切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (09) : 836 -842. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2024.09.003

指南解读

《心血管影像评估人工瓣膜功能指南》的解读
王霜1, 王斌1,()   
  1. 1. 430071,武汉,武汉大学中南医院心血管超声医学科
  • 收稿日期:2024-03-03 出版日期:2024-09-09
  • 通信作者: 王斌

Interpretation of recommendations for evaluation of prosthetic valves with echocardiography and doppler ultrasound

Shuang Wang, Bin Wang()   

  • Received:2024-03-03 Published:2024-09-09
  • Corresponding author: Bin Wang
引用本文:

王霜, 王斌. 《心血管影像评估人工瓣膜功能指南》的解读[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 836-842.

Shuang Wang, Bin Wang. Interpretation of recommendations for evaluation of prosthetic valves with echocardiography and doppler ultrasound[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2024, 21(09): 836-842.

表1 关于综合评价人工瓣膜的患者资料和超声心动图参数
表2 人工主动脉瓣超声心动图评估参数
表3 人工主动脉瓣的多普勒评估参数
表4 结构性瓣膜衰败的血流动力学标准
表5 主动脉瓣和二尖瓣人工瓣-患者不匹配的多普勒参数EOA 标准(cm2/m2
表6 人工主动脉瓣反流严重程度的评估
表7 评价人工二尖瓣狭窄的多普勒指标
表8 经胸和经食管超声心动图评价人工二尖瓣反流严重程度的标准
表9 评估人工肺动脉瓣狭窄的参数
表10 人工肺动脉瓣反流严重程度的超声心动图评估
表11 人工三尖瓣狭窄的多普勒超声参数评估
表12 三尖瓣置换或修复术后反流严重程度分级
1
Zoghbi WA, Chambers JB, Dumesnil JG, et al. Recommendations forevaluation of prosthetic valves with echocardiography and Doppler ultrasound: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's guidelines and standards Committee and the Task force on prosthetic valves, developed in conjunction with the American College of Cardiology Cardiovascular Imaging Committee, Cardiac Imaging Committee of the American Heart Association, the European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, the Japanese Society of Echocardiography and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography,endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation, American Heart Association, European Association of Echocardiography,a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, the Japanese Society of Echocardiography, and Canadian Society of Echocardiography [J]. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2009, 22: 975-1014.
2
Lancellotti P, Pibarot P, Chambers J, et al. Recommendations for the imaging assessment of prosthetic heart valves: a report from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging endorsed by the Chinese Society of Echocardiography, the Inter-American Society of Echocardiography, and the Brazilian Department of Cardiovascular Imaging [J]. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2016, 17(6): 589-590.
3
Zoghbi WA, Asch FM, Bruce C, et al. Guidelines for the evaluation of valvular regurgitation after percutaneous valve repair or replacement: a report from the American society of echocardiography developed in collaboration with the society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions,Japanese Society of Echocardiography, and Society for Cardio-vascular Magnetic Resonance [J]. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2019, 32(4): 431-475.
4
Zoghbi WA, Jone PN, Chamsi-Pasha MA, et al. Guidelines for the evaluation of prosthetic valve function with cardiovascular imaging: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance and the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography [J]. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2024, 37(1): 2-63.
5
Alkhouli M, Alqahtani F, Simard T, et al. Predictors of use and outcomes of mechanical valve replacement in the United States (2008-2017) [J]. J Am Heart Assoc, 2021, 10(9): e019929.
6
Eugène M, Duchnowski P, Prendergast B, et al. Contemporary management of severe symptomatic aortic stenosis [J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2021, 78(22): 2131-2143.
7
Pibarot P, Herrmann HC, Wu C, et al. Standardized definitions for bioprosthetic valve dysfunction following aortic or mitral valve replacement:JACC state-of-the-art review [J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2022, 80(5): 545-561.
8
Windecker S, Okuno T, Unbehaun A, et al. Which patients with aortic stenosis should be referred to surgery rather than transcatheter aortic valve implantation? [J]. Eur Heart J, 2022, 43(29): 2729-2750.
9
Barbetseas J, Nagueh SF, Pitsavos C, et al. Differentiating thrombus from pannus formation in obstructed mechanical prosthetic valves: an evaluation of clinical, transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiographic parameters [J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1998, 32(5): 1410-1417.
10
Ueda T, T eshima H, Fukunaga S, et al. Evaluation of prosthetic valve obstruction on electrocardiographically gated multidetector-row computed tomography--identification of subprosthetic pannus in the aortic position [J]. Circ J, 2013, 77(2): 418-423.
11
Habib G, Hoen B, T ornos P, et al. Guidelines on the prevention, diagnosis,and treatment of infective endocarditis (new version 2009): the Task force on the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of infective endocarditis of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Endorsed by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) and the International Society of Chemotherapy (ISC) for infection and Cancer[J]. Eur Heart J, 2009, 30(19): 2369-2413.
12
Afridi I, Apostolidou MA, Saad RM, et al. Pseudoaneurysms of the mitral-aortic intervalvular fibrosa: dynamic characterization using transesophageal echocardiographic and Doppler techniques [J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1995, 25(1): 137-145.
13
Kouchoukos NT, Wareing TH, Murphy SF, et al. Sixteen-year experience with aortic root replacement. Results of 172 operations [J].Ann Surg, 1991, 214(3): 308-320.
14
Del Val D, Panagides V, Mestres CA, et al. Infective endocarditis after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: JACC state-of-the-art review[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2023, 81(4): 394-412.
15
Jiménez CES, Papolos AI, Kenigsberg BB, et al. Management of mechanical prosthetic heart valve thrombosis: JACC review topic of the week [J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2023, 81(21): 2115-2127.
16
Tomšič A, Arabkhani B, Schoones JW, et al. Prosthesis-patient mismatch after mitral valve replacement: a pooled meta-analysis of Kaplan-Meier derived individual patient data [J]. J Card Surg, 2020, 35(12): 3477-3485.
17
Pibarot P, Herrmann HC, Wu C, et al. Standardized definitions for bioprosthetic valve dysfunction following aortic or mitral valve replacement:JACC state-of-the-art review [J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2022, 80(5): 545-561.
18
Nicoara A, Skubas N, Ad N, et al. Guidelines for the use of transesophageal echocardiography to assist with surgical decision-making in the operating room: a surgery-based approach: from the American Society of Echocardiography in Collaboration with the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons [J].J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2020, 33(6): 692-734.
19
Hamid NB, Khalique OK, Monaghan MJ, et al. Transcatheter valve implantation in failed surgically inserted bioprosthesis: review and practical guide to echocardiographic imaging in valve-in-valve procedures [J]. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 2015, 8(8): 960-979.
20
Spencer RJ, Gin KG, Tsang MY, et al. Doppler parameters derived from transthoracic echocardiography accurately detect bioprosthetic mitral valve dysfunction [J]. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2017, 30(10): 966-973.e1.
21
Porter TR, Mulvagh SL, Abdelmoneim SS, et al. Clinical applications of ultrasonic enhancing agents in echocardiography: 2018 American Society of Echocardiography guidelines update [J]. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2018, 31(3): 241-274.
22
Puchalski MD, Lui GK, Miller-Hance WC, et al. Guidelines for performing a comprehensive transesophageal echocardiographic:examination in children and all patients with congenital heart disease:recommendations from the American Society of Echocardiography [J].J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2019, 32(2): 173-215.
23
Simpson J, Lopez L, Acar P, et al. Three-dimensional echocardiography in congenital heart disease: an expert consensus document from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography [J]. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2017, 30(1): 1-27.
No related articles found!
阅读次数
全文


摘要