切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2015, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (06) : 459 -466. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2015.06.009

所属专题: 文献

腹部超声影像学

影响肝细胞癌射频消融术后疗效的相关因素分析
罗敏1, 时美欣1, 张巍1, 张羽1, 杨秀华1,(), 丁红2   
  1. 1. 150001 哈尔滨医科大学第一临床医学院腹部超声科
    2. 150001 哈尔滨,黑龙江省第二医院物理诊断科
  • 收稿日期:2014-09-15 出版日期:2015-06-01
  • 通信作者: 杨秀华

The influence factors on therapeutic effect of radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma

Min Luo1, Meixin Shi1, Wei Zhang1, Yu Zhang1, Xiuhua Yang1,(), Hong Ding2   

  1. 1. Department of Abdominal Ultrasonography, the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150001, China
    2. Department of Physical Diagnosis, the Second Hospital of Heilongjiang Province, Harbin 150001, China
  • Received:2014-09-15 Published:2015-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Xiuhua Yang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Yang Xiuhua, Email:
引用本文:

罗敏, 时美欣, 张巍, 张羽, 杨秀华, 丁红. 影响肝细胞癌射频消融术后疗效的相关因素分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2015, 12(06): 459-466.

Min Luo, Meixin Shi, Wei Zhang, Yu Zhang, Xiuhua Yang, Hong Ding. The influence factors on therapeutic effect of radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2015, 12(06): 459-466.

目的

分析影响超声引导下射频消融术(RFA)治疗肝细胞癌(HCC)预后的相关因素。

方法

收集2008年5月至2012年6月哈尔滨医科大学附属第一医院进行RFA治疗且随访资料完整的HCC患者104例,共147个病灶。随访36个月,记录HCC患者生存情况,采用超声造影监测RFA术后HCC患者局部复发的情况。采用Kaplan-Meier法及Log-rank检验对影响HCC患者RFA术后预后的因素进行单因素分析,对单因素分析与HCC患者RFA术后预后有关的因素再采用Cox比例风险回归模型进行多因素分析。

结果

104例HCC患者RFA术后半年、1、2、3年生存率分别为96.1%、92.0%、80.0%、53.3%,中位生存时间19个月,RFA术后1年局部复发率为13.6%。单因素分析结果显示术前肝功能Child-Pugh分级、首发癌、术后肝内产生新发病灶、消融范围、首选RFA治疗等因素与HCC患者RFA术后生存率有关(χ2=7.119,P=0.008;χ2=20.485,P=0.000;χ2=14.160,P=0.000;χ2=11.825,P=0.001;χ2=7.979,P=0.005);多因素分析结果显示术前肝功能Child-Pugh分级、首发癌、术后肝内产生新发病灶为影响HCC患者RFA术后生存率的独立因素(P=0.001;P=0.005;P=0.003)。单因素分析结果显示,病毒标志物、首发癌、背景肝、肿瘤直径、肿瘤边界、邻近脏器或大血管、消融范围、首选RFA治疗等因素与HCC患者RFA术后1年局部复发率有关(χ2=7.234,P=0.007;χ2=9.083,P=0.003;χ2=7.791,P=0.005;χ2=13.042,P=0.000;χ2=20.657,P=0.000;χ2=58.615,P=0.000;χ2=6.681,P=0.010);多因素分析结果显示,肿瘤边界、消融范围为影响HCC患者RFA术后1年局部复发率的独立因素(P=0.017;P=0.002)。

结论

影响HCC患者RFA术后生存率的独立因素是术前肝功能Child-Pugh分级、首发癌、术后肝内产生新发病灶,影响HCC患者RFA术后1年局部复发率的独立因素是肿瘤边界、消融范围。为了提高HCC患者生存期、减少局部复发应对高危人群建立良好的观察随访制度,治疗中采取多学科合作方式及规范的治疗方案。

Objective

To evaluate the prognostic factors of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with treatment of ultrasound-guided pereutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA).

Methods

A total of 104 patients with 147 HCC tumors who had 36-month regular follow-up after percuatenous RFA therapy in the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University between May 2008 tand June 2012 were included in this study. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) was the main method in evaluating the therapeutic effect of RFA. Kaplan-Meier model and Log-rank test were used in univariate analysis, and Cox regression model was used in multivariate analysis to identify the independent factors on therapeutic effect of RFA.

