切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (03) : 288 -296. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2024.03.007

腹部超声影像学

超声造影LI-RADS系统联合甲胎蛋白对有无高危因素背景人群肝细胞癌的诊断价值
马旦杰1, 黄品同2,(), 徐琛2, 周芳芳2, 潘敏强2   
  1. 1. 310009 杭州,浙江大学医学院附属第二医院超声医学科;314000 浙江省嘉兴学院附属第二医院超声科
    2. 310009 杭州,浙江大学医学院附属第二医院超声医学科
  • 收稿日期:2022-12-18 出版日期:2024-03-01
  • 通信作者: 黄品同
  • 基金资助:
    浙江省科技攻关计划(2019C03077); 嘉兴市公益性研究计划(2023AD31029)

Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound LI-RADS combined with alpha-fetoprotein in hepatocellular carcinoma in populations with and without high-risk factors

Danjie Ma1, Pintong Huang2,(), Chen Xu2, Fangfang Zhou2, Minqiang Pan2   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310009, China;Department of Ultrasound, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Jiaxing 314000, China
    2. Department of Ultrasound, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310009, China
  • Received:2022-12-18 Published:2024-03-01
  • Corresponding author: Pintong Huang
引用本文:

马旦杰, 黄品同, 徐琛, 周芳芳, 潘敏强. 超声造影LI-RADS系统联合甲胎蛋白对有无高危因素背景人群肝细胞癌的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(03): 288-296.

Danjie Ma, Pintong Huang, Chen Xu, Fangfang Zhou, Minqiang Pan. Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound LI-RADS combined with alpha-fetoprotein in hepatocellular carcinoma in populations with and without high-risk factors[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2024, 21(03): 288-296.

目的

探讨美国放射学会超声造影(CEUS)肝脏影像报告与数据系统(LI-RADS)LR-5类标准联合甲胎蛋白(AFP)在有无高危因素背景人群中对肝细胞癌(HCC)的诊断价值。

方法

回顾性分析2018年10月至2020年10月于浙江大学医学院附属第二医院就诊的共574例患者的592个肝内局灶性病变的CEUS及AFP等临床资料,病灶均经过病理或影像学随访证实。若患者有乙型肝炎、肝硬化、HCC既往史等HCC高风险因素则归为高危风险组,无高风险因素者归入无高危风险组,无高危风险组中符合代谢相关脂肪性肝病(MAFLD)患者归入无高危MAFLD组。根据CEUS LI-RADS v2017分类标准对所有结节进行分类。联合AFP后高危风险组具有以下任一特点诊断为HCC:(1)LR-5类;(2)LR-3、4类且AFP≥20 μg/L;(3)LR-M类中造影表现为动脉期高增强、出现廓清时间为30~60 s、120 s内呈轻度或无廓清且AFP≥20 μg/L;(4)LR-M类且AFP≥400 μg/L;无高危风险组及无高危MAFLD组符合LR-5类表现且AFP≥20 μg/L时诊断为HCC。绘制受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线,分别计算各组CEUS LI-RADS LR-5类标准联合AFP前后诊断HCC的效能,并采用χ2检验或Delong's检验比较各组内两种诊断效能的差异。

结果

592个结节的病理学结果中,HCC 180个,非HCC恶性病变257个,良性病变155个。高危风险组LR-5类联合AFP相比于LR-5类单独诊断HCC的敏感度、ROC曲线下面积明显提高(74.36% vs 58.33%,0.854 vs 0.781),差异具有统计学意义(χ2=8.268,P=0.004;χ2=4.695,P<0.001)。无高危风险组和无高危MAFLD组LR-5类联合AFP与LR-5类单独诊断HCC相比AUC减小(0.583 vs 0.765,0.571 vs 0.754),2组联合诊断效能下降,差异具有统计学意义(Z=3.598、3.344,P均<0.001)。

结论

ACR CEUS LI-RADS系统在高危风险人群中具有较高的诊断价值,联合不同水平AFP使用可以使效能进一步提升,但在无高危因素下可否联合AFP诊断HCC仍有待进一步研究。

Objective

To assess the value of the combination of the American College of Radiology (ACR)'s contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) category LR-5 criteria and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) among populations with and without high-risk factors.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on the CEUS and AFP data for 592 intrahepatic focal lesions in 574 patients who were treated at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine from October 2018 to October 2020. All lesions were confirmed through pathological examination or imaging follow-up. Patients with high-risk factors for HCC such as hepatitis B, cirrhosis, or a history of HCC were classified into a high-risk group, while those without these high-risk factors were categorized into a non-high-risk group. In the non-high-risk group, patients meeting the criteria for metabolic associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) were further classified into a non-high-risk MAFLD subgroup. All nodules were categorized according to the CEUS LI-RADS v2017 classification criteria. After combined AFP, in the high-risk group, a diagnosis of HCC was made if any of the following criteria were met: (1) categorized as LR-5; (2) categorized as LR-3 or LR-4 with an AFP level ≥20 μg/L; (3) categorized as LR-M with contrast enhancement characteristics including arterial phase hyperenhancement, washout appearance within 30-60 seconds, and mild or no washout within 120 seconds, combined with an AFP level ≥20 μg/L; (4) categorized as LR-M with an AFP level ≥400 μg/L. In the non-high-risk group and the non-high-risk MAFLD subgroup, a diagnosis of HCC was made when the criteria for LR-5 were met along with an AFP level ≥20 μg/L. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of CEUS LI-RADS category LR-5 criteria combined with AFP for HCC across different groups. The diagnostic performance of CEUS LI-RADS LR-5 criteria, alone or in combination with AFP, was calculated for each group. The chi-square (χ2) test or Delong's test was used to compare the differences in diagnostic efficacy between the two diagnostic approaches within each group.

Results

Out of the 592 nodules, pathological results identified 180 as HCC lesions, 257 as non-HCC malignant lesions, and 155 as benign lesions. In the high-risk group, the combination of LR-5 category and AFP significantly improved the sensitivity and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) for diagnosing HCC compared to using the LR-5 category alone (74.36% vs 58.33% and 0.854 vs 0.781, respectively, χ2=8.268, P=0.004 and χ2=4.695, P<0.001). In the non-high-risk group and the non-high-risk MAFLD subgroup, the AUC of the combination of LR-5 category and AFP in diagnosing HCC decreased significantly compared to using the LR-5 category alone (0.583 vs 0.765 and 0.571 vs 0.754, respectively, Z=3.598, 3.344, P<0.001 for both).

Conclusion

ACR CEUS LI-RADS demonstrates substantial diagnostic value for HCC in high-risk populations, and its efficacy can be further enhanced by combining it with AFP levels at various thresholds. However, the effectiveness of ACR CEUS LI-RADS combined with AFP in the diagnosis of HCC in populations without high-risk factors remains to be further investigated.

