切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (03) : 226 -233. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2022.03.007

妇产科超声影像学

声触诊组织定量剪切波弹性成像联合盆底超声对阴道分娩者产后盆底功能障碍的诊断价值
钟婷婷1, 王丽1, 李载红1, 杨大艳1, 骆东妮1, 陈艳1, 林青2, 米宇1, 景香香1,()   
  1. 1. 570311 海口,海南省人民医院,海南医学院附属海南医院超声科
    2. 570311 海口,海南省人民医院,海南医学院附属海南医院产科
  • 收稿日期:2020-06-17 出版日期:2022-03-01
  • 通信作者: 景香香
  • 基金资助:
    海南省自然科学基金青年基金项目(819QN352)

Diagnostic value of virtual touch tissue imaging quantification shear wave elastography combined with pelvic ultrasound in pelvic floor dysfunction after vaginal delivery

Tingting Zhong1, Li Wang1, Zaihong Li1, Dayan Yang1, Dongni Luo1, Yan Chen1, Qing Lin2, Yu Mi1, Xiangxiang Jing1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, Hainan General Hospital, Hainan Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou 570311, China
    2. Department of Obstetrics, Hainan General Hospital, Hainan Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou 570311, China
  • Received:2020-06-17 Published:2022-03-01
  • Corresponding author: Xiangxiang Jing
引用本文:

钟婷婷, 王丽, 李载红, 杨大艳, 骆东妮, 陈艳, 林青, 米宇, 景香香. 声触诊组织定量剪切波弹性成像联合盆底超声对阴道分娩者产后盆底功能障碍的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(03): 226-233.

Tingting Zhong, Li Wang, Zaihong Li, Dayan Yang, Dongni Luo, Yan Chen, Qing Lin, Yu Mi, Xiangxiang Jing. Diagnostic value of virtual touch tissue imaging quantification shear wave elastography combined with pelvic ultrasound in pelvic floor dysfunction after vaginal delivery[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2022, 19(03): 226-233.

目的

探讨声触诊组织成像定量(VTIQ)剪切波弹性成像联合盆底超声对阴道分娩者产后盆底功能障碍(PFD)的诊断价值。

方法

选取2019年1月至12月海南医学院附属海南医院收治的经阴道分娩的42例PFD患者为PFD组,选择同期52名经阴道分娩的健康志愿者为正常对照组,均进行盆底超声和VTIQ剪切波弹性成像检查。记录并比较2组受检者的临床资料,包括年龄、体质量指数、产次及新生儿体质量以及盆底超声检查参数[膀胱颈移动度(BND)、膀胱尿道后角(PUVA)、尿道旋转角度(URA)、子宫颈外口移动度(COD)、直肠壶腹部移动度(RAD)、盆膈裂孔面积(LHA)]和弹性超声参数(静息状态和最大缩肛状态下杨氏模量值)。单因素分析采用秩和检验及t检验,筛选出对PFD有诊断价值的指标,并建立二分类Logistic回归模型,明确阴道分娩者产后PFD的独立影响因素。采用受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析单个参数及回归模型的诊断价值,并进行曲线下面积(AUC)的比较。

结果

单因素分析正常对照组和PFD组产次、新生儿体质量、BND、PUVA、URA、COD、RAD、LHA、最大缩肛状态杨氏模量值及杨氏模量值差值比较,差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。杨氏模量值差值区分正常对照组与PFD组AUC大于最大缩肛状态杨氏模量值(0.865 vs 0.750),差异具有统计学意义(Z=2.844,P<0.001)。二分类Logistic回归分析结果显示新生儿体质量(X4)、BND(X5)及LHA(X10)是阴道分娩后PFD的独立危险因素,杨氏模量值差值(X13)是阴道分娩后PFD的独立保护因素,构建的Logistic回归模型为:Logit(P)=-60.011+0.010X4+0.599X5+1.202X10-0.416X13。ROC曲线结果显示新生儿体质量、BND及LHA、杨氏模量值差值以及回归模型预测阴道分娩后PFD的AUC分别为0.779、0.836、0.876、865、0.996,其中回归模型预测的AUC明显高于各指标单独预测的结果(P<0.001、<0.001、=0.006、=0.013),其余单个指标AUC比较,差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。当回归模型预测概率为0.5454时,其敏感度与特异度分别为88.10%和94.23%。

结论

VTIQ技术联合盆底超声建立的回归模型对阴道分娩者产后PFD有较高的诊断价值。

Objective

To assess the value of virtual touch tissue imaging quantification (VTIQ) shear wave elastography combined with pelvic ultrasound in the diagnosis of pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) after vaginal delivery.

