切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (04) : 296 -299. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2020.04.002

所属专题: 文献

腹部超声影像学

超声引导放射性粒子治疗复发性肝癌的疗效及安全性评价
苏伟力1, 齐二朋1, 高元瑾1, 刘方义1, 韩治宇1, 于晓玲1,()   
  1. 1. 100853 北京,解放军总医院第一医学中心介入超声科
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-02 出版日期:2020-04-01
  • 通信作者: 于晓玲
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(8167071354)

Ultrasound-guided radioactive seed implantation for treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma

Weili Su1, Erpeng Qi1, Yuanjin Gao1, Fangyi Liu1, Zhiyu Han1, Xiaoling Yu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Interventional Ultrasound, General Hospital of People′s Liberation Army, Beijing 100853, China
  • Received:2019-12-02 Published:2020-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Xiaoling Yu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Yu Xiaoling, Email:
引用本文:

苏伟力, 齐二朋, 高元瑾, 刘方义, 韩治宇, 于晓玲. 超声引导放射性粒子治疗复发性肝癌的疗效及安全性评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2020, 17(04): 296-299.

Weili Su, Erpeng Qi, Yuanjin Gao, Fangyi Liu, Zhiyu Han, Xiaoling Yu. Ultrasound-guided radioactive seed implantation for treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2020, 17(04): 296-299.

目的

评价超声引导下放射性粒子植入治疗复发性肝癌的疗效。

方法

选取2014年1月至2018年12月于解放军总医院第一医学中心接受超声引导下粒子植入治疗的肝癌患者31例,共计33个病灶。对31例复发性肝癌患者进行影像重建,导入放射治疗计划系统(TPS)进行术前规划,术中实时超声引导下按照规划布放粒子,术后增强影像扫描重建并利用TPS系统进行放射剂量学评估及疗效评价。评价指标包括术后2、3、6、12个月的影像学改变,术后并发症、肿瘤局部控制率、无进展生存时间(PFS)、总生存期(OS)。以Kaplan-Meier法绘制生存曲线。

结果

所有手术均顺利完成,中位随访时间25个月,术后2个月随访病例完全缓解率、部分缓解率、疾病稳定率和局部控制率分别为3%(1/33),15.2%(5/33),75.8%(25/33),93.9(31/33),2例出现局部进展(6.1%,2/33);术后12个月局部控制率为90.9%(30/33);术后1、3、5年的总生存率为91%、81%、50%,平均无进展生存时间为27.6个月,中位无进展生存时间为23.2个月。术后疼痛5例,发热2例,腹泻1例。

结论

超声引导下放射性粒子治疗复发性肝癌临床疗效确切,是一种安全有效的治疗方法。

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy of ultrasound-guided radioactive seed implantation in the treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma.

Methods

Image reconstruction was performed in 31 patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma. Preoperative planning was carried out by using the treatment planning system (TPS). Particles were placed according to the plan under the guidance of real-time ultrasound during operation. Postoperative enhanced imaging reconstruction was performed, and radiodosimetric evaluation and curative effect evaluation were carried out using the TPS. The indicators evaluated included imaging changes at 3, 6 and 12 months after operation, postoperative complications, local tumor control rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). SPSS 19.0 software was used for statistical analyses, and Kaplan Meier method was used to plot the survival curve.

Results

All operations were successfully completed. The median follow-up time was 25 months. The complete remission rate, partial remission rate, disease stability rate, and local control rate were 3% (1/33), 15.2% (5/33), 75.8% (25/33), and 93.9 (31/33), respectively, and two (6.1%, 2/33) cases had local progress. The local control rate was 90.9% (30/33) at 12 months after operation. The overall survival rates were 91%, 81%, and 50%, respectively, at 1, 3, and 5 years after operation. The average progression-free survival time was 27.6 months and the median progression-free survival time was 23.2 months. Postoperative pain occurred in five cases, fever in two cases, and diarrhea in one case.

Conclusion

Ultrasound-guided radioactive particle therapy for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma is effective and safe.

