切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (02) : 127 -133. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2017.02.011

所属专题: 文献

妇产科超声影像学

三维超声对弓形子宫与纵隔子宫的诊断价值及诊断指标研究
郑芳媛1, 周毓青2,(), 隋龙3, 任芸芸3, 戴蓓蓓3, 林如3   
  1. 1. 200011 上海,复旦大学附属妇产科医院超声科;310008 杭州市妇产科医院 杭州市第一人民医院钱江新城院区
    2. 200051 上海市长宁区妇幼保健院超声科
    3. 200011 上海,复旦大学附属妇产科医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2016-09-30 出版日期:2017-02-01
  • 通信作者: 周毓青

A discussion of diagnostic value and diagnostic indicator in distinguishing arcuate uterus from septate uterus by three dimensional sonography

Fangyuan Zheng1, Yuqin Zhou2,(), Long Sui3, Yunyun Ren3, Beibei Dai3, Ru Lin3   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200011, China; Hangzhou Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Qianjiang New construction branch of The Frist People′s Hospital of Hangzhou, Hangzhou 310008, China
    2. Department of Ultrasound, Shanghai Changning Maternity and Infant Health Hospital, Shanghai 200051, China
    3. Department of Ultrasound, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200011, China
  • Received:2016-09-30 Published:2017-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Yuqin Zhou
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhou Yuqing, Email:
引用本文:

郑芳媛, 周毓青, 隋龙, 任芸芸, 戴蓓蓓, 林如. 三维超声对弓形子宫与纵隔子宫的诊断价值及诊断指标研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2017, 14(02): 127-133.

Fangyuan Zheng, Yuqin Zhou, Long Sui, Yunyun Ren, Beibei Dai, Ru Lin. A discussion of diagnostic value and diagnostic indicator in distinguishing arcuate uterus from septate uterus by three dimensional sonography[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2017, 14(02): 127-133.

目的

探讨三维超声诊断弓形子宫与纵隔子宫的准确性,构建弓形子宫与纵隔子宫鉴别诊断的定量指标。

方法

对2011年8月至2013年3月复旦大学附属妇产科医院临床检查拟诊为子宫畸形的96例患者行三维超声检查,在Omni view成像模式下对子宫三维容积图像进行子宫冠状面的重建、测量分析和分型诊断。与宫(腹)腔镜诊断结果对照,计算三维超声诊断弓形子宫、不全纵隔子宫和完全纵隔子宫的敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值及总体符合率。构建弓形子宫与纵隔子宫鉴别诊断的定量指标。

结果

96例患者经三维超声诊断为弓形子宫33例(34.4%,33/96),不全纵隔子宫54例(56.2%,54/96),完全纵隔子宫9例(9.4%,9/96)。三维超声诊断弓形子宫和纵隔子宫的总体符合率为86.5%(83/96)。三维超声诊断弓形子宫的敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值分别为100%、82.9%、60.6%、100%;诊断不全纵隔子宫的敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值分别为80.6%、100%、100%、69.1%;诊断完全纵隔子宫的敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值及阴性预测值均为100%。纵隔子宫的子宫内膜凹陷深度占子宫底部浆膜层-纵隔顶端间距的50%以上,而大部分弓形子宫的子宫内膜凹陷深度占子宫底部浆膜层—纵隔顶端间距的50%以下。

结论

三维超声对不同分型子宫畸形的诊断准确率不同。应用三维超声定量指标辅助诊断,有助于提高三维超声诊断弓形子宫与纵隔子宫的准确率。

Objective

To discuss the accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) sonography in diagnosing arcuate uterus and septate uterus and propose a quantitative indicator in distinguishing arcuate uterus and septate uterus.

Methods

Ninety-six patients with suspected congenital uterine malformation underwent 3D sonography to assess uterine anomalies at Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University from August 2011 to March 2013. Uterine coronal section was reconstructed and measured in omni view imaging mode of 3D sonography. Then qualitative diagnosis and categorization was done. The results were compared with diagnosis of hysteroscopy, hysteroscopy combined with laparoscope to determine the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, negative predictive values and total accuracy of 3D sonography in diagnosing arcuate uterus, partial and complete septate uterus respectively. The variable was created in coronal section of uterus constructed through 3D imaging mode to differentiate arcuate uterus from septate uterus.

Results

There were 33 cases (34.4%, 33/96) of arcuate uterus, 54 cases (56.2%, 54/96) of partial septate uterus and 9 cases (9.4%, 9/96) of complete uterus in 96 cases diagnosed by 3D sonography. The accuracy of 3D sonography in diagnosing arcuate uterus and septate uterus was 86.5%. We concluded that 3D sonography had 100% sensitivity, 82.9% specificity, 60.6% positive predictive value and 100% negative predictive value in the diagnosis of arcuate uterus. The sensitivity of 3D sonography for diagnosis of partial septate uterus was 80.6%, the specificity was 100%, the positive predictive value was 100%, and the negative predictive value was 69.1%. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of 3D sonography for detecting complete septate uterus were all 100%. The ratio of depth of uterine internal indentation and depth from uterine fundus to the top of internal indentation was more than 50% for septate uterus, while less than 50% for most of the arcuate uterus.

