切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (04) : 300 -307. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2020.04.003

所属专题: 文献

腹部超声影像学

同时性结直肠癌肝转移瘤消融治疗后辅助化疗起始时间对患者预后的影响
林静1, 崔瑞1, 覃斯1, 陈瑶1, 黄玉笑1, 刘广健1,()   
  1. 1. 510655 广州,中山大学附属第六医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2019-11-13 出版日期:2020-04-01
  • 通信作者: 刘广健

Effect of time of initiating adjuvant chemotherapy on prognosis of patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastasis after microwave ablation

Jing Lin1, Rui Cui1, Si Qin1, Yao Chen1, Yuxiao Huang1, Guangjian Liu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Medical Ultrasound, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510655, China
  • Received:2019-11-13 Published:2020-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Guangjian Liu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Liu Guangjian,
引用本文:

林静, 崔瑞, 覃斯, 陈瑶, 黄玉笑, 刘广健. 同时性结直肠癌肝转移瘤消融治疗后辅助化疗起始时间对患者预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2020, 17(04): 300-307.

Jing Lin, Rui Cui, Si Qin, Yao Chen, Yuxiao Huang, Guangjian Liu. Effect of time of initiating adjuvant chemotherapy on prognosis of patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastasis after microwave ablation[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2020, 17(04): 300-307.

目的

本研究以探究微波消融(MWA)治疗后辅助化疗(AC)起始时间对同时性结直肠癌肝转移瘤(CRLM)患者肝内无复发生存(RFS)及肝损害的影响。

方法

回顾性分析2013年10月至2019年1月在中山大学附属第六医院确诊为同时性CRLM且行超声引导下经皮MWA治疗联合AC治疗的患者。本研究共纳入患者144例,其中G1组98例,G2组46例。中位肝内RFS为22.2个月。根据MWA术后AC开始时间,将患者分为≤4周(G1)和4~8周(G2)2组。比较G1组和G2组消融后及第1次AC前后血清丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT)、天冬氨酸转氨酶(AST)水平的变化。采用Kaplan-Meier法和Log-rank检验计算并比较两组患者的肝内RFS。采用Cox比例风险模型对肝内RFS的危险因素进行单因素和多因素回归分析。

结果

G1组肝内RFS较G2组显著延长(中位肝内RFS,40.6个月 vs 12.6个月,Log-rank P=0.007)。采用Cox比例风险模型分析结果发现,辅助化疗开始时间间隔为4~8周(HR=1.917,95%CI:1.104~3.327,P=0.021)和肝转移瘤个数(HR=1.292,95%CI:1.096~1.524,P=0.002)是肝内RFS时间短的独立影响因素。G1组和G2组第1次AC前、后ALT、AST水平,差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。

结论

对于同时性CRLM患者,在MWA治疗后早期开始AC(≤4周)有助于延长术后肝内RFS时间。

Objective

To investigate the influence of time of initiating adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) on intrahepatic recurrence-free survival (RFS) and liver injury in patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) after receiving microwave ablation (MWA).

Methods

Data were retrospectively collected from patients with synchronous CRLM undergoing ultrasound-guided percutaneous MWA combined with AC at our center from October 2013 to January 2019. According to the time of initiating AC relative to the date of MWA, the patients were categorized into two groups:≤4 weeks (G1) and 4~8 weeks (G2). Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to compare the RFS between the two groups. Cox regression models were used for univariate and multivariate analyses to identify predictors of RFS. Besides, the levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) before and after the first AC were also compared between the G1 and G2 groups.

Results

A total of 144 patients were included in this study (G1, n=98; G2, n=46). Median RFS was 22.2 months. The RFS was significantly longer in the G1 group than in the G2 group (median RFS, 40.6 months vs 12.6 months, log-rank P=0.007). In Cox regression analysis, G2 (hazard ratio [HR]=1.917, 95% confidence interval CI: 1.104-3.327, P=0.021) and the number of tumors (HR=1.292, 95%CI: 1.096-1.524, P=0.002) were independent predictors of shorter RFS. There was no difference in ALT or AST level between the G1 and G2 groups before and after the first AC (P>0.05).

Conclusion

For synchronous CRLM patients, receiving AC within 4 weeks after MWA may be beneficial to longer RFS.

