切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (03) : 281 -287. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2024.03.006

妇产科超声影像学

Miller-Dieker综合征胎儿产前超声、磁共振影像学特征及遗传学分析
徐燕1, 茹彤1, 郑明明1, 顾燕1, 朱湘玉1, 严陈晨2, 陈玲3, 戴晨燕1,()   
  1. 1. 210008 南京,南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院妇产医学中心
    2. 210008 南京,南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院医学影像科
    3. 210008 南京,南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院病理科
  • 收稿日期:2023-08-16 出版日期:2024-03-01
  • 通信作者: 戴晨燕
  • 基金资助:
    南京市卫生科技发展专项资金(YKK20077); 南京鼓楼医院临床研究专项资金(2021-LCYJ-PY-11)

Prenatal ultrasound and MRI characteristics and genetic analysis of Miller-Dieker syndrome

Yan Xu1, Tong Ru1, Mingming Zheng1, Yan Gu1, Xiangyu Zhu1, Chenchen Yan2, Ling Chen3, Chenyan Dai1,()   

  1. 1. Medical Center of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing 210008, China
    2. Department of Radiology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing 210008, China
    3. Department of Pathology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing 210008, China
  • Received:2023-08-16 Published:2024-03-01
  • Corresponding author: Chenyan Dai
引用本文:

徐燕, 茹彤, 郑明明, 顾燕, 朱湘玉, 严陈晨, 陈玲, 戴晨燕. Miller-Dieker综合征胎儿产前超声、磁共振影像学特征及遗传学分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(03): 281-287.

Yan Xu, Tong Ru, Mingming Zheng, Yan Gu, Xiangyu Zhu, Chenchen Yan, Ling Chen, Chenyan Dai. Prenatal ultrasound and MRI characteristics and genetic analysis of Miller-Dieker syndrome[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2024, 21(03): 281-287.

目的

探讨Miller-Dieker综合征胎儿的产前超声、磁共振影像学特征及其与遗传学结果的相关性。

方法

回顾性分析2019年11月至2022年9月因“胎儿发育异常”转诊至南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院妇产医学中心就诊的经产前诊断的4例Miller-Dieker综合征胎儿的资料,对其超声筛查、神经学超声检查、磁共振成像检查、遗传学和病理结果进行总结分析。

结果

4例Miller-Dieker综合征胎儿中,(1)产前超声筛查发现宫内生长受限3例,心脏畸形2例,侧脑室扩张、室管膜下囊肿、小脑下蚓部缺失、头围小和羊水增多各1例;(2)其中2例接受了神经学超声检查,进一步发现无脑回畸形2例、胼胝体部分缺失和颅后窝Blake's囊肿各1例,排除小脑下蚓部缺失1例;(3)3例接受了头颅磁共振成像检查,发现无脑回畸形2例、胼胝体部分缺失和显示不清各1例;(4)4例孕妇均终止妊娠,尸检结果显示3例无脑回畸形、2例心脏畸形和3例面部轻度异常;(5)染色体微阵列检测显示4例胎儿均存在17p13.3区域不同片段缺失,累及基因包括PAFAH1B1YWHAECRK;3例PAFAH1B1基因缺失胎儿均出现无脑回畸形,3例宫内生长受限胎儿均出现YWHAE基因缺失。

结论

Miller-Dieker综合征具有特征性的产前超声征象,当产前超声发现无脑回畸形和宫内生长受限时应考虑本病的存在,部分病例有特殊面部征象,这些征象主要与17p13.3区域缺失的PAFAH1B1YWHAECRK基因有关;神经学超声检查的加入,明显提高了Miller-Dieker综合征胎儿颅脑复杂畸形和无脑回畸形的检出率。

Objective

To explore the prenatal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of Miller-Dieker syndrome and their correlation with genetic results.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted to review the clinical data of 4 cases of pregnant women with Miller-Dieker syndrome fetuses who were referred to the Obstetrics and Gynecology Medical Center of Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University Medical College from November 2019 to September 2022 due to "fetal developmental abnormalities". The ultrasound screening, neurosonography, MRI examination, genetics, and pathological results were summarized and analyzed.

