切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (04) : 308 -314. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2020.04.004

所属专题: 文献

腹部超声影像学

肝细胞癌患者局部热消融后早期复发与长期预后的相关性
秦正义1, 丁建民2, 周燕2, 王彦冬2, 周洪雨2, 经翔2,()   
  1. 1. 300170 天津医科大学三中心临床学院;300170 天津市重症疾病体外生命支持重点实验室 天津市人工细胞工程技术研究中心 天津市肝胆研究所
    2. 300170 天津市第三中心医院超声科;300170 天津市重症疾病体外生命支持重点实验室 天津市人工细胞工程技术研究中心 天津市肝胆研究所
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-29 出版日期:2020-04-01
  • 通信作者: 经翔
  • 基金资助:
    天津市科学技术委员会(17ZXMFSY00050,17YFZCSY01070)

Correlation between early recurrence and long-term prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after local thermal ablation

Zhengyi Qin1, Jianmin Ding2, Yan Zhou2, Yandong Wang2, Hongyu Zhou2, Xiang Jing2,()   

  1. 1. The Third Central Clinical College of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300170, China; Artificial Cell Engineering Technology Research Center, Tianjin Institute of Hepatobiliary Disease, Tianjin 300170, China
    2. Department of Ultrasound, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Extracorporeal Life Support for Critical Diseases, Tianjin 300170, China; Artificial Cell Engineering Technology Research Center, Tianjin Institute of Hepatobiliary Disease, Tianjin 300170, China
  • Received:2019-12-29 Published:2020-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Xiang Jing
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Jing Xiang, Email:
引用本文:

秦正义, 丁建民, 周燕, 王彦冬, 周洪雨, 经翔. 肝细胞癌患者局部热消融后早期复发与长期预后的相关性[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2020, 17(04): 308-314.

Zhengyi Qin, Jianmin Ding, Yan Zhou, Yandong Wang, Hongyu Zhou, Xiang Jing. Correlation between early recurrence and long-term prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after local thermal ablation[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2020, 17(04): 308-314.

目的

探究肝细胞癌患者热消融治疗后早期进展对总生存期的影响。

方法

回顾性分析2014年1月至2016年12月于天津市第三中心医院行热消融治疗且有完整随访资料的329例患者。通过Kaplan-Meier法分析患者总生存期。采用Log-Rank检验及Cox比例风险回归模型对热消融治疗后总生存期的影响因素进行分析。

结果

共329例患者,根据肿瘤进展时间分为1年内进展组、2年内进展组及2年内未进展组。3组患者1、3、5年累计生存率分别为88.2%、40.7%和22.0%(1年内进展组);98.0%、83.6%和50.2%(2年内进展组);99.5%、97.2%和75.2%(2年内未进展组),差异均有统计学意义(整体:χ2=142.0,组1 vs组2:χ2=19.58,组2 vs组3:χ2=15.04,P均<0.001)。Cox多因素分析结果显示肿瘤个数、甲胎蛋白(AFP)、碱性磷酸酶(ALP)和白蛋白-胆红素(ALBI)分级是影响患者总生存期的独立危险因素。基于ALBI分级、肿瘤个数、AFP及ALP的亚组分析结果显示,1年内进展的患者总生存期较差。

结论

早期进展与肝细胞癌患者局部热消融后长期预后相关,随着治疗后肿瘤进展时间缩短,患者预后降低。

Objective

To investigate the effect of early progression on overall survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after thermal ablation.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on 329 patients who underwent thermal ablation at our hospital from January 2014 to December 2016 and had complete follow-up data. The overall survival of the patients was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank test and Cox regression model were used for analyzing the factors that effected overall survival.

Results

According to the time of tumor progression, the patients were divided into three groups: patients having progression within 1 year, those having progression within 2 years, and those with no progression within 2 years. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of the three groups were 88.2%, 40.7%, and 22.0% (progression within 1 year); 98.0% 83.6%, and 50.2% (progression within 2 years); and 99.5%, 97.2%, and 75.2% (no progression within 2 years), respectively, and there were significant differences among them. Cox multivariate analysis showed that the number of tumors, alpha fetoprotein (AFP), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade were independent risk factors affecting the overall survival of patients. The results of subgroup analysis based on the number of tumors, ALBI grade, AFP, and ALP showed that the patients who had tumor progression within 1 year had a poorer overall survival.

Conclusion

Early progression is associated with long-term prognosis of HCC patients after local thermal ablation. The shorter the time to tumor progression after treatment, the worse the prognosis of HCC patients.

