切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (05) : 380 -385. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2019.05.016

所属专题: 文献

妇产科超声影像学

三维超声断层成像技术评价胎儿肛门直肠发育的价值
广旸1, 何文1,(), 张红霞1, 张雨康1, 宁彬1, 于腾飞1   
  1. 1. 100160 首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2018-10-08 出版日期:2019-05-01
  • 通信作者: 何文

Three-dimensional ultrasonography for evaluation of development of fetal anal sphincter

Yang Guang1, Wen He1,(), Hongxia Zhang1, Yukang Zhang1, Bin Ning1, Tengfei Yu1   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100160, China
  • Received:2018-10-08 Published:2019-05-01
  • Corresponding author: Wen He
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: He Wen, Email:
引用本文:

广旸, 何文, 张红霞, 张雨康, 宁彬, 于腾飞. 三维超声断层成像技术评价胎儿肛门直肠发育的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2019, 16(05): 380-385.

Yang Guang, Wen He, Hongxia Zhang, Yukang Zhang, Bin Ning, Tengfei Yu. Three-dimensional ultrasonography for evaluation of development of fetal anal sphincter[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2019, 16(05): 380-385.

目的

应用三维超声断层成像技术(TUI)评价产前超声对胎儿肛门直肠发育的诊断价值,从而为产前超声诊断肛门闭锁提供更加丰富的诊断信息。

方法

选取2017年6月至2018年7月首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院315例正常单胎孕妇,年龄23~40岁,平均年龄(29±3)岁,孕周为19~40周。应用TUI技术分别测量胎儿肛门括约肌直径(ASD)、肛管直径(ACD)及肛管长径(ACL)。各测量值与孕周之间的关系采用Pearson相关分析,取得ASD、ACD及ACL与孕周的相关性,建立回归方程及曲线。采用组内相关系数(ICC)及其95%可信区间(95% CI)观察对ASD、ACD及ACL测量的可重复性,以此评价测量的可靠性。

结果

所有胎儿应用TUI技术胎儿肛门直肠部位显示率为97.8%(308/315),Pearson相关分析结果表明,正常胎儿ASD、ACD及ACL与胎儿孕周呈正相关。回归方程分别为:ASD:Y=-0.001X2+0.421X-1.726(r=0.83,P<0.01);ACD:Y=0.418X-4.207(r=0.89,P<0.01);ACL:Y=0.526X-1.062(r=0.87,P<0.01)。

结论

TUI技术评价胎儿肛门直肠结构的发育可作为产前观察胎儿肛门直肠结构的一种方法,应用该方法可以提高胎儿肛门直肠结构的显示率。

Objective

To investigate the capability of tomography ultrasound (TUI) in evaluating the development of the normal anorectal structure to provide a reference for prenatal diagnosis of imperforate anus.

Methods

From June 2017 to July 2018, 315 singleton pregnant women at 19-40 weeks of gestational age were selected from Beijing Tiantan Hospital, and they ranged in age from 23 to 40 years, with an average age of 29±3 years. The TUI technique was applied to measure the fetal anal sphincter diameter (ASD), anal canal diameter (ACD), and anal canal length (ACL). The correlation between ASD, ACD, or ACL and gestational age was analyzed by Pearson correlation analysis, and the regression equation and curve were established. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to evaluate the repeatability of the measurement of ASD, ACD, and ACL.

Results

The display rate of fetal anorectum in all fetuses by the TUI technique was 97.8% (308/315). Pearson correlation analysis showed that the normal fetal ASD, ACD, and ACL were positively correlated with the gestational age of the fetus, and the regression equations are: ASD, Y=-0.001X2+ 0.421X-1.726 (r=0.83, P<0.01); ACD, Y=0.418X-4.207 (r=0.89, P<0.01); and ACL, Y=0.526X-1.062 (r=0.87, P<0.01).

Conclusion

TUI for assessment of fetal anorectum is feasible. This method can be applied to improve the display rate of fetal anorectum.

图1 应用三维超声断层成像技术获得孕24周胎儿肛门括约肌横切面及其周围软组织结构的一系列平行切面图像。会阴部中央可显示"靶环征",即中心部为高回声,周边为环状低回声带,最外周为环状高回声线(箭头所示)
图2 应用三维超声断层成像技术获得孕24周胎儿会阴部肛管矢状切面及其周围组织结构的一系列平行切面图像。可见中心部为线状强回声,周边为中等回声管状结构的肛管(箭头所示)
图3 胎儿肛门括约肌直径与孕周相关性的散点图。直线分别代表均数及95%置信区间
图4 胎儿肛管直径与孕周相关性的散点图。直线分别代表均数及95%置信区间
图5 胎儿肛管长径与孕周相关性的散点图。直线分别代表均数及95%置信区间
表1 308例正常胎儿肛门括约肌直径、肛管直径、肛管长径按孕周(19~40周)统计结果
表2 胎儿肛门括约肌直径、坐骨间距、直肠直径、肛管直径及肛管长径的ICC值及95%CI
1
Cho S, Moore SP, Fangman T. One hundred three consecutive patients with anorectal malformations and their associated anomalies [J]. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, 2001, 155(5): 587-591.
2
Bischoff A, Levitt MA, Lim FY, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of cloacal malformations [J]. Pediatr Surg Int, 2010, 26(11): 1071-1075.
3
Taipale P, Rovamo L, Hiilesmaa V. First-trimester diagnosis of imperforate anus [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2005, 25(2): 187-188.
4
Kaponis A, Paschopoulos M, Paraskevaidis E, et al. Fetal anal atresia presenting as transient bowel dilatation at 16 weeks of gestation [J]. Fetal Diagn Ther, 2006, 21(4): 383-385.
5
Brantberg A, Blaas HG, Haugen SE, et al. Imperforate anus: A relatively common anomaly rarely diagnosed prenatally [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2006, 28(7): 904-910.
6
Harris RD, Nyberg DA, Mack LA, et al. Anorectal atresia: prenatal sonographic diagnosis [J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1987, 149(2): 395-400.
7
Bronshtein M, Zimmer EZ. Early sonographic detection of fetal intestinal obstruction and possible diagnostic pitfalls [J]. Prenat Diagn, 1996, 16(3): 203-206.
8
吕康泰,徐倩君,查文, 等. 胎儿下消化道梗阻的超声诊断分析 [J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2010, 26(2): 176-178.
9
Guzman ER, Ranzini A, Day-Salvatore D, et al. The prenatal ultrasonographic visualization of imperforate anus in monoamniotic twins [J]. J Ultrasound Med, 1995, 14(7): 547-551.
10
Ochoa JH, Chiesa M, Vildoza RP, et al. Evaluation of the perianal muscular complex in the prenatal diagnosis of anorectal atresia in a high-risk population [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2012, 39(5): 521-527.
11
Elchalal U, Yanai N, Valsky DV, et al. Application of 3-dimensional ultrasonography to imaging the fetal anal canal [J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2010, 29(8): 1195-1201.
12
袁鹰,李胜利,田晓先, 等. ″靶环征″在产前诊断肛门闭锁中的意义 [J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2014, 5(23): 427-430.
13
Vijayaraghavan SB, Prema AS, Suganyadevi P. Sonographic depiction of the fetal anus and its utility in the diagnosis of anorectal malformations [J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2011, 30(1): 37-45.
14
Gindes L, Weissmann-Brenner A, Achiron R, et a1. 3-Dimensional demonstration of fetal anal canal and sphincter [J]. Ultraschall Med, 2012, 33(7): E25-E30.
15
Moon MH, Cho JY, Kim JH, et al. In-utero development of the fetal anal sphincter [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2010, 35(5): 556-559.
16
张玉珍,张忠阳,刘明, 等. 胎儿腹部异常的MRI诊断及评价 [J]. 临床放射学杂志, 2006, 25(6): 558-562.
17
李胜利. 胎儿畸形产前超声诊断学 [M]. 北京: 人民军医出版社, 2004: 294-296.
[1] 王振宁, 杨康, 王得晨, 邹敏, 归明彬, 王雅楠, 徐明. 机器人与腹腔镜手术联合经自然腔道取标本对中低位直肠癌患者远期疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 437-442.
[2] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[3] 吴晖, 佴永军, 施雪松, 魏晓为. 两种解剖入路下行直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 40-43.
[4] 周世振, 朱兴亚, 袁庆港, 刘理想, 王凯, 缪骥, 丁超, 汪灏, 管文贤. 吲哚菁绿荧光成像技术在腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫中的应用效果分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 44-47.
[5] 徐逸男. 不同术式治疗梗阻性左半结直肠癌的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 72-75.
[6] 杨建波, 马欢, 黄小梅, 刘华柱. 结肠镜辅助下EMR、CSP和RFA术治疗直径<1cm结直肠息肉的疗效和安全性比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 76-79.
[7] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[8] 中国抗癌协会, 中国抗癌协会大肠癌专业委员会. 中国恶性肿瘤整合诊治指南-肛管癌(2024 版)[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 441-449.
[9] 韩加刚, 王振军. 梗阻性左半结肠癌的治疗策略[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 450-458.
[10] 梁轩豪, 李小荣, 李亮, 林昌伟. 肠梗阻支架置入术联合新辅助化疗治疗结直肠癌急性肠梗阻的疗效及其预后的Meta 分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 472-482.
[11] 严虹霞, 王晓娟, 张毅勋. 2 型糖尿病对结直肠癌患者肿瘤标记物、临床病理及预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 483-487.
[12] 赵磊, 刘文志, 林峰, 于剑, 孙铭骏, 崔佑刚, 张旭, 衣宇鹏, 于宝胜, 冯宁. 深部热疗在改善结直肠癌术后辅助化疗副反应及生活质量中的作用研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 488-493.
[13] 陈杰, 武明胜, 李一金, 李虎, 向源楚, 荣新奇, 彭健. 低位直肠癌冷冻治疗临床初步分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 494-498.
[14] 王湛, 李文坤, 杨奕, 徐芳, 周敏思, 苏珈仪, 王亚丹, 吴静. 炎症指标在早发性结直肠肿瘤中的应用[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 802-810.
[15] 刘福成, 赵欣, 乔海朋, 刘晓峰, 张翀, 张宗明. 保留左结肠动脉的肠系膜下动脉根部淋巴结清扫对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术的疗效影响[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 647-653.
阅读次数
全文


摘要