切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2015, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (09) : 696 -701. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2015.09.006

所属专题: 文献

心血管超声影像学

三维应变斑点追踪显像技术评价高血压患者左心室收缩功能
牛海燕, 张敏郁, 丁桂春, 王建华   
  • 收稿日期:2015-04-10 出版日期:2015-09-01
  • 通信作者: 王建华
  • 基金资助:
    首都临床特色应用研究基金(Z121107001012143)

Evaluation of left ventricular systolic function in primary hypertension patients by three-dimensional strain imaging

Haiyan Niu, Minyu Zhang, Guichun Ding, Jianhua Wang   

  • Received:2015-04-10 Published:2015-09-01
  • Corresponding author: Jianhua Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang Jianhua, Email:
引用本文:

牛海燕, 张敏郁, 丁桂春, 王建华. 三维应变斑点追踪显像技术评价高血压患者左心室收缩功能[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2015, 12(09): 696-701.

Haiyan Niu, Minyu Zhang, Guichun Ding, Jianhua Wang. Evaluation of left ventricular systolic function in primary hypertension patients by three-dimensional strain imaging[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2015, 12(09): 696-701.

目的

应用三维应变斑点追踪显像(3D-STI)技术检测高血压患者左心室心肌组织应变特征,评价高血压患者左心室收缩功能的改变。

方法

选择2013年9月至2015年1月北京军区总医院收治的原发性高血压患者79例,其中左心室正常构型(LVN)42例,左心室肥厚(LVH)37例。另取同期健康体检者30名作为健康对照组。采集所有受检者心脏实时三维全容积成像图像,分析测定左心室射血分数(LVEF)、左心室心肌质量(LVM),得出左心室心肌质量指数(LVMI)。采用3D-STI技术测定所有受检者左心室整体纵向应变(LVGLS)、左心室整体径向应变(LVGRS)、左心室整体环向应变(LVGCS)、左心室整体面积应变(LVGAS)。采用单因素方差分析比较3组受检者LVMI、LVGLS、LVGRS、LVGCS、LVGAS差异,进一步组间两两比较采用LSD-t检验。采用Pearson相关分析比较高血压患者LVGLS、LVGAS与LVMI的相关性。

结果

健康对照组、高血压LVN组和高血压LVH组LVMI分别为88.5±10.2、102.4±13.5、128.0±17.2,高血压LVN组、高血压LVH组LVMI均高于健康对照组,高血压LVH组LVMI高于高血压LVN组,且差异均有统计学意义(t值分别为22.152、39.623、31.125,P均<0.05)。健康对照组、高血压LVN组和高血压LVH组LVGLS分别为(-22.2±5.8)%、(-17.6±5.2)%、(-13.7±4.5)%,LVGRS分别为(41.6±7.5)%、(38.8±8.6)%、(30.1±7.4)%,LVGCS分别为(-20.9±6.6)%、(-19.6±5.4)%、(-12.4±5.5)%,LVGAS分别为(-33.2±6.9)%、(-26.6±6.4)%、(-20.2±5.6)%。高血压LVN组、高血压LVH组LVGLS、LVGAS均低于健康对照组,高血压LVH组LVGLS、LVGAS均低于高血压LVN组,且差异均有统计学意义(LVGLS:t值分别为8.642、22.623、13.125,LVGAS:t值分别为12.591、30.332、21.302;P均<0.05);高血压LVN组LVGRS、LVGCS均低于健康对照组,但差异均无统计学意义(t值分别为0.386、0.599,P均>0.05);高血压LVH组LVGRS、LVGCS均低于健康对照组、高血压LVN组,且差异均有统计学意义(LVGRS:t值分别为16.605、9.613;LVGCS:t值分别为10.130、9.526,P均<0.05)。高血压患者LVGLS、LVGAS均随LVMI的增高而降低,呈负相关(r值分别为-0.728、-0.853,P均<0.05)。

结论

3D-STI技术可检测高血压患者早期左心室心肌收缩功能异常。高血压患者三维应变参数随着LVH的出现明显降低。

Objective

To explore the characteristic of three-dimensional strain speckle tracking imaging (3D-STI) of left ventricular (LV) systolic function in patients with primary hypertension (HT), and to observe the value of three-dimensional strain imaging in early diagnosis of hypertension induced myocardial dysfunction.

