切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (03) : 226 -231. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2019.03.013

所属专题: 文献

浅表器官超声影像学

超声造影与弹性成像对细胞学不能明确的TI-RADS 4类甲状腺结节的诊断价值
陆爱美1, 黄品同2,(), 洪玉蓉2, 张超2, 骆洁丽2   
  1. 1. 310009 杭州,浙江大学医学院附属第二医院超声诊断科(现就职于宁波市鄞州区第二医院)
    2. 310009 杭州,浙江大学医学院附属第二医院超声诊断科
  • 收稿日期:2018-10-13 出版日期:2019-03-01
  • 通信作者: 黄品同

Diagnositic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and ultrasound elastography in thyroid nodules (TI-RADS 4) with indeterminate cytology

Aimei Lu1, Pintong Huang2,(), Yurong Hong2, Chao Zhang2, Jieli Luo2   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Medical College, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310009, China
  • Received:2018-10-13 Published:2019-03-01
  • Corresponding author: Pintong Huang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Huang Pintong, Email:
引用本文:

陆爱美, 黄品同, 洪玉蓉, 张超, 骆洁丽. 超声造影与弹性成像对细胞学不能明确的TI-RADS 4类甲状腺结节的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2019, 16(03): 226-231.

Aimei Lu, Pintong Huang, Yurong Hong, Chao Zhang, Jieli Luo. Diagnositic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and ultrasound elastography in thyroid nodules (TI-RADS 4) with indeterminate cytology[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2019, 16(03): 226-231.

目的

探讨超声造影及弹性成像对细胞学不能明确诊断的TI-RADS 4类甲状腺结节的诊断价值。

方法

选取2014年1月至2016年12月在浙江大学医学院附属第二医院对140例患者共151个细胞学不能明确诊断的甲状腺影像报告与数据系统(TI-RADS 4)类结节,按结节最大径分成A组(≤1.0 cm)和B组(>1.0 cm),行超声造影(CEUS)及弹性成像评估,最后与手术结果对比,以手术病理结果为"金标准",通过四格表分别计算超声弹性、CEUS及两者联合诊断的敏感度、特异度及准确性,CEUS、弹性成像以及联合诊断的敏感度、特异度及准确性比较,采用多组间χ2检验,有统计学意义的采用两两比较,A组与B组间三种诊断方法的敏感度、特异度及准确性比较采用两两比较的χ2检验。

结果

A组中CEUS与弹性成像联合诊断的敏感度为98.0%、特异度为89.0%、准确性为93.7%。B组中CEUS、弹性成像联合诊断的敏感度为96.8%、特异度为88.0%、准确性为92.9%。A组中敏感度及准确性比较,差异均有统计学意义(χ2=17.344、16.315,P均<0.001)。两两比较,联合诊断的敏感度及准确性高于CEUS,差异均有统计学意义(χ2=17.344、16.173,P均<0.001),联合诊断的敏感度及准确性均高于弹性成像,差异均有统计学意义(χ2=7.111、5.141,P均<0.05)。B组中敏感度及准确性比较,差异均有统计学意义(χ2=15.123、15.485,P均<0.01)。两两比较,联合诊断的敏感度及准确性高于CEUS,差异均有统计学意义(χ2=5.167、3.903,P均<0.05),联合诊断的敏感度及准确性也高于弹性成像,差异均有统计学意义(χ2=14.862、14.882,P均<0.001)。CEUS的准确性高于弹性成像,差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.375,P=0.036)。弹性成像在A组的敏感度及准确性高于B组,差异均有统计学意义(χ2=6.943、8.127,P均<0.01)。

结论

CEUS与弹性成像联合应用可以更准确评估细胞学未定性的甲状腺结节的性质,为该类结节的诊疗提供一定依据。且弹性成像在结节最大径≤1.0 cm中的诊断价值高于>1.0 cm。

Objective

To ivestigate the clinical value of ultrasound elastography in combination with contrast-enhanced ultrasound in nondiagonostic thyroid nodules with suspicous ultrasound features.

