切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (02) : 103 -107. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2020.02.003

所属专题: 总编推荐 妇产科超声影像学 文献

专家论坛

子宫内膜容受性的多模态超声评估
徐子宁1, 彭成忠2,(), 吕亚儿2, 孙娟2, 金碧辉3, 郭晓燕3   
  1. 1. 310014 杭州,浙江省人民医院超声科(原工作单位为浙江省立同德医院)
    2. 310014 杭州,浙江省人民医院超声科
    3. 310014 杭州,浙江省人民医院生殖内分泌科
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-03 出版日期:2020-02-22
  • 通信作者: 彭成忠
  • 基金资助:
    浙江省科技厅基础公益研究项目(LGF19H180011); 浙江省卫生医药科技计划项目(2020KY430)

Multimodal ultrasound evaluation of endometrial receptivity

Zining Xu1, Chengzhong Peng2(), Ya′er Lyv2   

  • Received:2019-12-03 Published:2020-02-22
  • Corresponding author: Chengzhong Peng
引用本文:

徐子宁, 彭成忠, 吕亚儿, 孙娟, 金碧辉, 郭晓燕. 子宫内膜容受性的多模态超声评估[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2020, 17(02): 103-107.

Zining Xu, Chengzhong Peng, Ya′er Lyv. Multimodal ultrasound evaluation of endometrial receptivity[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2020, 17(02): 103-107.

