Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited
Obstetric and Gynecologic Ultrasound

Ultrasound-related risk factors for stillbirth in the third trimester

  • Zhang Zhang ,
  • Huang Huang ,
  • Bao Bao ,
  • Lu Lu ,
  • Shi Shi
Expand
  • 1. Department of Ultrasound, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310006, China

Received date: 2020-01-22

  Online published: 2020-08-01

Abstract

Objective

To identify the ultrasound-related risk factors for stillbirth in the third trimester.

Methods

Seventy-eight cases of stillbirth at Hangzhou First People's Hospital from January 2009 to December 2018 were enrolled in this study as a case group. One hundred and fifty-six normal pregnant women were included as a control group. The patients in the case group were further divided into two subgroups: high risk subgroup (with at least one clinical risk factor) and low risk group (without any clinical risk factor). The abnormal ultrasonic findings in the third trimester were collected and classified as abnormal umbilical cord, abnormal placenta, abnormal amniotic fluid, fetal anomalies, and maternal uterine abnormality. Logistic regression was used to perform statistical analyses, with odds ratios (ORs) of the included variables calculated.

Results

In the case group, 51 cases were classified into the high risk subgroup and 27 into the low risk subgroup. Overall, only fetal anomalies detected by ultrasound could be considered as the independent risk factor for stillbirth (Y=-0.798+ 1.491X, OR=4.441, P=0.009). In the high risk subgroup, abnormal umbilical cord (OR=2.805, P=0.023), abnormal placenta (OR=3.386, P=0.028), and fetal anomalies (OR=8.909, P=0.002) could be considered as the independent risk factors for stillbirth (Y=-1.206+ 2.187×fetal anomalies+ 1.220×abnormal placenta+ 1.031×abnormal umbilical cord).

Conclusion

In the multiple abnormal findings by ultrasound, only fetal anomalies could be considered as an independent risk factor for stillbirth. For pregnant women with clinical high risk factors, abnormal umbilical cord, abnormal placenta, and fetal anomalies could be considered as the independent risk factors for stillbirth.

Cite this article

Zhang Zhang , Huang Huang , Bao Bao , Lu Lu , Shi Shi . Ultrasound-related risk factors for stillbirth in the third trimester[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2020 , 17(08) : 770 -775 . DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2020.08.011

References

1
谢幸, 苟文丽. 妇产科学 [M]. 8版, 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2013: 64-74.
2
Blencowe H, Cousens S, Jassir FB, et al. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of stillbirth rates in 2015, with trends from 2000: a systematic analysis[J]. Lancet Glob Health, 2016, 4(2): e98-e108.
3
Goldenberg RL, McClure EM, Bhutta ZA, et al. Stillbirths: the vision for 2020[J]. Lancet, 2011, 377(9779): 1798-1805.
4
GBD 2015 Child Mortality Collaborators. Global, regional, national, and selected subnational levels of stillbirths, neonatal, infant, and under-5 mortality, 1980-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015[J]. Lancet, 2016, 388(10053): 1725-1774.
5
李欢喜,吴泉锋,魏玮, 等. 妊娠晚期单胎死胎的原因分析[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2019, 34(13): 2925-2927.
6
李平平,张雪娟,白云. 215例晚孕期死胎相关因素分析[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2019, 34(12): 2730-2733.
7
刘海虹,李雪兰. 宫内死胎原因分析及防治措施392例探讨[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2018, 34(2): 199-202.
8
熊钰,夏和霞,王宜生, 等. 死胎的高危因素分析[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2017, 52(12): 811-817.
9
Machin GA, Ackerman J, Gilbert-Barness E. Abnormal umbilical cord coiling is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes[J]. Pediatr Dev Pathol, 2000, 3(5): 462-471.
10
张莉英,余艳红,苏桂栋, 等. 胎盘提前钙化的超声征象与胎盘细胞凋亡的关系[J]. 现代妇产科进展, 2007, 16(2): 130-131, 133.
11
冯莉,邢爱耘,战军, 等. 609例死胎相关因素分析[J]. 华西医学, 2013, 28(1): 59-62.
12
胡美娜,张颖,赵温. 妊娠晚期649例死胎的临床分析[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2017, 52(12): 822-827.
13
刘景超,赵丽萍,李丹凤, 等. 114例死胎的临床特征及相关因素分析[J]. 中国医刊, 2018, 53(2): 221-223.
14
余从琴. 彩色多普勒超声对妊高症胎儿宫内窘迫的诊断价值[J]. 现代医用影像学, 2019, 28(1): 134-135.
15
罗素凤,陈薇. 61例胎盘脐带入口的产前超声诊断分析[J]. 影像研究与医学应用, 2019, 3(8): 138-139.
16
陈丹,邹震宇. 中孕期超声检查诊断帆状胎盘的应用分析[J]. 浙江医学, 2017, 39(22): 2035-2036.
17
王谢桐. 胎儿超声异常与病毒感染[J]. 实用妇产科杂志, 2018, 34(12): 888-890.
18
门杰,曾宁,张宇, 等. 孕期梅毒妇女胎儿宫内感染的超声影像研究[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2017, 27(14): 3285-3287, 3349.
19
李幸丽,关灿彬. 实验室检查联合超声对孕妇TORCH感染诊断的意义研究[J]. 临床研究, 2019, 27(7): 140-142.
20
刘勤,汪龙霞,王艳秋, 等. 产前胎盘植入超声图像特征及漏诊原因分析[J/CD]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2017, 14(11): 851-856.
Outlines

/

Copyright © Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 010-51322630、2632、2628 Fax: 010-51322630 E-mail: csbjb@cma.org.cn
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd