切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (04) : 300 -306. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2026.04.006

心血管超声影像学

强直性脊柱炎患者主动脉僵硬度超声定量评估的单中心观察性研究
肖琰1, 王臻2,3, 张炎1, 袁鸣2, 黄国强4, 杨勇3, 张春玲1,()   
  1. 1 723000 陕西汉中,汉中市中心医院超声医学科
    2 723102 陕西汉中,中国人民解放军96608部队医院医学影像科
    3 710038 西安,空军军医大学唐都医院超声医学科
    4 723000 陕西汉中,汉中市中心医院血液·风湿病科
  • 收稿日期:2025-10-23 出版日期:2026-04-01
  • 通信作者: 张春玲
  • 基金资助:
    陕西省汉中市科技攻关项目(2025)

Quantitative assessment of aortic stiffness by ultrasonography in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a single-center observational controlled study

Yan Xiao1, Zhen Wang2,3, Yan Zhang1, Ming Yuan2, Guoqiang Huang4, Yong Yang3, Chunling Zhang1,()   

  1. 1 Department of Ultrasound Medicine, Hanzhong Central Hospital, Hanzhong 723000, China
    2 Department of Medical Imaging, Hospital of Unit 96608, PLA, Hanzhong 723102, China
    3 Department of Ultrasound Medicine, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Military Medical University, Xi'an 710038, China
    4 Department of Hematology and Rheumatology, Hanzhong Central Hospital, Hanzhong 723000, China
  • Received:2025-10-23 Published:2026-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Chunling Zhang
引用本文:

肖琰, 王臻, 张炎, 袁鸣, 黄国强, 杨勇, 张春玲. 强直性脊柱炎患者主动脉僵硬度超声定量评估的单中心观察性研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2026, 23(04): 300-306.

Yan Xiao, Zhen Wang, Yan Zhang, Ming Yuan, Guoqiang Huang, Yong Yang, Chunling Zhang. Quantitative assessment of aortic stiffness by ultrasonography in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a single-center observational controlled study[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2026, 23(04): 300-306.

目的

探讨主动脉僵硬度超声定量检测在强直性脊柱炎(AS)患者心血管疾病发生风险早期预测中的临床应用价值。

方法

纳入2024年6月1日至12月31日期间在汉中市中心医院接受诊治的AS患者(AS组),同期招募年龄、血压相匹配的健康志愿者(健康对照组)。根据传统危险因素计算Framingham风险评分(FRS)和未来十年心血管疾病发生风险,并采用Mann-Whitney U检验比较组间差异。采用超声动脉僵硬度自动定量测量新技术测量颈-股脉搏波传播速度(cfPWV),采用独立样本t检验比较组间差异,采用Spearman相关分析cfPWV与FRS和未来十年心血管疾病发生风险的相关性,并采用多因素线性回归模型分析各混杂因素与cfPWV间的独立相关性。

结果

研究共纳入AS组患者40例,健康对照组48人。健康对照组的FRS为5.00(2.00,7.00)分,对应的未来十年心血管疾病发生风险为3.60%(2.01%,5.60%),AS组FRS为7.50(2.25,10.75)分,未来十年心血管疾病发生风险为4.60%(2.01%,9.85%),2组比较差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。AS组患者的cfPWV较对照组显著升高[(7.56±1.45)m/s vs(6.80±0.72)m/s],差异具有统计学意义(t=3.200,P=0.002),且AS组患者的cfPWV与FRS、未来十年心血管疾病发生风险存在显著正相关关系(rs=0.614、0.574,P均<0.001)。多因素线性回归分析显示,年龄、平均动脉压、心率和AS是cfPWV的独立影响因素(P均<0.05),在校正年龄、平均动脉压和心率后,是否患AS仍是cfPWV的独立影响因素(P=0.037)。

结论

基于超声技术的主动脉僵硬度定量检测有望为临床AS患者的心血管健康风险评估提供一种新方法,AS患者的主动脉僵硬度较健康人群显著增高,提示其心血管疾病风险可能升高。

Objective

To investigate the clinical utility of quantitative measurement of aortic stiffness based on ultrasonography for early detection of cardiovascular (CV) disease risk in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

Methods

Patients with AS (AS group) who were diagnosed and treated at Hanzhong Central Hospital from June 1 to December 31, 2024 were included, and healthy volunteers (healthy control group) matched in age and blood pressure were recruited at the same time. The Framingham risk score (FRS) and the corresponding risk of CV disease in the next 10 years based on traditional CV risk factors were calculated, with differences compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) was measured by ultrasonography via a novel automatic measurement of arterial stiffness and independent sample t-tests were used to compare differences between groups. Spearman correlation analysis was performed to explore the correlations between cfPWV and FRS as well as the risk of cardiovascular diseases in the next 10 years. The independent correlations between confounding factors and cfPWV were analyzed using a multivariate linear regression model.

Results

A total of 40 AS patients and 48 healthy controls were included. The FRS of the healthy control group was 5.00 (2.00, 7.00), and the corresponding risk of CV disease in the next 10 years was 3.60% (2.01%, 5.60%); the corresponding values in the AS group were 7.50 (2.25, 10.75) and 4.60% (2.01%, 9.85%). There was no statistically significant difference in the FRS or risk of CV disease between the two groups (P>0.05). The cfPWV of the patients was significantly higher than that of the control group (7.56±1.45 m/s vs 6.80±0.72 m/s, t=3.200, P=0.002). Among AS patients, cfPWV was significantly correlated with the FRS and the risk of CV disease in the next 10 years (rs=0.614 and 0.574, respectively, P<0.001). Multivariate linear regression analysis showed that age, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and AS were independent influencing factors of cfPWV (all P<0.05). After adjusting for age, mean arterial pressure, and heart rate, AS were also independent influencing factors of cfPWV (P=0.037).

Conclusion

Quantitative detection of aortic stiffness based on ultrasound technology is expected to provide a new method for CV risk assessment in AS patients. The aortic stiffness of AS patients is significantly higher than that of healthy subjects, suggesting that the risk of CV disease in these patients may increase.

图1 超声动脉僵硬度自动测量系统测算颈-股脉搏波传播速度(cfPWV)界面。图a:在颈总动脉血流速度频谱上,系统会自动测量脉搏波起始点与心电图R波顶点的时间延迟,并显示10个合格心动周期的测量结果(右侧黄色部分);图b:系统自动分析测量股总动脉脉搏波起始点与心电图R波顶点的时间延迟。输入测得的颈-股取样点体表距离(本例中,该距离为50.00 cm),系统会自动完成计算,右下角黄色虚线框处为系统自动计算出的cfPWV结果(7.15 m/s)
表1 2组研究对象一般临床资料比较
表2 多因素线性回归分析混杂因素与颈-股脉搏波传播速度的相关性(n=88)
1
Braun J, Sieper J. Ankylosing spondylitis [J]. Lancet, 2007, 369(9570): 1379-1390.
2
Wei Y, Zhang S, Shao F, et al. Ankylosing spondylitis: from pathogenesis to therapy [J]. Int Immunopharmacol, 2025, 145: 113709.
3
Klisic A, Kotur-Stevuljevic J, Cure O, et al. Cardiovascular risk in patients with ankylosing spondylitis [J]. J Clin Med, 2024, 13(20): 6064.
4
Laurent S, Cockcroft J, Van Bortel L, et al. Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications [J]. Eur Heart J, 2006, 27(21): 2588-2605.
5
Prado G, Forner MJ, Calaforra O, et al. Usefulness of arterial stiffness as an integrated marker of cardiovascular risk [J]. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich), 2025, 27(3): e70038.
6
Ben-Shlomo Y, Spears M, Boustred C, et al. Aortic pulse wave velocity improves cardiovascular event prediction: an individual participant meta-analysis of prospective observational data from 17,635 subjects [J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2014, 63(7): 636-646.
7
Van Bortel LM, Laurent S, Boutouyrie P, et al. Expert consensus document on the measurement of aortic stiffness in daily practice using carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity [J]. J Hypertens, 2012, 30(3): 445-448.
8
Ward MM, Deodhar A, Gensler LS, et al. 2019 update of the American College of Rheumatology/Spondylitis Association of America/Spondyloarthritis Research and Treatment Network Recommendations for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis and nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis [J]. Arthritis Rheumatol, 2019, 71(10): 1599-1613.
9
Wang Z, Wang D, Han M, et al. A novel methodology for semi-automatic measurement of arterial stiffness by doppler ultrasound: clinical feasibility and reproducibility [J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2021, 47(7): 1725-1736.
10
