切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (04) : 341 -346. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2020.04.009

所属专题: 文献

心血管超声影像学

心脏超声造影在肥厚型心肌病冠状动脉微循环功能评价中的应用及影响因素
苏亚芬1, 方小梅1, 韩薇1,(), 杨宁1   
  1. 1. 150001 哈尔滨医科大学附属第一医院心血管内科
  • 收稿日期:2019-07-01 出版日期:2020-04-01
  • 通信作者: 韩薇

Contrast echocardiography for evaluation of coronary microcirculation function in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: application and influencing factors

Yafen Su1, Xiaomei Fang1, Wei Han1,(), Ning Yang1   

  1. 1. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150001, China
  • Received:2019-07-01 Published:2020-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Wei Han
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Han Wei, Email:
引用本文:

苏亚芬, 方小梅, 韩薇, 杨宁. 心脏超声造影在肥厚型心肌病冠状动脉微循环功能评价中的应用及影响因素[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2020, 17(04): 341-346.

Yafen Su, Xiaomei Fang, Wei Han, Ning Yang. Contrast echocardiography for evaluation of coronary microcirculation function in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: application and influencing factors[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2020, 17(04): 341-346.

目的

应用心脏超声造影评价肥厚型心肌病(HCM)患者冠状动脉微循环功能,并探讨其可能的影响因素。

方法

选取2013年9月至2019年7月于哈尔滨医科大学附属第一医院就诊的HCM患者82例,所有患者均行二维经胸超声心动图(2D-TTE)及左心声学造影(LVO)检查,评估2种方法对HCM的诊断率。应用心肌声学造影(MCE)评价HCM冠状动脉微循环功能。采用单因素分析及多因素Logistic回归方法分析HCM患者冠状动脉微循环功能异常的独立预测因子。

结果

82例HCM患者中,2D-TTE诊断率为76.0%(62/82);LVO诊断率为91.5%(75/82),2者差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。13例心尖肥厚型HCM患者中,2D-TTE诊断率为61.5%(8/13);LVO诊断率为77.0%(10/13),2者差异有统计学意义(P=0.035)。82例HCM患者中,MCE检出冠状动脉微循环功能障碍60例,冠状动脉微循环功能异常发生率为73.1%(60/82)。依据MCE结果将82例患者分为冠状动脉微循环功能正常组(22例)与异常组(60例)。多因素Logistic回归分析结果显示,超敏肌钙蛋白I(hs-cTnI)升高为HCM患者冠状动脉微循环功能异常的独立预测因子(OR=1.13,95%CI:1.01~1.34,P=0.03)。

结论

LVO可提高HCM患者的诊断率,MCE是评价HCM患者冠状动脉微循环功能障碍的可行和有效方法,hs-cTnI升高对HCM患者冠状动脉微循环功能障碍具有独立预测价值。

Objective

To explore the application of contrast echocardiography in the evaluation of coronary microcirculation function in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), and identify the possible influencing factors.

Methods

From September 2013 to July 2019, 82 patients with HCM were selected at the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University. All patients were examined by two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography (2D-TTE) and left ventriculography (LVO) to evaluate their diagnosis rates for HCM. Myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) was used to evaluate the coronary microcirculation function of HCM patients. Univariate analysis and multivariate Logistic regression analysis were used to screen independent predictors of coronary microcirculation dysfunction in HCM patients.

Results

Among 82 patients with HCM, the diagnosis rate by 2D-TTE was 75.6% (62/82), and that by LVO was 91.5% (75/82); the difference between them was statistically significant (P<0.001). In 13 patients with apical HCM, the diagnostic rate by 2D-TTE was 61.5% (8/13), and that by LVO was 77.0% (10/13); the difference between them was statistically significant (P=0.035). Among 82 patients with HCM, 60 (60/82, 73.1%) were diagnosed with coronary microcirculation dysfunction by MCE. According to the results of MCE, 82 patients were divided into two groups: normal coronary microcirculation function group (22 cases) and abnormal coronary microcirculation function group (60 cases). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that the increase of high sensitivity troponin I (hs-cTnI) was an independent predictor of coronary microcirculation dysfunction in HCM patients (OR=1.13, 95%CI: 1.01-1.34, P=0.03).

