切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (12) : 1162 -1167. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2020.12.003

所属专题: 乳腺超声 文献

浅表器官超声影像学

常规超声联合超声造影对乳腺囊实性复合肿块良恶性的鉴别诊断价值
朱琳1, 郑燕1, 薛剑桥1, 刘瑾瑾1, 后利珠1, 赵丹1, 王伟1, 董凤林1,()   
  1. 1. 215006 苏州大学附属第一医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2020-06-28 出版日期:2020-12-01
  • 通信作者: 董凤林

Value of conventional ultrasound combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasound in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant complex cystic and solid breast masses

Lin Zhu1, Yan Zheng1, Jianqiao Xue1, Jinjin Liu1, Lizhu Hou1, Dan Zhao1, Wei Wang1, Fenglin Dong1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China
  • Received:2020-06-28 Published:2020-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Fenglin Dong
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Dong Fenglin, Email:
引用本文:

朱琳, 郑燕, 薛剑桥, 刘瑾瑾, 后利珠, 赵丹, 王伟, 董凤林. 常规超声联合超声造影对乳腺囊实性复合肿块良恶性的鉴别诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2020, 17(12): 1162-1167.

Lin Zhu, Yan Zheng, Jianqiao Xue, Jinjin Liu, Lizhu Hou, Dan Zhao, Wei Wang, Fenglin Dong. Value of conventional ultrasound combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasound in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant complex cystic and solid breast masses[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2020, 17(12): 1162-1167.

目的

探讨常规超声联合超声造影(CEUS)在不同超声分组乳腺囊实性复合肿块良恶性鉴别中的应用价值。

方法

回顾性选取2017年4月至2019年11月苏州大学附属第一医院收治的乳腺囊实性复合肿块患者111例,共计111个乳腺病灶。根据肿块内部囊实性成分比例及分布特点将其分为3组[A组:厚壁和(或)厚分隔;B组:囊性为主;C组:实性为主]。结合病理分析各组肿块的常规超声及超声造影声像图特征。

结果

111个乳腺病灶中,A组病灶28个(良性24个,恶性4个),B组病灶36个(良性28个,恶性8个),C组病灶47个(良性29个,恶性18个)。B、C组恶性肿块的年龄及最大径均大于良性组,差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。A组肿块CEUS后恶性肿块多表现为边缘不光整、壁和(或)分隔增厚,与良性肿块比较差异均有统计学意义(P=0.004、0.016)。B、C组恶性肿块多表现为常规超声及CEUS后实性边缘不光整、实性成分增强范围超出基底部,与良性肿块比较差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。C组良性肿块与恶性肿块间形态、后方回声、有无钙化及血供情况比较,差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。

结论

常规超声联合CEUS对乳腺囊实性复合肿块的良恶性鉴别具有重要意义,可为临床评估提供可靠的诊断依据。

Objective

To evaluate the value of conventional ultrasound combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in differentiating benign from malignant complex cystic and solid breast masses in different ultrasonic subgroups.

Methods

A total of 111 patients with 111 complex cystic and solid breast masses admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from April 2017 to November 2019 were retrospectively selected. The lesions were divided into three groups according to the proportion and distribution of cystic/solid components (Group A: thick outer wall and/or thick internal septa; Group B: predominantly cystic component; Group C: predominantly solid component). Based on pathological results, the sonographic features of conventional ultrasound and CEUS in each group were analyzed.

Results

Among the 111 breast lesions, 28 were classified into group A (24 benign lesions, 4 malignant lesions), 36 in group B (28 benign lesions, 8 malignant lesions), and 47 in group C (29 benign lesions, 18 malignant lesions). The patient age and maximum diameter of malignant masses in groups B and C were significantly greater than those in benign masses (P<0.05 for all). In group A, most malignant masses had no smooth margin and thicker wall/septum on CEUS, with statistically significant differences from benign masses (P<0.05). In groups B and C, malignant masses were usually characterized by rough solid margin (both on conventional ultrasound and CEUS) and the enhancement range of solid components beyond the basilar part, with statistically significant differences from benign masses (P<0.05). The differences in shape, posterior echo, calcification, and blood supply between benign and malignant masses in Group C were statistically significant (P<0.05 for all).

Conclusion

Conventional ultrasound combined with CEUS is of great significance in differentiating benign and malignant complex cystic and solid breast masses, which can provide a reliable diagnostic basis for clinical evaluation.

