切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (09) : 661 -666. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2018.09.005

所属专题: 文献

头颈部超声影像学

症状性及无症状性脑小血管病变脑血流动力学比较
钟经馨1,(), 陈俊2, 陈向燕3, 莫秀云1, 张珏堃1   
  1. 1. 510120 广州中医药大学第二临床医院脑病功能科
    2. 510120 广州中医药大学第二临床医院影像科
    3. 香港中文大学威尔斯亲王医院神经临床研究中心
  • 收稿日期:2018-07-17 出版日期:2018-09-01
  • 通信作者: 钟经馨
  • 基金资助:
    广东省中医药管理局(20131220)

Comparison of cerebral Hemodynamics Between Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Cerebral Small Vessel Disease

Jingxin Zhong1,(), Jun Chen2, Xiangyan Chen3, Xiuyun Mo1, Juekun Zhang1   

  1. 1. Department of Functional Encephalopathy, Guangzhou 510120, China
    2. The Second Clinical Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510120, China
    3. Departments of Medicine and Therapeutics, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China
  • Received:2018-07-17 Published:2018-09-01
  • Corresponding author: Jingxin Zhong
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhong Jingxin, Email:
引用本文:

钟经馨, 陈俊, 陈向燕, 莫秀云, 张珏堃. 症状性及无症状性脑小血管病变脑血流动力学比较[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2018, 15(09): 661-666.

Jingxin Zhong, Jun Chen, Xiangyan Chen, Xiuyun Mo, Juekun Zhang. Comparison of cerebral Hemodynamics Between Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Cerebral Small Vessel Disease[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2018, 15(09): 661-666.

目的

探讨症状性及无症状性脑小血管病变(SVD)颅内血流动力学变化,寻找经颅多普勒超声检查(TCD)诊断SVD的血流参数截断值。

方法

连续性纳入2013年6月至2014年12月广州中医药大学第二临床医院收治的经头颅磁共振成像证实的SVD患者。所有患者均行磁共振血管成像(MRA)、颈部血管超声及TCD检查。记录脑白质病变程度、梗死灶数目与脑血流动力学参数。采用χ2检验比较症状性与无症状性SVD组患者脑白质病变程度;采用t检验比较症状性与无症状性SVD组患者脑血流参数;绘制脑血管搏动指数(PI)诊断症状性SVD患者的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线。

结果

无症状性SVD组患者脑白质疏松程度以0级、1级为主,分别34.6%(28/81)及35.8%(29/81),3级、4级均分别占14.8%(12/81);症状性SVD组患者脑白质疏松程度以0级为最少,占15.7%(31/198),1级、2级、3级分别占29.8%(59/198)、29.3%(58/198)、25.3%(50/198)。无症状性SVD组患者脑白质疏松程度0级者比例多于症状性SVD组患者,而脑白质疏松程度2级、3级者比例少于症状性SVD组患者,且差异均有统计学意义(χ2=13.574,P=0.001;χ2=6.423,P=0.040;χ2=8.265,P=0.005)。症状性SVD组患者椎动脉、基底动脉平均流速均低于无症状性SVD组患者[(23.6±7.3)cm/s vs(27.8±7.0)cm/s,(31.9±10.3)cm/s vs(35.3±9.3)cm/s],且差异均有统计学意义(t=4.269,P<0.001;t=2.500,P=0.013),而2组患者大脑前、中、后动脉平均流速差异均无统计学意义。症状性SVD组患者大脑前、中、后动脉、椎动脉、基底动脉PI指数均高于无症状性SVD组患者(0.99±0.17 vs 0.93±0.14,1.03±0.18 vs 0.96±0.15,0.98±0.17 vs 0.92±0.14,1.10±0.18 vs 1.04±0.23,1.09±0.21 vs 1.00±0.18),且差异均有统计学意义(t=-2.945,P=0.008;t=-2.616,P=0.003;t=-2.724,P=0.007;t=-3.323,P=0.025;t=-2.896,P=0.004)。ROC曲线显示,PI为1.05时,PI诊断症状性SVD的敏感度为37.9%,特异度为78.7%,曲线下面积为0.590;PI为1.10时,PI诊断症状性SVD的敏感度为22.6%,特异度为82.5%,曲线下面积分别为0.534。

结论

症状性SVD组患者PI高于无症状性组SVD患者,但作为TCD对SVD的早期筛查指标可能缺乏敏感性。

Objectives

To investigate the changes of intracranial hemodynamics of symptomatic and asymptomatic in patients with the small vessel disease (SVD), to find the cut off value for the diagnosis of SVD by TCD.