Conclusion

LVO can improve the diagnosis rate of HCM patients. MCE is a feasible and effective method to evaluate the coronary microcirculation dysfunction of HCM patients. Hs-cTnI has independent predictive value for the coronary microcirculation dysfunction of HCM patients.

图1 肥厚型心肌病患者心肌声学造影(MCE)图像。图a为MCE显示左心室前壁、侧壁、后壁、心尖段至基底段灌注迟缓、减低;图b为MCE未见到明显冠状动脉微循环功能障碍和充盈迟缓
表1 HCM患者冠状动脉微循环功能正常组与异常组一般资料比较
表2 预测HCM患者冠状动脉微循环功能异常的单因素分析
表3 预测HCM患者冠状动脉微循环功能异常的多因素Logistic回归分析
1
Heitner SB, Fischer KL. Lifestyle modification and medical management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy [J]. Cardiol Clin, 2019, 37(1): 45-54.
2
Elliott PM, Anastasakis A, Borger MA, et al. 2014 ESC Guidelines on Diagnosis and Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy [J]. Euro Heart J, 2014, 68(39): 1054-1126.
3
Olivotto I, Girolami F, Sciagrà R, et al. Microvascular function is selectively in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and sarcomere myofilament gene mutations [J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2011, 16, 58(8): 839-848.
4
Ismail IF, Hsu LY, Greve AM, et al. Coronary microvascular ischemia in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy a pixel-wise quantitative cardiovascular magnetic resonance perfusion study [J]. J Cardiovascular Magn Resone, 2014, 12(16): 49.
5
Everaars H, de Waard GA, Driessen RS, et al. Doppler Flow Velocity and Thermodilution to Assess Coronary Flow Reserve: A Head-to-Head Comparison With [15O]H2O PET [J]. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2018, 11(20): 2044-2054.
6
Gersh BJ, Maron BJ, Bonow RO, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy [J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2011, 58 (25): e212-e260.
7
中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会. 中国成人肥厚型心肌病诊断与治疗指南 [J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 2017(12): 1015-1032.
8
Senior RI, Becher H, Monaghan M, et al. Contrast echocardiography: evidence-based recommendations by European Association of Echocardiography [J]. Eur J Echocardiogr, 2009, 10(2): 194-212.
9
田锦润,丁云川,王庆慧. 左心声学造影的临床应用进展 [J]. 临床超声医学杂志, 2017, 19(12): 838-840.
10
Krishnan S, Papworth DP, Farivar RS, et al. Identification of Coronary Sinus Injury by Transesophageal Echocardiography During Placement of a Retrograde Cardioplegia Catheter for Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery [J]. Anesth Analg, 2013, 116(3): 560-562.
11
Yuan L, Xie M, Cheng TO, et a. Left ventricular noncompaction associated with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: echocardiographic diagnosis and genetic analysis of a new pedigree in China [J]. Int J Cardiol, 2014, 174(2): 249-259.
12
To AC, Dhillon A, Desai MY, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy [J]. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 2011, 4(10): 1123-1137.
13
Kwon DH, Smedira NG, Rodriguez ER, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance detetion of myocardial scarring in hypertrophic cardiomyo-pathy: correlation with histopathology and prevalence of ventricular tachycardia [J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2009, 54(3): 242-249.
14
Camici P, Chiriatti G, Lorenzoni R, et al. Coronary vasodilation is impaired in both hypertrophied and nonhypertrophied myocardium of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a study with nitrogen-13 ammonia and positron [J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1991, 17(4): 879-886.
15
Knaapen A, Germans T, Camici PG, et al. Determinants of coronary microvascular dysfunction in symptomatic hypertrophic cardiomyopathy [J]. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol , 2008, 294(2): H986-H993.
