切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华医学超声杂志（电子版）

中华医学超声杂志（电子版） ›› 2020, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (09) : 815 -820. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2020.09.001

所属专题： 文献；

腹部超声影像学

高帧频超声造影在鉴别诊断胆囊腺瘤性息肉与胆固醇性息肉中的临床应用
韩鹏1, 费翔1, 罗渝昆1,†(), 朱连华1, 唐文博2   
  1. 1. 100853　北京，解放军总医院第一医学中心超声科
    2. 100853　北京，解放军总医院第一医学中心肝胆外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-07-09 出版日期:2020-09-01
  • 通信作者: 罗渝昆

Clinical application of high-frame-rate contrast-enhanced ultrasound in distinguishing gallbladder adenomas from cholesterol polyps

Peng Han1, Xiang Fei1, Yukun Luo1,†(), Lianhua Zhu1, Wenbo Tang2   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, the First Medical Centre of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
    2. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the First Medical Centre of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
  • Received:2020-07-09 Published:2020-09-01
  • Corresponding author: Yukun Luo
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Luo Yukun, Email:
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

韩鹏, 费翔, 罗渝昆, 朱连华, 唐文博. 高帧频超声造影在鉴别诊断胆囊腺瘤性息肉与胆固醇性息肉中的临床应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2020, 17(09): 815-820.

Peng Han, Xiang Fei, Yukun Luo, Lianhua Zhu, Wenbo Tang. Clinical application of high-frame-rate contrast-enhanced ultrasound in distinguishing gallbladder adenomas from cholesterol polyps[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2020, 17(09): 815-820.

目的

比较常规超声造影（CEUS）与高帧频超声造影（H-CEUS）在鉴别腺瘤性息肉与胆固醇性息肉中的诊断价值。

方法

收集2019年8月至2020年2月解放军总医院第一医学中心因胆囊息肉样病变（GPL）行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者65例。术前先行CEUS和H-CEUS，根据术后病理结果分为腺瘤性息肉组（16例）和胆固醇性息肉组（49例），比较2种检查方法对病变的灌注特征的显示和最终诊断。采用χ2检验比较2组之间以及CEUS和H-CEUS下的血管形态、增强强度和胆囊壁完整性的差异。

结果

CEUS对胆囊腺瘤性息肉和胆固醇性息肉的血管形态判断，差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。CEUS观察到85.71%（42/49）的胆固醇性息肉和68.75%（11/16）的胆囊腺瘤性息肉血管形态表现为均匀点状。H-CEUS判断胆囊腺瘤性息肉和胆固醇性息肉之间的血管形态，差异具有统计学意义（χ2=26.527，P<0.001）。H-CEUS可观察到75.51%（37/49）的胆固醇性息肉和25.00%（4/16）的腺瘤性息肉血管形态表现为均匀点状。胆固醇性息肉组在CEUS和H-CEUS下的血管形态比较，差异无统计学意义（P>0.05），而腺瘤性息肉组，在CEUS和H-CEUS下的血管形态比较，差异具有统计学意义（χ2=7.878，P=0.019）。腺瘤性息肉组中CEUS仅能检测到6.25%（1/16）的分支血管形态，而H-CEUS能检测到43.75%（7/16）的分支血管形态。

结论

H-CEUS通过提高帧频来提高时间分辨率，有助于准确反映GPL微循环的差异，并提高胆固醇性息肉和腺瘤性息肉的鉴别诊断能力。在选择治疗方案时，H-CEUS可作为GPL诊断的有效影像学检查手段。

关键词: 超声造影, 胆囊息肉样病变, 胆囊腺瘤, 胆固醇性息肉
Objective

To compare the diagnostic value of conventional contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and high-frame-rate CEUS (H-CEUS) in differentiating gallbladder adenomas from cholesterol polyps.

Methods

Sixty-five patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallbladder polypoid lesions (GPL) at the First Medical Centre of Chinese PLA General Hospital from August 2019 to February 2020 were collected. Pre-operative CEUS and H-CEUS were performed in all patients. According to the pathological results, the patients were divided into either an adenoma group (16 cases) or a cholesterol polyp group (49 cases). The perfusion characteristics of the lesions and the final diagnosis were compared between the two methods and between CEUS and H-CEUS. The χ2 test was used to compare the differences in vascular morphology, enhancement intensity, and gallbladder wall integrity between the two groups.

Results

CEUS had no statistical difference in judging the vascular morphology of gallbladder adenomas and cholesterol polyps (P>0.05). CEUS observed that 85.71% (42/49) of cholesterol polyps and 68.75% (11/16) of gallbladder adenomas showed uniform spot vascular structures. H-CEUS can significantly judge the difference in vascular morphology between gallbladder adenomas and cholesterol polyps (χ2=26.527, P<0.001). H-CEUS observed that 75.51% (37/49) of cholesterol polyps and 25.00% (4/16) of adenomas showed uniform spot vascular structures. There was no difference in the vascular morphology between CEUS and H-CEUS in the cholesteric polyp group (P>0.05), while the vascular morphology between CEUS and H-CEUS in the adenoma group was statistically different (χ2=7.878, P=0.019). In the adenoma group, CEUS can only detect 6.25% (1/16) of the branch vessel morphologies, while H-CEUS can detect 43.75% (4/16) of the branch vessel morphologies.