Methods

Form June 2013 to December 2014, a total of 279 SVD patients were recruited confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the Second Clinical Hospital of Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine. All patients underwent magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), color Doppler ultrasound and TCD examination. The white matter lesions, number of infarcts and hemodynamic parameters were recorded. The cerebral vascular risk factors, stroke number, degree of cerebral white matter lesions and hemodynamic parameters were compared between symptomatic and asymptomatic in patients with SVD. The sensitivity and specificity of pulsatility index (PI) in the diagnosis of SVD were calculated, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted.

Results

There was statistically difference in degree of white matter lesion between the asymptomatic and symptomatic group (P<0.05). The degree of leukoaraiosis in asymptomatic SVD group was mainly grade 0~1 accounting for 34.6% (28/81) and 35.8% (29/81) respectively, and grade 3~4 accounting for 14.8% (12/81). In symptomatic SVD group, grade 0 accounted for 15.7% (31/198), grade 1~3 for 29.8% (59/198), 29.3% (58/198) and 25.3% (50/198), respectively. The proportion of leukoaraiosis with grade 0 in asymptomatic SVD was higher than in symptomatic group, while the grade 2~3 was lower than that in symptomatic SVD, and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=13.574, P=0.001; χ2=6.423, P=0.040; χ2=8.265; P=0.005). The mean flow velocity of vertebral artery (VA) and basilar artery (BA) in the symptomatic group was lower than that in asymptomatic group [(23.6±7.3) cm/s vs (27.8±7.0) cm/s, (31.9±10.3) cm/s vs (35.3±9.3) cm/s], and the difference was statistically significant (t=4.269, P<0.001; t=2.500, P=0.013). There was no significant difference in mean velocity of anterior cerebral artery (ACA), middle cerebral artery (MCA) and posterior cerebral artery (PCA) between the two groups. PI were higher in patients with symptom group than asymptomatic group (P<0.05). The mean flow velocity of vertebral and basilar artery of symptom group were lower than those in the asymptomatic group (P<0.05). The optimum cut-off values of PI in diagnosing symptomatic SVD were 1.05 and 1.10, and their sensitivity, specificity and area under the ROC curve was 37.9%, 78.7%, 0.590 and 22.6%, 82.5%, 0.534 respectively.

Conclusion

It may be lack of sensitivity to screen SVD by TCD, although the PI were higher in patients with the symptomatic SVD than the asymptomatic SVD.