表1 超声造影肝脏影像报告与数据系统3、4、5类诊断标准参照表
表2 不同分组肝脏局灶性病变患者临床特征
表3 肝局灶性病变的LI-RADS分类与病理结果对照(个)
图1 乙型肝炎肝硬化患者,男性,55岁,超声造影(CEUS)肝脏影像报告与数据系统(LI-RADS)肝Ⅴ段实质内肿块被分为5类,大小2.27 cm×1.55 cm,甲胎蛋白5.4 μg/L,术后常规病理结果为肝细胞癌,Edmondson分级Ⅱ级;图a:常规超声显示肝Ⅶ段等回声团块,边界不清(箭头所示);图b:CEUS动脉期结节高增强(箭头所示);图c:门静脉早期(<60 s)结节内造影剂未见明显廓清(箭头所示);图d:延迟期造影剂轻度廓清(箭头所示)
图2 高危风险组患者,男性,29岁,超声造影(CEUS)肝脏影像报告与数据系统(LI-RADS)肝Ⅳ段实质内肿块被分为LR-M类,大小4.74 cm×3.62 cm,术后常规病理结果为肝细胞癌,Edmondson分级Ⅱ级,甲胎蛋白47.5 μg/L;图a:常规超声显示肝Ⅳ段混合性回声团块,边界欠清晰,内部回声不均匀(箭头所示);图b:CEUS动脉期(15 s)结节呈向心性高增强,边界清晰(箭头所示);图c:门静脉早期(<60 s)可见造影剂廓清(箭头所示);图d:延迟期(>120 s)造影剂轻度廓清(箭头所示)
图3 无肝硬化非代谢相关脂肪性肝病患者,女性,58岁,超声造影(CEUS)肝脏影像报告与数据系统(LI-RADS)肝Ⅴ~Ⅷ区肿块被分为5类,大小11.97 cm×12.18 cm,甲胎蛋白5.6 μg/L,神经元特异性烯醇化酶181 ng/ml,术后常规病理结果为神经内分泌癌转移;图a:常规超声显示肝SV~Ⅷ段高回声团块,边界清晰(箭头所示);图b:CEUS动脉期结节呈不均匀高增强,内见不规则低-无增强区(箭头所示);图c:门静脉早期(<60 s)结节内造影剂未见明显廓清(箭头所示);图d:延迟期造影剂轻度廓清(箭头所示)
图4 高危风险组(图a)、无高危风险组(图b)、无高危代谢相关脂肪性肝病组(图c)以超声造影肝脏影像报告与数据系统(LI-RADS)5类标准单独及联合甲胎蛋白(AFP)诊断肝细胞癌的受试者操作特征曲线图
表4 各组肝局灶性病变以LR-5类及联合甲胎蛋白后对肝细胞癌的诊断价值比较
1
中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会医政医管局. 原发性肝癌诊疗指南(2022年版) [J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2022, 21(2): 143-168.
2
American College of Radiology. CEUS Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2018 [EB/OL]. Accessed May 25 2022.
3
中华医学会肝病学分会, 中华医学会感染病学分会. 慢性乙型肝炎防治指南(2022年版) [J]. 中华肝脏病杂志, 2022, 30(12): 1309-1331.
4
Liu Z, Suo C, Mao X, et al. Global incidence trends in primary liver cancer by age at diagnosis, sex, region, and etiology, 1990-2017: incidence trends in liver cancer with different diagnosed ages [J]. Cancer, 2020, 126(10): 2267-2278.
5
Younossi, ZM, Koenig, AB, Abdelatif D, et al. Global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease-Meta-analytic assessment of prevalence, incidence, and outcomes [J]. Hepatology, 2016, 64(1): 73-84.
6
Bengtsson B, Stål P, Wahlin S, et al. Characteristics and outcome of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with NAFLD without cirrhosis [J]. Liver Int, 2019, 39(6): 1098-1108.
7
Eslam M, Ratziu V, George J, et al. A new definition for metabolic associated fatty liver disease: an international expert consensus statement [J]. J Hepatol, 2020, 73(1): 202-209.
8
Huang Z, Zhou PP, Li SS, et al. Evaluation of contrast-enhanced ultrasound LI-RADS version 2017: application on 271 liver nodules in individuals with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis [J]. Eur Radiol, 2022, 32(10): 7146-7154.
9
丁建民, 龙磊, 周洪雨, 等. 超声造影肝脏影像报告与数据系统对高危人群肝细胞癌的风险预测 [J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2020, 29(2): 138-142.
10
Yang D, Li R, Zhang XH, et al. Perfusion characteristics of hepatocellular carcinoma at contrast-enhanced ultrasound: influence of the cellular differentiation, the tumor size and the underlying hepatic condition [J]. Sci Rep, 2018, 8(1): 4713.
11
赖江琼, 徐超丽, 刘国安, 等. 肝细胞癌超声造影特征与其分化程度的关系[J/CD]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2016, 13(4): 281-285.
12
Terzi E, Iavarone M, Pompili M, et al. Contrast ultrasound LI-RADS LR-5 identifies hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis in a multicenter restropective study of 1,006 nodules [J]. J Hepatol, 2018, 68(3): 485-492.
13
吴晓贝, 罗鸿昌, 李开艳, 等. 超声造影LI-RADS分类在肝细胞癌诊断中的应用价值 [J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2018, 27(11): 936-941.
14
