切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (04) : 292 -296. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2017.04.011

所属专题: 文献

心血管超声影像学

超声心动图监测体外膜式氧合治疗心源性休克的价值
余正春1, 马小静1,(), 夏娟1, 李菁1   
  1. 1. 430022 武汉亚洲心脏病医院超声中心
  • 收稿日期:2016-07-01 出版日期:2017-04-01
  • 通信作者: 马小静
  • 基金资助:
    武汉市卫计委课题(WX15A01)

The value of echocardiography in monitoring the treatment of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in patients with cardiogenic shock

Zhengchun Yu1, Xiaojing Ma1,(), Juan Xia1, Jing Li1   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasonography, Wuhan Asia Heart Hospital, Wuhan 430022, China
  • Received:2016-07-01 Published:2017-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Xiaojing Ma
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Ma Xiaojing, Email:
引用本文:

余正春, 马小静, 夏娟, 李菁. 超声心动图监测体外膜式氧合治疗心源性休克的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2017, 14(04): 292-296.

Zhengchun Yu, Xiaojing Ma, Juan Xia, Jing Li. The value of echocardiography in monitoring the treatment of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in patients with cardiogenic shock[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2017, 14(04): 292-296.

目的

探讨超声心动图监测体外膜式氧合(ECMO)治疗心源性休克(CS)的价值。

方法

选取2013年1月至2015年12月在武汉亚洲心脏病医院使用ECMO辅助治疗并成功脱机的CS患者21例。应用超声心动图分别在ECMO建立前、ECMO流量减半时、ECMO停机后即刻测量左心室射血分数(LVEF)及Tei指数,同时记录肱动脉收缩压(SBP)、动脉血氧饱和度(SaO2)。采用单因素方差分析比较接受ECMO辅助治疗且成功撤机的21例患者ECMO建立前、流量减半时、撤离后即刻LVEF、Tei指数、SBP、SaO2差异,进一步组间两两比较采用LSD-t检验;采用配对样本t检验比较接受ECMO辅助治疗且成功撤机的21例患者ECMO建立前与撤离后即刻心率、左心室前后径、下腔静脉宽度、下腔静脉塌陷率、肺动脉楔压、中心静脉压差异。

结果

与ECMO建立前比较,接受ECMO辅助治疗且成功撤机的21例患者ECMO流量减半时、ECMO撤离后即刻LVEF均增加,Tei指数均降低,且差异均有统计学意义(LVEF:t=31.952、59.404,P均<0.01;Tei指数:t=34.406、58.969,P均<0.01)。与ECMO建立前比较,接受ECMO辅助治疗且成功撤机的21例患者ECMO撤离后即刻SBP、SaO2、下腔静脉塌陷率均增大,左心室前后径、肺动脉楔压、中心静脉压均减小,且差异均有统计学意义(t=7.382、37.785、-11.286、3.294、13.923、16.971,P<0.01或0.05);心率、下腔静脉宽度差异均无统计学意义。

结论

在应用ECMO治疗CS患者时,超声心动图能对CS患者心脏进行有效监测、为临床判断ECMO疗效、掌握撤机时机提供重要心脏功能参数。

Objective

To investigate the value of echocardiography in monitoring the treatment of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS).

Methods

A total of 21 patientss were included into the present study, who were treated by ECMO due to CS in Wuhan Asia Heart Hospital from January 2013 to December 2015. The left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and Tei index were measured by echocardiography before, in the middle of (flow reduced to one half) and immediately after the process of ECMO. The systolic blood pressure (SBP) and the arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) were also recorded, and the parameters were compared. The differences of LVEF, Tei index, SBP and SaO2 among different phases of ECMO were compared by using one-way ANOVA and LSD-t test. The differences of heart beat rate, the diameters of left ventricle, diameters of inferior vena cava, subsidence rate of inferior vena cava, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and central venous pressure among different phases of ECMO were also compared by paired-samples t test.

Results

Compared with the pre-ECMO level, the LVEF increased during and immediately after the ECMO (t=31.952, 59.404, both P<0.01), while the Tei index decreased significantly (t=34.406, 58.969, both P<0.01). Compared with the pre-ECMO level, the SBP, SaO2 and subsidence rate of inferior vena cava all increased during and immediately after the ECMO, while the diameter of left ventricle, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and central venous pressure all decreased significantly (t=7.382, 37.785, -11.286, 3.294, 13.923, 16.971, all P<0.01 or 0.05). In contrast, there was no significant change for the parameters of heart beat rate and diameter of inferior vena cava.

Conclusion

When treating CS patients with ECMO, the echocardiography can monitor the cardiac function effectively, and provide important parameters for the clinical doctors to estimate the ECMO efficacy and decide the weaning time.