表1 不同肿瘤进展时间的3组肝细胞癌患者的基本资料[例(%)]
因素 组1 组2 组3 χ2 P
性别(男性/女性) 52(15.8)/160(48.6) 26(7.8)/42(12.8) 10(3.0)/39(11.9) 6.118 0.047
年龄(<60/≥60岁) 123(37.4)/89(27.1) 30(9.1)/38(11.6) 28(8.5)/21(6.4) 4.125 0.127
C-P分级(A/B) 177(55.3)/29(9.1) 59(18.4)/9(2.8) 43(13.4)/3(0.9) 1.936 0.380
ALBI分级(1/2或3) 117(35.6)/95(28.9) 30(9.1)/38(11.6) 25(7.6)/24(7.3) 2.566 0.277
肿瘤大小(<3 cm/≥3 cm) 170(51.7)/42(12.8) 50(15.2)/18(5.5) 39(11.9)/10(3.0) 1.389 0.499
肿瘤个数(1个/2~3个) 181(55.0)/31(9.4) 47(14.3)/21(6.4) 41(12.5)/8(2.4) 9.269 0.010
邻近危险部位a 171(52.0)/41(12.5) 53(16.1)/15(4.6) 42(12.8)/7(2.1) 1.125 0.570
联合TACE(无/有) 201(61.1)/11(3.3) 63(19.1)/5(1.5) 45(13.7)/4(1.2) 0.860 0.650
AFP(<100 μg/L/≥100 μg/L) 181(55.0)/31(9.4) 50(15.2)/18(5.5) 44(13.4)/5(1.5) 6.886 0.032
PLT(≤100×109个/L/>100×109个/L) 108(32.8)/104(31.6) 27(8.2)/41(12.5) 23(7.0)/26(7.9) 2.632 0.268
ALB(≤35 g/L/>35 g/L) 177(53.8)/35(10.6) 48(14.6)/20(6.1) 38(11.6)/11(3.3) 5.549 0.062
ALT(<80 U/L/≥80 U/L) 205(62.3)/7(2.1) 64(19.5)/4(1.2) 45(13.7)/4(1.2) 2.506 0.286
AST(<80 U/L/≥80 U/L) 199(60.5)/13(4.0) 66(20.1)/2(0.6) 47(14.3)/2(0.6) 1.208 0.547
GGT(<60U/L/≥60U/L) 153(46.5)/59(17.9) 37(11.2)/31(9.4) 28(8.5)/21(6.4) 9.404 0.009
ALP(<125 U/L/≥125 U/L) 176(53.5)/36(10.9) 53(16.1)/15(4.6) 35(10.6)/14(4.3) 3.659 0.160
T-Bil(<34 μmol/L/≥34 μmol/L) 186(56.5)/26(7.9) 61(18.5)/7(2.1) 46(14.0)/3(0.9) 1.578 0.454
PT(<14 s/≥14 s) 83(25.2)/129(39.2) 21(6.4)/47(14.3) 13(4.0)/36(10.9) 3.586 0.166
图1 不同复发时期对患者总生存期影响
表2 肝细胞癌热消融治疗后患者总生存期的影响因素
图2 肝细胞癌患者热消融治疗后的生存曲线。图a为白蛋白-胆红素1级患者不同复发时间对总生存期的影响;图b为白蛋白-胆红素2、3级患者不同复发时间对总生存期的影响
图3 肝细胞癌患者热消融治疗后的生存曲线。图a肿瘤为1个的患者不同复发时间对总生存期的影响;图b为2或3个肿瘤的患者不同复发时间对总生存期的影响
图4 肝细胞癌患者热消融治疗后的生存曲线。图a为甲胎蛋白<100 μg/L的患者不同复发时间对总生存期的影响;图b为甲胎蛋白≥100 μg/L的患者不同复发时间对总生存期的影响
图5 肝细胞癌患者热消融治疗后的生存曲线。图a为碱性磷酸酶<125 μg/L的患者不同复发时间对总生存期的影响;图b为碱性磷酸酶≥125 μg/L的患者不同复发时间对总生存期的影响
1
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries [J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2018, 68(6): 394-424.
2
Bruix J, Sherman M. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update [J]. Hepatology, 2011, 53(3): 1020-1022.
3
Pompili M, Saviano A, de Matthaeis N, et al. Long-term effectiveness of resection and radiofrequency ablation for single hepatocellular carcinoma ≤3 cm. Results of a multicenter Italian survey [J]. J Hepatol, 2013, 59(1): 89-97.
4
Heimbach JK, Kulik LM, Finn RS, et al. AASLD guidelines for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma [J]. Hepatology, 2018, 67(1): 358-380.
5
Feng K, Yan J, Li X, et al. A randomized controlled trial of radiofrequency ablation and surgical resection in the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma [J]. J hepatol, 2012, 57(4): 794-802.
6
Ding J, Jing X, Wang Y, et al. Thermal ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a large-scale analysis of long-term outcome and prognostic factors [J]. Clin Radiol, 2016, 71(12): 1270-1276.
7
Wang T, Lu XJ, Chi JC, et al. Microwave ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma as first-line treatment: long term outcomes and prognostic factors in 221 patients [J]. Sci Rep, 2016, 6: 32728.
8
Zhang L, Ge NL, Chen Y, et al. Long-term outcomes and prognostic analysis of radiofrequency ablation for small hepatocellular carcinoma: 10-year follow-up in Chinese patients [J]. Med Oncol, 2015, 32(3): 77.