Conclusions

The diagnostic efficiency of 3D sonography in specific uterine malformation is different. The new quantitative indicator maybe helpful in improving the accuracy of 3D sonography in diagnosing arcuate uterus and septate uterus.

图2 三维超声Omin view模式下不全纵隔子宫冠状面图像,该切面需测量:子宫底部肌层厚度(图中1所示),子宫内膜凹陷深度(图中2所示)和宫腔深度(图中3所示)
图7,8 三维超声Omin view模式下完全纵隔子宫冠状面声像图[图中1为子宫底部内膜呈锐角凹陷;2为子宫底部肌层厚度;3为纵隔呈低回声,自宫底延伸至宫颈内口,纵隔深度(子宫内膜凹陷深度)与宫腔深度一致)]。子宫底外部轮廓平直、增宽,宫底部内膜呈锐角(41.9°)凹陷,子宫底部肌层厚度约0.5 cm,纵隔呈低回声,自宫底延伸至宫颈内口,纵隔深度(子宫内膜凹陷深度)与宫腔深度均为3.3 cm
表1 96例子宫畸形患者三维超声检查结果与腔镜诊断结果比较(例)
[1]
Byrne J, Nussbaum-Blask A, Taylor WS, et al. Prevalence of Müllerian duct anomalies detected at ultrasound [J]. Am J Med Genet, 2000, 94(1):9-12.
[2]
Saravelos SH, Cocksedge KA, Li TC. Prevalence and diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies in women with reproductive failure: a critical appraisal [J]. Hum Reprod Update, 2008, 14(5):415-429.
[3]
Liu YH, Jain S, Lee CL, et al. Incidence of mullerian defects in fertile and infertile women [J]. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc, 2000, 7(3):435-436.
[4]
Raga F, Bonilla-Musoles F, Blanes J, et al. Congenital Müllerian anomalies: diagnostic accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound [J]. Fertil Steril, 1996, 65(3):523-528.
[5]
Kupesic S. Clinical implications of sonographic detection of uterine anomalies for reproductive outcome [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2001, 18(4):387-400.
[6]
赵凡桂,周毓青,隋龙, 等. 三维超声C平面在先天性子宫畸形诊断及分型中的应用 [J]. 实用妇产科杂志, 2011(6):432-435.
[7]
田晓先,林连恩,李雪琴, 等. 三维超声在诊断不同类型先天性子宫畸形的临床价值 [J]. 广西医科大学学报, 2008(4):606-607.
[8]
Ludwin A, Pityński K, Ludwin I, et al. Two- and three-dimensional ultrasonography and sonohysterography versus hysteroscopy with laparoscopy in the differential diagnosis of septate, bicornuate, and arcuate uteri [J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2013, 20(1):90-99.
[9]
Moini A, Mohammadi S, Hosseini R, et al. Accuracy of 3-dimensional sonography for diagnosis and classification of congenital uterine anomalies [J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2013, 32(6):923-927.
[10]
Grimbizis GF, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Saravelos SH, et al. The Thessaloniki ESHRE/ESGE consensus on diagnosis of female genital anomalies [J]. Hum Reprod. 2016, 31(1):2-7.
[11]
中华医学会妇产科学分会. 女性生殖器官畸形诊治的中国专家共识 [J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2015, 50(10):729-733.
[12]
Grimbizis GF, Gordts S, Di Spiezio Sardo A, et al. The ESHRE/ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies [J]. Hum Reprod, 2013, 28(8):2032-2044.
[13]
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Uterine septum: a guideline [J]. Fertil Steril, 2016, 106(3):530-540.
[14]
Salim R, Woelfer B, Backos M, et al. Reproducibility of three-dimensional ultrasound diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2003, 21(6):578-582.
[15]
Raga F, Bauset C, Remohi J, et al. Reproductive impact of congenital Müllerian anomalies [J]. Hum Reprod, 1997, 12(10):2277-2281.
[16]
Valle RF, Ekpo GE. Hysteroscopic metroplasty for the septate uterus: review and meta-analysis [J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2013, 20(1):22-42.
[17]
Kupesić S, Kurjak A, Skenderovic S, et al. Screening for uterine abnormalities by three-dimensional ultrasound improves perinatal outcome [J]. J Perinat Med, 2002, 30(1):9-17.
[18]
Woelfer B, Salim R, Banerjee S, et al. Reproductive outcomes in women with congenital uterine anomalies detected by three-dimensional ultrasound screening [J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2001, 98(6):1099-1103.
[19]
Tomaževič T, Ban-Frangež H, Virant-Klun I, et al. Septate, subseptate and arcuate uterus decrease pregnancy and live birth rates in IVF/ICSI [J]. Reprod Biomed Online, 2010, 21(5):700-705.
[20]
Shuiqing M, Xuming B, Jinghe L. Pregnancy and its outcome in women with malformed uterus [J]. Chin Med Sci J, 2002, 17(4):242-245.
[21]
