Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition) ›› 2016, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (04): 297-301. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2016.04.013

Special Issue:

• Superficial Parts Ultrasound • Previous Articles     Next Articles

The early diagnostic value of ultrasound in ductal carcinoma in situ of breast

Xi Lin1, Qingguang Lin1, Cheng Li1, Anhua Li1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation, Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China
  • Received:2015-11-23 Online:2016-04-01 Published:2016-04-01
  • Contact: Anhua Li
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Li Anhua, Email:

Abstract:

Objectives

To evaluate the early diagnostic value of ultrasound in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of breast.

Methods

The sonographic characteristics in 261 cases of pathologically-confirmed DCIS from May, 2005 to June, 2015 in Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center were retrospectively analyzed and the sonograms were divided into mass or ductal change including dilation and extension. The Chi-square test was used to determine the difference of ultrasound diagnostic accuracy between with and without microcalcifications cases.

Results

Two (1.14%) of the 261 lesions were not visible on sonography. The detection rate was 99.23% (259/261) and the diagnostic accuracy was 83.40% (216/259). Sonography revealed a mass in 98 cases (37.84%), ductal changes in 161 cases (62.16%). The diagnostic accuracy of each type was 82.65% (mass), 80.00% (single ductal dilatation), 82.19% (multiple ductal dilatation), 66.67% (mixed echogenicity), 0 (single ductal extension), 87.76% (multiple ductal extension), 100% (mixed type) respectively. Microcalcifications were visible on sonography in 179 (69.11%) of the 259 lesions. The diagnostic accuracies with and without microcalcifications were 93.85% and 67.50%. The diagnostic accuracy in cases with microcalcifications was higher than those without microcalcifications and there was significant difference between these two groups (χ2=14.54, P<0.01).

Conclusions

The diagnostic accuracy of DCIS has close relationship with ultrasound classification and microcalcifications. The accurate interpretation of ultrasound classification is essential for its clinical application and the early diagnosis of DCIS.

Key words: Ultrasonography, Ductal carcinoma in situ, Diagnosis

Copyright © Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 010-51322630、2632、2628 Fax: 010-51322630 E-mail: csbjb@cma.org.cn
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd