常染色体结果的相关性分析

将上述各组单脐动脉与异常染色体结果进行线性分析,两者间存在正相关性(r=0.264,P<0.001),即单脐动脉组别的升高伴随着染色体结果异常概率的增加。

六、失访病例及引(流)产病例

本文统计了433例妊娠11~13+6周诊断单脐动脉的病例,在后续的随访中,失访42例(NT检查后未在本院继续产检),余下的391例中有31例在后续检查中排除单脐动脉,最终有360例病例满足单脐动脉的诊断标准,故本文中早孕期超声诊断单脐动脉的准确率为92.1%(360/391)。
本文统计的病例中共有87例引(流)产胎儿,其中有68例(68/87,78.16%)超声提示为niSUA,且有52例(52/87,59.77%)在超声检查中发现合并多发结构异常;87例引(流)产孕妇中的大多数(71/87,81.61%)未接受产前咨询关于染色体检查的建议,仅有16例(16/87,18.39%)获得了染色体检测结果。

七、4例特殊的iSUA胎儿的超声异常情况

在早孕期诊断iSUA且染色体结果正常胎儿的后续随访中,4例胎儿产前超声诊断为多发畸形:病例1,孕23+4周,系统超声检查提示:右肾缺如?异位肾?胸椎上段发育异常:肋骨融合;单脐动脉;超声心动图检查提示:主动脉横弓与动脉导管相通,考虑永存第五弓(C型);双上腔静脉,冠状静脉窦增宽;右锁骨下动脉迷走。病例2,孕22+6周,系统超声检查提示:胸5椎体蝴蝶椎;门静脉走行变异;单脐动脉;超声心动图检查提示:左心发育不良、二尖瓣狭窄、主动脉发育不良,双上腔静脉,冠状静脉增宽。病例3,孕22+5周,系统超声检查提示:十二指肠梗阻(图1);单脐动脉(图2);超声心动图检查提示:肺动脉吊带(图3)。病例4,孕18+2周,系统超声检查提示:唇腭裂(Ⅲ度),胎儿双侧脉络膜丛回声不均质,单脐动脉;超声心动图检查提示:室间隔完整型肺动脉闭锁。
图1 孕22+5周,系统超声检查示胎儿腹部可见“双泡征”,大泡与小泡间可见较窄的无回声区相通
图2 孕12+5周,胎儿颈后透明层检查中超声提示胎儿仅见右侧脐动脉,左侧脐动脉未显示
图3 孕22+5周,胎儿超声心动图检查示左肺动脉起自右肺动脉主干,自右向左绕行于食管及气管的后方,形成血管环

讨论

一、单脐动脉

脐带是孕期胎儿与母体之间进行物质及营养交换的纽带,正常脐带内存在2条脐动脉和1条脐静脉。脐带内仅存在1条脐动脉及1条脐静脉就称之为单脐动脉,在1870年首次由Hyrtl报道17。单脐动脉是胎儿最常见的产前诊断异常之一,据研究,其发生率为0.2%~2%18,发生机制尚不完全清楚,胚胎发育早期的血流动力学障碍似乎对其发生具有重要影响,另外可能的影响因素还有遗传、环境等。目前公认的主要有3种学说19:(1)单侧脐动脉原发性发育不全;(2)继发性单侧脐动脉萎缩或闭锁;(3)体柄尿囊动脉持续存在。脐动脉萎缩或闭锁被认为是最常见的原因,在实际工作中也会经常碰到这种情况,在妊娠前3个月的产前超声检查时可以显示2条脐动脉,但在孕中、晚期的产前超声检查中二维和彩色多普勒超声均只能显示单条的脐动脉,这部分胎儿并不在本文的讨论范围内。近年来还有关于脐动脉栓塞(umbilical artery thrombosis,UAT)的报道,产前彩色多普勒超声检查显示膀胱一侧脐动脉血流信号消失,但脐带断面仍可显示3个管状结构。单脐动脉与UTA的处理截然不同,单脐动脉侧重于对胎儿结构的筛查及遗传咨询,而UTA则更侧重于对胎儿宫内状态的评估20

