切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (03) : 186 -192. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2017.03.006

所属专题: 文献

心血管超声影像学

超声测量的心外膜脂肪厚度与心房颤动的相关性
张梅青1, 李越2,(), 王秋霜1, 翟亚楠2, 魏丽群2, 黄党生1   
  1. 1. 100048 北京,解放军总医院第一附属医院心内科
    2. 100853 北京,解放军总医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2016-06-04 出版日期:2017-03-01
  • 通信作者: 李越

The correlation of epicardial adipose tissue thickness and atrial fibrillation by echocardiography

Meiqing Zhang1, Yue Li2,(), Qiushuang Wang1, Yanan Zhai2, Liqun Wei2, Dangsheng Huang1   

  1. 1. Department of Cardiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Chinese People′s Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing 100048, China
    2. Department of Ultrasonography, Chinese People′s Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
  • Received:2016-06-04 Published:2017-03-01
  • Corresponding author: Yue Li
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Li Yue, Email:
引用本文:

张梅青, 李越, 王秋霜, 翟亚楠, 魏丽群, 黄党生. 超声测量的心外膜脂肪厚度与心房颤动的相关性[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2017, 14(03): 186-192.

Meiqing Zhang, Yue Li, Qiushuang Wang, Yanan Zhai, Liqun Wei, Dangsheng Huang. The correlation of epicardial adipose tissue thickness and atrial fibrillation by echocardiography[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2017, 14(03): 186-192.

目的

探讨超声测量的心外膜脂肪(EAT)厚度与心房颤动(简称房颤)的相关性。

方法

选取2014年3月至2016年6月解放军总医院第一附属医院收治的房颤患者138例,其中阵发性房颤患者87例,持续性房颤患者51例,另选取窦性心律患者112例作为对照。超声测量所有患者EAT厚度,并记录常规参数。采用单因素方差分析比较阵发性房颤组、持续性房颤组与窦性心律组患者EAT厚度,进一步组间两两比较采用LSD-t检验;采用多因素Logistic回归分析分析房颤发生的危险因素;绘制EAT厚度、左心房内径(LAD)预测房颤发生的操作者工作特征(ROC)曲线;采用Pearson相关分析法分析EAT厚度与LAD的相关性。

结果

持续性房颤组、阵发性房颤组、窦性心律组患者EAT厚度分别为(4.75±1.83)、(4.32±1.76)、(1.38±0.68) mm。持续性房颤组、阵发性房颤组患者EAT厚度均大于窦性心律组患者,且差异均有统计学意义(t=-9.541、-11.439,P均<0.01);Logistic回归分析结果显示,EAT厚度、LAD是房颤发生的独立危险因素(OR=3.17,95%CI 1.31~7.68,P<0.01;OR=2.65,95%CI 1.69~4.15,P<0.05);ROC曲线显示,EAT厚度、LAD预测房颤发生的曲线下面积分别为0.784、0.865,最佳阈值分别为4.45 mm、40.00 mm;Pearson相关分析结果显示,EAT厚度与LAD呈显著正相关(r=0.512,P<0.01)。

结论

超声测量的EAT厚度的增加与房颤的发生显著相关,是房颤发生的独立危险因素之一,对预测房颤发生有一定的临床价值。

Objective

To investigate the association between atrial fibrillation (AF) and epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) by echocardiography.

Methods

One hundred and thirty-eight patients of AF in First Affiliated Hospital of Chinese Peoples Liberation Army General Hospital from March 2014 to June 2016 were divided into two groups, including paroxysmal AF group with 87 casesand persistent AF group with 51 cases, and 112 cases of sinus rhythm were chosen as control group. Epicardial adipose tissue was measured using echocardiography in all patients, and the conventional parameters were recorded. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare the thickness of EAT in patients with paroxysmal AF group, persistent AF group and sinus rhythm group, and LSD-t test was used in further comparison between two groups. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the risk factors of AF. The receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) cure of EAT and left atrium diameter (LAD) were drawn to predict the incidence of AF. The correlation between EAT thickness and LAD was analyzed by Pearson correlation analysis.

Results

The thickness of EAT in patients with persistent AF, paroxysmal AF and sinus rhythm group were (4.75±1.83), (4.32±1.76) and (1.38±0.68) mm, respectively. Epicardial adipose tissue was significantly larger in paroxysmal AF and persistent AF patients compared with that of sinus rhythm group, and the differences were statistically significant (t=-9.541, -11.439, both P<0.01). Logistic regression analysis indicated that EAT thickness and LAD were independent risk factors of atrial fibrillation (odds ratio: 3.17, 95% confidence interval: 1.31-7.68, P<0.01; odds ratio: 2.65, 95% confidence interval 1.69-4.15, P<0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) of EAT and LAD to predict presence of AF were 0.784 and 0.865, and the best threshold value were 4.45 mm and 40.00 mm, respectively. Pearson correlation analysis showed that the EAT thickness and LAD had significantly positive correlation (r=0.512, P<0.01).

