|
||||
|
|
Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition) >
2022 , Vol. 19 >Issue 09: 920 - 925
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2022.09.009
Effect of parity and delivery mode on levator hiatus area evaluated by pelvic floor three-dimensional ultrasound
Received date: 2020-12-03
Online published: 2022-11-03
Copyright
To observe the effect of parity and delivery mode on levator hiatus (LH) area evaluated by pelvic floor three-dimensional ultrasound, and to explore their relationship with pelvic organ prolapse (POP).
A total of 250 postpartum women at 42~60 days after childbirth were selected at the Material and Child Health Hospital of Hubei Province from April to December 2019, including 150 first vaginal delivery (FVD) women, 50 second vaginal delivery (SVD) women, and 50 cesarean section (CS) women. The change of LH area was observed at rest and on maximal Valsalva maneuver by pelvic floor three-dimensional ultrasound. And 120 undelivered women were selected as a control group. The detection rate of POP by pelvic floor ultrasound in each group was analyzed. All the subjects were divided into a POP group (n=167) and a non-POP group (n=203) according to whether they had POP or not. The LH area was compared between groups at rest and on maximal Valsalva maneuver. ANOVA was used to compare LH area among different groups. The t-test was used to compare LH between the POP group and non-POP group. The difference of POP detection rate between different groups was analyzed by the χ2 test.
The LH areas at rest in the SVD group, FVD group, CS group, and control group were (16.59±3.12) cm2, (15.34±3.50) cm2, (13.09±2.78) cm2, and (11.09±2.47) cm2, respectively; the corresponding values on maximal Valsalva maneuver were (22.80±8.37) cm2, (18.46±6.63) cm2, (15.58±3.91) cm2, and (13.11±5.30) cm2, respectively. The LH area both at rest and on maximal Valsalva maneuver differed significantly among the groups (F=31.89 and 11.14, respectively, P<0.001), with the SVD group having the greatest values, followed by the FVD group, CS group, and control group. The detection rates of POP by pelvic floor ultrasound were 17.5%, 26.0%, 60.0%, and 86.0% in the control group, CS group, FVD group, and SVD group, respectively; although there was no significant difference between the CS group and control group, the differences between the following groups were statistically significant: SVD group vs FVD group (χ2=11.38, P<0.001); SVD group vs CS group (χ2=36.53, P<0.001); SVD group vs control group (χ2=70.55, P<0.001); FVD group vs CS group (χ2=17.36, P<0.001); FVD group vs control group (χ2=49.74, P<0.001). The LH areas in the POP group were significantly larger than those in the non-POP group both at rest [(14.88±3.49) cm2 vs (12.38±2.17) cm2, t=8.06, P<0.001] and on maximal Valsalva maneuver [(20.93±6.53) cm2 vs (15.59±3.50) cm2, t=9.50, P<0.001].
Different delivery modes and parity have different effects on the LH area. The larger the area, the greater the risk of POP. Three-dimensional ultrasound can measure the LH area of postpartum women in different states, so as to detect the change of pelvic floor structure early.
Xia Zhu , Yanduo Gao , Cai Xu , Wan Tang , Lei Xie , Qian Ge , Fenfang Chen , Sheng Zhao . Effect of parity and delivery mode on levator hiatus area evaluated by pelvic floor three-dimensional ultrasound[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2022 , 19(09) : 920 -925 . DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2022.09.009
1 |
白云, 徐莲, 刘菲菲, 等. 不同方式分娩后女性肛提肌损伤的断层超声观察 [J/CD]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2016, 13(3): 209-212.
|
2 |
李载红, 洪燕, 游佳, 等. 四维盆底超声评估生产方式及胎次对盆膈裂孔的影响 [J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志, 2016, 27(8): 576-579.
|
3 |
段丽, 李菊香, 楚宁宁, 等. 应用三维超声成像技术评估不同分娩方式对产后早期盆底结构的近期影响 [J]. 中国临床医生杂志, 2019, 47(3): 340-342.
|
4 |
秦学敏, 柏根基, 盛文伟, 等. 三维盆底超声检查联合盆底肌力评估在产后盆底功能中的应用 [J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2019, 3(12): 1112-1114.
|
5 |
|
6 |
邹霞, 杨秋红, 王慧芳, 等. 经会阴超声评估不同分娩方式对女性后盆腔器官的影响 [J]. 中囯妇幼保健, 2015, 30(20): 3397-3399.
|
7 |
|
8 |
林建群, 张逸仲, 许哲, 等. 三维彩超评估女性压力性尿失禁盆底病变的应用 [J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2015, 9(4): 51-54.
|
9 |
|
10 |
黄泽萍, 毛永江, 杨丽新, 等. 经会阴实时三维超声评估正常女性盆底结构的重复性研究 [J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2014, 23(11): 966-969.
|
11 |
刘茂春, 陈奎喜, 邱燕, 等. 三维超声用于评价阴道分娩产妇盆底肌肉功能的效果 [J]. 中国计划生育学杂志, 2020, 28(2): 288-290.
|
12 |
王丽珍, 冯才敏. 经会阴三维盆底超声检查在诊断经阴道分娩、剖宫产患者盆腔脏器脱垂的价值分析 [J]. 现代医用影像学, 2020, 29(3): 529-531.
|
13 |
刘瑞芳. 不同分娩方式对产后骨盆底功能的影响 [J]. 临床合理用药杂志, 2014, 7(7): 146.
|
14 |
|
15 |
杨慧燕, 温红, 陈子满. 实时三维超声评估分娩方式对经产妇盆底结构的近期影响 [J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2018, 34(8): 728-731.
|
16 |
靳梅, 陈晓敏, 张焱, 等. 初产妇与经产妇孕期尿失禁及盆底结构情况比较 [J]. 中国医学影像学杂, 2019, 27(12): 953-957.
|
17 |
徐英姿, 唐海林, 冯泽阳. 盆底超声检查观察二次经阴道分娩对女性盆底结构的近期影响 [J/CD]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2018, 15(3): 218-222.
|
18 |
|
19 |
|
20 |
|
21 |
|
22 |
|
23 |
朱兰, 朗景和. 女性盆底学 [M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2014: 43-50.
|
24 |
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved. Tel: 010-51322630、2632、2628 Fax: 010-51322630 E-mail: csbjb@cma.org.cn Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd |