切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (10) : 1031 -1035. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2022.10.002

所属专题: 总编推荐

指南与规范

《ASRM苗勒管发育异常分类2021版》解读
罗舒榆1, 林琪1, 王慧芳2,()   
  1. 1. 518020 深圳市人民医院(暨南大学第二临床医学院,南方科技大学第一附属医院)超声科
    2. 518001 深圳大学第三附属医院 深圳市罗湖区人民医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2022-07-05 出版日期:2022-10-01
  • 通信作者: 王慧芳

Interpretation of ASRM Müllerian anomalies classification 2021

Shuyu Luo1, Qi Lin1, Huifang Wang2()   

  • Received:2022-07-05 Published:2022-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Huifang Wang
引用本文:

罗舒榆, 林琪, 王慧芳. 《ASRM苗勒管发育异常分类2021版》解读[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(10): 1031-1035.

Shuyu Luo, Qi Lin, Huifang Wang. Interpretation of ASRM Müllerian anomalies classification 2021[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2022, 19(10): 1031-1035.

图1 苗勒管发育异常分类表格的打印版本[图片来源:Pfeifer SM, Attaran M, Goldstein J, et al. ASRM Müllerian anomalies classification 2021. Fertil Steril, 116(5): 1238-1252.]
图2 不全纵隔子宫的诊断依据[图片来源:Pfeifer SM, Attaran M, Goldstein J, et al. ASRM Müllerian anomalies classification 2021. Fertil Steril, 116(5), 1238-1252.]
1
The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, pregnanciestubal, müllerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions [J]. Fertil Steril, 1988, 49(6): 944-955.
2
Oppelt P, Renner SP, Brucker S, et al. The VCUAM (Vagina Cervix Uterus Adnex-associated Malformation) classification: a new classification for genital malformations [J]. Fertil Steril, 2005, 84(5): 1493-1497.
3
Grimbizis GF, Gordts S, Di Spiezio Sardo A, et al. The ESHRE-ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies [J]. Gynecol Surg, 2013, 10(3): 199-212.
4
Pfeifer SM, Attaran M, Goldstein J, et al. ASRM mullerian anomalies classification 2021 [J]. Fertil Steril, 2021, 116(5): 1238-1252.
5
Prior M, Richardson A, Asif S, et al. Outcome of assisted reproduction in women with congenital uterine anomalies: a prospective observational study [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2018, 51: 110-117.
6
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Uterine septum: a guideline [J]. Fertil Steril, 2016, 106(3): 530-540.
7
Ludwin A, Martins WP , Nastri CO , et al. Congenital Uterine Malformation by Experts (CUME): better criteria for distinguishing between normal/arcuate and septate uterus? [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2018, 51(1): 101-109.
8
Seyhan A, Ertas S, Urman B. Prevalence of T-shaped uterus among fertile women based on ESHRE/ESGE and Congenital Uterine Malformation by Experts (CUME) criteria [J]. Reprod Biomed Online, 2021, 43(3): 515-522.
9
Naftalin J, Bean E, Saridogan E, et al. Imaging in gynecological disease: clinical and ultrasound characteristics of accessory cavitated uterine malformations [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2020, 57(5): 821-828.
10
Ludwin A, Pitynski K, Ludwin I, et al. Two- and three-dimensional ultrasonography and sonohysterography versus hysteroscopy with laparoscopy in the differential diagnosis of septate, bicornuate, and arcuate uteri [J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2013, 20(1): 90-99.
11
Salim R, Woelfer B, Backos M, et al. Reproducibility of three-dimensional ultrasound diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2003, 21(6): 578-582.
12
Grimbizis GF, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Saravelos SH , et al. The Thessaloniki ESHRE/ESGE consensus on diagnosis of female genital anomalies [J]. Hum Reprod, 2016, 31(1): 2-7.
13
Ludwin A, Tudorache S, Martins WP. ASRM Müllerian Anomalies Classification 2021: a critical review [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2022, 60(1): 7-21.
No related articles found!
阅读次数
全文


摘要