Conclusions

The increase of EAT thickness is significantly correlated with the incidence of AF and is independent to traditional risk factors. Therefore, the increase of EAT thickness has certain clinical value to predict AF.

图2 超声测量房颤患者右心室前壁外心外膜脂肪略厚
表1 窦性心律组、阵发性房颤组、持续性房颤组患者一般临床资料及EAT厚度比较
表2 房颤发生危险因素的Logistic回归分析
图3 心外膜脂肪厚度、左心房内径预测房颤发生的操作者工作特征曲线。心外膜脂肪厚度、左心房内径预测房颤发生的最佳阈值分别为4.45 mm、40.00 mm,曲线下面积分别为0.784、0.865。心内膜脂肪厚度>4.45 mm预测房颤发生的敏感度、特异度分别为72.7%、65.3%,左心房内径>40.00 mm预测房颤发生的敏感度、特异度分别为83.5%、71.6%
图4 房颤患者心外膜脂肪厚度与左心房内径的相关性。心外膜脂肪厚度与左心房内径呈显著正相关(r=0.512,P<0.01)
[1]
January CT, Wann LS, Alpert JS, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation:a report of the American College of Cardiology/AmericanHeart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society [J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2014, 64(21):2305-2307.
[2]
European Heart Rhythm A, European Association for Cardio-Thoracic S, Camm AJ, et al. Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: the task force for the management of atrial fibrillation of the european society of cardiology (ESC) [J]. Eur Heart J, 2010, 12(10):1360-1420.
[3]
Shin SY, Yong HS, Lim HE, et al. Total and interatrial epicardial adipose tissues are independently associated with left atrial remodeling in patients with atrial fibrillation [J]. Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, 2011, 22(6):647-655.
[4]
Nagashima K, Okumura Y, Watanabe I, et al. Association between epicardial adipose tissue volumes on 3-dimensional reconstructed CT images and recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation [J]. Circ J, 2011, 75(11):2559-2565.
[5]
Friedrichs K, Klinke A, Baldus S. Inflammatory pathwaysunderlying atrial fibrillation [J]. Trends Mol Med, 2011, 17(10):556-563.
[6]
Tsao HM, Hu WC, Wu MH, et al. Quantitative analysis of quantity and distribution of epicardial adipose tissue surrounding the left atrium in patients with atrial fibrillation and effect of recurrence after ablation [J]. Am J Cardiol, 2011, 107(10):1498-1503.
[7]
Khairy P, Nattel S. New insights into the mechanisms and management of atrial fibrillation [J]. CAMJ, 2002, 167(9):1012-1020.
[8]
Schotten U, Verheule S, Kirchhof P, et al. Pathophysiological mechanisms of atrial fibrillation: a translational appraisal [J]. Physiol Rev, 2011, 91(1):265-325.
[9]
Nishida K, Qi XY, Wakili R, et al. Mechanisms of atrial tachyarrhythmias associated with coronary artery occlusion in a chronic canine model [J]. Circulation, 2011, 123(2):137-146.
[10]
Swifka J, Weiss J, Addicks K, et al. Epicardial fat from guineapig: a model to study the paracrine network of interactions between epicardial fat and myocardium [J]. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther, 2008, 22(2):l07-l14.
[11]
Alasady M, Shipp NJ, Brooks AG, et al. Myocardial infarction and atrial fibrillation: importance of atrial ischemia [J]. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol, 2013, 6(4):738-745.
[12]
Iacobellis G, Leonetti F, Singh N, et al. Relationship of epicardial adipose tissue with atrial dimensions and diastolic function in morbidly obese subjects [J]. Int J Cardiol, 2007, 115(2):272-273.
[13]
Akyel A, Yayla KG, Erat M, et al. Relationship between Epicardial Adipose Tissue Thickness and Atrial Electromechanical Delay in Hypertensive Patients [J]. Echocardiography, 2015, 32(10):1498-1503.
[14]
Shen MJ, Zipes DP. Role of the autonomic nervous system in modulating cardiac arrhythmias [J]. Cire Res, 2014, 114(6):1004-1121.
[15]