Methods

From September 2013 to January 2015, 79 patients with primary hypertension diagnosed in Beijing Army General Hospital were divided into two groups: group left ventricular normal geometry (LVN, n=42), and group left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH, n=37). Concurrently, 30 age-matched healthy subjects were enrolled as the controls. Parameters of LV and values of left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) and left ventricular mass (LVM) were acquired by three-dimensional full volume echocardiography. Left ventricular mass index (LVMI) was calculated. Left ventricle global longitudinal strain (LVGLS), left ventricle global radial strain (LVGRS), left ventricle global circular strain (LVGCS), and left ventricle global area strain (LVGAS) were analyzed off line using three-dimensional strain imaging, respectively. The global strain (LVGLS, LVGRS, LVGCS and LVGAS, respectively) and mean values of all segments were acquired. All data of 3 groups were analyzed using One-Way analysis of variance, and LSD-t test was used to compare between two groups. The correlation between LVGLS and LVMI and the correlation between LVGAS and LVMI in hypertensive patients was tested by Pearson correlation analysis.

Results

There were significant differences of LVMI among the 3 groups (88.5±10.2, 102.4±13.5 and 128.0±17.2). LVMI were significantly increased in the LVN and LVH groups compared with those in control group. LVMI in group LVH was significantly higher than that in group LVN (t=22.152, 39.623 and 31.125, all P<0. 05). The value of LVGLS, LVGRS, LCGCS and LVGAS were (-22.2±5.8)%, (-17.6±5.2)%, (-13.7±4.5)%, (41.6±7.5)%, (38.8±8.6)%, (30.1±7.4)%, (-20.9±6.6)%, (-19.6±5.4)%, (-12.4±5.5)%, (-33.2±6.9)%, (-26.6±6.4)% and (-20.2±5.6)% in group control, group LVN and group LVH, respectively. LVGLS and LVGAS were significantly decreased in the LVN and LVH group compared with those in control group, and the LVGLS and LVGAS in group LVH were significantly lower than those in group LVN (LVGLS: t=8.642, 22.623 and 13.125; LVGAS: t=12.591, 30.332 and 21.302; all P<0.05). There was no significant difference of LVGRS and LVGCS between group LVN and control group (t=0.386 and 0.599, both P>0. 05). The parameters of LVGRS and LVGCS in LVH group were lower than those in control group and LVN group (LVGRS: t=16.605 and 9.613; LVGCS: t=10.130 and 9.526; all P<0.05). Pearson correlation analysis indicated that decreased LVGLS and LVGAS in patients with hypertension were inversely linearly correlated with increasing LVMI (r=-0.728 and -0.853, both P<0. 05).

Conclusion

Three-dimensional STI can evaluate the early change of left ventricular systolic dysfunctions in hypertensive patients, can detect the decreases of LV myocardial three-dimensional strain with the LVH.

