切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华医学超声杂志（电子版）

中华医学超声杂志（电子版） ›› 2018, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (03) : 184 -190. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2018.03.005

所属专题： 文献；

心血管超声影像学

二维斑点追踪技术评价心房同步性与病态窦房结综合征伴发阵发性心房颤动的关系
朱玲斐1, 马苏亚1,†(), 谢晓红1   
  1. 1. 315100　浙江省宁波市鄞州第二医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2017-11-27 出版日期:2018-03-01
  • 通信作者: 马苏亚

Assessment of relationship between atrial synchrony and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation by two-dimensional speckle tracking imaging in patients with sick sinus syndrome

Lingfei Zhu1, Suya Ma1,†(), Xiaohong Xie1   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, Ningbo Yinzhou No. 2 Hospital, Ningbo 315100, China
  • Received:2017-11-27 Published:2018-03-01
  • Corresponding author: Suya Ma
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Ma Suya, Email:
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

朱玲斐, 马苏亚, 谢晓红. 二维斑点追踪技术评价心房同步性与病态窦房结综合征伴发阵发性心房颤动的关系[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2018, 15(03): 184-190.

Lingfei Zhu, Suya Ma, Xiaohong Xie. Assessment of relationship between atrial synchrony and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation by two-dimensional speckle tracking imaging in patients with sick sinus syndrome[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2018, 15(03): 184-190.

目的

采用二维斑点追踪技术评价心房同步性与病态窦房结综合征伴发阵发性心房颤动的关系。

方法

收集2015年1月至2016年8月在浙江省宁波市鄞州第二医院超声科行超声心动图检查的病态窦房结综合征患者。选择病态窦房结综合征不伴发阵发性心房颤动患者25例（病态窦房结综合征A组），病态窦房结综合征伴发阵发性心房颤动患者19例（病态窦房结综合征B组）。选择同期本科行超声心动图检查的健康志愿者28名作为健康对照组。采用超声心动图评价所有受检者左心室结构和功能参数，在获取右心房游离壁、房间隔和左心房游离壁二维斑点追踪图像后，测量心电图P波起始点至图像上舒张期第二个负向波的时间间期，代表右心房游离壁电-机械运动时间（P-RA）、房间隔电-机械运动时间（P-IAS）和左心房游离壁电-机械运动时间（P-LA），计算心房同步性参数。采用单因素方差分析比较3组受检者常规超声心动图参数、P-RA、P-IAS、P-LA及心房同步性参数差异，进一步组间两两比较采用SNK-q检验；采用Spearman相关分析法分析心房电-机械运动时间参数、心房同步性参数与阵发性心房颤动的相关性；绘制应用心房电-机械运动时间参数、心房同步性参数预测病态窦房结综合征伴发阵发性心房颤动的受试者工作特征（ROC）曲线。

结果

病态窦房结综合征A组、病态窦房结综合征B组患者左心房前后径（LAD）均大于健康对照组受检者，且差异均有统计学意义（q=4.18、5.37，P均<0.05）；而病态窦房结综合征A组与病态窦房结综合征B组患者LAD差异无统计学意义。病态窦房结综合征A组、病态窦房结综合征B组患者P-RA、P-IAS均大于健康对照组受检者，且差异均有统计学意义（q=4.03、4.10；q=4.16、4.31，P均<0.05），但病态窦房结综合征A组与病态窦房结综合征B组患者P-RA、P-IAS差异均无统计学意义；P-LA、右心房内同步性、左心房内同步性和左右心房间同步性均为健康对照组<病态窦房结综合征A组<病态窦房结综合征B组，且任意两组间差异均有统计学意义（q=5.18、11.23、4.43；q=5.25、11.74、4.63；q=7.38、14.67、4.73；q=8.01、16.37、6.39，P均<0.05）。Spearman相关分析结果显示，P-LA、右心房内同步性、左心房内同步性和左右心房间同步性与病态窦房结综合征伴发阵发性心房颤动均呈正相关（r=0.61、0.55、0.75、0.78，P均<0.01），其中，左右心房间同步性与与病态窦房结综合征伴发阵发性心房颤动的相关性最佳。ROC曲线显示，P-LA预测病态窦房结综合征伴发阵发性心房颤动的最佳阈值为94 ms，敏感度和特异度分别为68.42%和76.00%，曲线下面积为0.764（95% CI 0.612~0.879）；右心房内同步性预测病态窦房结综合征伴发阵发性心房颤动的阈值为19 ms，敏感度和特异度分别为57.89%和76.00%，曲线下面积为0.714（95% CI 0.558~0.840）；左心房同步性预测病态窦房结综合征伴发阵发性心房颤动的阈值为42 ms，敏感度和特异度分别为78.95%和76.00%，曲线下面积为0.860（95% CI 0.722~0.946）；左右心房间同步性预测病态窦房结综合征伴发阵发性心房颤动的阈值为68 ms，敏感度和特异度分别为84.21%和84.00%，曲线下面积为0.859（95% CI 0.721~0.945）；ROC曲线下面积显示，左心房内同步性和左右心房间同步性预测病态窦房结综合征伴发阵发性心房颤动的效能优于右心房内同步性。

