切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (03) : 193 -199. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2017.03.007

所属专题: 文献

腹部超声影像学

动态三维超声造影评价肝癌射频消融术疗效的价值
陈露阳1, 廖锦堂1,(), 齐文君1, 张波1, 姜琴1, 潘瑞哲1, 王书初1, 李文政2, 龙学颖2   
  1. 1. 410008 长沙,中南大学湘雅医院超声影像科
    2. 410008 长沙,中南大学湘雅医院放射科
  • 收稿日期:2016-06-15 出版日期:2017-03-01
  • 通信作者: 廖锦堂

Value of dynamic three-dimensional contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in evaluating therapeutic response of hepatoma treated with radiofrequency ablation

Luyang Chen1, Jintan Liao1,(), Wenjun Qi1, Bo Zhang1, Qin Jiang1, Ruizhe Pan1, Shuchu Wang1, Wenzheng Li2, Xueying Long2   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasonography, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha 410008, China
    2. Department of Radiology, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha 410008, China
  • Received:2016-06-15 Published:2017-03-01
  • Corresponding author: Jintan Liao
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Liao Jintan, Email:
引用本文:

陈露阳, 廖锦堂, 齐文君, 张波, 姜琴, 潘瑞哲, 王书初, 李文政, 龙学颖. 动态三维超声造影评价肝癌射频消融术疗效的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2017, 14(03): 193-199.

Luyang Chen, Jintan Liao, Wenjun Qi, Bo Zhang, Qin Jiang, Ruizhe Pan, Shuchu Wang, Wenzheng Li, Xueying Long. Value of dynamic three-dimensional contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in evaluating therapeutic response of hepatoma treated with radiofrequency ablation[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2017, 14(03): 193-199.

目的

探讨动态三维超声造影(3D-CEUS)评价肝癌射频消融术疗效的价值。

方法

选择2012年9月至2014年1月中南大学湘雅医院收治的肝癌患者48例共48个病灶。其中30例患者经手术后病理确诊,18例患者经临床诊断。所有患者均行射频消融术。所有患者射频消融术后1个月、3个月行二维超声造影(2D-CEUS)、动态3D-CEUS评价疗效,并与增强CT或磁共振成像(MRI)检查结果进行比较。以活检病理或2种以上影像学检查(超声检查、CT、MRI、PET)、肿瘤标志物水平、患者3个月以上随访结果综合判断的最终诊断结果作为金标准,分别计算CEUS、增强CT或MRI诊断肿瘤灭活的敏感度、特异度、准确性。

结果

射频消融术后,本组48例患者48个病灶中,75.0%(36/48)的病灶应用动态3D-CEUS后能得到更多有价值的信息,有助于操作者评估射频消融术疗效;25.0%(12/48)的病灶应用动态3D-CEUS与应用2D-CEUS相比,对临床结果的影响没有明显差别,动态3D-CEUS没有改变任何一个病灶的诊断或者临床治疗方案。2D-CEUS及动态3D-CEUS显示40个病灶消融区域无增强,提示肿瘤完全消融;8个病灶边缘部分呈结节样不规则高增强,提示肿瘤部分残存。增强CT或MRI示39个病灶消融区域无增强,提示肿瘤完全消融;9个病灶边缘可见不规则强化,提示肿瘤部分残存。CEUS、增强CT或MRI诊断射频消融术后肿瘤灭活的敏感度、特异度、准确性分别为80.0%、100%、95.8%和80.0%、97.4%、93.8%。

结论

动态3D-CEUS在评价射频治疗疗效方面,与2D-CEUS及增强CT或MRI无明显差异,但动态3D-CEUS能提供更多有价值的信息,在评估肝癌射频消融术疗效中具有潜在的价值。

Objective

To investigate the value of dynamic three-dimensional contrast-enhanced ultrasound (3D-CEUS) in evaluating therapeutic response of hepatoma treated with radiofrequency ablation (RFA).

Methods

Totally 48 cases of patients with hepatic carcinoma (48 lesions) admitted in Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from September 2012 to January 2014 were selected. All patients underwent radiofrequency ablation, of which 30 patients were diagnosed by pathology after surgery, 18 patients by clinical diagnosis. All patients underwent two-dimensional contrast-enhanced ultrasound (2D-CEUS) and 3D-CEUS 1 month and 3 months after RFA treatment to evaluate the therapeutic response, and the results of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and enhanced computed tomography (CT) [or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)] were compared . The final diagnostic results of pathologic biopsy or more than two imaging examinations [ultrasonography, CT, MRI, positron emission tomography (PET)], tumor markers, and more than 3 months follow-up of patients were used as the gold standard. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of dynamic 3D-CEUS, 2D-CEUS, enhanced CT (or MRI) in the diagnosis of tumor inactivation were calculated respectively.