1
Craciunas L, Gallos I, Chu J, et al. Conventional and modern markers of endometrial receptivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Hum Reprod Update, 2019, 25(2): 202-223.
2
Bonilla-Musoles F, Raga F, Osborne NG, et al. Endometrial Receptivity Evaluation With Ultrasound [J]. Ultrasound Q, 2013, 29(1): 3-20.
3
Rogers PA, Milne BJ, Trounson AO. A model to show human uterine receptivity and embryo viability following ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization [J]. J In Vitro Fertil Embryo Transf, 1986, 3(2): 93-98.
4
Momeni M, Rahbar MH, Kovanci E. A meta-analysis of the relationship between endometrial thickness and outcome of in vitro fertilization cycles [J]. J Hum Reprod Sci, 2011, 4(3): 130-137.
5
中国医师协会超声医师分会. 中国妇科超声检查指南 [M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2017.
6
李力,乔杰. 实用生殖医学 [M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2017.
7
Casper RF. It's time to pay attention to the endometrium [J]. Fertil Steril, 2011, 96(3): 519-521.
8
Kasius A, Smit JG, Torrance HL, et al. Endometrial thickness and pregnancy rates after IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Hum Reprod Update, 2014, 20(4): 530-541.
9
Kovachev E, Ganchev ZH, Cherneva S, et al. Measurement of endometrial volume and endometrial thickness for assessment of endometrial receptivity in assisted reproductive techniques [J]. Akush Ginekol(Sofiia), 2005, 44(Suppl 2): 27-33.
Kovachev E, Ganchev Zh, Cherneva S, et al. Measurement of endometrial volume and endometrial thickness for assessment of endometrial receptivity in assisted reproductive techniques [J]. Akush Ginekol(Sofiia), 2005, 44(Suppl 2): 27-33.
10
Ng EH, Yeoung WS, Ho PE, et al. Endometrial and subendometrial vascularity are significantly lower in patients with endometrial volume of 2.5 mm or less [J]. Reprod Biomed Online, 2009,18(2): 262-268.
11
Engels V, Sanfrutos L, Pérez-Medina T, et al. Evaluation of endometrial and subendometrial vascularization and endometrial volume by 3-D power Doppler ultrasound and its relationship with age and pregnancy in intrauterine insemination cycles [J]. Gynecol Obstet Invest, 2011, 72(2): 117-122.
12
Gonen Y, Casper RF. Prediction of implantation by the sonographie appearance of the endometrium during controlled ovarian stimulation for in-vitro fertilization [J]. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf, 1990, 7(3): 146-152.
13
Seshadri S, El-Toukhy T, Douiri A, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of saline infusion sonography in the evaluation of uterine cavity abnormalities prior to assisted reproductive techniques: a systematic review and meta-analyses [J]. Hum Reprod Update, 2015, 21(2): 262-274.
14
Grimbizis GF, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Saravelos SH, et al. The Thessaloniki ESHRE/ESGE consensus on diagnosis of female genital anomalies [J]. Gynecological Surgery, 2016, 13(1): 1-16.
15
Seshadri S, El-Toukhy T, Douiri A, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of saline infusion sonography in the evaluation of uterine cavity abnormalities prior to assisted reproductive techniques: a systematic review and meta-analyses [J]. Hum Reprod Update, 2015, 21(2): 262-274.
16
van Gestel I, IJland MM, Johannes L, et al. Complex endometrial wave-patterns in IVF [J]. Fertil Steril, 2007, 88(3): 612-615.
17
Fanchin R, Ayoubi JM, Righini C, et al. Uterine contractility decreases at the time of blastocyst transfers [J]. Hum Reprod, 2002, 17(3): 1115-1119.
18
徐步芳,冯云,王枫钊, 等. 胚胎移植日子宫内膜运动波对冻融胚胎移植周期结局的预测价值 [J/CD]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2011, 5(14): 4033-4037.
19
Zhu L, Che HS, Xiao L, et al. Uterine peristalsis before embryo transfer affects the chance of clinical pregnancy in fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles [J]. Hum Reprod, 2014, 29(6): 1238-1243.
20
IJland MM, Hoogland HJ, Dunselman GA, et al. Endometrial wave direction switch and the outcome of in vit ro fertilization [J]. Fertil Steril, 1999, 71(3): 476-481.
21
Lazzarin N, Exacoustos C, Vaquero E, et al. Uterine junctional zone at three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasonography in patients with recurrent miscarriage: a new diagnostic tool? [J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2014,174: 128-132.
22
Maged AM, Ramzy AM, Ghar MA, et al. 3D ultrasound assessment of endometrial junctional zone anatomy as a predictor of the outcome of ICSI cycles [J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2017, 212: 160-165.
23
Exacoustos C, Manganaro L, Zupi E. Imaging for the evaluation of endometriosis and adenomyosis [J]. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 2014, 28(5): 655-681.
24
Exacoustos C, Luciano D, Corbett B, et al. The uterine junctional zone: a 3-dimensional ultrasound study of patients with endometriosis [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2013, 209(3): 248.e1-248.e7.
25
Basir GS, Lam TP, Chau MT, et al. Colour Doppler analysis of peri-implantation utero-ovarian haemodynamics in women with excessively high oestradiol concentrations after ovarian stimulation [J]. Hum Reprod, 2001, 16(10): 2114-2117.
26
Mitko Ivanovski. The Role of Ultrasound in the Evaluation of Endometrial Receptivity Following Assisted Reproductive Treatments. In Vitro Fertilization [M]. INTECH, 2012: 31-68.
27
Ng EH, Chan CC, Tang OS, et al. Relationship between uterine blood flow and endometrial and subendometrial blood flows during stimulated and natural cycles [J]. Fertil Steril, 2006, 85(3): 721-727.
28
王缘,何亚琼,杨静, 等. 三维超声参数对IVF/ICSI-ET妊娠结局的预测价值 [J]. 生殖与避孕, 2016, 36(6): 471-478.
29
Wang L, Qiao J, Li R, et al. Role of endometrial blood flow assessment with color Doppler energy in predicting pregnancy outcome of IVF-ET cycles [J]. Reprod Biol Endocrinol, 2010, 8: 122.
30
Gong X, Li Q, Zhang Q, et al. Predicting endometrium receptivity with parameters of spiral artery blood flow [J]. Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci, 2005, 25(3): 335-338.
31
Son JB, Jeong JE, Joo JK, et al. Measurement of endometrial and uterine vascularity by transvaginal ultrasonography in predicting pregnancy outcome during frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles [J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2014, 40(6): 1661-1667.
32
Chien LW, Au HK, Chen PL, et al. Assessment of uterine receptivity by endometrial-subendometrial blood flow distribution pattern in women undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer [J]. Fertil Steril, 2002, 78(2): 245-251.
33
Sharkey AM, Day K, McPherson A, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor expression in human endometrium is regulated by hypoxia [J]. Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2000, 85(1): 402-409.
34
Ng EH, Chan CC, Tang OS, et al. The role of endometrial and subendometrial blood flows measured by three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound in the prediction of pregnancy during IVF treatment [J]. Hum Reprod, 2006, 21(1): 164-170.
35
Mishra VV, Agarwal R, Sharma U, et al. Endometrial and Subendometrial Vascularity by Three-Dimensional (3D) Power Doppler and Its Correlation with Pregnancy Outcome in Frozen Embryo Transfer (FET) Cycles [J]. J Obstet Gynaecol India, 2016, 66(Suppl 1): 521-527.
36
Levgur M, Tsai T, Kang K, et al. Endometrial stripe thickness in tubal and intrauterine pregnancies [J]. Fertil Steril, 2000, 74(5): 889-891.
37
Liu Y, Tian JW, Xu Y, et al. Role of transvaginal contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the early diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma [J]. Chin Med J (Engl), 2012, 125(3): 416-421.
38
Zhou HL, Xiang H, Duan L, et al. Application of Combined Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Transvaginal Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Endometrial Carcinoma [J]. Biomed Res Int, 2015, 292743.
39
Chen M, He Y, Zhang P, Geng Q, et al. Comparison of uterine Receptivity between Fertile and Unexplained Infertile Women by Assessment of Endometrial and subendometrial Perfusion Using Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound: Which Index is Better--Peak Intensity or Area under the Curve [J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2016, 42(3): 654-663.
No related articles found!
阅读次数
全文


摘要