结论

心房电-机械运动时间参数和同步性参数与病态窦房结综合征伴发阵发性心房颤动关系密切。左心房内同步性和左右心房间同步性预测病态窦房结综合征伴发阵发性心房颤动的价值最佳。

关键词: 超声心动描记术, 病态窦房结综合征, 阵发性心房颤动, 心房同步性
Objective

To evaluate the relationship between atrial synchrony and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) in patients with sick sinus syndrome (SSS) by two-dimensional speckle tracking imaging.

Methods

Forty-four SSS patients who underwent echocardiographic examination at Department of Ultrasound, No. 2 Hospital of Yinzhou in Ningbo City of Zhejiang Province from January 2015 to August 2016 were enrolled, including 25 without PAF and 19 with PAF. Twenty-eight normal adults who underwent echocardiographic examination at this department at the same time were included as a normal control group. The structural and functional parameters of the left ventricle of all enrolled subjects were evaluated by echocardiographic examination. After two-dimensional speckle tracking images of the right atrium free wall, atrial septum, and left atrium free wall were obtained, the time interval from the initial point of P wave on electrocardiograph to the second negative wave of the diastolic phase in two-dimensional speckle tracking images were measured to calculate the electrical-mechanical time of the right atrium free wall (P-RA), the electrical-mechanical time of the atrial septum (P-IAS), and the electrical-mechanical time (P-LA) of the left atrium free wall. Subsequently, the parameters of atrial synchrony were calculated. Conventional echocardiographic parameters, P-RA, P-IAS, P-LA, and the parameters of atrial synchrony were compared among the three groups by one-way ANOVA, and further comparisons between any two groups were performed by the SNK-q test. The relationship between the parameters of electrical-mechanical time, parameters of atrial synchrony, and PAF were analyzed by Spearman correlation analysis. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was then performed to evaluate the value of the parameters of electrical-mechanical time and parameters of atrial synchrony in predicting PAF.

Results

The left atrial size was significantly larger in the SSS without PAF group and SSS with PAF group than in the normal control group (q=4.18, 5.37, both P<0.05), although there was no significant difference between the SSS without PAF group and SSS with PAF group. The P-RA and P-IAS were significantly larger in the SSS without PAF group and SSS with PAF group than in the normal control group (q=4.03, 4.10; q=4.16, 4.31, all P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the SSS without PAF group and SSS with PAF group. The P-LA, right atrial intra-atrial synchrony, left atrial intra-atrial synchrony, and inter-atrial synchrony showed a gradually rising trend from the normal control group to the SSS without PAF group and SSS with PAF group, and the difference between any two groups was statistically significant (q=5.18, 11.23, 4.43; q=5.25, 11.74, 4.63; q=7.38, 14.67, 4.73; q=8.01, 16.37, 6.39, all P<0.05). Spearman correlation analysis showed that P-LA, right atrial intra-atrial synchrony, left atrial intra-atrial synchrony, and inter-atrial synchrony were significantly positively correlated with PAF in patients with SSS (r=0.61, 0.55, 0.75, 0.78, all P<0.01), and the correlation between inter-atrial synchrony and PAF was the highest. ROC analysis demonstrated the optimal threshold of P-LA for prediction of PAF was 94 ms [sensitivity: 68.42%; specificity: 76.00%; the area under the ROC curve (AUC): 0.764 (95% CI: 0.612-0.879)]; the optimal threshold of right atrial intra-atrial synchrony was 19 ms [sensitivity: 57.89%; specificity: 76.00%; AUC: 0.714 (95% CI: 0.558-0.840)]; the optimal threshold of left atrial intra-atrial synchrony was 42 ms [sensitivity: 78.95%; specificity: 76.00%; AUC: 0.860 (95% CI: 0.722-0.946)]; and the optimal threshold of inter-atrial synchrony was 68 ms [sensitivity: 84.21%; specificity: 84.00%; AUC: 0.859 (95% CI: 0.721-0.945)]. These results suggest that left atrial intra-atrial synchrony and inter-atrial synchronization are superior to right atrial intra-atrial synchrony in predicting PAF in patients with SSS.