Methods

A total of 140 patients with 151 thyroid nodules (TIRADS 4) were examined by elastography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in this study. The results were compared with surgical pathology. According to the maximal diameter of thyroid nodules, they were divided into group A (≤1.0 cm) and group B (>1.0 cm). Surgical pathologic results as the ″gold standard″, through four tables calculated the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the elastography, CEUS and combining both diagnosis. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were analyzed by chi-square test.

Results

The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy of CEUS combined with elastography were 98.0%, 89.0%, 93.7% in group A, while in group B, they were 96.8%, 88.0%, 92.9%. In group A, the differeces in sensitivity and accuracy were statistically significant (χ2=17.344, 16.315, all P<0.001); the sensitivity and accuracy of combined were higher than those of CEUS (χ2=17.344, 16.173, P<0.001); The sensitivity and accuracy of combined were higher than those of elastography (χ2=7.111, 5.141, P均<0.05). In group B, the differeces in sensitivity and accuracy were statistically significant (χ2=15.123, 15.485, all P<0.01) the sensitivity and accuracy of combined were higher than those of CEUS (χ2=5.167, 3.903, P均<0.05); The sensitivity and accuracy of combined were higher than those of elastography (χ2=14.862, 14.882, P<0.001). The accuracy of CEUS is higher than elastography in group B (χ2=4.375, P=0.036). The sensitivity and accuracy of elastography in group A were higher those in group B (χ2=6.943, 8.127, P均<0.01). The above differences were statistically significant (all P<0.05).

Conclusions

Combination of CEUS with ultrasound elastography have good application value in diagnosis of thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology. And elastography has a higher diagnostic value for thyroid nodules in group A than in group B.

