|
||||
|
|
Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition) >
2022 , Vol. 19 >Issue 12: 1366 - 1372
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2022.12.009
Value of multi-modal ultrasound in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant focal lesions of the salivary gland
Received date: 2021-06-09
Online published: 2023-01-19
Copyright
To assess the value of multi-modal ultrasound in the differential diagnosis of focal lesions of the salivary gland.
A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical and ultrasonic imaging data of 128 patients with focal lesions of salivary gland who were cured at the First Medical Center of PLA General Hospital from January 2018 to December 2020. Those patients were divided into either a benign group or a malignant group based on the pathology results as golden standard. All the patients underwent conventional ultrasound (US), real-time ultrasound elastography (RTE), and contrast enhanced ultrasound sonography (CEUS), and the features of all ultrasound images were recorded and analyzed. The χ2 test was used to compare the multimodal ultrasound image characteristics of the lesions between the two groups, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted. The diagnostic efficacy of US, US+RTE, US+CEUS, and US+RTE+CEUS in the diagnosis of focal salivary gland lesions was assessed by the area under the ROC curve (AUC).
Among the 128 patients included, 85 were confirmed to have benign lesions through pathological diagnosis, and 43 had malignant lesions. The incidence of sharpness of the border and regularity of the shape on US was significantly higher in the benign group than in the malignant group (P<0.001). In the malignant group, 46.5% (20/43) of cases were classified as grade Ⅲ by RTE and 72.1% (31/43) were classified as type IIc by CEUS; the corresponding percentages in the benign group were only 16.5% (14/85) and 11.8% (10/85), respectively. When positivity obtained by either US or RTE was used to diagnose malignancy, the sensitivity, specificity, AUC, and Youden's index were 0.767, 0.800, 0.784, and 0.567, respectively. When positivity obtained by either US or CEUS was used to diagnose malignancy, the sensitivity, specificity, AUC, and Youden's index were 0.791, 0.882, 0.837, and 0.673, respectively. When positivity obtained by any one of US, RTE, and CEUS was used to diagnose malignancy, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value were 0.767, 0.941, 0.883, 0.868, and 0.889, respectively, and the AUC and Youden's index were 0.854 and 0.708, respectively.
Combined application of multi-modal ultrasound can improve the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant focal lesions of the salivary gland.
Liuqing Peng , Peng Han , Nan Li , Shuyuan Liang , Xiang Fei . Value of multi-modal ultrasound in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant focal lesions of the salivary gland[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2022 , 19(12) : 1366 -1372 . DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2022.12.009
1 |
|
2 |
|
3 |
李匡政, 江义霞, 范晓升, 等. 不同手术方式治疗腭部涎腺肿瘤的临床观察[J]. 微创医学, 2018, 13(5): 631-632, 662.
|
4 |
|
5 |
|
6 |
|
7 |
|
8 |
韩明丽, 史秋生, 陈红燕, 等. 超声鉴别诊断涎腺肿瘤良恶性的特征分析[J]. 临床超声医学杂志, 2020, 22(6): 458-461.
|
9 |
文宏, 何娇, 周琳, 等. 腮腺上皮来源性肿瘤超声图像特点与病理对照研究[J]. 医学影像学杂志, 2018, 28(11): 1818-1821.
|
10 |
李巧珍, 肖萤, 徐乐天, 等. 超声弹性成像技术在腮腺良恶性占位性病变鉴别诊断中的应用价值[J/CD]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2012, 9(9): 809-812.
|
11 |
岳林先. 浅表淋巴结病变的超声诊断[J]. 四川医学, 2004, 25(7): 822-823.
|
12 |
|
13 |
|
14 |
|
15 |
|
16 |
|
17 |
|
18 |
|
19 |
|
20 |
苟加梅, 陈琴, 周果, 等. 超声造影对涎腺肿块定性诊断的初步研究[J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2013(2): 141-144.
|
21 |
蒋丽萍, 周爱云, 余美琴. CEUS鉴别诊断涎腺良恶性病变[J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2019, 35(4): 521-525.
|
22 |
陈丽羽, 周玲燕, 吴丽丽, 等. 超声造影在大涎腺良、恶性多形性腺瘤鉴别诊断中的价值[J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2017, 26(3): 259-263.
|
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
蒋丽萍. 超声检查在涎腺肿瘤中的应用[D] 南昌:南昌大学, 2020.
|
26 |
邵琦, 陈丽羽, 徐栋, 等. 31例涎腺黏液表皮样癌的超声表现与病理分析[J]. 肿瘤学杂志, 2016, 22(11): 969-971.
|
27 |
张旭, 刘丹, 黄品同. 多模态超声在颈部淋巴瘤诊断中的价值[J/CD]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2020, 17(10): 987-992.
|
28 |
|
29 |
曹文斌, 陈琴, 岳林先, 等. 原发性腮腺淋巴瘤常规超声造影表现及相关文献复习[J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2019, 35(2): 180-183.
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved. Tel: 010-51322630、2632、2628 Fax: 010-51322630 E-mail: csbjb@cma.org.cn Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd |