切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (09) : 860 -865. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2020.09.008

所属专题: 文献

头颈部超声影像学

超声对Stanford A型主动脉夹层患者颈部动脉受累伴发血栓的血管评估价值
刘艳1, 周玲1, 郑敏娟1,()   
  1. 1. 710032 西安,空军军医大学西京医院超声医学科
  • 收稿日期:2020-02-19 出版日期:2020-09-01
  • 通信作者: 郑敏娟
  • 基金资助:
    陕西省国际合作项目(2015KW-049); 空军军医大学第一附属医院学科助推计划(XJGX15Y16)

Vascular ultrasound evaluation of carotid artery involvement with thrombus in Stanford type A aortic dissection

Yan Liu1, Ling Zhou1, Minjuan Zheng1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound Diagnostics, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Military Medical University, Xi’an 710032, China
  • Received:2020-02-19 Published:2020-09-01
  • Corresponding author: Minjuan Zheng
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zheng Minjuan, Email:
引用本文:

刘艳, 周玲, 郑敏娟. 超声对Stanford A型主动脉夹层患者颈部动脉受累伴发血栓的血管评估价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2020, 17(09): 860-865.

Yan Liu, Ling Zhou, Minjuan Zheng. Vascular ultrasound evaluation of carotid artery involvement with thrombus in Stanford type A aortic dissection[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2020, 17(09): 860-865.

目的

应用超声评估Stanford A型主动脉夹层患者继发颈部动脉夹层合并血栓对脑血供的影响。

方法

连续性纳入2015年4月至2018年12月经空军军医大学西京医院急诊超声诊断及计算机断层扫描血管造影(CTA)确诊的Stanford A型主动脉夹层累及颈部动脉的住院患者49例,依据患者是否伴有颈部动脉血栓将其分为无血栓组26例和血栓组23例。收集患者的超声心动图、颈部血管超声及临床资料,将椎动脉及颈内动脉按血流频谱形态分为正常频谱、高阻力频谱、低速低阻频谱和窃血频谱4类。分析2组间超声心动图及颈部动脉血流频谱参数,并对2组的外科手术时间、术后神经系统症状及死亡率进行对比分析。

结果

血栓组与无血栓组患者的超声心动图参数比较,差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。血栓组颈部动脉血流频谱异常率为46.15%(12/26),高于无血栓组的86.96%(20/23),2组比较差异有统计学意义(χ2=9.561,P=0.006)。各频谱类型进行2组间比较,结果显示除高阻力频谱外,其他3种频谱类型发生率组间差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。2组患者的外科手术时间、死亡率及术后神经系统症状发生率差异均有统计学意义(t=4.985,χ2=4.506、5.014,P均<0.05),2组患者新发脑梗死发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

主动脉夹层患者继发颈部动脉夹层合并血栓时,患者的颈部动脉血供明显受影响,且死亡风险也增加,血管超声能够评估颈部动脉血流频谱的变化,为患者脑血供状况评估及预后判断提供依据。

Objective

To analyze the cerebral blood flow and related neural symptoms in type A aortic dissection (AD) patients with carotid artery thrombosis (CAT) by vascular ultrasound.

Methods

From April 2015 to December 2018, 49 consecutive AD patients with CAD diagnosed by cardiovascular ultrasound and CT angiography (CTA) at Xijing Hospital were included. According to the presence or absence of CAT, the patients were divided into two groups: no CAT group (n=26) and CAT group (n=23). The patients' echocardiography, cervical vascular ultrasound, and clinical data were collected, and the vertebral artery and internal carotid artery were divided into four types according to the blood flow spectrum: normal spectrum, high resistance spectrum, low resistance spectrum, and stolen blood spectrum. The data of emergency echocardiography and carotid Doppler spectrum parameters between the two groups were analyzed, and the general data of neurologic symptoms, operation time, and mortality were also compared.

Results

Comparison of echocardiography parameters between the two groups showed no statistically significant difference (P>0.05). The abnormal rate of cervical artery flow spectrum in the CAT group was 46.15% (12/26), which was significantly higher than that of the non-thrombosis group (86.96%; 20/23) (χ2=9.561, P=0.006). Except for the high resistance spectrum, the incidence of the other three spectrum types differed significantly between the two groups (P<0.05). There were statistically significant differences in the duration of surgery, mortality, and incidence of postoperative neurological symptoms between the two groups (t=4.985, χ2=4.506, and χ2=5.014, P<0.05), but there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of new cerebral infarction (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Blood supply of the carotid artery is obviously impaired in AD patients with CAT, and the risk of death is higher in AD patients with CAT than in those without. The changes of blood flow spectrum of the carotid artery can be evaluated by cardiovascular ultrasound, which can provide a basis for the evaluation of cerebral blood supply and prognosis.

