切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (08) : 849 -853. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2023.08.011

浅表器官超声影像学

术前经皮超声造影对乳腺癌腋窝前哨淋巴结转移及负荷的诊断价值
邵华, 那子悦, 荆慧, 李博, 王秋程, 程文()   
  1. 150040 哈尔滨医科大学附属肿瘤医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2022-04-26 出版日期:2023-08-01
  • 通信作者: 程文

Value of preoperative percutaneous contrast-enhanced ultrasound in diagnosis of axillary sentinel lymph node metastasis and burden in breast cancer

Hua Shao, Ziyue Na, Hui Jing, Bo Li, Qiucheng Wang, Wen Cheng()   

  1. Department of Ultrasound, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin 150040, China
  • Received:2022-04-26 Published:2023-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Wen Cheng
引用本文:

邵华, 那子悦, 荆慧, 李博, 王秋程, 程文. 术前经皮超声造影对乳腺癌腋窝前哨淋巴结转移及负荷的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 849-853.

Hua Shao, Ziyue Na, Hui Jing, Bo Li, Qiucheng Wang, Wen Cheng. Value of preoperative percutaneous contrast-enhanced ultrasound in diagnosis of axillary sentinel lymph node metastasis and burden in breast cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2023, 20(08): 849-853.

目的

探讨术前经皮超声造影对乳腺癌腋窝前哨淋巴结(SLN)转移以及腋窝淋巴结负荷的诊断价值。

方法

收集2020年7月至2021年12月于哈尔滨医科大学附属肿瘤医院乳腺外科就诊的75例乳腺癌患者,术前经皮超声造影确定SLN并记录其增强模式(分为Ⅰ型均匀增强、Ⅱ型不均匀增强、Ⅲ型无增强)。以病理诊断作为金标准,0~2个SLN转移为有限淋巴结负荷,≥3个SLN转移为高淋巴结负荷,应用四格表分析增强模式诊断腋窝SLN转移及负荷的效能。

结果

超声造影对75例乳腺癌患者SLN的检出率为97.3%(73/75),共检出88个SLN。其中Ⅰ型淋巴结40个,Ⅱ型淋巴结42个,Ⅲ型淋巴结6个。超声造影增强模式诊断SLN转移的敏感度为100%,特异度为62.5%,阳性预测值为50%,阴性预测值为100%,诊断符合率为72.7%。71例T1、T2期乳腺癌患者中24例有SLN转移,其中6例为高淋巴结负荷,18例为低淋巴结负荷。超声造影增强模式诊断SLN负荷状态的敏感度为100%,特异度为56.9%,准确性为60.6%。阳性预测值为17.6%,阴性预测值为100%。

结论

经皮超声造影可有效识别腋窝SLN,超声造影增强模式有助于预测腋窝SLN转移及评估负荷状态。

Objective

To assess the value of preoperative percutaneous contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the diagnosis of axillary sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis in breast cancer and the value of enhancement mode in diagnosing axillary lymph node burden.

Methods

Seventy-five breast cancer patients at the Breast Surgery Department of Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital were enrolled from July 2020 to December 2021. Preoperative percutaneous CEUS was used to identify SLNs and record their enhancement pattern (divided into type Ⅰ uniform enhancement, type Ⅱ non-uniform enhancement, and type Ⅲ no enhancement). Pathological diagnosis was used as the gold standard. The value of enhancement pattern analysis in diagnosing axillary SLN metastasis and burden was then assessed by fourfold table.

Results

The detection rate of CEUS for SLN in 75 breast cancer patients was 97.3% (73/75), and a total of 88 SLNs were detected. Among them, there are 40 type Ⅰlymph nodes, 42 type Ⅱ lymph nodes, and 6 type Ⅲ lymph nodes. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of CEUS enhancement patterns in predicting SLN metastasis were 100%, 62.5%, 50%, 100%, and 72.7%, respectively. Twenty-four of 71 patients with stage T1/T2 breast cancer had sentinel lymph node metastasis, of whom 6 had high lymph node load and 18 had low lymph node load. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the enhancement patterns of CEUS in diagnosing SLN burden status were 100%, 56.9%, 60.6%, 17.6%, and 100%, respectively.

Conclusion

Percutaneous CEUS is effective in identifying axillary SLNs, and CEUS enhancement patterns can help predict axillary SLN metastasis and burden.