Conclusion

Atrial electro-mechanical motion time parameters and synchrony parameters are closely related to PAF in patients with SSS, and left atrial intra-atrial synchrony and inter-atrial synchronization are the most effective parameters in predicting PAF in patients with SSS.

Key words: Echocardiography, Sick sinus syndrome, Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, Atrial synchrony
表1 3组受检者一般临床资料及常规超声心动图参数比较
组别 例数 性别（例，男性/女性） 年龄（岁，±s） IVST（mm，±s） LVPWT（mm，±s） LVEDD（mm，±s） LVESD（mm，±s） LVEF（%，±s） LAD（mm，±s）
健康对照组 28 5/23 65.36±10.35 11.5±1.8 11.4±1.6 48.34±6.32 25.73±3.25 60.24±7.57 32.35±4.47a
病态窦房结综合征A组 25 4/21 64.25±11.63 11.4±1.6 11.7±1.5 47.26±6.55 26.23±3.41 62.54±8.03 38.23±4.61
病态窦房结综合征B组 19 3/16 66.35±10.34 11.8±1.8 11.4±1.6 49.47±6.43 25.63±3.16 62.61±7.88 40.53±4.73
检验值 ? χ2=0.047 F=1.147 F=1.025 F=1.046 F=1.323 F=1.182 F=1.224 F=5.124
P值 ? 0.9767 0.7483 0.8346 0.7354 0.6383 0.6839 0.6947 0.006
图3 病态窦房结综合征伴发阵发性心房颤动组患者左心房心肌二维斑点追踪曲线，示左心房心肌各节段运动差异较健康对照组受检者及病态窦房结综合征不伴发阵发性心房颤动组患者均明显增加（提示左心房内同步性进一步下降）
表2 3组受检者心房电-机械运动时间参数及心房同步性参数比较（ms，±s）
组别 例数 P-RA P-IAS P-LA 右心房内同步性 左心房内同步性 左右心房间同步性
健康对照组 28 23.53±5.16a 35.43±6.53b 51.42±13.43c 14.21±3.19e 16.53±3.53g 27.32±5.53i
病态窦房结综合征A组 25 29.53±5.42 45.39±7.39 84.35±19.73d 17.33±3.22f 39.34±7.22h 56.39±10.34j
病态窦房结综合征B组 29 30.95±5.62 49.82±7.66 103.45±24.44 21.45±3.74 53.39±12.15 72.54±13.32
F值 ? 4.883 4.644 5.743 5.832 10.448 12.438
P值 ? 0.021 0.037 0.002 0.001 <0.001 <0.001
图4 左心房游离壁电-机械运动时间、右心房内同步性、左心房内同步性和左右心房间同步性预测病态窦房结综合征伴发阵发性心房颤动的受试者工作特征曲线
[1]
Ohkubo K,Watanabe L,Okumura Y, et al. Pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and prolonged sinus pause[J]. Int Heant J, 2007, 48(2): 247-252.
[2]
Guray U,Guray Y,Yýlmaz MB, et al. Evaluation of P wave duration and P wave dispersion in adult patients with secundum atrial septal defect during normal sinus rhythm[J]. Int J Cardiol, 2003, 91(1): 75-79.
[3]
Wang M,Lau CP,Zhang XH, et al. Interatrial mechanical dyssynchrony worsened atrial mechanical function in sinus node disease with or without paroxysmal atrial fibrillation[J]. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, 2009, 20(11): 1237-1243.
[4]
Mandel WJ,Jordan JL,Karagueuzian HS. Disorders of Sinus Function[J]. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med, 1999, 1(2): 179-186.
[5]
Menozzi C,Brignole M,Alboni P, et al. The natural course of untreated sick sinus syndrome and identification of the variables predictive of unfavorable outcomes[J]. Am J Cardiol, 1998, 82(10): 1205-1209.
[6]
Endoh Y,Nakamura A,Suzuki T, et al. Clinical significance of prolonged P wave width after right atrial appendage pacing in sick sinus syndrome[J]. Circ J, 2003, 67(6): 485-489.
[7]
Salah A,Yang H,Tang L, et al. Left atrial dyssynchrony time measured by tissue Doppler imaging to predict atrial fibrillation recurrences after pulmonary vein isolation[J]. Anatol J Cardiol, 2015, 15(2): 115-122.
[8]
Kuklik P,Schäffer B,Hoffmann BA, et al. Local Electrical Dyssynchrony during Atrial Fibrillation: Theoretical Considerations and Initial Catheter Ablation Results[J]. PLoS One, 2016, 11(10): e0164236.
[9]
Bytyçi I,Haliti E,Berisha G, et al. Left ventricular longitudinal systolic dysfunction is associated with right atrial dyssynchrony in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction[J]. Rev Port Cardiol, 2016, 35(4): 207-214.