表1 症状性与无症状性SVD组患者脑血管病变危险因素比较
表2 症状性与无症状性SVD组患者脑白质病变程度及梗死灶数目比较[例(%)]
图1 血管搏动指数诊断症状性脑小血管病变的受试者工作特征曲线。血管搏动指数为1.05时,血管搏动指数诊断症状性脑小血管病变的敏感度为37.9%,特异度为78.7%,曲线下面积为0.590;血管搏动指数为1.10时,血管搏动指数诊断症状性脑小血管病变的敏感度为22.6%,特异度为82.5%,曲线下面积分别为0.534
表3 症状性与无症状性SVD组患者脑血流动力学参数比较(±s
1
陶雯,柯开富. 脑小血管病研究进展 [J]. 中华卒中杂志, 2017, 12(2): 147-151.
2
樊亚超,王海峰,王新, 等. 缺血性脑小血管病患者轻度认知障碍的危险因素和临床特征:回顾性病例系列研究 [J]. 国际脑血管病杂志, 2012, 20(8): 564-569.
3
Schmidtke K,Htill M. Cerebral small vessel disease: how does it profess [J]. Neurol Sci, 2005, 229-230: 13-20.
4
Wardlaw JM,Smith C,Dichgans M. Mechanisms of sporadic cerebral small vessel disease: insights from neuroimaging [J]. Lancet Neurol, 2013, 12(5): 483-497.
5
脑小血管病诊治专家共识组. 脑小血管病的诊治专家共识 [J]. 中华内科杂志, 2013, 529(10): 893-896.
6
Wahlund LO,Barkhof F,Fazekas F, et al. A New Rating Scale for Age-Related White Matter Changes Applicable to MRI and CT [J]. Stroke, 2001, 32(6): 1318-1322.
7
Adams HP,Davis PH,Leira EC, et al. Baseline NIH stroke scale score strongly predicts outcome after stroke: A report of the trial of org 10 172 in acute stroke treatment (TQAST) [J]. Neurology, 1999, 53(1): 126-131.
8
North American Symptomatic Carotid Endartetectomy Trial. Methods, patient characteristics, and progress [J]. Stroke, 1991, 22(6): 711-720.
9
Hasasn A,Hunt BJ,O′Sullivan M, et al. Homocysteine is a risk factor for cerebral small vessel disease, acting via endothelial dysfunction [J]. Brain, 2004, 127(Pt 1): 212-219.
10
艾楠,柴文,卢东, 等. 皮质下血管性认知障碍患者弥散张量成像和脑血流量的研究 [J]. 中华卒中杂志, 2017, 12(2): 105-111.
11
Wardlaw JM. Blood-brain barrier and cerebral small disease [J]. Neurol Sci, 2010, 299(1-2): 66-71.
12
Zhang AJ,Yu XJ,Wang M. The clinical manifestations and pathophysiology of cerebral small vessel disease [J]. Neurosci Bull, 2010, 26(3): 257-264.
13
Liu J,Tseng BY,Khan MA, et al. Individual variability of cerebral autoregulation, posterior cerebral circulation and white matter hyperintensity [J]. Physiol, 2016, 594(11): 3141-3155.
14
张雄伟,王佳楠. 脑动脉狭窄及侧支循环评估与解读 [M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社, 2015: 179-180.
15
Mok V,Ding D,Fu J, et al. Transcranial Doppler ultrasound for screening cerebral small vessel disease: a community study [J]. Stroke, 2012, 43(10): 2791-2793.
16
Xiong YY,Mok V,Wong A, et al. Evaluation of age-related white matter changes using transcranial Doppler ultrasonography [J]. J Neuroimaging, 2013, 23(1): 53-57.
17
Urao N,Okonkwo UA,Fang MN, et al. MicroCT angiography detects vascular formation and regression in skin wound healing [J]. Microvasc Res, 2016, 106: 57-66.
18
Promjunyakul N,Lahna D,Kaye JA, et al. Characterizing the white matter hyperintensity penumbra with cerebral blood flow measures [J]. Neuroimage Clin, 2015, 8: 224-229.
19
Smith EE,Beaudin AE. New insights into cerebral small vessel disease and vascular cognitive impairment from MRI [J]. Curr Opin Neurol, 2018, 31(1): 36-43.
[1] 唐博, 罗季平, 周桃, 黄多, 刘廷琼, 陈亚萍, 岳文胜. 慢性肾衰竭血液透析患者造瘘侧上肢肱动脉-指端微小动脉血流动力学变化特点分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(12): 1276-1281.
[2] 李凤仪, 李若凡, 高旭, 张超凡. 目标导向液体干预对老年胃肠道肿瘤患者术后血流动力学、胃肠功能恢复的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 29-32.
[3] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[4] 丁荷蓓, 王珣, 陈为国. 七氟烷吸入麻醉与异丙酚静脉麻醉在儿童腹股沟斜疝手术中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 570-574.
[5] 李先锋, 何懿, 程贞永, 邓国魁, 胡波, 谢红, 王莉, 王小燕, 李晓明. 右美托咪定对腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术患者血流动力学及麻醉复苏效果的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 437-441.
[6] 郭建丽, 珠娜, 宋飞, 柴国东. 七氟烷吸入复合瑞芬太尼麻醉在小儿腹腔镜疝修补术中的效果[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 223-227.
[7] 彭敏敏, 杨晓斌, 芮亚楠. 羟考酮复合舒芬太尼在腹腔镜疝修补术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 218-222.
[8] 潘忠军, 戎国祥, 丁明, 殷优宏, 张双龙. 非气管插管麻醉下单孔胸腔镜手术对肺结节及血流动力学、炎性指标的影响[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 272-275.
[9] 王守森, 傅世龙, 鲜亮, 林珑. 深入理解控制性减压技术对创伤性颅脑损伤术中脑膨出的预防机制与效果[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 257-262.
[10] 袁宝玉, 管义祥, 王东流, 陆正. 不同时机颅骨修补术治疗颅脑外伤的临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(01): 35-41.
[11] 弥亮钰, 隆云. 心脏效率在血流动力学治疗中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2024, 10(01): 72-78.
[12] 谢浩文, 丁建英, 刘小霞, 冯毅, 姚婧. 椎旁神经阻滞对微创胃切除肥胖患者术中血流、术后应激及康复质量的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 569-573.
[13] 袁琼, 李智珍, 黄少容, 孙玮萱. 腹腔镜下单侧输卵管开窗取胚术结合甲氨蝶呤对输卵管妊娠患者卵巢储备功能及血流动力学的影响[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(12): 1315-1319.
[14] 刘聪辉, 何浩然, 黄一诺, 张凤, 王凡月, 郝翰. 膳食铜补充对大鼠心肌梗死后心肌基质金属蛋白酶2表达水平及血流动力学的影响[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 166-172.
[15] 芦乙滨, 李梦蝶, 许明. PDCA(计划、执行、检查和处理)循环教学在内科住院医师重症超声指导血流动力学评估培训中的效果评价[J/OL]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 224-228.
阅读次数
全文


摘要