图3,4 Tei指数测量方法。图3为于心尖四腔心切面测量二尖瓣口的血流频谱,测量前一心动周期A峰结束至下一心动周期E峰开始间隔的时间;图4为在主动脉瓣口血流频谱上测量射血时间。通过公式计算获得Tei指数
表1 接受ECMO辅助治疗且成功撤机的21例患者ECMO建立前、流量减半时、撤离后即刻超声心动图、临床参数比较(±s
表2 接受ECMO辅助治疗且成功撤机的21例患者ECMO建立前与撤离后即刻超声心动图、临床参数比较(±s
[1]
Conrad SA, Rycus PT, Dalton H. Extracorporeal Life Support Registry Report 2004 [J]. ASAIO J, 2005, 51(1):4-10.
[2]
Tei C, Ling LH, Hodge DO, et al. New index of combined systolic and diastolic myocardial performance:a simple and reproducible measure of cardic function:a study in normals and dilated cardiomyopathy [J]. J Cardiol, 1995, 26(6):357-366.
[3]
Cheng JM, den Uil CA, Hoeks SE, et al. Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices vs. Intra-aortic balloon pump couterpulsation for treatment of cardiogenic shock: a meta-analysis of controlled trials [J]. Eur Heart J, 2009, 30(17):2102-2108.
[4]
李世阳,杨明,蔡萍. 人工心脏的测控技术研究进展 [J]. 北京生物医学工程, 2007, 26(2):216-218.
[5]
侯六生,谢钢,李建伟, 等. 体外膜肺氧合在成人心源性休克救治中的临床应用 [J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 2013, 7(41):590-593.
[6]
Stretch R, Sauer CM, Yuh DD, et al. National trends in the utilization of short-term mechanical circulatory support: incidence, outcomes and cost analysis [J]. J Am Coll Card, 2014, 64(14):1407-1415.
[7]
Thiele H, Allam B, Chatellier G, et al. Shock in acute myocardial infartion: the Cape Horn for trials? [J]. Eur Heart J, 2010, 31(15):1828-1835.
[8]
Werdan K, Gielen S, Ebelt H, et al. Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock [J]. Eur Heart J, 2014, 35(3):156-157.
[9]
Pöss J, Desch S, Thiele H. Shock management in acute myocardial infarction [J]. EuroIntervention, 2014, 10 Suppl T:T74-T82.
[10]
Jozef VH, Marc JC, Rudi DP, et al. Management of cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction [J]. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovascular Care, 2015, 4(3):278-297.
[11]
Thiele H, Ohman EM, Desch S, et al. Management of cardiogenic shock [J]. Eur Heart J, 2015, 36(20):1223-1230.
[12]
Moskovitz JB, Levy ZD, Slesinger TL. Cardiogenic shock [J]. Emerg Med Clin N Am, 2015(33):645-652.
[13]
屈正. 现代机械辅助循环治疗心力衰竭 [M]. 北京: 科学技术文献出版社, 2008: 218-223.
[14]
潘华福. 老年退行性心瓣膜病的临床与超声心动图特点分析 [J]. 当代医学, 2011, 17(33):111-112.
[1] 张婉微, 秦芸芸, 蔡绮哲, 林明明, 田润雨, 金姗, 吕秀章. 心肌收缩早期延长对非ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征患者冠状动脉严重狭窄的预测价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1016-1022.
[2] 任书堂, 刘晓程, 张亚东, 孙佳英, 陈萍, 周建华, 龙进, 黄云洲. 左心室辅助装置支持下单纯收缩期主动脉瓣反流的超声心动图特征[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1023-1028.
[3] 孙佳英, 黄云洲, 任书堂, 王翠华, 陈新华, 于艾嘉, 陈元禄. 无创心肌做功对左束支传导阻滞患者左心室整体及节段心肌收缩功能的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 836-843.
[4] 钟露, 曹省, 宋宏宁, 陈金玲, 周青. 超声心动图定量评估二尖瓣反流程度的质量控制[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(07): 705-711.
[5] 金姗, 丁雪晏, 蔡绮哲, 李一丹, 赵智玲, 郭兮恒, 吕秀章. 左心室压力-应变环对阻塞型睡眠呼吸暂停综合征患者心肌功能的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 575-580.
[6] 张贺彬, 高枫, 郑哲岚, 王晓嫚, 陈丽, 杨寸芯, 胡佩佩. 二维斑点追踪超声心动图对业余马拉松运动员右心室收缩功能的评估[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(10): 1091-1097.
[7] 刘婷婷, 丁明岩, 冀威, 郭丽娟, 李颖, 赵含章, 朱芳. 非冠状动脉梗阻性缺血性心脏病女性患者心率储备与微循环功能障碍的相关性研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(10): 1077-1082.
[8] 钟春燕, 董虹美, 张晓航, 冉素真. 胎儿永存左上腔静脉合并肺/主动脉和右/左心室比例异常的产前超声诊断及预后分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(09): 933-940.
[9] 张红梅, 李春梅, 王胰, 张清凤, 丁戈琦, 邓燕, 林薿, 李文华, 尹立雪. 经胸右心声学造影不同右心房增压方式评估卵圆孔未闭隐匿性右向左分流的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(06): 508-513.
[10] 杨喆, 尹立雪, 王斯佳, 罗素秋, 赵欣, 周乔, 苏江, 邬锐. 超声血流向量成像对痛风患者左心室能量损耗的初步评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(06): 527-534.
[11] 陈樱, 陈艳莉. 高龄孕妇心率变异性原因及围产结局分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 295-301.
[12] 方可, 笪欢欢, 汪君, 孙瑞祥, 王涛, 李阳, 江海娇, 鲁卫华. ECMO联合肾上腺切除救治妊娠期嗜铬细胞瘤并儿茶酚胺心肌病一例并文献回顾[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 304-310.
[13] 江岚, 梁伟翔, 苏春宏, 苏志源, 刘丹丹, 戴丽, 陈敦金. 超声心动图评估妊娠合并严重心脏病患者剖宫产围术期心容量及功能的变化特征[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2023, 12(01): 28-35.
[14] 李燕伟, 黄大军, 伍洲, 张嬿, 康彧, 孔令秋. 曲折的右心声学造影一例[J]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 179-181.
[15] 王瑶, 杨艳敏. 伴大量心包积液及可逆性左心室流出道梗阻的应激性心肌病一例[J]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2023, 11(01): 50-53.
阅读次数
全文


摘要