二、早孕期产前超声诊断单脐动脉

超声医师关注的早孕期多普勒筛查脐动脉数目对胚胎是否安全,李胜利21认为妊娠11~13+6周应将胎儿膀胱两侧的脐动脉作为常规存图。操作上可以在观察完静脉导管后,探头偏转90°再向胎儿足侧移动,即可清楚地观察到脐动脉数目。在临床工作中应把握好超声参数和检查时间,早孕期筛查脐动脉数目利大于弊。
单脐动脉在孕中、晚期被反复研究过,虽然在孕早期推荐筛查脐动脉的数量,但通常不作为常规筛查的一部分3。因为以往的报道认为早孕期诊断单脐动脉的假阴性率较高22,但随着近年来超声仪器及技术的不断更新,产前超声医师水平的不断提高,越来越多的研究证明在妊娠11~13+6周左右即可通过超声筛查胎儿是否存在单脐动脉及其他合并畸形23;Martinez-Payo等3也得出类似结论,即早孕期诊断单脐动脉的特异度及敏感度均较高,分别约为99.8%和84.2%,值得注意的是,该数据是在经阴道及腹部超声联合扫查的基础上得出的。故在早孕期产前超声筛查胎儿单脐动脉及其他结构异常可以得出较为可靠的结果。
在早孕期筛查出单脐动脉后,通常会在4周后(妊娠16~18周)进行复查,在妊娠16周时绝大多数有明显畸形的胎儿可以被诊断出来,所以早孕期诊断单脐动脉有利于尽早发现大量的畸形病例3。另外,在前文中提到的UAT,超声表现为1条脐动脉血流消失,在临床工作中经常被误诊为单脐动脉,但二者的临床处理方式截然不同20。如果在早孕期进行胎儿脐动脉数目的筛查,可以为中、晚孕期超声区分UAT和单脐动脉提供参照,提高诊断的准确性。
本文中妊娠11~13+6周超声诊断单脐动脉的准确率为92.1%(360/391),与文献报道相符3。分析在随访中超声排除单脐动脉诊断的病例,原因可能是受胎儿体位因素、宫内活动度较大、仪器参数调节不当等因素影响,导致彩色多普勒血流成像显示不清而误诊。

三、单脐动脉胎儿结构异常及染色体结果分析

271例单脐动脉胎儿中检出结构异常69例(25.46%),共计97个部位,最常见畸形部位为心血管系统(50.5%),与以往的报道相符24, 25, 26
以往的文献报道单脐动脉胎儿染色体异常的发生率在1.3%~15.3%1823,以染色体数目异常常见,如13-三体和18-三体2。本文获得染色体结果的271例病例中有13例(4.80%)显示结果异常,但染色体数目异常仅2例(15.38%),1例为13-三体,1例为18号染色体3/2条。除1例染色体异常类型不明外,其余均为染色体部分结构异常。分析原因是本文中87例引(流)产胎儿中有大多数(52/87,59.77%)在超声检查中发现合并多发结构异常,但仅有16例(16/87,18.39%)获得了染色体结果,染色体检查结果缺失的胎儿没有纳入数据分析,导致结果可能存在偏倚。
值得注意的是,本文中有4例在早孕期筛查出iSUA且染色体检查结果正常的胎儿,在后续产前超声检查中筛查出严重畸形,占比0.15%(4/271)。这4个病例结构异常的发生涉及多个系统,且均表现出心血管系统的畸形,故产前诊断的医师应提醒孕妇胎儿发育是一个动态的过程,即使早孕期诊断iSUA且染色体检查结果正常者仍有出现重大畸形的可能性,虽然概率较低,但需按时规范产检,特别是完善中孕期的胎儿超声心动图检查,同时对产前诊断的超声医师具有一定的提醒作用,对于这部分胎儿需警惕是否合并其他结构异常,特别是心血管系统。

四、iSUA有无染色体检查的必要

目前iSUA是否需要染色体检查还尚有争议。以往文献报道约1.1%的iSUA存在胎儿基因异常的风险17,但近年来的研究似乎更倾向于iSUA不会增加胎儿基因遗传的概率27。本文获得染色体检查结果的iSUA胎儿中,4例(1.98%)异常,与Gornall等17得到的结果较接近,考虑到目前的医疗环境,在条件允许的情况下,建议早孕期诊断iSUA的胎儿在4周后(即孕16~18周)复查超声,如果得出相同的结论,仍然建议其积极进行无创DNA检查。
本文是1篇病例数目有限的回顾性研究,且没有获得孕妇及胎儿的更多一般临床资料,故未进行各组单脐动脉及染色体结果之间相关性的回归分析;另外还有很多引(流)产病例没有获得染色体结果,导致结果可能存在偏倚。
总之,在产前超声检查的过程中,如果超声医师发现胎儿存在单脐动脉,应特别注意检查胎儿有无合并其他软指标异常或结构畸形。当产前超声检查提示niSUA时,染色体异常的比例较iSUA高,应特别引起临床医师的重视,应建议孕妇行相应的检查以排除染色体异常,并定期超声随访。
早孕期产前超声诊断单脐动脉,对进行产前诊断的超声医师及超声设备均有较高的要求,但可以为产前诊断的临床医师提供较为及时的检查结果,方便其为孕妇孕中、晚期产前检查的选择提出建议。由于各项染色体检查项目有其最佳的检查时间,尽早诊断意味着孕妇可以有更多的选择,但在后续的妊娠过程中仍需随访复查。
1
Burshtein S, Levy A, Holcberg G, et al. Is single umbilical artery an independent risk factor for perinatal mortality? [J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2011, 283(2): 191-194.

2
Friebe-Hoffmann U, Hiltmann A, Friedl TWP, et al. Prenatally diagnosed single umbilical artery (SUA)-retrospective analysis of 1169 fetuses [J]. Ultraschall Med, 2019, 40(2): 221-229.