图1 患者男性,45岁,确诊乙状结肠癌肝转移1个月超声与超声造影图像。图a为超声表现为1个高回声结节,边界尚清,形态规则,内回声不均;图b为超声造影团注后病灶动脉期呈均匀高增强;图c为超声造影门脉相及延迟相病灶廓清,低于周围肝组织;图d为消融针抵达病灶底部;图e为消融区域被强回声完全覆盖;图f为微波消融术后6个月超声造影动脉期消融灶及周边未见异常增强
表1 微波消融结直肠癌肝转移瘤后辅助化疗开始时间不同的两组患者的基本信息
临床资料 ≤4周(G1组,98例) 4~8周(G2组,46例) 统计值 P
性别[例(%)]     - 1.000
  男性 72(73.5) 34(73.9)    
  女性 26(26.5) 12(26.1)    
年龄[岁,例(%)]     - 0.113
  ≤65 76(77.6) 41(89.1)    
  >65 22(22.4) 5(10.9)    
原发灶位置[例(%)]     Z=1.486 0.510
  右半结肠 9(9.2) 7(15.2)    
  左半结肠 39(39.8) 19(41.3)    
  直肠 50(51.0) 20(43.5)    
原发灶病理T分期[例(%)]a     - 0.413
  ≤T3 88(89.8) 39(84.8)    
  T4 10(10.2) 7(15.2)    
原发灶病理N分期[例(%)]a     - 0.264
  N0 38(38.8) 13(28.3)    
  N1~2 60(61.2) 33(71.7)    
肝外转移[例(%)]     - 0.505
  80(81.6) 35(76.1)    
  18(18.4) 11(23.9)    
肝转移瘤个数[个,中位数(范围)] 2(1~9) 2(1~7) Z=-0.184 0.856
肝转移瘤最大直径[mm,中位数(范围)] 15.0(6~45) 15.5(6~34) Z=-0.333 0.741
消融前CEA[ng/ml,例(%)]     - 0.388
  ≤30 86(87.8) 43(93.5)    
  >30 12(12.2) 3(6.5)    
术前化疗[例(%)]     - 0.474
  48(49.0) 19(41.3)    
  50(51.0) 27(58.7)    
消融时原发灶是否切除[(%)]     - 0.074
  已切除 53(54.1) 17(37.0)    
  未切除 45(45.9) 29(63.0)    
原发灶切除时间[例(%)]     - <0.001
  非同期 69(70.4) 9(19.6)    
  同期 29(29.6) 37(80.4)    
MWA距离AC时间[d,中位数(范围)] 13(0~28) 36(29~54) Z=-9.661 <0.001
表2 微波消融结直肠癌肝转移瘤后辅助化疗开始时间不同的两组患者的肝功能水平对比
图2 微波消融结直肠癌肝转移瘤后辅助化疗开始时间不同的两组患者的肝内无复发生存曲线
表3 微波消融治疗结直肠癌肝转移瘤患者肝内无复发生存的影响因素与赋值
表4 微波消融治疗结直肠癌肝转移瘤患者肝内无复发生存的影响因素Cox回归单因素分析
表5 微波消融治疗结直肠癌肝转移瘤患者肝内无复发生存的影响因素Cox回归多因素分析
1
John LC. Current Surgical Therapy E-Book (12th ed) [M]. Elsevier Health Sciences: Elsevier, 2016.
2
田文硕, 匡铭, 吕明德, 等. 超声引导经皮射频消融与微波消融治疗肝脏肿瘤的随机对照研究 [J]. 中华肝胆外科杂志, 2014, 20(2): 119-122.
3
中华医学会外科分会胃肠外科学组, 中华医学会外科分会结直肠外科学组, 中国抗癌协会大肠癌专业委员会, 等. 中国结直肠癌肝转移诊断和综合治疗指南(V 2018) [J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2018, 7(4): 302-314.
4
Tanaka K, Adam R, Shimada H, et al. Role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of multiple colorectal metastases to the liver [J]. Br J Surg, 2003, 90(8): 963-969.
5
Berglund A, Cedermark B, Glimelius B. Is it deleterious to delay the start of adjuvant chemotherapy in colon cancer stage III? [J]. Ann Oncol, 2008, 19(2): 400-402.
6
Turner MC, Farrow NE, Rhodin KE, et al. Delay in Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Survival Advantage in Stage III Colon Cancer [J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2018, 226(4): 670-678.
7
Biagi JJ, Raphael MJ, Mackillop WJ, et al. Association between time to initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy and survival in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. JAMA, 2011, 305(22): 2335-2342.
8
Sun Z, Adam MA, Kim J, et al. Determining the Optimal Timing for Initiation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy After Resection for Stage II and III Colon Cancer [J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2016, 59(2): 87-93.
9
Tohme S, Goswami J, Han K, et al. Minimally Invasive Resection of Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases Leads to an Earlier Initiation of Chemotherapy Compared to Open Surgery [J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2015, 19(12): 2199-2206.
10
Nikfarjam M, Muralidharan V, Christophi C. Altered growth patterns of colorectal liver metastases after thermal ablation [J]. Surgery, 2006, 139(1): 73-81.
11
Frich L, Bjornland K, Pettersen S, et al. Increased activity of matrix metalloproteinase 2 and 9 after hepatic radiofrequency ablation [J]. J Surg Res, 2006, 135(2): 297-304.