杨勇, 梁潇, 杜京奚, 等. 基于脉搏波传播速度的动脉僵硬度超声自动测量新方法 [J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2022, 31(7): 579-584.
11
中国医师协会超声医师分会. 血管超声检查指南 [J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2009, 18(10): 911-920.
12
Kwon OC, Park MC. Basdai cut-off values corresponding to asdas cut-off values [J]. Rheumatology (Oxford), 2022, 61(6): 2369-2374.
13
D'Agostino RB, Sr M, Vasan RS, et al. General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: the Framingham heart study [J]. Circulation, 2008, 117(6): 743-753.
14
Bodnár N, Kerekes G, Seres I, et al. Assessment of subclinical vascular disease associated with ankylosing spondylitis [J]. J Rheumatol, 2011, 38(4): 723-729.
15
李思靓, 袁建军, 朱好辉. 强直性脊柱炎相关心血管病变的超声研究进展 [J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2021, 18(4): 416-419.
16
Hughes DM, Coronado JIC, Schofield P, et al. The predictive accuracy of cardiovascular disease risk prediction tools in inflammatory arthritis and psoriasis: an observational validation study using the clinical practice research datalink [J]. Rheumatology (Oxford), 2024, 63(12): 3432-3441.
17
赵鹏栋, 肖汉光, 任慧娇, 等. 基于脉搏波传导速度的动脉硬化无创检测方法进展 [J]. 中国动脉硬化杂志, 2021, 29(1): 82-86.
18
Yang Y, Liang X, Luo H, et al. Assessment of aortic and peripheral arterial stiffness in patients with knee osteoarthritis by ultrasound Doppler derived pulse wave velocity [J]. Sci Rep, 2024, 14(1): 1346.
19
骆虎, 陈建民, 黄艳丽, 等. 骨关节炎患者动脉僵硬度评估及相关影响因素分析 [J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2022, 28(4): 309-312, 338.
20
Lin H, Liu X, Zhang J, et al. Assessment of aortic stiffness determinants including smoking status by a novel semiautomatic Doppler ultrasound [J]. Sci Rep, 2025, 15(1): 40937.
[1] 郝玥萦, 毛盈譞, 张羽, 汪佳旭, 韩林霖, 匡雯雯, 孟瑶, 杨秀华. 超声引导衰减参数成像评估肝脂肪变性及其对心血管疾病风险的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 770-777.
[2] 曹雯佳, 刘学兵, 罗安果, 钟释敏, 邓岚, 王玉琳, 李赵欢. 超声矢量血流成像对2型糖尿病患者颈动脉壁剪切应力的研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(07): 709-717.
[3] 陈晓玲, 钟永洌, 刘巧梨, 李娜, 张志奇, 廖威明, 黄桂武. 超高龄髋膝关节术后谵妄及心血管并发症风险预测[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 575-584.
[4] 宋新雅, 苏小慧, 卞士柱, 丁小涵. 吸入性药物治疗肺动脉高压的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 831-835.
[5] 冯熔熔, 苏晓乐, 王利华. 慢性肾脏病患者并发心血管疾病相关生物标志物研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 273-278.
[6] 刘丹, 张克石, 康清源, 袁平, 关振鹏. 生命早期危险因素暴露与成年期疾病的关系[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(07): 520-525.
[7] 王玲洁, 王瑷萍, 李朝军, 丁跃有, 杨德业, 赵清, 崔兆强, 王京昆, 王宏宇. 心脏和血管健康技术创新研发策略专家共识(2024第一次报告,上海)[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 323-336.
[8] 王美琴, 潘海涛, 陈祥菲, 吴婉, 周昱和, 王砚青. S100B 蛋白在心血管疾病中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 229-233.
[9] 马豆豆, 丁艳, 古今, 王丽芳, 石连杰. 以发热为首发表现的强直性脊柱炎合并潜伏性结核感染一例[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 791-794.
[10] 罗漫灵, 黄莉萍. 子痫前期对孕产妇心血管系统的远期影响[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2025, 14(04): 205-209.
[11] 王瑞, 张小杉, 魏颖, 王雅晳. 人工智能赋能心血管影像学在早期筛查与亚临床病变评估中的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2025, 13(03): 153-158.
[12] 杜泽宇, 郭恒, 张向辉, 何佳, 木拉提别克·克尔曼, 马儒林, 郭淑霞. 新疆兵团农村居民血脂指标与心血管疾病发病关联的队列研究[J/OL]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2026, 14(01): 28-35.
[13] 陈公渊, 黄周青. 《2024年ESC肥胖与心血管疾病临床共识》解读[J/OL]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2025, 13(03): 140-148.
[14] 王国峰, 吕舒, 肖金潭, 刘国力, 刘伯芹. 体重变异性与泛血管疾病关系的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2025, 11(02): 135-141.
[15] 宋宇佳, 孟化. 基于营养刺激激素受体靶点新型减重药物的临床研究现状与进展[J/OL]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2025, 11(01): 33-39.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?