Zhou H, Zhang C, Du L, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound liver imaging reporting and data system in diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma: diagnostic performance and interobserver agreement [J]. Ultraschall Med, 2020, 43(1): 64-71.
15
李小娟, 黄品同, 徐永远, 等. 超声造影肝影像报告和数据系统与磁共振肝影像报告和数据系统对肝细胞癌高危患者肝占位性病变的一致性评价研究 [J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2020, 29(6): 522-528.
16
Fraum TJ, Cannella R, Ludwig DR, et al. Assessment of primary liver carcinomas other than hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with LI-RADS v2018: comparison of the LI-RADS target population to patients without LI-RADS-defined HCC risk factors [J]. Eur Radiol, 2020, 30(2): 996-1007.
17
Zhou F, Zhou J, Wang W, et al. Unexpected rapid increase in the burden of NAFLD in China from 2008 to 2018: a systematic review and meta‐analysis [J]. Hepatology, 2019, 70(4): 1119-1133.
18
Sivesgaard K, Larsen LP, Srensen M, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of CE-CT, MRI and FDG PET/CT for detecting colorectal cancer liver metastases in patients considered eligible for hepatic resection and/or local ablation [J]. Eur Radiol, 2018, 28(11): 4735-4747.
19
曹东明, 景香香, 林运旺. 肝转移癌超声造影增强模式表现分析 [J]. 实用肝脏病杂志, 2020, 23(3): 431-434.
20
尹珊珊, 姜彬彬, 崔秋丽, 等. 神经内分泌肿瘤肝转移超声造影表现与分化程度的关系初探 [J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2019, 28(2): 108-113.
21
Lyshchik A, Kono Y, Dietrich CF, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the liver: technical and lexicon recommendations from the ACR CEUS LI-RADS working group [J]. Abdom Radiol (NY), 2018, 43(4): 861-879.
22
姚艳琴, 邢建东, 叶志伟, 等. 弥散加权成像联合磁共振成像动态增强在鉴别肝转移瘤与原发肝癌中的应用价值 [J]. 山西医药杂志, 2021, 50(23): 3255-3257.
[1] 马琳, 彭驰涵, 朱晓霞, 范红霞, 杨家丽, 罗燕. 超声造影定量评估大鼠70%肝切除后不同类型门静脉狭窄残肝微循环灌注的实验研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(01): 83-89.
[2] 刘逸群, 朱家安, 熊钰, 辛雨薇, 曲琳琳, 杨力, 李文雪, 田辉. 超声造影定量分析大鼠肝急性移植物抗宿主病的实验研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(01): 75-81.
[3] 覃斯, 刘一铭, 周静雯, 李昀芸, 刘广健. Sonazoid®超声造影不同参数成像效果的体外研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(12): 1287-1293.
[4] 池梦婷, 赵萍, 李静波, 朱嘉宁, 宋禄达, 罗渝昆, 李秋洋. 高帧频超声造影在膀胱癌分级及分期中的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(11): 1107-1113.
[5] 李秋洋, 赵萍, 李静波, 宋禄达, 朱嘉宁, 姜波, 罗渝昆. 高帧频超声造影对小肾透明细胞癌假包膜的评价价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(11): 1114-1118.
[6] 任新平, 郑丽丽, 冯梅晶, 肖俊飞, 林艳艳, 詹维伟. 高帧频超声造影对慢性肝病患者≤3 cm肝局灶性病变定性诊断的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(11): 1119-1124.
[7] 吕琦, 惠品晶, 丁亚芳, 颜燕红. 颈动脉斑块易损性的超声造影评估及与缺血性卒中的相关性研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1040-1045.
[8] 丁雷, 罗文, 杨晓, 庞丽娜, 张佩蒂, 刘海静, 袁佳妮, 刘瑾. 高帧频超声造影在评价C-TIRADS 4-5类甲状腺结节成像特征中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 887-894.
[9] 张茜, 陈佳慧, 高雪萌, 赵傲雪, 黄瑛. 基于高帧频超声造影的影像组学特征鉴别诊断甲状腺结节良恶性的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 895-903.
[10] 赵向阳, 刘双池, 张懿刚, 陶滔, 谈燚. 顺铂对肝细胞癌Hep3B细胞程序性死亡配体1表达及药物敏感性的研究[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 51-55.
[11] 邢益民, 张天飞, 戴慧勇. 胃肠充盈超声造影检查在反酸、嗳气患者临床诊断中的应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 303-306.
[12] 陈政, 叶庆旺, 赵东波, 石鑫, 吴建强, 余德才. 定位针引导下腹腔镜精准局部肝切除应用探索[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 125-128.
[13] 莫鹏, 郭杏春, 梁秀娟, 王耀明. 超声引导与CT引导射频消融治疗肝细胞癌患者疗效及预后比较[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(02): 151-154.
[14] 万菲, 任勇军. 原发性肝细胞癌肿瘤标志物研究进展[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(01): 77-81.
[15] 崔皓然, 顾俊鹏, 任伟新. 基于经导管动脉化疗栓塞联合治疗肝癌伴门静脉癌栓的进展[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 64-69.
阅读次数
全文


摘要