表1 不同性质的各组乳腺囊实性复合肿块的患者年龄及最大径比较(
xˉ
±s
图1 患者女,53岁,高分化黏液腺癌超声及超声造影图像。图a为常规超声示肿块形态不规则,内可见多条厚分隔;图b为彩色多普勒超声示肿块内部点状血流信号;图c为超声造影示肿块呈高增强,边缘不光整,壁增厚
图2 患者女,53岁,浸润性导管癌III级超声及超声造影图像。图a为常规超声示肿块边缘不光整,内见大片状无回声区,实性成分可见点状微钙化;图b为彩色多普勒超声示肿块内部点状血流信号;图c为超声造影示肿块实性成分呈高增强,边缘不光整,增强范围超出基底部
表2 不同性质的各组乳腺囊实性复合肿块的声像图比较(例)
1
Mendelson EB, Böhm-Vélez M, Berg WA, et al. ACR BI-RADS Ultrasound. ACR BI-RADS Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System [S]. Reston: American College of Radiology, 2013.
2
Kim MY, Cho N, Yi A, et al. Sonoelastography in distinguishing benign from malignant complex breast mass and making the decision to biopsy [J]. Korean J Radiol, 2013, 14(4): 559-567.
3
Zhang Y, Zhao CK, Li XL, et al. Virtual touch tissue imaging and quantification: value in malignancy prediction for complex cystic and solid breast lesions [J]. Sci Rep, 2017, 7(1): 7807.
4
王芬, 高毅, 陈雅玲, 等. 超声BI-RADS分类在乳腺囊实性病变中的应用 [J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2016, 25(6): 520-524.
5
Hsu HH, Yu JC, Lee HS, et al. Complex cystic lesions of the breast on ultrasonography: feature analysis and BI-RADS assessment [J]. Eur J Radiol, 2011, 79(1): 73-79.
6
Adler DD, Carson PL, Rubin JM, et al. Doppler ultrasound color flow imaging in the study of breast cancer: preliminary findings [J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 1990, 16(6): 553-559.
7
Chen YJ, Tang LN, Du ZS, et al. Factors influencing the performance of a diagnostic model including contrast-enhanced ultrasound in 1023 breast lesions: comparison with histopathology [J]. Ann Transl Med, 2019, 7(22): 647.
8
Park AY, Kwon M, Woo OH, et al. A prospective study on the value of ultrasound microflow assessment to distinguish malignant from benign solid breast masses: association between ultrasound parameters and histologic microvessel densities [J]. Korean J Radiol, 2019, 20(5): 759-772.
9
沈海云, 黄备建, 李翠仙, 等. 低度恶性潜能多房囊性肾瘤的超声造影表现 [J]. 复旦学报(医学版), 2018, 45(5): 703-707.
10
沈若霞, 杨丽春, 罗晓茂, 等. 基于中国多中心研究数据的乳腺良恶性病灶超声造影定性特征的回顾性研究 [J]. 中国医学影像学杂志, 2018, 26(12): 885-889.
11
严松莉. 乳腺超声与病理 [M]. 1版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2009: 5-14.
12
Li WW, Zhou QH, Xia SJ, et al. Application of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ [J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2020, 39(1): 39-50.
13
赵璐, 张莹, 程颢, 等. 乳腺超声造影预测模型的建立及其对乳腺良恶性病变诊断效能的分析 [J/CD]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2019, 16(6): 419-425.
[1] 王亚红, 蔡胜, 葛志通, 杨筱, 李建初. 颅骨骨膜窦的超声表现一例[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(11): 1089-1091.
[2] 汪洪斌, 张红霞, 何文, 杜丽娟, 程令刚, 张雨康, 张萌. 低级别阑尾黏液性肿瘤与阑尾黏液腺癌超声及超声造影特征分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 865-871.
[3] 宋勇, 李东炫, 王翔, 李锐. 基于数据挖掘法分析3 种超声造影剂不良反应信号[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 890-898.
[4] 王博冉, 乔春梅, 李春歌, 王欣, 王晓磊. 超声造影评估类风湿关节炎亚临床滑膜炎疾病进展的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 802-808.
[5] 马晓菊, 梁潇, 段云友, 袁丽君, 赵萍. NBAV脂质纳泡对ApoE -/-小鼠动脉粥样硬化病变的评估和干预[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 608-616.
[6] 邢益民, 张天飞, 戴慧勇. 胃肠充盈超声造影检查在反酸、嗳气患者临床诊断中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 303-306.
[7] 郑大雯, 王健东. 胆囊癌辅助诊断研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 769-773.
[8] 张红君, 郑博文, 廖梅, 任杰. 超声及超声造影在肝移植术后上腹部淋巴结良恶性鉴别诊断中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 562-567.
[9] 温绍敏, 王雅晳, 施依璐, 段莎莎, 云书荣, 张小杉. 靶向超声造影技术在动脉粥样硬化治疗中的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 496-499.
[10] 曹建辉, 冯斌, 黄伟伟, 张超. 超声造影在乳腺BI-RADS 4A类结节诊断及穿刺活检中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 363-368.
[11] 赵欣, 李昊昌, 卫星彤. 多模态超声在非肿块型乳腺病变中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 407-410.
[12] 黄宏山, 陈成彩. 经淋巴管超声造影在乳腺癌前哨淋巴结诊断中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 411-414.
[13] 卫星彤, 李昊昌, 赵欣. 甲状腺木乃伊结节于多模态超声下的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 415-419.
[14] 徐森胤, 黄斌, 郭绍锋, 王涵. 超声造影引导下关节囊内注射治疗老年粘连性关节囊炎的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2024, 11(03): 24-27.
[15] 史宛瑞, 崔立刚. 颈动脉一过性血管周围炎综合征的影像学诊断研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 516-519.
阅读次数
全文


摘要