Results

The 0.5-, 1-, 2-, 3-year overall survival rates after RFA were 96.1%, 92.0%, 80.0%, 53.3% respectively, and the median survival time was 19 months. 1-year local recurrence rate was 13.6%. The univariate analysis showed that Child-Pugh classification, original lesion condition, intrahepatic recurrence, ablative area, and RFA priority were related to survival rate (χ2=7.119, P=0.008; χ2=20.485, P=0.000; χ2=14.160, P=0.000; χ2=11.825, P=0.001; χ2=7.979, P=0.005). The Child-Pugh classification, original lesion condition, intrahepatic recurrence were identified as independent prognostic factors of survival rate (P=0.001; P=0.005; P=0.003). The univariate analysis showed that virus marker, original lesion condition, hepatic background, tumor diameter, tumor boundary, relation with adjacent organ and vessels, ablative area, RFA priority weresignificantly related to local recurrence rate (χ2=7.234, P=0.007; χ2=9.083, P=0.003; χ2=7.791, P=0.005; χ2=13.042, P=0.000; χ2=20.657, P=0.000; χ2=58.615, P=0.000; χ2=6.681, P=0.010). The ablative area and tumor boundary were identified as independent prognostic factors of local recurrence rate (P=0.017; P=0.002).

Conclusions

Child-Pugh classification, original lesion condition, intrahepatic recurrence were identified as independent prognostic factors of survival. And ablative area and tumor boundary were identified as independent prognostic factors of local rcurrence rate. In order to improve patient`s survival and reduce local recurrence in high-risk cases, it is importantant to establish appropriate follow-up plan and multidisciplinary cooperation framework within a standard treatment procedure.