Results

After radiofrequency ablation, dynamic 3D-CEUS could provide more valuable information in 75.0% (36/48) lesions, which contribute to assess the efficacy of radiofrequency ablation. While compared with 2D-CEUS, 3D-CEUS did not change the diagnosis or clinical management in 12 (25.0%) lesions. 40 of 48 lesions were found no-enhancement in entire CEUS procedure suggesting that the tumor completely inactivated, while 8 lesions showed local enhancement on the edge of lesion suggesting that part of the tumors were active. 39 of 48 lesions showed no-enhancement and other 9 with irregular enhancement on enhanced CT (or MRI). The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of CEUS and enhanced CT (or MRI) in detection of residual tumor after radiofrequency ablation were 80.0%, 100%, 95.8% and 80.0%, 97.4%, 93.8%, respectively.

Conclusions

There was no statistical significance among 3D-CEUS, 2D-CEUS and enhanced CT or MRI in evaluating therapeutic response of hepatoma treated with radiofrequency ablation. But 3D-CEUS can provide more valuable information, 3D-CEUS has potential usefulness in the evaluation of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of hepatic tumors..

表1 CEUS与增强CT或MRI评价射频消融术后疗效(个)
图1~3 肝癌射频消融术后,病灶完全消融,消融区形态规则。图1示消融区域二维超声造影动脉期,病灶呈无增强;图2示消融区域二维超声造影动脉期,病灶位于中心,呈无增强,被周边呈等增强的正常肝组织包围;图3示经3D颠倒处理后,"高增强"的病灶清晰显示,形态规则,周边正常组织呈"无增强"
图4~16 肝癌射频消融术后,病灶完全消融,消融区域形态不规则。图4、5示消融灶二维超声造影和三维超声造影动脉期;图6示增强CT动脉期;图7~16示消融灶经MPR技术处理后,可从不同层面连续观察消融灶的形态,并可精确计算消融灶体积
图17~21 肝癌射频术后,病灶部分残存。图17、18分别为二维超声造影和三维超声造影注射造影剂后22 s时,病灶边缘可见团状高增强,范围较小(箭头所示);图19、20分别为二维超声造影和三维超声造影注射造影剂后25 s时,病灶边缘团状高增强区明显增大;图21示增强磁共振成像动脉期病灶边缘可见高增强区
[1]
Albrecht T, Hoffmann CW, Schmitz SA, et al. Phase-inversion sonography during the liver-specific late phase of contrast enhancement: improved detection of liver metastases [J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2001, 176(5):1191-1198.
[2]
Wen YL, Kudo M, Zheng RQ, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: therapeutic response using contrast-enhanced coded phase-inversion harmonic sonography [J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2003, 181(1):57-63.
[3]
毛丽娟,王文平,丁红, 等. 肝肿瘤动态三维超声造影与二维超声造影的比较研究 [J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2012, 21(2):133-137.
[4]
谢晓红,马苏亚,徐萍, 等. 实时动态三维超声造影技术在肝肾肿瘤诊断中的应用 [J]. 临床超声医学杂志, 2014, 16(12):808-811.
[5]
刘慧玉,徐金锋,董发进, 等. 动态三维超声造影在肝肿瘤血管研究中的应用 [J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2014, 23(12):1040-1044.
[6]
张秀梅,严昆,陈敏华, 等. 原发性肝癌及肝转移癌局部治疗后超声造影表现类型及其诊断价值 [J/CD]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2009, 6(1):31-41.
[7]
Albrecht T, Blomley M, Bolondi L, et al. Guidelines for the use of contrast agents in ultrasound. January 2004 [J]. Ultraschall Med, 2004, 25(4):249-256.
[8]
Masuzaki R, Shiina S, Tateishi R, et al. Utility of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography with Sonazoid in radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma [J]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2011, 26(4):759-764.
[9]
廖锦堂,潘瑞喆,刘艳, 等. 超声造影评价肝癌射频消融治疗近期疗效 [J]. 中国普外基础与临床杂志, 2009, 16(4):265-268.