16
Chiribiri A, Leuzzi S, Conte MR, et al. Rest perfusion abnormalities in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: correlation with myocardial fibrosis and risk factors for sudden cardiac death [J]. Clin Radiol, 2015, 70(5): 495-501.
17
Bravo PE, Zimmerman SL, Luo HC, et al. Relationship of Delayed Enhancement by Magnetic Resonance to Myocardial Perfusion by Positron Emission Tomography in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy [J]. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, 2013, 6(2): 210-217.
18
Takashio S, Yamamuro M, Izumiya Y, et al. Coronary microvascular dysfunction and diastolic load correlate with cardiac troponin T release measured by a highly sensitive assay in patients with nonischemic heart failure [J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2013, 62: 632-640.
19
Taqueti VR, Everett BM, Murthy VL, et al. Interaction of impaired coronary flow reserve and cardiomyocyte injury on adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients without overt coronary artery disease [J]. Circulation, 2015, 131: 528-535.
20
Olivotto I, Cecchi F, Camici PG, et al. Coronary microvascular dysfunction and ischemia in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.Mechanisms and clinical consequences [J]. Ital Heart J , 2004, 5(8): 572-580.
21
Petersen SE, Jeroseh-Hemld M, Hudsmith LE, et al. Evidence for microvascular dysfunction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, new insights from multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging [J]. Circulation, 2007, 115: 2418-2425.
22
Kubo T, Kitaoka H, Yamanaka S, et al. Significance of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy [J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2013, 62: 1252-1259.
[1] 张婉微, 秦芸芸, 蔡绮哲, 林明明, 田润雨, 金姗, 吕秀章. 心肌收缩早期延长对非ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征患者冠状动脉严重狭窄的预测价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1016-1022.
[2] 吕琦, 惠品晶, 丁亚芳, 颜燕红. 颈动脉斑块易损性的超声造影评估及与缺血性卒中的相关性研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1040-1045.
[3] 丁雷, 罗文, 杨晓, 庞丽娜, 张佩蒂, 刘海静, 袁佳妮, 刘瑾. 高帧频超声造影在评价C-TIRADS 4-5类甲状腺结节成像特征中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 887-894.
[4] 张茜, 陈佳慧, 高雪萌, 赵傲雪, 黄瑛. 基于高帧频超声造影的影像组学特征鉴别诊断甲状腺结节良恶性的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 895-903.
[5] 朱连华, 费翔, 韩鹏, 姜波, 李楠, 罗渝昆. 高帧频超声造影在胆囊息肉样病变中的鉴别诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 904-910.
[6] 李淼, 朱连华, 韩鹏, 姜波, 费翔. 高帧频超声造影评价肝细胞癌血管形态与风险因素的研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 911-915.
[7] 张卫平, 王婧玲, 刘志兴, 陈莉, 谌芳群. 肾透明细胞癌高帧频超声造影时间-强度曲线特征分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 916-922.
[8] 丁建民, 秦正义, 张翔, 周燕, 周洪雨, 王彦冬, 经翔. 超声造影与普美显磁共振成像对具有高危因素的≤3 cm肝结节进行LI-RADS分类诊断的前瞻性研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 930-938.
[9] 韩丹, 王婷, 肖欢, 朱丽容, 陈镜宇, 唐毅. 超声造影与增强CT对儿童肝脏良恶性病变诊断价值的对比分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 939-944.
[10] 刘嘉嘉, 王承华, 陈绪娇, 刘瑗玲, 王善钰, 屈海花, 张莉. 经阴道子宫-输卵管实时三维超声造影中患者疼痛发生情况及其影响因素分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 959-965.
[11] 邵华, 那子悦, 荆慧, 李博, 王秋程, 程文. 术前经皮超声造影对乳腺癌腋窝前哨淋巴结转移及负荷的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 849-853.
[12] 张旭, 徐建平, 苏冬明, 王彩芬, 王大力, 张文智. 男性乳腺肿块的超声造影特征[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 854-859.
[13] 谢迎东, 孙帼, 徐超丽, 杨斌, 孙晖, 戴云. 超声造影定量评价不同生存期移植肾血流灌注的临床价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(07): 749-754.
[14] 王晗宇, 张司可, 张羽, 万欣, 贺秋霞, 李明明, 杨秀华. 超声造影在脑胶质瘤切除术术中的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(07): 755-760.
[15] 廖梅, 张红君, 金洁玚, 吕艳, 任杰. 床旁超声造影对肝移植术后早期肝动脉血栓的诊断价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 630-634.
阅读次数
全文


摘要