9
罗敏, 时美欣, 张巍, 等. 影响肝细胞癌射频消融术后疗效的相关因素分析 [J/CD]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2015, 12(6): 36-44.
10
周洪雨, 周燕, 丁建民, 等. 肝动脉化疗栓塞联合射频消融治疗直径≥5cm肝细胞癌患者10年疗效及预后分析 [J/CD]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2018, 15(9): 65-71.
11
Johnson PJ, Berhane S, Kagebayashi C, et al. Assessment of liver function in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a new evidence-based approach-the ALBI grade [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2015, 33(6): 550-558.
12
EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma [J]. J Hepatol, 2018, 69(1): 182-236.
13
Portolani N, Coniglio A, Ghidoni S, et al. Early and late recurrence after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: prognostic and therapeutic implications [J]. Ann Surg, 2006, 243(2): 229-235.
14
Poon RT, Fan ST, Ng IO, et al. Different risk factors and prognosis for early and late intrahepatic recurrence after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma [J]. Cancer, 2000, 89(3): 500-507.
15
Wu JC, Huang YH, Chau GY, et al. Risk factors for early and late recurrence in hepatitis B-related hepatocellular carcinoma [J]. J Hepatol, 2009, 51(5): 890-897.
16
Pinato DJ, Sharma R, Allara E, et al. The ALBI grade provides objective hepatic reserve estimation across each BCLC stage of hepatocellular carcinoma [J]. J Hepatol, 2017, 66(2): 338-346.
[1] 李淼, 朱连华, 韩鹏, 姜波, 费翔. 高帧频超声造影评价肝细胞癌血管形态与风险因素的研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 911-915.
[2] 丁建民, 秦正义, 张翔, 周燕, 周洪雨, 王彦冬, 经翔. 超声造影与普美显磁共振成像对具有高危因素的≤3 cm肝结节进行LI-RADS分类诊断的前瞻性研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 930-938.
[3] 李越洲, 张孔玺, 李小红, 商中华. 基于生物信息学分析胃癌中PUM的预后意义[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 426-432.
[4] 董杰, 杨松, 杨浩, 陈翔, 张万里. 乙酰辅酶A羧化酶2基因高甲基化与肝细胞癌临床病理因素和生存期的关系[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 433-437.
[5] 张俊, 罗再, 段茗玉, 裘正军, 黄陈. 胃癌预后预测模型的研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 456-461.
[6] 马伟强, 马斌林, 吴中语, 张莹. microRNA在三阴性乳腺癌进展中发挥的作用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 111-114.
[7] 杨倩, 李翠芳, 张婉秋. 原发性肝癌自发性破裂出血急诊TACE术后的近远期预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 33-36.
[8] 栗艳松, 冯会敏, 刘明超, 刘泽鹏, 姜秋霞. STIP1在三阴性乳腺癌组织中的表达及临床意义研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 52-56.
[9] 江振剑, 蒋明, 黄大莉. TK1、Ki67蛋白在分化型甲状腺癌组织中的表达及预后价值研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 623-626.
[10] 晏晴艳, 雍晓梅, 罗洪, 杜敏. 成都地区老年转移性乳腺癌的预后及生存因素研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 636-638.
[11] 鲁鑫, 许佳怡, 刘洋, 杨琴, 鞠雯雯, 徐缨龙. 早期LC术与PTCD续贯LC术治疗急性胆囊炎对患者肝功能及预后的影响比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 648-650.
[12] 姜明, 罗锐, 龙成超. 闭孔疝的诊断与治疗:10年73例患者诊疗经验总结[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 706-710.
[13] 李永胜, 孙家和, 郭书伟, 卢义康, 刘洪洲. 高龄结直肠癌患者根治术后短期并发症及其影响因素[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 962-967.
[14] 王军, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 索利斌, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 腹膜后肿瘤切除术中大量输血患者的麻醉管理特点与分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 844-849.
[15] 索利斌, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 王军, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 原发性腹膜后副神经节瘤切除术麻醉管理的特点和分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 771-776.
阅读次数
全文


摘要