Results

Prenatal ultrasound screening revealed 3 cases of intrauterine growth restriction, 2 cases of cardiac malformation, 1 case of ventriculomegaly, 1 case of subependymal cyst, 1 case of cerebellar vermis deficiency, 1 case of small head circumference, and 1 case of increased amniotic fluid. Neurosonography was further performed in two fetuses, which revealed 2 cases of lissencephaly, 1 case of partial agenesis of the corpus callosum, and 1 case of Blake's cyst in the posterior fossa, and excluded crebellar vermis deficiency in one fetus. Three fetuses underwent fetal MRI examination, which revealed 2 cases of lissencephaly, 1 case of partial agenesis, and 1 case of unclear display of the corpus callosum. All four pregnant women terminated their pregnancies, and fetal autopsy results showed 3 cases of lissencephaly, 2 cases of cardiac malformations, and 3 cases of mild facial abnormalities. Chromosome microarray detection showed different deletions in the 17p13.3 region in the 4 fetuses, involving the PAFAH1B1, YWHAE, and CRK genes. Three fetuses with PAFAH1B1 gene deletion all showed lissencephaly, and three cases with intrauterine growth restriction all showed YWHAE gene deletion.

Conclusion

Miller-Dieker syndrome has characteristic prenatal ultrasound features. When lissencephaly and intrauterine growth restriction are found by prenatal ultrasound, the presence of this disease should be considered. Some cases have special facial signs. All of these features are mainly related to the deletion of PAFAH1B1, YWHAE, and CRK genes in the 17p13.3 region. The addition of neurosonography may significantly improve the detection rate of complex cranial malformations and lissencephaly in Miller-Dieker syndrome fetuses.

表1 4例Miller-Dieker综合征胎儿CMA检测结果
表2 4例Miller-Dieker综合征胎儿的产前超声筛查、神经学超声检查、MRI检查及随访结果
病例 孕妇年龄(岁) 孕周(周) 超声筛查 神经学超声检查 MRI检查 随访
1 25 22 宫内生长受限,左心发育不良综合征(左心偏小、主动脉瓣及升主动脉狭窄) - - 尸检结果:显示体质量偏轻(446 g),面容轻度异常(双眼线下斜、鼻梁塌陷、宽大、短鼻、鼻孔略上翻、双耳低位、上唇肥厚),左心室发育不良(左心室约为右心室1/3大小),主动脉狭窄(主动脉周径0.6 cm,肺动脉周径1.2 cm),主动脉弓离断
2 26 36 宫内生长受限,双侧脑室后角增宽(左侧11.1 mm,右侧12.0 mm),左侧室管膜下囊肿 - 胎儿脑实质、脑沟回、部分脑室形态及信号异常,考虑无脑回畸形,右侧脑室后角中度增宽(14.63 mm),左侧脑室后角轻度增宽(11.52 mm),双顶径小于孕周 尸检结果:胎儿相当于34周,面容轻度异常(眼距增宽,双耳低置,小下颌),无脑回畸形,脑室轻度扩张
3 28 24 小脑下蚓部缺失、室间隔缺损 透明隔腔偏窄(1.3 mm)、颅后窝Blake's囊肿(9.4 mm×6.1 mm×5.1 mm)、蛛网膜下腔增宽、无脑回畸形(外侧裂浅显,顶枕沟、距状沟及扣带沟未显示) 双侧脑室后角轻度增宽(6.25 mm/8.00 mm),胼胝体显示欠清晰,脑沟回显示不满意 尸检结果:室间隔膜部缺损、无脑回畸形
4 31 30 宫内生长受限、头围小、羊水增多(羊水指数233 mm) 小头畸形、胼胝体部分缺失(胼胝体短)、无脑回畸形(外侧裂及顶枕沟浅显,距状沟及扣带沟未显示、大脑表面光滑,脑沟回不明显)、蛛网膜下腔增宽 小头畸形、胼胝体部分缺失、无脑回畸形 尸检结果:各发育参数小于孕周,提示存在宫内生长受限,脑沟及脑回结构不明显,提示无脑回畸形,胼胝体部分缺失。外眦间距显著增宽,下牙床中部稍突起
图1 病例4,孕30周胎儿,图a~d为神经学超声检查切面,图a经丘脑冠状切面:扣带沟未显示(黄箭头),双侧外侧裂发育迟缓(红箭头),蛛网膜下腔增宽;图b正中矢状切面:胼胝体部分缺失(胼胝体长26 mm),顶枕沟未显示(箭头),蛛网膜下腔增宽;图c经小脑冠状切面:距状沟未显示(箭头),图d旁矢状切面示右侧大脑皮质表面光滑,未见明显脑沟;图e~g为颅脑MRI检查切面,图e横轴位:双侧外侧裂浅显(箭头),蛛网膜下腔增宽;图f正中矢状位:胼胝体显示欠清晰,顶枕沟未显示(箭头);图g冠状位:距状沟未显示(箭头);图h为镜下无脑回畸形继发征象(HE×10):黄线为额叶皮层灰白质分界线,右侧是灰质区,相对增宽,左侧是白质区,相对变窄
1
García-Herrero S, Campos-Galindo I, Martínez-Conejero JA, et al. BACs-on-Beads technology: a reliable test for rapid detection of aneuploidies and microdeletions in prenatal diagnosis [J]. Biomed Res Int, 2014, 2014: 590298.
2
Herbst SM, Proepper CR, Geis T, et al. LIS1-associated classic lissencephaly: a retrospective, multicenter survey of the epileptogenic phenotype and response to antiepileptic drugs [J]. Brain Dev, 2016, 38(4): 399-406.
3
Nagamani SC, Zhang F, Shchelochkov OA, et al. Microdeletions including YWHAE in the Miller-Dieker syndrome region on chromosome 17p13.3 result in facial dysmorphisms, growth restriction, and cognitive impairment [J]. J Med Genet, 2009, 46(12): 825-833.
4
Hsieh DT, Jennesson MM, Thiele EA, et al. Brain and spinal manifestations of Miller-Dieker syndrome [J]. Neurol Clin Pract, 2013, 3(1): 82-83.
5
章锦曼, 杨必成, 冯燕, 等. Miller-Dieker综合征新发染色体突变胎儿二例产前诊断 [J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2017, 52(10): 700-702.
6
解丽梅. 产前超声发展及展望 [J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志, 2019, 30(1): 1-3.
7
Salomon LJ, Alfirevic Z, Berghella V, et al. Practice guidelines for performance of the routine mid-trimester fetal ultrasound scan [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2011, 37(1): 116-126.
8
Carvalho JS, Allan LD, Chaoui R, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): sonographic screening examination of the fetal heart [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2013, 41(3): 348-359.
9
Sonographic examination of the fetal central nervous system: guidelines for performing the 'basic examination' and the 'fetal neurosonogram' [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2007, 29(1): 109-116.
10
Paladini D, Malinger G, Birnbaum R, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): sonographic examination of the fetal central nervous system. Part 2: performance of targeted neurosonography [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2021, 57(4): 661-671.
11
Thomas MA, Duncan AM, Bardin C, et al. Lissencephaly with der (17)t(17;20) (p13.3; p12.2) mat [J]. Am J Med Genet A, 2004, 124A(3): 292-295.
12
Ghai S, Fong KW, Toi A, et al. Prenatal US and MR imaging findings of lissencephaly: review of fetal cerebral sulcal development [J]. Radiographics, 2006, 26(2): 389-405.
13
Shi X, Huang W, Lu J, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of Miller-Dieker syndrome by chromosomal microarray [J]. Ann Hum Genet, 2021, 85(2): 92-96.
14
Chen CP, Chang TY, Guo WY, et al. Chromosome 17p13.3 deletion syndrome: aCGH characterization, prenatal findings and diagnosis, and literature review [J]. Gene, 2013, 532(1): 152-159.
15
Malinger G, Ben-Sira L, Lev D, et al. Fetal brain imaging: a comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and dedicated neurosonography [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2004, 23(4): 333-340.
16
Saltzman DH, Krauss CM, Goldman JM, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of lissencephaly [J]. Prenat Diagn, 1991, 11(3): 139-143.
