切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (05) : 375 -379. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2019.05.015

所属专题: 妇产科超声影像学 文献 妇产科超声

妇产科超声影像学

孕中期左心发育不良综合征胎儿的肺动脉血流参数特征的价值
陈小敏1, 邓学东1,(), 苟中山1, 杨忠1, 梁泓1   
  1. 1. 215002 南京医科大学附属苏州医院 苏州市立医院超声中心
  • 收稿日期:2017-12-14 出版日期:2019-05-01
  • 通信作者: 邓学东

Characteristics of branch pulmonary artery flow patterns in fetuses with left heart hypoplasia syndrome in the second trimester

Xiaomin Chen1, Xuedong Deng1,(), Zhongshan Gou1, Zhong Yang1, Hong Liang1   

  1. 1. Center for Medical Ultrasound, the Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou 215002, China
  • Received:2017-12-14 Published:2019-05-01
  • Corresponding author: Xuedong Deng
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Deng Xuedong, Email:
引用本文:

陈小敏, 邓学东, 苟中山, 杨忠, 梁泓. 孕中期左心发育不良综合征胎儿的肺动脉血流参数特征的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2019, 16(05): 375-379.

Xiaomin Chen, Xuedong Deng, Zhongshan Gou, Zhong Yang, Hong Liang. Characteristics of branch pulmonary artery flow patterns in fetuses with left heart hypoplasia syndrome in the second trimester[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2019, 16(05): 375-379.

目的

探讨孕中期左心发育不良综合征(HLHS)胎儿肺动脉血流参数特征。

方法

选取2015年8月至2017年5月在南京医科大学附属苏州医院确诊HLHS胎儿54例,将中孕期HLHS胎儿按照其房间隔血流模式分为血流通畅组(41例)与梗阻组(13例),并与正常胎儿(健康对照组,55例)在肺动脉主干内径、右肺动脉内径和右肺动脉第一级分支血流频谱参数3个层面进行对比,采用LSD-t检验分析通畅型和梗阻型HLHS胎儿的肺动脉内径、收缩期峰值流速(PSV)、舒张期末期速度(EDV)、平均速度(TAMXV)、速度-时间积分(VTI)和肺动脉搏动指数(PA PI)等血流参数特征。

结果

肺动脉主干内径方面,三组间均值比较(5.4±0.6 vs 6.7±0.8 vs 6.8±0.9),差异有统计学意义(F=198.56,P<0.05),且通畅组和梗阻组的肺主干内径均大于健康对照组,差异均有统计学意义(t=-18.501、-13.97,P均<0.05),而通畅组和梗阻组的均值比较,差异无统计学意义(P=0.85);右肺动脉内径方面,三组间均值比较,差异无统计学意义(P=0.59);右肺动脉第一级分支血流频谱参数方面,三组间在PSV比较,差异无统计学意义(P=0.34),而在EDV、TAMXV、VTI和PA PI方面,差异均有统计学意义(F=62.98、38.45、13.19及12.46,P均<0.05),且通畅组和梗阻组胎儿EDV、TAMXV和VTI均值小于健康对照组,差异均有统计学意义(t=4.273和10.353、3.546和7.978、-0.441和5.418,P均<0.05),且梗阻组均值小于通畅组,差异均有统计学意义(t=5.542、7.033及4.098,P均<0.05);而通畅组和梗阻组HLHS胎儿PA PI均值大于健康对照组,差异均有统计学意义(t=-2.638、-6.474,P均<0.05),且梗阻组大于通畅组,差异均有统计学意义(t=-2.541,P<0.05)。

结论

HLHS胎儿肺动脉分支血流前向阻力增加,且房间隔血流梗阻型相对于通畅型表现更为显著,这可能与梗阻型肺血管床受损程度相对较重有关。

Objective

To explore the characteristics of branch pulmonary artery flow patterns in fetuses with left heart hypoplasia syndrome (HLHS).

Methods

HLHS fetuses were divided into an unobstructed group and an obstructed group according to the blood flow pattern across the interatrial septum. Main pulmonary artery diameter, right pulmonary artery diameter, and Doppler parameters of first-order right pulmonary artery of both groups were measured by fetal echocardiography and compared with those of normal controls.

Results

There was a significant difference in the diameter of pulmonary trunk among different the three groups (F=198.56, P<0.05), and the main pulmonary artery diameter in the two groups of HLHS fetuses were larger than that in normal controls (t=-18.501, -13.97, P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups of HLHS fetuses (P=0.85). There was no significant difference in right pulmonary artery diameter among the three groups (P=0.59). The end-diastolic velocity, time-averaged maximum velocity, and velocity-time integral in the two HLHS groups were lower than those in normal controls, and these parameters in the obstructed group were less than those in the unobstructed group. The pulmonary artery pulsatility index in the two HLHS groups was higher than those in normal controls, and it was higher in the obstructed group than in the unobstructed group. There was no statistically significant difference in peak systolic velocity among the three groups (P=0.34).