Methods

From January 2019 to December 2019, 42 patients with PFD treated at Hainan Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University Hospital after vaginal delivery were selected as a PFD group, and 52 healthy volunteers without PFD were included in a control group. All patients underwent pelvic ultrasound and VTIQ shear wave elastography. The clinical data of the two groups were recorded and compared, including age, body mass index, parity, the mean of birth weight, pelvic floor ultrasound parameters [bladder neck descent (BND), posterior urethrovesical angle (PUVA), urethral rotation angle (URA), cervical orifice descent (COD), rectal ampulla descent (RAD), and levator hiatus area (LHA)], and elastic ultrasound parameters [Young's modulus of the puborectalis (PR) at resting and maximum anal contraction state]. Rank sum test and t-test were used to screen out indicators with diagnostic value for PFD, and a binary logistic regression model was developed to identify the independent factors for postpartum PFD. Receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was performed to analyze the diagnostic value of single parameter and regression model, and the area under curve (AUC) was compared.

Results

There were significant differences in parity, the mean of birth weight, BND, PUVA, URA, COD, RAD, LHA, Young's modulus of PR at maximum anal contraction state, and Young's modulus difference between the two groups (P<0.05). The AUC of Young's modulus difference was higher than that of Young's modulus at maximum anal contraction state between the two groups (0.865 vs 0.750; Z=2.844, P<0.001). Binary logistic regression analysis showed that the mean of birth weight (X4), BND (X5), and LHA (X10) were identified as independent risk factors, and Young's modulus difference (X13) was identified as an independent protective factor for PFD after vaginal delivery. The developed logistic regression equation was: Logit (P) =-60.011+0.010X4+0.599X5+1.202X10-0.416X13. ROC curves analysis indicated that the AUCs of the mean of birth weight, BND, LHA, Young's modulus difference, and the regression model for predicting PFD after vaginal delivery were 0.779, 0.836, 0.876, 0.865, and 0.996, respectively. The AUC of the regression model was significantly higher than those of other indexes (P<0.001,<0.001, =0.006, and =0.013, respectively), but the AUCs of the other indexes did not differ significantly (P>0.05). When the prediction probability of the regression model was 0.5454, the sensitivity and specificity were 88.10% and 94.23%, respectively.

Conclusion

The regression model established by VTIQ technology combined with pelvic ultrasound has high diagnostic value for PFD after vaginal delivery.