17
Fong KW, Ghai S, Toi A, et al. Prenatal ultrasound findings of lissencephaly associated with Miller-Dieker syndrome and comparison with pre- and postnatal magnetic resonance imaging [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2004, 24(7): 716-723.
18
Cohen-Sacher B, Lerman-Sagie T, Lev D, et al. Sonographic developmental milestones of the fetal cerebral cortex: a longitudinal study [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2006, 27(5): 494-502.
19
陈芷萱, 文华轩, 钟晓红, 等. 正常胎儿脑表面沟回在三维反转水晶仿真成像上的发育变化规律[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(11): 1165-1172.
20
Toi A, Lister WS, Fong KW. How early are fetal cerebral sulci visible at prenatal ultrasound and what is the normal pattern of early fetal sulcal development? [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2004, 24(7): 706-715.
21
Pistorius LR, Stoutenbeek P, Groenendaal F, et al. Grade and symmetry of normal fetal cortical development: a longitudinal two- and three-dimensional ultrasound study [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2010, 36(6): 700-708.
22
Pooh RK, Machida M, Nakamura T, et al. Increased Sylvian fissure angle as early sonographic sign of malformation of cortical development [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2019, 54(2): 199-206.
23
Montaguti E, Bellussi F, Rizzo R, et al. Sylvian fossa sonographic measurements in 18 to 23 weeks fetuses with and without cerebral malformations [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM, 2021, 3(4): 100357.
24
Chen X, Li SL, Luo GY, et al. Ultrasonographic characteristics of cortical sulcus development in the human fetus between 18 and 41 weeks of gestation [J]. Chin Med J (Engl), 2017, 130(8): 920-928.
25
Liang B, Yu D, Zhao W, et al. Clinical findings and genetic analysis of patients with copy number variants involving 17p13.3 using a single nucleotide polymorphism array: a single-center experience [J]. BMC Med Genomics, 2022, 15(1): 268.
26
Bruno DL, Anderlid BM, Lindstrand A, et al. Further molecular and clinical delineation of co-locating 17p13.3 microdeletions and microduplications that show distinctive phenotypes [J]. J Med Genet, 2010, 47(5): 299-311.
[1] 曾晴, 文华轩, 袁鹰, 廖伊梅, 秦越, 罗丹丹, 梁美玲, 彭桂艳, 林毅, 谭莹, 温昕, 黄文兰, 李胜利. 胎儿颅脑五横切面法的临床应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(03): 243-250.
[2] 尹宏宇, 吴青青, 李晓菲. 颈后透明层和头臀长在妊娠11~13+6周双胎心脏畸形筛查中的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(03): 251-256.
[3] 朱惠娟, 邝海燕, 骆迎春, 邓光祁, 蒋凌晖, 汪圣, 王政, 孔一凡, 龙煜. 胎儿脐-门-体静脉系统异常分流的产前超声诊断及产后结局[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(03): 257-267.
[4] 张焱, 刘春媚, 姚瑾, 陈苗苗, 徐雯, 黄品同. 超声O-RADS分类和临床特征对不同病理类型卵巢浆液性肿瘤的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(03): 268-274.
[5] 谢峰, 伍玉晗, 赵胜, 杨小红, 王玉波, 石珍, 范建华, 章敏. 产前超声和MRI诊断胎儿硬脑膜窦畸形的联合应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(03): 275-280.
[6] 王莹, 王亚红, 赵瑞娜, 韦瑶, 王红燕, 蔡胜, 李建初, 杨萌. 网络教学与传统教学在超声规培医师血管超声检查理论学习中的比较研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(02): 163-166.
[7] 张胜男, 苗雅敬, 周虹, 韩高洁, 王静, 仝巧立, 张旭倩, 尹洪宁. 左心耳三维经食管超声测量与Watchman左心耳封堵器大小的相关性研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(02): 107-113.
[8] 刘昌盛, 江思, 童娟. 可视化超声引导下针刀治疗狭窄性腱鞘炎的疗效分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 310-316.
[9] 金从稳, 陈霖霖, 刘浩, 余有声, 陈本鑫. 超声联合细针穿刺定位在乳腺微小病灶切除中的应用研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 423-426.
[10] 谢丽春, 欧庆芬, 张秋萍, 叶升. 简化和标准肝脏MRI方案在结直肠癌肝转移患者随访中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 434-437.
[11] 邢益民, 张天飞, 戴慧勇. 胃肠充盈超声造影检查在反酸、嗳气患者临床诊断中的应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 303-306.
[12] 王伟利, 唐流康, 陈明政, 谢峰. 超声检查在肝胆外科中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 265-269.
[13] 熊安妮, 黄锦彬, 汪昕荣, 雷漫诗, 邓锶锶, 向青, 孟占鳌. 光梭成像及梯度自旋回波技术在MRCP应用中的优势[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 182-188.
[14] 高振轩, 谢晨, 曹绍东, 甘中伟, 周倍, 罗朝川, 王子齐, 葛煜彤, 张伟光. 高分辨率核磁共振在颅颈大动脉狭窄介入治疗中的临床应用进展[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(02): 112-119.
[15] 贾诗琪, 荣冬梅, 叶晖, 温齐平, 唐芬, 李雪娇, 王伟. 颅内血管壁磁共振成像序列综述[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 185-189.
阅读次数
全文


摘要