Conclusion

H-CEUS improves the temporal resolution by increasing the frame rate, which helps to accurately reflect the differences of GPL microcirculation and improves the differential diagnosis of cholesterol polyps and adenomas. In the selection of treatment plans, H-CEUS provides an effective imaging examination method for GPL patients.

Key words: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound, Gallbladder polyp lesion, Gallbladder adenoma, Cholesterol polyp
表1 胆囊息肉样病变患者一般情况及超声图像特征
组别 例数 年龄（岁，±s） 性别（男/女） 最大径（cm，±s） 回声特征（例） 数量（例） 血流信号（例）
高回声 等回声 低回声 单发 多发 有 无
胆固醇性息肉组 49 41.45±1.65 20/29 1.13±0.12 41 8 0 40 9 3 46
腺瘤性息肉组 16 45.37±3.42 11/5 1.57±0.14 9 6 1 13 3 14 2
统计值 ? t=1.456 χ2=3.773 t=9.173 χ2=6.974 χ2=0.001 χ2=41.357
P值 ? 0.135 0.052 <0.001 0.031 0.973 <0.001
表2 CEUS和H-CEUS下胆固醇性息肉与腺瘤性息肉灌注特征（例）
检查方法 组别 例数 血管形态 增强强度 胆囊壁完整性
点状 单支样 分支样 高增强 非高增强 完整 缺损
CEUS 胆固醇性息肉组 49 42 7 0 2 47 49 0
? 腺瘤性息肉组 16 11 4 1 11 5 13 3
? χ2值 ? 4.306 31.526 9.632
? P值 ? 0.116 <0.001 0.002
H-CEUS 胆固醇性息肉组 49 37 12 0 1 48 49 0
? 腺瘤性息肉组 16 4 5 7 15 1 13 3
? χ2值 ? 26.527 54.669 9.632
? P值 ? <0.001 <0.001 0.002
χ2值a ? ? 1.632 0.344 0.000
P值a ? ? 0.201 0.558 1.000
χ2值b ? ? 7.878 3.282 0.000
P值b ? ? 0.019 0.070 1.000
图1 胆固醇性息肉常规超声造影与高帧频超声造影表现。图a为常规超声可见胆囊壁上一偏高回声结节（☆处）；图b~d常规超声造影可见息肉呈整体快速强化（Δ处）；图e~h高帧频超声造影可见动脉期造影剂灌注过程中病灶内部单支样血管形态（→处）
图2 腺瘤性息肉常规超声造影与高帧频超声造影表现。图a常规超声可见胆囊壁上一等回声结节（☆处）；图b、c常规超声造影显示病灶整体呈快速增强（Δ处）；图d~h高帧频超声造影可见动脉期造影剂灌注过程中病灶内部分支样血管形态（→处）
1
Choi YS, Do JH, Seo SW, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of gallbladder polypoid lesions in a healthy population [J]. Yonsei Med J, 2016, 57(6): 1370-1375.
2
Lee YJ, Park KS, Cho KB, et al. Shifting prevalence of gallbladder polyps in Korea [J]. J Korean Med Sci, 2014, 29(9): 1247-1252.
3
Inui K, Yoshino J, Miyoshi H. Diagnosis of gallbladder tumors [J]. Int Med, 2011, 50(11): 1133-1136.
4
Xu A, Zhang Y, Hu H, et al. Gallbladder polypoid-lesions: what are they and how should they be treated? A single-center experience based on 1446 cholecystectomy patients [J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2017, 21(11): 1804-1812.
5
Yuan HX, Cao JY, Kong WT, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in diagnosis of gallbladder adenoma [J]. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int, 2015, 14(2): 201-207.
6
Zemour J, Marty M, Lapuyade B, et al. Gallbladder tumor and pseudotumor: diagnosis and management [J]. J Visc Surg, 2014, 151(4): 289-300.
7
Park JK, Yoon YB, Kim YT, et al. Management strategies for gallbladder polyps: is it possible to predict malignant gallbladder polyps? [J]. Gut Liver, 2008, 2(2): 88-94.
8
Sun Y, Yang Z, Lan X, et al. Neoplastic polyps in gallbladder: a retrospective study to determine risk factors and treatment strategy for gallbladder polyps [J]. Hepatobiliary Surgery Nutr, 2019, 8(3): 219-227.
9
Saei Hamedani F, Garcia-Buitrago M. Pyloric gland adenoma of gallbladder: a review of diagnosis and management [J]. Adv Med, 2018, 2018: 7539694.
10
European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL). EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of gallstones [J]. J hepatol, 2016, 65(1): 146-181.
11
Chou SC, Chen SC, Shyr YM, et al. Polypoid lesions of the gallbladder: analysis of 1204 patients with long-term follow-up [J]. Surg Endosc, 2017, 31(7): 2776-2782.
12
Cairns V, Neal CP, Dennison AR, et al. Risk and cost-effectiveness of surveillance followed by cholecystectomy for gallbladder polyps [J]. Arch Surg, 2012, 147(12): 1078-1083.
13
Konstantinidis IT, Bajpai S, Kambadakone AR, et al. Gallbladder lesions identified on ultrasound. Lessons from the last 10 years [J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2012, 16(3): 549-553.