表1 75例患者基本特征[例(%)]
图1 前哨淋巴结超声造影增强模式图。图a为Ⅰ型均匀增强,病理证实为无转移性淋巴结;图b为Ⅱ型不均匀增强,病理证实为转移性淋巴结;图c为Ⅲ型无增强,病理证实为转移性淋巴结
表2 前哨淋巴结超声造影增强模式与病理结果对照(个)
表3 T1、T2期乳腺癌SLN超声造影增强模式与病理结果对照(例)
1
Li B, Zhao X, Wang Q, et al. Prediction of high nodal burden in invasive breast cancer by quantitative shear wave elastography [J]. Quant Imaging Med Surg, 2022, 12(2): 1336-1347.
2
左梦, 张海宇, 巴黎, 等. 超声造影联合声触诊组织成像定量技术对乳腺癌前哨淋巴结转移的评估[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2021, 18(2): 171-176.
3
Morrow M, Van Zee KJ, Patil S, et al. Axillary dissection and nodal irradiation can be avoided for most node-positive Z0011-eligible breast cancers: a prospective validation study of 793 patients[J]. Ann Surg, 2017, 266(3): 457-462.
4
Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Viale G, et al. A randomized comparison of sentinel-node biopsy with routine axillary dissection in breast cancer[J]. N Eng J Med, 2003, 349(6): 546-553.
5
Mansel RE, Fallowfield L, Kissin M, et al. Randomized multicenter trial of sentinel node biopsy versus standard axillary treatment in operable breast cancer: the ALMANAC Trial[J]. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2006, 98(9): 599-609.
6
Giuliano AE, Hunt KK, Ballman KV, et al. Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: a randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA, 2011, 305(6): 569-75.
7
Kim T, Giuliano AE, Lyman GH. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast carcinoma: a metaanalysis[J]. Cancer, 2006, 106(1): 4-16.
8
Mattrey RF, Kono Y, Baker K, et al. Sentinel lymph node imaging with microbubble ultrasound contrast material[J]. Acad Radiol, 2002, 9 Suppl 1: S231-S235.
9
Sever AR, Mills P, Jones SE, et al. Sentinel node identification using microbubbles and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography[J]. Clin Radiol, 2012, 67(7): 687-694.
10
郭晓霞, 刘昱含, 李潜. 乳腺癌前哨淋巴结超声造影不均匀增强模式的表现分析[J]. 中华实用诊断与治疗杂志, 2019, 33(4): 386-388.
11
Galimberti V, Cole BF, Zurrida S, et al. Axillary dissection versus no axillary dissection in patients with sentinel-node micrometastases (IBCSG 23-01): a phase 3 randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2013, 14(4): 297–305.
12
Sever AR, Mills P, Jones SE, et al. Sentinel node identification using microbubbles and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography[J]. Clin Radiol, 2012, 67(7): 687-694.
13
Gkegkes ID, Iavazzo C. Contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEU) using microbubbles for sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: a systematic review[J]. Acta Chir Belg, 2015, 115(3): 212-218.
14
Zhao J, Zhang J, Zhu QL, et al. The value of contrastenhanced ultrasound for sentinel lymph node identification and characterisation in pre-operative breast cancer patients: A prospective study[J]. Eur Radiol, 2018, 28(4): 1654-1661.
15
胥桐, 郭丽苹, 方红, 等. 经皮超声造影对乳腺癌前哨淋巴结的定性评估[J]. 中国医学影像学杂志, 2020, 28(2): 86-89.
16
Nielsen MA, Bull J, Culpan AM, et al. Preoperative sentinel lymph node identification, biopsy and localization using contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in patients with breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Clin Radiol, 2017, 72(11): 959-971.
17
Kim WH, Kim HJ, Lee SM, et al. Prediction of high nodal burden with ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in clinically node-negative breast cancer patients[J]. Cancer Imaging, 2019, 19(1): 4.
[1] 王亚红, 蔡胜, 葛志通, 杨筱, 李建初. 颅骨骨膜窦的超声表现一例[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(11): 1089-1091.
[2] 汪洪斌, 张红霞, 何文, 杜丽娟, 程令刚, 张雨康, 张萌. 低级别阑尾黏液性肿瘤与阑尾黏液腺癌超声及超声造影特征分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 865-871.
[3] 宋勇, 李东炫, 王翔, 李锐. 基于数据挖掘法分析3 种超声造影剂不良反应信号[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 890-898.
[4] 王博冉, 乔春梅, 李春歌, 王欣, 王晓磊. 超声造影评估类风湿关节炎亚临床滑膜炎疾病进展的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 802-808.
[5] 马晓菊, 梁潇, 段云友, 袁丽君, 赵萍. NBAV脂质纳泡对ApoE -/-小鼠动脉粥样硬化病变的评估和干预[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 608-616.
[6] 洪玮, 叶细容, 刘枝红, 杨银凤, 吕志红. 超声影像组学联合临床病理特征预测乳腺癌新辅助化疗完全病理缓解的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 571-579.
[7] 刘伟, 牛云峰, 安杰. LINC01232 通过miR-516a-5p/BCL9 轴促进三阴性乳腺癌的恶性进展[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 330-338.
[8] 杨柳, 宋振川, 王新乐. 乳腺癌改良根治术联合背阔肌复位的临床疗效评估[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 269-273.
[9] 黄程鑫, 陈莉, 刘伊楚, 王水良, 赖晓凤. OPA1 在乳腺癌组织的表达特征及在ER阳性乳腺癌细胞中的生物学功能研究[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 275-284.
[10] 郑大雯, 王健东. 胆囊癌辅助诊断研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 769-773.
[11] 刘琦, 王守凯, 王帅, 苏雨晴, 马壮, 陈海军, 司丕蕾. 乳腺癌肿瘤内微生物组的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 841-845.
[12] 王誉英, 刘世伟, 王睿, 曾娅玲, 涂禧慧, 张蒲蓉. 老年乳腺癌新辅助治疗病理完全缓解的预测因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 641-646.
[13] 王帅, 张志远, 苏雨晴, 李雯雯, 王守凯, 刘琦, 李文涛. 孟德尔随机化及其在乳腺癌研究中的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 671-676.
[14] 崔军威, 蔡华丽, 胡艺冰, 胡慧. 亚甲蓝联合金属定位夹及定位钩针标记在乳腺癌辅助化疗后评估腋窝转移淋巴结的临床应用价值探究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 625-632.
[15] 温绍敏, 王雅晳, 施依璐, 段莎莎, 云书荣, 张小杉. 靶向超声造影技术在动脉粥样硬化治疗中的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 496-499.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?