12
Rozenblum N, Zeira E, Scaiewicz V, et al. Oncogenesis: An "Off-Target" Effect of Radiofrequency Ablation [J]. Radiology, 2015, 276(2): 426-432.
13
Li Y, Huang N, Wang C, et al. Impact of liver tumor percutaneous radiofrequency ablation on circulating tumor cells [J]. Oncol Lett, 2018, 16(3): 2839-2850.
14
Malietzis G, Mughal A, Currie AC, et al. Factors Implicated for Delay of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-analysis of Observational Studies [J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2015, 22(12): 3793-3802.
15
Hendren S, Birkmeyer JD, Yin H, et al. Surgical complications are associated with omission of chemotherapy for stage III colorectal cancer [J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2010, 53(12): 1587-1593.
16
Poylin V, Curran T, Lee E, et al. Laparoscopic colectomy decreases the time to administration of chemotherapy compared with open colectomy [J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2014, 21(11): 3587-3591.
17
Cizginer S, Tatli S, Hurwitz S, et al. Biochemical and hematologic changes after percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of liver tumors: experience in 83 procedures [J]. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2011, 22(4): 471-478.
18
Okholm C, Mollerup TK, Schultz NA, et al. Synchronous and metachronous liver metastases in patients with colorectal cancer [J]. Dan Med J, 2018, 65(12). pii: A5524.
19
Yu J, Liang P, Yu XL, et al. Local tumour progression after ultrasound-guided microwave ablation of liver malignancies: risk factors analysis of 2529 tumours [J]. Eur Radiol, 2015, 25(4): 1119-1126.
[1] 洪玮, 叶细容, 刘枝红, 杨银凤, 吕志红. 超声影像组学联合临床病理特征预测乳腺癌新辅助化疗完全病理缓解的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 571-579.
[2] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[3] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[4] 徐逸男. 不同术式治疗梗阻性左半结直肠癌的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 72-75.
[5] 谢田伟, 庞于樊, 吴丽. 超声引导下不同消融术对甲状腺良性结节体积缩减率、复发率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 80-83.
[6] 李伟, 宋子健, 赖衍成, 周睿, 吴涵, 邓龙昕, 陈锐. 人工智能应用于前列腺癌患者预后预测的研究现状及展望[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 541-546.
[7] 皮尔地瓦斯·麦麦提玉素甫, 李慧灵, 艾克拜尔·艾力, 李赞林, 王志, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 生物补片修补巨大复发性腹壁切口疝临床疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-628.
[8] 公宇, 廖媛, 尚梅. 肝细胞癌TACE术后复发影响因素及预测模型建立[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 818-824.
[9] 焦振东, 惠鹏, 金上博. 三维可视化结合ICG显像技术在腹腔镜肝切除术治疗复发性肝癌中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 859-864.
[10] 严虹霞, 王晓娟, 张毅勋. 2 型糖尿病对结直肠癌患者肿瘤标记物、临床病理及预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 483-487.
[11] 赵磊, 刘文志, 林峰, 于剑, 孙铭骏, 崔佑刚, 张旭, 衣宇鹏, 于宝胜, 冯宁. 深部热疗在改善结直肠癌术后辅助化疗副反应及生活质量中的作用研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 488-493.
[12] 黄海洋, 邝永龙, 陈嘉胜. 基层医院结直肠肿瘤经自然腔道取标本手术30 例分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 510-518.
[13] 韩加刚, 王振军. 梗阻性左半结肠癌的治疗策略[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 450-458.
[14] 韦巧玲, 黄妍, 赵昌, 宋庆峰, 陈祖毅, 黄莹, 蒙嫦, 黄靖. 肝癌微波消融术后中重度疼痛风险预测列线图模型构建及验证[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 715-721.
[15] 郭曌蓉, 王歆光, 刘毅强, 何英剑, 王立泽, 杨飏, 汪星, 曹威, 谷重山, 范铁, 李金锋, 范照青. 不同亚型乳腺叶状肿瘤的临床病理特征及预后危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 524-532.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?