图6 图5肝右叶肿瘤射频布针模式图。a>0.5 cm,b>0.5 cm
图7 104例肝细胞癌患者射频消融术后生存曲线
图8 104例肝细胞癌患者147枚病灶射频消融术后1年局部复发率
表1 影响肝细胞癌患者射频消融术后生存率的患者因素的单因素分析(%)
表2 影响肝细胞癌患者射频消融术后生存率的肿瘤因素单因素分析(%)
表3 影响肝细胞癌患者射频消融术后生存率的治疗因素单因素分析(%)
表4 影响肝细胞癌病灶射频消融术后1年局部复发率的患者因素单因素分析(%)
表5 影响肝细胞癌病灶射频消融术后1年局部复发率的肿瘤因素单因素分析(%)
表6 影响肝细胞癌病灶射频消融术后1年局部复发率的治疗因素单因素分析(%)
表7 影响肝细胞癌患者射频消融术后生存率的COX多因素分析
图9 术后肝内是否产生新发病灶肝细胞癌患者射频消融术后生存曲线比较
表8 影响肝细胞癌病灶射频消融术后1年局部复发率的COX多因素分析
图10 不同肿瘤边界肝细胞癌病灶射频消融术后1年局部复发率
图11 不同消融范围肝细胞癌病灶射频消融术后1年局部复发率
1
Tandon M, Pandey CK. Myocardial oxidative stress protection with sevoflurane versus propofol [J]. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2012, 29(6):296-297.
2
Minami Y, Kudo M. Radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: current status [J]. World J Radiol, 2010, 2(11):417-424.
3
中国抗癌协会肝癌专业委员会:原发性肝癌的临床诊断与分期标准 [J]. 中华肝脏病杂志, 2004, 9(Suppl):67-68.
4
Nishijima N, Ohsaki Y, Kita R, et al. Proposal of radicality grading as a criterion for therapeutic effectiveness of RFA against hepatocellular carcinoma, in relation to the local recurrence rate [J]. Kanzo, 2008, 49(5):192-199.
5
Chen MH, Yang W, Yan K, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of problematically located hepatocellular carcinoma: tailored approach [J]. Abdom Imaging, 2008, 33(4):428-436.
6
Hung HH, Chiou YY, Hsia CY, et al. Survival rates are comparable after radiofrequency ablation or surgery in pa-tients with small hepatocellular carcinomas [J]. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2011, 9(1):79-86.
7
吴杰,陈敏华,严昆, 等. 射频消融治疗中晚期肝细胞癌患者疗效及影响因素分析 [J]. 中华医学杂志, 2012, 92(11):735-738.
8
孔轶,李科. 原发性肝癌射频治疗后的预后影响因素分析 [J]. 中国肿瘤临床与康复, 2012, 19(6):495-498.
9
石铮,杨明智. 复发性肝癌的诊治 [J/CD]. 中华普通外科学文献:电子版, 2012, 6(5):381-385.
10
李杰,庄辉. 病毒性肝炎流行病学进展 [J]. 肝脏, 2012, 17(1):2-5.
11
陈杰,周振座,庄辉. 广西某医学院新生乙型肝炎疫苗接种情况及血清流行病学调查[J]. 中国病毒学杂志, 2012, 2(4):255-259.
12
Lencioni RA, Allgaier HP, Cioni D, et al. Small hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: randomized comparison of radiofrequency thermal ablation versus percutaneous ethanol injection [see comment] [J]. Radiology, 2003, 228(1):235–240.
13
Kim YS, Rhim H, Cho OK, et al. Intrahepatic recurrence after percutaneous radio- frequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: analysis of the pattern and risk factors [J]. Eur J Radiol, 2006, 59(3):432-441.
14
覃肖溪,杨红,何云, 等. 肝癌射频消融治疗后疗效及影响因素分析 [J]. 广西医科大学学报, 2013, 30(4):587-590.
15
Lencioni R, Cioni D, Della Pina C, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma: new options for image -guided ablation [J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2012, 17(4):399-403.
16
Kei SK, Rhim H, Choi D, et al. Local tumor progression after radiofrequency ablation of liver tumors: analysis of morphologic pattern and site of recurrence [J] AJR. Am J Roentgenol, 2008, 190(6):1544.
17
Livraghi T, Goldberg SN, Lazzaroni S, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma: radiofrequency ablation of medium and large lesions [J]. Radiology, 2000, 214(3):761-768.
18
文兆明. 肝癌射频消融后肝内局部复发的相关因素 [J]. 中国实验诊断学, 2011, 15(1):1929-1931.
19
Chen MH, Yang W, Yan K, et al. The role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in planning treatment protocols for hepatocellular carcinoma before radiofrequency ablation [J]. Clin Radiol, 2007, 62(8):752-760.
20
孙雅林. 超声造影在肝恶性肿瘤射频消融治疗疗效评估中的应用 [J]. 影像与介入, 2013, 20(9):100-101.
[1] 韩丹, 王婷, 肖欢, 朱丽容, 陈镜宇, 唐毅. 超声造影与增强CT对儿童肝脏良恶性病变诊断价值的对比分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 939-944.
[2] 王宏宇. 固定与活动平台假体在全膝关节置换术中的应用价值[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 871-876.
[3] 许正文, 李振, 侯振扬, 苏长征, 朱彪. 富血小板血浆联合植骨治疗早期非创伤性股骨头坏死[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 773-779.
[4] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[5] 张海涛, 康婵娟, 翟静洁. 胰管支架置入治疗急性胆源性胰腺炎效果观察[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 654-657.
[6] 陈垚, 徐伯群, 高志慧. 改良式中间上入路根治术治疗甲状腺癌的有效性安全性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 619-622.
[7] 杜锡林, 谭凯, 贺小军, 白亮亮, 赵瑶瑶. 肝细胞癌转化治疗方式[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 597-601.
[8] 唐灿, 李向阳, 秦浩然, 李婧, 王天云, 柯阳, 朱红. 原发性肝脏神经内分泌肿瘤单中心12例诊治与疗效分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 674-680.
[9] 崔佳琪, 吴迪, 陈海艳, 周惠敏, 顾元龙, 周光文, 杨军. TACE术后并发肝脓肿的临床诊治分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 688-693.
[10] 王楚风, 蒋安. 原发性肝癌的分子诊断[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 499-503.
[11] 王峰杰, 王礼光, 廖珊, 刘颖, 符荣党, 陈焕伟. 腹腔镜右半肝切除术治疗肝癌的安全性与疗效[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 517-522.
[12] 顾娇娇, 邹燕, 陈奕辰, 黄师菊, 张慧玲, 林楠. 基于简易营养评价精法评估肝癌患者出院后营养状况及其影响因素[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 534-539.
[13] 孟令展, 李虎, 俞鹏, 于燕宾, 曹李, 翟伟, 高远, 邵艳玲, 严锦, 朱震宇. ICG荧光染色在肝癌腹腔镜解剖性肝切除术中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 557-561.
[14] 韩冰, 顾劲扬. 深度学习神经网络在肝癌诊疗中的研究及应用前景[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 480-485.
[15] 何传超, 肖治宇. 晚期肝癌综合治疗模式与策略[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 486-489.
阅读次数
全文


摘要