Conclusion

The antegrade resistance of the pulmonary arteries of HLHS fetuses increase and these pathologcial conditions are more obvious in those with obstructed flow across the atrial septum compared to those with unobstructed flow.

图1~3 右肺动脉第一级分支频谱多普勒参数测量。图1健康对照组胎儿舒张期频谱明亮、平缓;图2通畅型HLHS胎儿舒张期频谱暗淡、低平;图3而梗阻型舒张期频谱部分微弱、缺失
表1 健康对照组、通畅组、梗阻组孕中期左心发育不良综合征胎儿肺动脉内径和右肺动脉第一级分支频谱多普勒参数均值比较(±s
1
Greenleaf CE, Urencio JM, Salazar JD, et al. Hypoplastic left heart syndrome: current perspectives [J]. Transl Pediatr, 2016, 5(3): 142-147.
2
Freud LR, McElhinney DB, Marshall AC, et al. Fetal aortic valvuloplasty for evolving hypoplastic left heart syndrome: postnatal outcomes of the first 100 patients [J]. Circulation, 2014, 130(8): 638-645.
3
高其云. HLHS的超声特征及其合并心内、心外结构异常与染色体异常的关系 [J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2014, 29(12): 1892-1894.
4
Feinstein JA, Benson DW, Dubin AM, et al. Hypoplastic left heart syndrome: current considerations and expectations [J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2012, 59(1 Suppl): S1-S42.
5
Chintala K, Tian Z, Du W, et al. Fetal pulmonary venous Doppler patterns in hypoplastic left heart syndrome: relationship to atrial septal restriction [J]. Heart, 2008, 94(11): 1446-1449.
6
Frommelt MA. Challenges and controversies in fetal diagnosis and treatment: hypoplastic left heart syndrome [J]. Clin Perinatol, 2014, 41(4): 787-798.
7
满婷婷,何怡华,孙琳, 等. 左心发育不良综合征的鉴别诊断与预后分析 [J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2015, 31(8): 708-711.
8
Gu X, He Y, Zhang Y, et al. Fetal echocardiography: reference values for the Chinese population [J]. J Perinat Med, 2017, 45(2): 171-179.
9
Gu X, Zhang Y, Han J, et al. Isolated premature restriction or closure of foramen ovale in fetuses: Echocardiographic characteristics and outcome [J]. Echocardiography, 2018 5(8): 1189-1195.
10
International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Carvalho JS, Allan LD, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): sonographic screening examination of the fetal heart [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2013, 41(3): 348-359.
11
王鸿,耿丹明,涂学军, 等. 产前超声心动图诊断胎儿左心发育不良综合征 [J/CD]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2008, 4(6): 908-913.
12
Thakur V, Munk N, Mertens L, et al. Does prenatal diagnosis of hypoplastic left heart syndrome make a difference? -A systematic review [J]. Prenat Diagn, 2016, 36(9): 854-863.
13
Fonseca BM. Perioperative imaging in hypoplastic left heart syndrome [J]. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2013, 17(2): 117-127.
14
Nguyen T, Miller M, Gonzalez J, et al. Echocardiography of hypoplastic left heart syndrome [J]. Cardiol Young, 2011, 21 Suppl 2: 28-37.
15
Hunter LE, Simpson JM. Prenatal screening for structural congenital heart disease [J]. Nat Rev Cardiol, 2014, 11(6): 323-334.
16
Dadlani GH, Braley K, Perez-Colon E, et al. Long-term management of patients with hypoplastic left heart syndrome: the diagnostic approach at All Children′s Hospital [J]. Cardiol Young, 2011, 21 Suppl 2: 80-87.
17
Said SM, Dearani JA, Silversides CK, et al. Longer-term issues for young adults with hypoplastic left heart syndrome: contraception, pregnancy, transition, transfer, counselling, and re-operation [J]. Cardiol Young, 2011, 21 Suppl 2: 93-100.
18
Hickey EJ, Caldarone CA, McCrindle BW. Left ventricular hypoplasia: a spectrum of disease involving the left ventricular outflow tract, aortic valve, and aorta [J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2012, 59(1 Suppl): S43-S54.
19
Yabrodi M, Mastropietro CW. Hypoplastic left heart syndrome: from comfort care to long-term survival [J]. Pediatr Res, 2017, 81(1-2): 142-149.
No related articles found!
阅读次数
全文


摘要