[10]
袁惠,牛锦东,张梓桢, 等. 三维超声造影对肝癌射频治疗的评价 [J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2015, 31(6):521-523.
[11]
何芬,邓旦,陈重, 等. 动态三维超声造影与增强CT/MRI对肝肿瘤成像质量的评价比较 [J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2015, 24(2):123-127.
[12]
Numata K, Fukuda H, Ohto M, et al. Evaluation of the therapeutic efficacy of high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma by three-dimensional sonography with a perflubutane-based contrast agent [J]. Eur J Radiol, 2010, 75(2):e67-e75.
[13]
张喆,金成兵,周崑, 等. 三维超声造影技术在HIFU治疗肝肿瘤中的初步临床研究 [J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2014, 283(5):419-421.
[14]
罗葆明,智慧,文艳玲, 等. 肝脏恶性肿瘤局部消融治疗后即刻超声造影必要性探讨 [J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2006, 22(7):535-537.
[15]
Dromain C, de Baere T, Elias D, et al. Hepatic tumors treated with percutaneous radio-frequency ablation: CT and MR imaging follow-up [J]. Radiology, 2002, 223(1):255-262.
[16]
Solbiati L, Ierace T, Tonolini M, et al. Guidance and monitoring of radiofrequency liver tumor ablation with contrast-enhanced ultrasound [J]. Eur J Radiol, 2004, 51 Suppl:S19-S23.
[17]
Lim HK, Choi D, Lee WJ, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma treated with percutaneous radio-frequency ablation: evaluation with follow-up multiphase helical CT [J]. Radiology, 2001, 221(2):447-454.
[1] 魏淑婕, 惠品晶, 丁亚芳, 张白, 颜燕红, 周鹏, 黄亚波. 单侧颈内动脉闭塞患者行颞浅动脉-大脑中动脉搭桥术的脑血流动力学评估[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1046-1055.
[2] 张璇, 马宇童, 苗玉倩, 张云, 吴士文, 党晓楚, 陈颖颖, 钟兆明, 王雪娟, 胡淼, 孙岩峰, 马秀珠, 吕发勤, 寇海燕. 超声对Duchenne肌营养不良儿童膈肌功能的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1068-1073.
[3] 朱连华, 费翔, 韩鹏, 姜波, 李楠, 罗渝昆. 高帧频超声造影在胆囊息肉样病变中的鉴别诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 904-910.
[4] 韩丹, 王婷, 肖欢, 朱丽容, 陈镜宇, 唐毅. 超声造影与增强CT对儿童肝脏良恶性病变诊断价值的对比分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 939-944.
[5] 张梅芳, 谭莹, 朱巧珍, 温昕, 袁鹰, 秦越, 郭洪波, 侯伶秀, 黄文兰, 彭桂艳, 李胜利. 早孕期胎儿头臀长正中矢状切面超声图像的人工智能质控研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 945-950.
[6] 陈舜, 薛恩生, 叶琴. PDCA在持续改进超声危急值管理制度中的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 974-978.
[7] 周钰菡, 肖欢, 唐毅, 杨春江, 周娟, 朱丽容, 徐娟, 牟芳婷. 超声对儿童髋关节暂时性滑膜炎的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 795-800.
[8] 刘欢颜, 华扬, 贾凌云, 赵新宇, 刘蓓蓓. 颈内动脉闭塞病变管腔结构和血流动力学特征分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 809-815.
[9] 郏亚平, 曾书娥. 含鳞状细胞癌成分的乳腺化生性癌的超声与病理特征分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 844-848.
[10] 张丽丽, 陈莉, 余美琴, 聂小艳, 王婧玲, 刘婷. PDCA循环法在超声浅表器官亚专科建设中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(07): 717-721.
[11] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[12] 廖梅, 张红君, 金洁玚, 吕艳, 任杰. 床旁超声造影对肝移植术后早期肝动脉血栓的诊断价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 630-634.
[13] 杨天池, 韩威, 邱枫, 祁佳慧. 术中胰腺超声弹性成像在胰腺质地评估中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 646-650.
[14] 唐灿, 李向阳, 秦浩然, 李婧, 王天云, 柯阳, 朱红. 原发性肝脏神经内分泌肿瘤单中心12例诊治与疗效分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 674-680.
[15] 崔佳琪, 吴迪, 陈海艳, 周惠敏, 顾元龙, 周光文, 杨军. TACE术后并发肝脓肿的临床诊治分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 688-693.
阅读次数
全文


摘要