[10]
Dinov B,Knopp H,Löbe S, et al. Patterns of left atrial activation and evaluation of atrial dyssynchrony in patients with atrial fibrillation and normal controls: Factors beyond the left atrial dimensions[J]. Heart Rhythm, 2016, 13(9): 1829-1836.
[11]
Tuluce K,Ozerkan F,Yakar Tuluce S, et al. Relationships between P wave dispersion, atrial electromechanical delay, left atrial remodeling, and NT-proBNP levels, in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy[J]. Cardiol J, 2015, 22(1): 94-100.
[12]
周燕翔, 陈金玲, 曹省, 等. 双多普勒同步取样技术评价阵发性心房颤动患者心房内及心房间同步性[J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2016, 25(11): 937-941.
[13]
Loghin C,Karimzadehnajar K,Ekeruo IA, et al. Outcome of pulmonary vein isolation ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: predictive role of left atrial mechanical dyssynchrony by speckle tracking echocardiography[J]. J Interv Card Electrophysiol, 2014, 39(1): 7-15.
[14]
曹省, 陈金玲, 周青, 等. 二维斑点追踪显像技术评价阵发性心房颤动患者左心房功能和同步性的研究[J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2013, 22(3): 194-198.
[15]
张瑞芳, 郭玮涛, 赵丽娟, 等. 三维斑点追踪技术评价房颤患者左房收缩功能及同步性[J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2014, 30(12): 1099-1101.
[1] 杜祖升, 赵博文, 张帧, 潘美, 彭晓慧, 陈冉, 毛彦恺. 应用二维斑点追踪成像技术评估孕周及心尖方向对中晚孕期正常胎儿左心房应变的影响[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2024, 21(09): 843-851.
[2] 张商迪, 赵博文, 潘美, 彭晓慧, 陈冉, 毛彦恺, 陈阳, 袁华, 陈燕. 中晚孕期胎儿心房内径定量评估心房比例失调胎儿心脏畸形的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2024, 21(08): 785-793.
[3] 王水清, 赵博文, 潘美, 彭晓慧, 陈冉, 马明明, 狄敏. 16~40周正常胎儿左心房后间隙指数及其Z评分的定量研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2024, 21(05): 460-469.
[4] 李文秀, 杨爽, 吴江, 耿斌, 苏俊武. 二维经胸超声心动图诊断小儿二尖瓣裂的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2023, 20(11): 1186-1192.
[5] 任书堂, 刘晓程, 张亚东, 孙佳英, 陈萍, 周建华, 龙进, 黄云洲. 左心室辅助装置支持下单纯收缩期主动脉瓣反流的超声心动图特征[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2023, 20(10): 1023-1028.
[6] 张婉微, 秦芸芸, 蔡绮哲, 林明明, 田润雨, 金姗, 吕秀章. 心肌收缩早期延长对非ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征患者冠状动脉严重狭窄的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2023, 20(10): 1016-1022.
[7] 孙佳英, 黄云洲, 任书堂, 王翠华, 陈新华, 于艾嘉, 陈元禄. 无创心肌做功对左束支传导阻滞患者左心室整体及节段心肌收缩功能的评价[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2023, 20(08): 836-843.
[8] 钟露, 曹省, 宋宏宁, 陈金玲, 周青. 超声心动图定量评估二尖瓣反流程度的质量控制[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2023, 20(07): 705-711.
[9] 金姗, 丁雪晏, 蔡绮哲, 李一丹, 赵智玲, 郭兮恒, 吕秀章. 左心室压力-应变环对阻塞型睡眠呼吸暂停综合征患者心肌功能的评价[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2023, 20(06): 575-580.
[10] 田权秀, 韩爱民, 徐艳. 动脉导管未闭与极低出生体重早产儿支气管肺发育不良的相关性分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(06): 675-682.
[11] 陈樱, 陈艳莉. 高龄孕妇心率变异性原因及围产结局分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 295-301.
[12] 江岚, 梁伟翔, 苏春宏, 苏志源, 刘丹丹, 戴丽, 陈敦金. 超声心动图评估妊娠合并严重心脏病患者剖宫产围术期心容量及功能的变化特征[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2023, 12(01): 28-35.
[13] 储慧民, 杜先锋. 心腔内超声心动图指导左心耳封堵的规范化标准流程[J/OL]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 1-5.
[14] 储慧民. 心腔内超声心动图指导下的左心耳封堵术标准流程解析[J/OL]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 58-58.
[15] 李燕伟, 黄大军, 伍洲, 张嬿, 康彧, 孔令秋. 曲折的右心声学造影一例[J/OL]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 179-181.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号