Greif M, Von Ziegler F, Wakili R, et al. Increased pericardial adipose tissue is correlated with atrial fibrillation and left atrial dilatation [J]. Clin Res Cardiol, 2013, 102(5):555-562.
[16]
Barter PJ, Nicholls S, Rye KA, et al. Antiinflammatory properties of HDL [J]. Circ Res, 2004, 95(1):764-772.
[17]
Vaisar T, Pennathur S, Green PS, et al. Shotgun proteomics implicates protease inhibition and complement activation in the antiinflammatory properties of HDL [J]. J Clin Invest, 2007, 117(3):746-756.
[18]
Nagashima K, Okumura K, Watanabe I, et al. Association between epicardial adipose tissue volumes on 3-dimensional reconstructed CT images and recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation [J]. Circ J, 2011, 75(11):2559-2565.
[19]
Batal O, Sehoenhagen P, Shao M, et al. Left atrial epicardialadiposity and atrial fibrillation [J]. J Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol, 2010, 3(3):230-236.
[20]
Yorgun H, Canpolat U, Aytemir K, et al. Association of epicardial and peri-atrial adipositywith the presence and severity of non-valvular atrial fibrillation [J]. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2015, 31(3):649-657.
[21]
Kocyigit D, Gurses KM, Yalcin MU, et al. Periatrial epicardial adipose tissue thickness is an independent predictor of atrial fibrillation recurrence after cryoballoon-based pulmonary vein isolation [J]. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr, 2015, 9(4):295-302.
[22]
Iacobellis G, Assael F, Ribaudo MC, et al. Epicardial fat from echocardiography: a new method for visceral adipose tissue prediction [J]. Obes Res, 2003, 11(2):1304-1310.
[1] 张胜男, 苗雅敬, 周虹, 韩高洁, 王静, 仝巧立, 张旭倩, 尹洪宁. 左心耳三维经食管超声测量与Watchman左心耳封堵器大小的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(02): 107-113.
[2] 刘丹妮, 敖梦, 冉海涛, 李世玉, 秦芳. 三维超声心动图及二维斑点追踪成像对持续性心房颤动复律后双心房逆向重构的评估[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 827-835.
[3] 张煜彭, 李浩南, 付焱, 冯继伟, 刘凯, 张文凯. 术后房颤对老年髋部骨折患者预后影响的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(01): 51-56.
[4] 王震, 杨晓月, 苏康康, 王朝阳, 李少杰, 陈淑霞, 谷剑. β受体阻滞剂对心力衰竭合并房颤患者预后影响的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 479-482.
[5] 黄淑萍, 龚蓓, 申铁梅, 杨丹莉, 陈秀梅, 李国琪, 李星, 麦爱欢, 钟冰, 广东省护士协会心血管疾病护理分会, 南方心血管护理联盟. 心房颤动患者介入手术围术期护理专家共识[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 1-9.
[6] 付明鹏, 牛国栋, 岑志富, 乔宇, 郭金锐, 郭雨龙, 谢阳, 刘晨, 袁华苑, 刘可, 何姗姗. 三维标测系统指导下国产花瓣状脉冲电场消融系统应用一例[J/OL]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 180-184.
[7] 储慧民, 杜先锋. 心腔内超声心动图指导左心耳封堵的规范化标准流程[J/OL]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 1-5.
[8] 储慧民. 心腔内超声心动图指导下的左心耳封堵术标准流程解析[J/OL]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 58-58.
[9] 王慧俐, 张沛刚, 李军, 薛立新, 刘向阳, 冯小梅, 刘江, 李芳, 王海雄. 经心腔内超声心动图指导下左心耳封堵与无导线起搏器植入术一例[J/OL]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2023, 11(04): 238-241.
[10] 段园霞, 顾柳娜, 张磊, 周丽婷, 朱海瀛, 杨超, 陈海英, 顾晓青, 高宗尚, 黄蛟灵. 上海市奉贤区基层全科医师对心房颤动的认知现状及影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 154-159.
[11] 文明, 张丽, 谢芳, 艾克拜尔·艾力, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 构建胃食管反流病患者发生心房颤动的临床预测模型[J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2024, 11(03): 130-136.
[12] 古丽尼格尔·吾布力, 印纹源, 冯艳, 买买提·依斯热依力, 克力木·阿不都热依木, 夏木西娅·哈德尔. 探讨胃食管反流病与心房颤动、酸反流及食管运动特征的相关性[J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2024, 11(01): 31-36.
[13] 郑屹, 刘莹, 张煜坤, 李广平, 陈康寅, 刘彤. 既往及新发心房颤动对急性心肌梗死患者远期卒中风险的影响[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 406-417.
[14] 李芳, 戴西望, 王凯, 郭廷昊, 涂江龙. 非瓣膜性心房颤动相关性卒中的治疗研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 393-397.
[15] 邱令智, 胡萍, 罗婷, 鄢华. 脂蛋白(a)与心房颤动关系的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 280-284.
阅读次数
全文


摘要