表1 血栓组与无血栓组患者的一般资料比较
图1 血管超声评估颈动脉夹层。图a为颈动脉夹层无血栓;图b为颈动脉夹层合并假腔内血栓
表2 血栓组与无血栓组的超声心动图参数比较[例(%)]
表3 主动脉夹层累及颈部动脉分支情况(n=49)
表4 血栓组与无血栓组颈部动脉血流频谱类型比较[根(%)]
图2 颈部动脉夹层患者的不同类型颈部动脉血流频谱图像。图a为正常频谱;图b为高阻力频谱;图c为低速低阻频谱;图d为窃血频谱
表5 血栓组与无血栓组临床资料比较
1
熊伟,董少红.急性主动脉夹层院内死亡的危险因素分析 [J].中华高血压杂志,2011,19(6):584-586.
2
易定华,段维勋.中国主动脉夹层诊疗现状与展望 [J].中国循环杂志,2013,28(1):1-2.
3
周炳元,杨向军,杨俊华,等.主动脉夹层累及颈动脉的超声图像特点 [J].苏州大学学报(医学版),2010,30(3):553-555,614.
4
Ohara T, Koga M, Tokuda N, et al. Rapid identification of type A aortic dissection as a cause of acute ischemic stroke [J]. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2016, 25(8): 1901-1906.
5
Kamimura T, Nomura E, Hara N, et al. Carotid artery dissection and ischemic stroke originating from localized aortic arch dissection [J]. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2016, 25(11): 209-211.
6
周玲,弓文清,郑敏娟,等. Stanford A型主动脉夹层对颈动脉血流影响及与脑梗死发生相关性 [J].中国超声医学杂志,2017,33(8):690-694.
7
钱蕴秋,周晓东,张军.实用超声诊断手册.2版.北京:人民军医出版社,2009,449-454
8
Gaul C, Dietrich W, Friedrich I, et al. Neurological symptoms in type A aortic dissections [J]. Stroke , 2007, 38(2): 292-297.
9
Lee VH, Brown RJ, Mandrekar JN, et al. Incidence and outcome of cervical artery dissection: a population-based study [J]. Neurology, 2006, 67(10): 1809-1812.
10
曹贵方,毕齐,曹莉.主动脉夹层患者神经系统症状的临床分析 [J].中华内科学杂志,2013,52(5):400-402.
11
弓文清,刘艳,周玲,等.Stanford A型急性主动脉夹层合并新发脑梗死的影像学特征及预后 [J].中国医学影像学杂志,2020,28(1):22-25.
12
马黎明,刘高利,李祥,等.主动脉夹层32例的外科治疗 [J/CD].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2012,6(6):1627-1628.
13
Chen Y, Li N, Li Y, et al. Risk factors for postoperative prolonged ventilation time in acute type A aortic dissection patients received modified aortic root procedure [J]. Heart Surg Forum, 2019, 22(6): E476-E480.
[1] 张莲莲, 惠品晶, 丁亚芳. 颈部血管超声在粥样硬化斑块易损性评估中的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 816-821.
[2] 马艳波, 华扬, 刘桂梅, 孟秀峰, 崔立平. 中青年人颈动脉粥样硬化病变的相关危险因素分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 822-826.
[3] 王珏, 陈赛君, 贲志飞, 詹锦勇, 徐开颖. 剪切波弹性成像联合极速脉搏波技术评估颈动脉弹性对糖尿病性视网膜病变的预测价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 636-641.
[4] 闫文, 谢兴文, 顾玉彪, 雷宁波, 马成, 于文霞, 高亚雄, 张磊. 微小RNA与全膝关节置换术后深静脉血栓的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 842-846.
[5] 肖志满, 龚煜, 谢景凌, 刘斌伟. 上下肢关节镜手术后患者下肢深静脉血栓发生的对比研究[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 601-606.
[6] 刘建龙, 张子轩, 徐圣杰, 张蕴鑫. 颈动脉爆裂综合征发生机制与治疗的研究进展[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(05): 434-437.
[7] 黄应雄, 叶子, 蒋鹏, 詹红, 姚陈, 崔冀. 急性肠系膜静脉血栓形成致透壁性肠坏死的临床危险因素分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 413-421.
[8] 张再博, 王冰雨, 焦志凯, 檀碧波. 胃癌术后下肢深静脉血栓危险因素的Meta分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 475-480.
[9] 莫闲, 杨闯. 肝硬化患者并发门静脉血栓危险因素的Meta分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 678-683.
[10] 廖梅, 张红君, 金洁玚, 吕艳, 任杰. 床旁超声造影对肝移植术后早期肝动脉血栓的诊断价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 630-634.
[11] 李飞翔, 段虎斌, 李晋虎, 吴昊, 王永红, 范益民. 急性颅脑损伤继发下肢静脉血栓的相关危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 277-282.
[12] 何彬, 王静. 彩色多普勒超声血流参数、血清尿酸、胱抑素C对短暂性脑缺血发作患者颈动脉狭窄的诊断价值[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 289-294.
[13] 王俊杰, 尹晓亮, 刘二腾, 陆军, 祁鹏, 胡深, 杨希孟, 陈鲲鹏, 张东, 王大明. 机器学习对预测颈内动脉非急性闭塞患者血管内再通术成功的潜在价值[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 464-470.
[14] 张许平, 刘佳成, 张舸, 杜艳姣, 李韶, 商丹丹, 王浩, 李艳, 段智慧. CYP2C19基因多态性联合血栓弹力图指导大动脉粥样硬化型非致残性缺血性脑血管事件患者抗血小板治疗的效果[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 477-481.
[15] 李秦鹏, 王其涛, 朱媛媛, 周琦, 刘笑言, 许勇. 颈动脉彩色多普勒超声、颈部CT血管成像及脑部CT灌注成像在脑梗死并发颈动脉狭窄患者中的应用研究[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 482-488.
阅读次数
全文


摘要