图1 肝癌患者粒子植入术后生存曲线。显示术后1年、3年、5年的总生存率为91%、81%、50%
图2 实时超声引导下沿引导线进针并于肿瘤内布放125I粒子(箭头所示)
图3 术后CT扫查观察粒子分布情况。箭头所示为肿瘤内部125I粒子
1
Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015 [J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2016, 66(2): 115-132.
2
Li W, Man W, Guo H, et al. Clinical study of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization combined with microwave ablation in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma [J]. J Cancer Res Ther, 2016, 12(Supplement): C217-C220.
3
Delhaye C, Hendlisz A, Vouche M. Update on transarterial approaches to locoregional treatment in hepatocellular carcinoma [J]. Curr Opin Oncol, 2019, 31(4): 339-345.
4
Shen X, Ma S, Tang X, et al. Clinical outcome in elderly Chinese patients with primary hepatocellular carcinoma treated with percutaneous microwave coagulation therapy (PMCT): A Strobe-compliant observational study [J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2018, 97(35): e11618.
5
Francica G, Meloni MF, Riccardi L, et al. Ablation treatment of primary and secondary liver tumors under contrast-enhanced ultrasound guidance in field practice of interventional ultrasound centers. A multicenter study [J]. Eur J Radiol, 2018, 105: 96-101.
6
Lee DH, Lee JM. Recent Advances in the Image-Guided Tumor Ablation of Liver Malignancies: Radiofrequency Ablation with Multiple Electrodes, Real-Time Multimodality Fusion Imaging, and New Energy Sources [J]. Korean J Radiol, 2018, 19(4): 545-559.
7
Pons-Llanas O, Roldan-Ortega S, Celada-Alvarez F, et al. Permanent seed implant brachytherapy in low-risk prostate cancer: Preoperative planning with 145 Gy versus real-time intraoperative planning with 160 Gy [J]. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother, 2018, 23(4): 290-297.
8
Wang W, Liu Z, Zhu J, et al. Brachytherapy with iodine 125 seeds for bone metastases [J]. J Cancer Res Ther, 2017, 13(5): 742-747.
9
Huang H, Xu S, Li F, et al. Clinical application of computed tomography-guided (125)I seed interstitial implantation for head and neck cancer patients with unmanageable cervical lymph node metastases [J]. Eur J Med Res, 2016, 21: 18.
10
Lencioni R, Llovet JM. Modified RECIST (mRECIST) assessment for hepatocellular carcinoma [J]. Semin Liver Dis, 2010, 30(1): 52-60.
11
Huang JW, Hernandez-Alejandro R, Croome KP, et al. Surgical vs percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma in dangerous locations [J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2011, 17(1): 123-129.
12
姜玉良, 吉喆, 郭福新, 等. CT引导辅助3D打印个体化非共面模板引导125I粒子治疗头颈部复发/转移肿瘤剂量学研究 [J]. 中华放射医学与防护杂志, 2018, 38(11): 842-845, 858.
13
张宏涛, 王娟, 王军, 等. 3D打印模板引导125I放射性粒子植入治疗食管癌颈部转移淋巴结的建议 [J]. 中华医学杂志, 2018, 98(39): 3129-3133.
14
Sun H, Zhang M, Liu R, et al. Endovascular implantation of 125I seed combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma [J]. Future Oncol, 2018, 14(12): 1165-1176.
15
屈佳, 王辉, 陈露, 等. 超声引导经皮徒手穿刺125I放射性粒子植入治疗中央型肝癌[J/CD]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2018, 15(7): 539-542.
[1] 江泽莹, 王安婷, 王姣丽, 陈慈, 周秋玲, 黄燕娟, 周芳, 薛琰, 周剑烽, 谭文勇, 杜美芳. 多种植物油组分预防肿瘤放化疗相关毒性反应的效果分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 523-527.
[2] 张华, 孙宇, 乡世健, 李樱媚, 王小群. 循环肿瘤细胞预测晚期胃肠癌患者化疗药物敏感性的研究[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 422-425.
[3] 刘有才, 张义君, 赵欣磊, 周家玄. Endobutton带袢钛板与钩钢板治疗肩锁关节脱位病例的疗效比较[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 212-217.
[4] 黄瑶, 袁滨, 束昊, 王磊, 孙鲁宁. 关节镜下带线锚钉修补术治疗Ⅴ型SLAP损伤临床观察[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 218-223.
[5] 钟东. 大脑凸面脑膜瘤的个体化全程管理[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(04): 193-198.
[6] 单秋洁, 孙立柱, 徐宜全, 王之霞, 徐妍, 马浩, 刘田田. 中老年食管癌患者调强放射治疗期间放射性肺损伤风险模型构建及应用[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 388-393.
[7] 梁文龙, 曹杰, 黄庆, 林泳, 黄红丽, 杨平, 李冠炜, 胡鹤. 信迪利单抗联合瑞戈非尼治疗晚期结直肠癌的疗效与安全性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 409-413.
[8] 姜里蛟, 张峰, 周玉萍. 多学科诊疗模式救治老年急性非静脉曲张性上消化道大出血患者的临床观察[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 520-524.
[9] 张景旭, 李德舫, 由上可, 张玉田. 贝伐珠单抗与安罗替尼联合奥沙利铂治疗晚期直肠癌的临床疗效[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 289-293.
[10] 盛静, 梅勇, 夏佩, 王晓林. 乌苯美司联合伊立替康二线治疗晚期胃癌的临床研究[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 317-321.
[11] 于晓东, 李德华, 高山, 徐鑫. 理中汤加味联合美沙拉嗪治疗轻度活动期克罗恩病的临床观察[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 199-202.
[12] 董骏, 吴芳芳. mFOLFOX6与FOLFOX4化疗方案治疗直肠癌的临床疗效及安全性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 236-240.
[13] 赵军, 李超杰, 李佳. 雷贝拉唑联合康复新液对治疗幽门螺杆菌阳性的十二指肠溃疡的疗效[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 254-258.
[14] 李莹倩, 李华山. 基于真实世界的完全性直肠脱垂治疗方式评价[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 700-705.
[15] 吕喆, 高庆坤, 常天静, 董含微, 王晓鹏, 那曼丽, 张滨. 磁共振3D-T2WI-FFE序列结合曲面重组观察直肠癌放疗对骶神经形态的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 513-518.
阅读次数
全文


摘要