14
Zhuang B, Li W, Wang W, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography improves the diagnostic specificity for gallbladder-confined focal tumors [J]. Abdom Radiol (NY), 2018, 43(5): 1134-1142.
15
Numata K, Oka H, Morimoto M, et al. Differential diagnosis of gallbladder diseases with contrast-enhanced harmonic gray scale ultrasonography [J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2007, 26(6): 763-774.
16
Fei X, Lu WP, Luo YK, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound may distinguish gallbladder adenoma from cholesterol polyps: a prospective case-control study [J]. Abdom Imaging, 2015, 40(7): 2355-2363.
17
Cokkinos DD, Antypa EG, Tsolaki S, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound examination of the gallbladder and bile ducts: A pictorial essay [J]. J Clin Ultrasound, 2018, 46(1): 48-61.
18
Dietrich CF, Ignee A, Greis C, et al. Artifacts and pitfalls in contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the liver [J]. Ultraschall Med, 2014, 35(2): 108-125; quiz 126-127.
19
Liu XS, Gu LH, Du J, et al. Differential diagnosis of polypoid lesions of the gallbladder using contrast-enhanced sonography [J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2015, 34(6): 1061-1069.
20
Boulton RA, Adams DH. Gallbladder polyps: when to wait and when to act [J]. Lancet, 1997, 349(9055): 817.
21
Okaniwa S. Role of conventional ultrasonography in the diagnosis of gallbladder polypoid lesions [J]. J Med Ultrason (2001), 2019. Online ahead of print.
[1] 吕琦, 惠品晶, 丁亚芳, 颜燕红. 颈动脉斑块易损性的超声造影评估及与缺血性卒中的相关性研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2023, 20(10): 1040-1045.
[2] 丁雷, 罗文, 杨晓, 庞丽娜, 张佩蒂, 刘海静, 袁佳妮, 刘瑾. 高帧频超声造影在评价C-TIRADS 4-5类甲状腺结节成像特征中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2023, 20(09): 887-894.
[3] 张茜, 陈佳慧, 高雪萌, 赵傲雪, 黄瑛. 基于高帧频超声造影的影像组学特征鉴别诊断甲状腺结节良恶性的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2023, 20(09): 895-903.
[4] 朱连华, 费翔, 韩鹏, 姜波, 李楠, 罗渝昆. 高帧频超声造影在胆囊息肉样病变中的鉴别诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2023, 20(09): 904-910.
[5] 李淼, 朱连华, 韩鹏, 姜波, 费翔. 高帧频超声造影评价肝细胞癌血管形态与风险因素的研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2023, 20(09): 911-915.
[6] 张卫平, 王婧玲, 刘志兴, 陈莉, 谌芳群. 肾透明细胞癌高帧频超声造影时间-强度曲线特征分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2023, 20(09): 916-922.
[7] 丁建民, 秦正义, 张翔, 周燕, 周洪雨, 王彦冬, 经翔. 超声造影与普美显磁共振成像对具有高危因素的≤3 cm肝结节进行LI-RADS分类诊断的前瞻性研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2023, 20(09): 930-938.
[8] 韩丹, 王婷, 肖欢, 朱丽容, 陈镜宇, 唐毅. 超声造影与增强CT对儿童肝脏良恶性病变诊断价值的对比分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2023, 20(09): 939-944.
[9] 刘嘉嘉, 王承华, 陈绪娇, 刘瑗玲, 王善钰, 屈海花, 张莉. 经阴道子宫-输卵管实时三维超声造影中患者疼痛发生情况及其影响因素分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2023, 20(09): 959-965.
[10] 邵华, 那子悦, 荆慧, 李博, 王秋程, 程文. 术前经皮超声造影对乳腺癌腋窝前哨淋巴结转移及负荷的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2023, 20(08): 849-853.
[11] 张旭, 徐建平, 苏冬明, 王彩芬, 王大力, 张文智. 男性乳腺肿块的超声造影特征[J]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2023, 20(08): 854-859.
[12] 谢迎东, 孙帼, 徐超丽, 杨斌, 孙晖, 戴云. 超声造影定量评价不同生存期移植肾血流灌注的临床价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2023, 20(07): 749-754.
[13] 王晗宇, 张司可, 张羽, 万欣, 贺秋霞, 李明明, 杨秀华. 超声造影在脑胶质瘤切除术术中的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2023, 20(07): 755-760.
[14] 蒋佳纯, 王晓冰, 陈培荣, 许世豪. 血清学指标联合常规超声及超声造影评分诊断原发性干燥综合征的临床价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2023, 20(06): 622-630.
[15] 廖梅, 张红君, 金洁玚, 吕艳, 任杰. 床旁超声造影对肝移植术后早期肝动脉血栓的诊断价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 630-634.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号