表1 2组产妇一般临床资料与盆底超声参数的单因素分析
图2 轻度膀胱脱垂者静息状态与Valsalva状态超声二维图注:URA为尿道旋转角度,PUVA为膀胱尿道后角
图3 正常者(图a)和轻度膀胱脱垂者(图b)盆膈裂孔面积图
表2 2组产妇不同状态下杨氏模量值及其差值的比较(kPa)
图1 正常者静息状态与Valsalva状态超声二维图。图a中A、B、C为静息状态下膀胱颈、子宫颈外口最低点、直肠壶腹部与参考线之间的垂直距离;图b中a、b、c为Valsalva状态下膀胱颈、子宫颈外口最低点、直肠壶腹部与参考线之间的垂直距离(若a、b、c位于参考线下,以负值表示;A-a、B-b、C-c分别为膀胱颈移动度、子宫颈外口移动度以及直肠壶腹部移动度)
图5 声触诊组织成像定量技术鉴别诊断正常组与盆底功能障碍组的受试者操作特征曲线
表3 经阴道分娩后盆底功能障碍危险因素的二分类Logistic回归模型分析结果
图 4 正常者(图a)和盆底功能障碍者(图b)耻骨直肠肌弹性图
图6 各参数及Logistic回归模型预测阴道分娩后盆底功能障碍的受试者操作特征曲线
表4 各参数对盆底功能障碍性疾病的预测分析
1
Keag OE, Norman JE, Stock SJ, et al. Long-term risks and benefits associated with cesarean delivery for mother, baby, and subsequent pregnancies: systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. PLoS Med, 2018, 15(1): 1-22.
2
Kam HA, Yagel S, Eisenberg VH, et al. Ultrasonography in pelvic floor dysfunction [J]. Obstet Gyn Clin N AM, 2019, 46(4): 715-732.
3
Gachon B, Nordez A, Pierre F, et al. In vivo assessment of the levator ani muscles using shear wave elastography: a feasibility study in women [J]. I Int Urogynecol J, 2019, 30(7): 1179-1186.
4
Mazur-Bialy AI, Nska-Bogucka DK, Nowakowski C, et al. Urinary incontinence in women: modern methods of physiotherapy as a support for surgical treatment or independent therapy [J]. J Clin Med, 2020, 9(4): 1211.
5
Howard D, Makhlouf M. Can pelvic floor dysfunction after vaginal birth be prevented? [J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2016, 27(12): 1811-1815.
6
刘丽, 刘静华, 蒋莹, 等. 经会阴三维超声断层成像评估盆腔器官脱垂患者肛提肌损伤的康复疗效 [J/CD]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2019, 16(1): 54-60.
7
Meng X, Huan Y, Pei MM, et al. Levator ani evaluation at transperineal elastography in women with deep infiltrating endometriosis postoperatively [J]. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod, 2020, 49(4): 101633.
8
Nakamura M, Hasegawa S, Umegaki H, et al. The difference in passive tension applied to the muscles composing the hamstrings-comparison among muscles using ultrasound shear wave elastography [J]. Man Ther, 2016, 24: 1-6.
9
Dietz HP, Franco AVM, Shek KL, et al. Avulsion injury and levator hiatal ballooning: two independent risk factors for prolapse? An observational study [J]. Acta Obstetr Gynecol Scand, 2012, 91(2): 211-214.
10
王秋静. 静、动态MRI对经阴道分娩后压力性尿失禁的研究 [D]. 天津: 天津医科大学, 2019.
11
Sindhwani N, Bamberg C, Famaey N, et al. In vivo evidence of significant levator ani muscle stretch on MR images of a live childbirth [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2017, 217(2): 194.e1-194.e8.
12
Handa VL, Roem J, Blomquist JL, et al. Pelvic organ prolapse as a function of levator ani avulsion, hiatus size, and strength [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2019, 221(1): 41.e1-41.e7.
13
牛旺, 史铁梅, 张原溪. 剪切波弹性成像技术定量评估盆腔器官脱垂患者耻骨直肠肌功能 [J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2018, 34(2): 270-274.
14
Laterza RM, Schrutka L, Umek W, et al. Pelvic floor dysfunction after levator trauma 1-year postpartum: a prospective case-control study [J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2015, 26(1): 41-47.
15
Nordin M, Frankel VH. Basic biomechanics of themusculoskeletal system [M]. 3rd edtion. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001: 102-125.
16
杨彩霞, 唐淑稳. 阴道分娩初产妇早期盆底功能障碍的危险因素分析 [J]. 重庆医学, 2020, 49(7): 1121-1124.
[1] 陈启阳, 刘玉江, 刘金苹, 谭小蕖, 钱林学, 胡向东. 基于超声造影的预测模型对甲状腺乳头状癌颈中央区淋巴结转移的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(04): 442-448.
[2] 高艳多, 朱霞, 范建华, 戢秀勤, 赵胜, 谢磊. 产钳助产术后女性盆底机能的三维超声评估[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(12): 1361-1365.
[3] 张旭, 苏冬明, 于秀蕾, 张莹, 于天琢, 张文智, 杨高怡. 常规超声及超声造影对无灌注缺损型颈部淋巴结良恶性的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(04): 331-336.
[4] 王蓓蓓, 董启秀, 郗红燕, 于庆云, 张丽君, 式光. 早孕期孕妇药物流产失败的影响因素分析与构建相关预测模型及其对药物流产成功的预测价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 588-594.
[5] 居晓庆, 金蕴洁, 王晓燕. 剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫患者再次妊娠阴道分娩发生子宫破裂的影响因素分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 575-581.
[6] 薛超, 张烨, 赵映, 韩建成, 谷孝艳, 孙琳, 刘晓伟, 宋伟, 何怡华. 胎儿先天性肺动脉瓣缺如综合征的超声特征及预后分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(04): 410-418.
[7] 陈莉, 雷雪芹, 段炼, 曾悦, 何国琳. 影响2次剖宫产术后阴道试产产妇试产成功因素及妊娠结局分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 287-294.
[8] 陈川, 杨太珠, 何泽凤. 肾脏彩色多普勒超声结果对儿童重症医学科急性肾损伤患儿的辅助诊断价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(02): 219-226.
[9] 刘顺利, 田志青, 曹杨, 乔莉娜. 儿童重症监护室脓毒症患儿死亡相关影响因素分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(02): 178-186.
[10] 郑璇, 赵云. 孕期与产后盆底功能障碍性疾病及防治研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(03): 366-372.
[11] 王锦怡, 鲍珽轶. 血清尿酸及NLRP3炎症小体对妊娠期高血压疾病孕妇并发急性肾损伤的预测价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 17(06): 663-670.
[12] 赵月, 张宗明, 刘立民, 张翀, 刘卓, 朱明文, 邓海, 万柏江, 谢希源, 张李鹏. 老年急性结石性胆囊炎手术时机危急值评判[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(05): 521-524.
[13] 李晓阳, 刘柏隆, 周祥福. 大数据及人工智能对女性盆底功能障碍性疾病的诊断及风险预测[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 549-552.
[14] 叶晓瑞, 金黑鹰, 张春霞. 盆底功能障碍性疾病多学科整合的必要性及其存在的问题[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(07): 605-609.
[15] 王永通, 金黑鹰, 张春霞, 叶晓瑞, 王俊, 杨阳, 刘建磊, 张心怡. 磁刺激联合生物反馈治疗盆底功能障碍性疾病的前瞻性非随机对照研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(07): 621-625.
阅读次数
全文


摘要