Venetis CA, Papadopoulos SP, Campo R, et al. Clinical implications of congenital uterine anomalies: a meta-analysis of comparative studies [J]. Reprod Biomed Online, 2014, 29(6):665-683.
[22]
Acién P. Reproductive performance of women with uterine malformations [J]. Hum Reprod, 1993, 8(1):122-126.
[23]
Demir B, Dilbaz B, Karadag B, et al. Coexistence of endometriosis and uterine septum in patients with abortion or infertility [J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2011, 37(11):1596-1600.
[24]
Saygili-Yilmaz E, Yildiz S, Erman-Akar M, et al. Reproductive outcome of septate uterus after hysteroscopic metroplasty [J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2003, 268(4):289-292.
[25]
Tonguc EA, Var T, Batioglu S. Hysteroscopic metroplasty in patients with a uterine septum and otherwise unexplained infertility [J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2011, 113(2):128-130.
[26]
Mollo A, De Franciscis P, Colacurci N, et al. Hysteroscopic resection of the septum improves the pregnancy rate of women with unexplained infertility: a prospective controlled trial [J]. Fertil Steril, 2009, 91(6):2628-2631.
[27]
Zlopasa G, Skrablin S, Kalafatić D, et al. Uterine anomalies and pregnancy outcome following resectoscope metroplasty [J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2007, 98(2):129-133.
[28]
Paradisi R, Barzanti R, Natali F, et al. Metroplasty in a large population of women with septate uterus [J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2011, 18(4):449-454.
[29]
Marcal L, Nothaft MA, Coelho F, et al. Mullerian duct anomalies: MR imaging [J]. Abdom Imaging, 2011, 36(6):756-764.
[30]
Chan YY, Jayaprakasan K, Zamora J, et al. The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review [J]. Hum Reprod Update, 2011, 17(6):761-771.
[31]
Gergolet M, Campo R, Verdenik I, et al. No clinical relevance of the height of fundal indentation in subseptate or arcuate uterus: a prospective study [J]. Reprod Biomed Online, 2012, 24(5):576-582.
[32]
Ludwin A, Ludwin I. Comparison of the ESHRE-ESGE and ASRM classifications of Müllerian duct anomalies in everyday practice [J]. Hum Reprod, 2015, 30(3):569-580.
[33]
Francisco R, Fernando BM. The diagnostic protocol of congenital uterine anomalies [J]. Fertil Steril, 2008, 90(1):239-240.
[1] 王亚红, 蔡胜, 葛志通, 杨筱, 李建初. 颅骨骨膜窦的超声表现一例[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(11): 1089-1091.
[2] 唐金侨, 叶宇佳, 王港, 赵彬, 马艳宁. 医学影像学检查方法在颞下颌关节紊乱病中临床应用研究进展[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 406-411.
[3] 赵林娟, 吕婕, 王文胜, 马德茂, 侯涛. 超声引导下染色剂标记切缘的梭柱型和圆柱型保乳区段切除术的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-637.
[4] 屈翔宇, 张懿刚, 李浩令, 邱天, 谈燚. USP24及其共表达肿瘤代谢基因在肝细胞癌中的诊断和预后预测作用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 659-662.
[5] 熊鹰, 林敬莱, 白奇, 郭剑明, 王烁. 肾癌自动化病理诊断:AI离临床还有多远?[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 535-540.
[6] 梁丽斯, 李洁, 贺帅, 来艳君, 刘铭, 张琳. MMP-9、MMP-2 及TLR4、HE4对非小细胞肺癌早期诊断意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 756-761.
[7] 中华医学会器官移植学分会. 肝移植术后缺血性胆道病变诊断与治疗中国实践指南[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 739-748.
[8] 郑大雯, 王健东. 胆囊癌辅助诊断研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 769-773.
[9] 王秋生. 胆道良性疾病诊疗策略[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 779-782.
[10] 袁雨涵, 杨盛力. 体液和组织蛋白质组学分析在肝癌早期分子诊断中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 883-888.
[11] 李浩, 陈棋帅, 费发珠, 张宁伟, 李元东, 王硕晨, 任宾. 慢性肝病肝纤维化无创诊断的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 863-867.
[12] 谭瑞义. 小细胞骨肉瘤诊断及治疗研究现状与进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 781-784.
[13] 王子阳, 王宏宾, 刘晓旌. 血清标志物对甲胎蛋白阴性肝细胞癌诊断的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 677-681.
[14] 陈慧, 邹祖鹏, 周田田, 张艺丹, 张海萍. 皮肤镜对头皮红斑性皮肤病辅助鉴别诊断的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 692-698.
[15] 胡云鹤, 周玉焯, 付瑞瑛, 于凡, 李爱东. CHS-DRG付费制度下GB1分组住院费用影响因素分析与管理策略探讨[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 568-574.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?