图1 甲状腺左叶良性结节灰阶超声与超声造影、弹性成像图。图a为超声造影显示结节内部无增强,图b结节及周边均呈蓝色,弹性评分5分
图2 甲状腺左叶恶性结节灰阶超声与超声造影、弹性成像图。图a为超声造影显示结节呈等增强,图b结节内部显示蓝色,周边绿色为主,弹性评分4分
图3 甲状腺右叶恶性结节灰阶超声与超声造影、弹性成像图。图a为超声造影显示结节呈不均低增强,图b结节内部显示蓝色,周边绿色为主,弹性评分4分
表1 甲状腺结节(≤1.0 cm)超声造影、弹性成像及联合应用与病理结果对照分析(例)
表2 甲状腺结节(>1.0 cm)超声造影、弹性成像及联合应用与病理结果对照分析(例)
表3 甲状腺结节(≤1.0 cm)行超声造影、弹性成像及联合应用的诊断效能比较(%)
表4 甲状腺结节(>1.0 cm)行超声造影、弹性成像及联合应用的诊断效能比较(%)
1
吕志红, 俞磊, 韩鄂辉, 等. 超声造影在甲状腺结节鉴别诊断中的价值 [J/CD]. 中华诊断学电子版, 2016, 4(2): 73-77.
2
Horvath E, Majlis S, Rossi R, et al. An ultrasonogram reporting system for thyroid nodules stratifying cancer risk for clinical management [J]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2009, 94(5): 1748-1751.
3
Cooper DS, Doherty GM, Haugen BR, et al. Revised American Thyroid Association management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer [J]. Thyroid, 2009, 19(11): 1167-1214.
4
Kwak JY, Han KH, Yoon JH, et al. Thyroid imaging reporting and data system for US features of nodules: a step in establishing better stratification of cancer risk [J]. Radiology, 2011, 260(3): 892-899.
5
Cibas ES, Ali SZ. NCI Throid FNA State of the Science Conference. The bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology [J]. Am J Clin Pathol, 2009, 132(5): 658-665.
6
Hong YR, Wu YL, Luo ZY, et al. Impact of nodular size on the predictive values of gray-scale,color-Doppler ultrasound, and sonoelastography for assessment of thyroid nodules [J]. J Zhejiang Univ SciB, 2012, 13(9): 707-716.
7
张金堂, 黄品同, 骆洁丽. 超声造影与弹性成像联合评分法对TI-RADS 4类甲状腺结节良恶性的诊断价值 [J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2017, 8(26): 677-681.
8
Zhang B, Jiang YX, Liu JB, et al. Utility of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for evaluation of thyroid nodules [J]. Thyroid, 2010, 20(1): 51-57.
9
曾敏霞, 王燕, 栾艳艳, 等. CEUS与超声弹性成像技术诊断甲状腺微小乳头状癌 [J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2012, 28(6): 1081-1084.
10
Moon HJ, Kim EK, Yoon JH, et al. Malignancy risk stratification in thyroid nodules with nondiagnostic results at cytologic examination: combination of thyroid imaging reporting and data system and the Bethesda System [J]. Radiology, 2015, 274(1): 287-295.
11
Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, et al. 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: The American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer [J]. Thyroid, 2016, 26(1): 1-333.
12
崔秋丽, 刘文英, 李广涵, 等. 甲状腺乳头状癌超声造影增强模式及与肿瘤侵袭性的关系探讨 [J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2015, 24(7): 580-583.
13
Barlolotta TV, Midiri M, Galia M, et al. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of solitary thyroid nodules with contrast-enhanced ultrasound: initial results [J]. Eur Radiol, 2006, 16: 2234-2241.
14
Zhang Y, Jiang Q, Zhang YX, et al. Association between real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasound characteristics and thyroid carcinoma size [J]. Mol Clin Oncol, 2015, 3(4): 743-746.
15
郑雅兰, 郑嫒媛, 王谷一. 不同大小及深度的甲状腺结节超声弹性成像的临床研究 [J].中国临床医学影像杂志, 2013, 24(5): 357-359.
[1] 王亚红, 蔡胜, 葛志通, 杨筱, 李建初. 颅骨骨膜窦的超声表现一例[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(11): 1089-1091.
[2] 汪洪斌, 张红霞, 何文, 杜丽娟, 程令刚, 张雨康, 张萌. 低级别阑尾黏液性肿瘤与阑尾黏液腺癌超声及超声造影特征分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 865-871.
[3] 宋勇, 李东炫, 王翔, 李锐. 基于数据挖掘法分析3 种超声造影剂不良反应信号[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 890-898.
[4] 史学兵, 谢迎东, 谢霓, 徐超丽, 杨斌, 孙帼. 声辐射力弹性成像对不可切除肝细胞癌门静脉癌栓患者放射治疗效果的评价[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 778-784.
[5] 王博冉, 乔春梅, 李春歌, 王欣, 王晓磊. 超声造影评估类风湿关节炎亚临床滑膜炎疾病进展的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 802-808.
[6] 马晓菊, 梁潇, 段云友, 袁丽君, 赵萍. NBAV脂质纳泡对ApoE -/-小鼠动脉粥样硬化病变的评估和干预[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 608-616.
[7] 李洋, 蔡金玉, 党晓智, 常婉英, 巨艳, 高毅, 宋宏萍. 基于深度学习的乳腺超声应变弹性图像生成模型的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 563-570.
[8] 唐小清, 何萍, 杨友, 罗霞, 张菊英, 杨鑫, 余进洪. 声触诊弹性成像联合脉冲多普勒超声成像参数与早期慢性肾脏病分期的相关性及临床价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 491-499.
[9] 郑大雯, 王健东. 胆囊癌辅助诊断研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 769-773.
[10] 温绍敏, 王雅晳, 施依璐, 段莎莎, 云书荣, 张小杉. 靶向超声造影技术在动脉粥样硬化治疗中的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 496-499.
[11] 曹建辉, 冯斌, 黄伟伟, 张超. 超声造影在乳腺BI-RADS 4A类结节诊断及穿刺活检中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 363-368.
[12] 赵欣, 李昊昌, 卫星彤. 多模态超声在非肿块型乳腺病变中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 407-410.
[13] 黄宏山, 陈成彩. 经淋巴管超声造影在乳腺癌前哨淋巴结诊断中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 411-414.
[14] 卫星彤, 李昊昌, 赵欣. 甲状腺木乃伊结节于多模态超声下的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 415-419.
[15] 史宛瑞, 崔立刚. 颈动脉一过性血管周围炎综合征的影像学诊断研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 516-519.
阅读次数
全文


摘要