表1 3组受检者临床资料和左心室功能参数比较
图10~12 三维应变斑点追踪显像技术测定左心室整体面积应变。图10、图11和图12分别为健康对照组、高血压左心室正常构型组和高血压左心室肥厚组;健康对照组、高血压左心室正常构型组和高血压左心室肥厚组左心室整体面积应变逐步降低
表2 3组受检者左心室整体应变参数比较(%,±s
[1]
Kleijin SA, Aly MF, Terwee CB, et al. Reliability of left ventricular volumes and function measurements using three-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography[J]. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2012, 13(2):159–168.
[2]
Sun YJ, Wang F, Zhang RS, et al. Incremental value of resting three-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography in detecting coronary artery disease[J]. Exp Ther Med, 2015, 9(6):2043–2046.
[3]
Hoey ET, Pakala V, Teoh JK, et al. The role of imaging in hypertensive heart disease[J]. Int J Angiol, 2014, 23(2):85–92.
[4]
Vakili BA, Okin PM, Devereux RB. Prognostic implications of left ventricular hypertrophy[J]. Am Heart J, 2001, 141(3):334–341.
[5]
Rajappan K, Rimoldi OE, Dutka DP, et al. Mechanisms of coronary microcirculatory dysfunction in patients with aortic stenosis and angiographically normal coronary arteries[J]. Circulation, 2002, 105(4):470–476.
[6]
Torrent-Guasp F, Buckberg GD, Clemente C, et al. The structure and function of the helical heart and its buttress wrapping: the normal macroscopic structure of the heart[J]. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Sur, 2001, 13(4):301–319.
[7]
Abduch MC, Alencar MA, Mathias Jr W, et al. Cardiac mechanics evaluated by speckle tracking echocardiography[J]. Arq Bras Cardiol, 2014, 102(4):403–412.
[8]
Pérez de Isla L, Balcones DV, Fernández-Golfín C, et al. Three-dimensional wall motion tracking: a new and faster tool for myocardial strain assessment: comparison with two-dimensional-wall motion tracking[J]. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2009, 22(4):325–330.
[9]
Hayat D, Koelckner M, Nahum J, et al. Comparison of real-time three-dimensional speckle tracking to magnetic resonance imaging in patients with coronary heart disease[J]. Am J Cardiol, 2012, 109(2):180–186.
[10]
Chen R, Wu X, Shen LJ, et al. left ventricular myocardial function in hemodialysis and nondialysis uremia patients: a three-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography study[J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(6):e100265.
[11]
Lekawanvijit S, Kompa AR, Manabe M, et al. Chronic kidney disease-induced cardiac fibrosis is ameliorated by reducing circulating levels of a non-dialysable uremic toxin, indoxyl sulfate[J]. PLoS One, 2012, 7(7):e41281.
[12]
牛海燕, 高宇, 张江霞, 等. 二维应变评价原发性高血压患者左心室收缩功能[J/CD]. 中华医学超声杂志: 电子版, 2012, 9(9):772–776.
[13]
Baccouche H, Maunz M, Beck T, et al. Differentiating cardiac amyloidosis and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy by use of three-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography[J]. Echocardiography, 2012, 29(6):668–677.
[14]
Russo C, Jin ZZ, Homma S, Rundek T, et al. Relationship of multidirectional myocardial strain with radial thickening and ejection fraction and impact of left ventricular hypertrophy. a study in a community-based cohort[J]. Echocardiography, 2013, 30(7):794–802.
[15]
Kleijin SA, Aly MF, Terwee CB, et al. Three-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography for automatic assessment of global and regional left ventricular function based on area strain[J]. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2011, 24(3):314–321.
[1] 靳茜雅, 黄晓松, 谭诚, 蒋琴, 侯昉, 李瑶悦, 徐冰, 贾红慧, 刘文英. 产前他克莫司治疗对先天性膈疝大鼠病理模型肺血管重构的影响[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(04): 428-436.
[2] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[3] 王昆, 潘迪, 王庆, 江克华, 孙发. 机器人手术治疗膀胱副神经节瘤一例报告[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 291-292.
[4] 张其坤, 商福超, 李琪, 栗光明, 王孟龙. 联合脾切除对肝癌合并门静脉高压症患者根治性切除术后的生存获益分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 613-618.
[5] 许语阳, 吕云福, 王葆春. 乙肝后肝硬化门静脉高压症脾肿大外科治疗进展[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 469-473.
[6] 赫嵘, 贾哲, 张珂, 李代京, 张萌, 蒋力. 基于PSM分析腹腔镜肝切除联合Hassab术治疗合并门静脉高压症肝癌疗效[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 376-383.
[7] 杨林青, 任松, 纪泛扑, 张健, 蒋安, 张丽, 安鹏, 王林, 李宗芳. 揿针疗法对门静脉高压症脾切除断流术后胃肠功能的调节作用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 322-326.
[8] 任国华, 杜晓晓, 洪善玲, 邵帅. 妊娠期高血压并发急性肾损伤患者血清白细胞介素-22、硫化氢及护骨素水平的变化与意义[J]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 150-155.
[9] 李晓晨, 乔晞. 血液透析患者的血压靶目标值研究进展[J]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 168-171.
[10] 运陌, 李茂芳, 王浩, 刘东远. 微创穿刺引流联合吡拉西坦、乌拉地尔治疗基底节区高血压性脑出血的临床研究[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 278-285.
[11] 刘政委, 仪立志, 尹夕龙, 孔文龙, 纠智松, 张文源. 锥颅血肿外引流与神经内镜手术治疗老年基底节区高血压性脑出血的疗效分析[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 299-303.
[12] 许秀兰, 朱建建. 血压变异性与伴H型高血压的急性脑梗死患者预后不良的临床关系分析[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 199-204.
[13] 吴晓翔, 杨波, 李景漩, 张凤玲, 郭桂辉, 郑少培. 脐动脉超声检查联合NLR、sFlt-1/PLGF对妊娠高血压综合征患者不良妊娠结局的预测价值[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 266-271.
[14] 万基伟, 耿乐乐, 龚雪梅, 邓伟滨. 混元灸治疗阳虚型高血压伴颈动脉粥样硬化患者的临床研究[J]. 中华针灸电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 101-105.
[15] 许毛毛, 王宝军, 石雨, 陈超, 庞江霞. 人工寒潮和热浪对易卒中型肾血管性高血压大鼠脑卒中的影响[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 237-243.
阅读次数
全文


摘要