3
Martinez-Payo C, Cabezas E, Nieto Y, et al. Detection of single umbilical artery in the first trimester ultrasound: its value as a marker of fetal malformation [J]. Biomed Res Int, 2014, 2014: 548729.

4
涂艳萍, 尚宁, 张婕, 等. 超声诊断胎儿单脐动脉合并畸形及其与染色体异常的关系 [J]. 中国医学影像学杂志, 2019, 27(4): 309-312, 319.

5
Audibert F, De Bie I, Johnson JA, et al. No. 348-joint SOGC-CCMG guideline: update on prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy, fetal anomalies, and adverse pregnancy outcomes [J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 2017, 39(9): 805-817.

6
Scala C, Morlando M, Familiari A, et al. Fetal tricuspid regurgitation in the first trimester as a screening marker for congenital heart defects: systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Fetal Diagn Ther, 2017, 42(1): 1-8.

7
Rao R, Platt LD. Ultrasound screening: status of markers and efficacy of screening for structural abnormalities [J]. Semin Perinatol, 2016, 40(1): 67-78.

8
Shen O, Rabinowitz R, Yagel S, et al. Absent gallbladder on fetal ultrasound: prenatal findings and postnatal outcome [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2011, 37(6): 673-677.

9
Taghavi K, Sharpe C, Stringer MD. Fetal megacystis: a systematic review [J]. J Pediatr Urol, 2017, 13(1): 7-15.

10
Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM), Fox NS, Monteagudo A, et al. Mild fetal ventriculomegaly: diagnosis, evaluation, and management [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2018, 219(1): B2-B9.

11
Scala C, Leone Roberti Maggiore U, Candiani M, et al. Aberrant right subclavian artery in fetuses with Down syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2015, 46(3): 266-276.

12
Ari ME, Dogan V, Ozgur S, et al. Persistent left superior vena cava accompanying congenital heart disease in children: experience of a tertiary care center [J]. Echocardiography, 2017, 34(3): 436-440.

13
Lide B, Lindsley W, Foster MJ, et al. Intrahepatic persistent right umbilical vein and associated outcomes: a systematic review of the literature [J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2016, 35(1): 1-5.

14
D'Antonio F, Khalil A, Zidere V, et al. Fetuses with right aortic arch: a multicenter cohort study and meta-analysis [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2016, 47(4): 423-432.

15
Van den Hof MC, Wilson RD, Diagnostic Imaging Committee Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada, et al. Fetal soft markers in obstetric ultrasound [J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 2005, 27(6): 592-636.

16
马婷婷, 刘华平, 侯朝晖, 等. 无创DNA检测技术对胎儿染色体非整倍体疾病的筛查效果 [J]. 空军医学杂志, 2015, 31(4): 235-239.

17
Gornall AS, Kurinczuk JJ, Konje JC. Antenatal detection of a single umbilical artery: does it matter? [J]. Prenat Diagn, 2003, 23(2): 117-123.

18
Geipel A, Germer U, Welp T, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of single umbilical artery: determination of the absent side, associated anomalies, Doppler findings and perinatal outcome [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2000, 15(2): 114-117.

19
邓春艳, 王晓东, 余海燕. 胎儿单脐动脉的研究进展 [J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2015, 11(6): 786-788.

20
董虹美, 张晓航, 冉素真. 一条脐动脉栓塞的产前超声特征分析 [J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2020, 29(10): 892-896.

21
李胜利. 胎儿畸形产前超声诊断学 [M]. 2版. 北京: 人民军医出版社, 2017: 86.

22
Persutte WH, Hobbins J. Single umbilical artery: a clinical enigma in modern prenatal diagnosis [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 1995, 6(3): 216-229.

23
Granese R, Coco C, Jeanty P. The value of single umbilical artery in the prediction of fetal aneuploidy: findings in 12,672 pregnant women [J]. Ultrasound Q, 2007, 23(2): 117-121.

24
Arcos-Machancoses JV, Marin-Reina P, Romaguera-Salort E, et al. Postnatal development of fetuses with a single umbilical artery: differences between malformed and non-malformed infants [J]. World J Pediatr, 2015, 11(1): 61-66.

25
Hua M, Odibo AO, Macones GA, et al. Single umbilical artery and its associated findings [J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2010, 115(5): 930-934.

26
Wu YP, Tsai HF, Cheng YC, et al. Prenatal sonographic diagnosis of single umbilical artery: emphasis on the absent side and its relation to associated anomalies [J]. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol, 2014, 53(2): 197-201.

27
Malova J, Bohmer D, Luha J, et al. Single umbilical artery and reproduction losses in Slovak population: relation to karyotype and fetal anomalies [J]. Bratisl Lek Listy, 2018, 119(6): 330-334.

Outlines

/

Copyright © Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 010-51322630、2632、2628 Fax: 010-51322630 E-mail: csbjb@cma.org.cn
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd