Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition) ›› 2016, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (10): 774-779. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2016.10.013

Special Issue:

• Basic Science Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

The experimental study on the interactive real-time tissue elastography

Huan Du1, Qingping Tong1,(), Junnan Zhang2, Lu Gan1, Yanting Yang1, Yu Liu1, Xiaorong Xu2   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound Center, the 105th Hospital of PLA, Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230032, China
    2. Department of Precision Machinery and Precision Instrumentation, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230027, China
  • Received:2016-04-22 Online:2016-10-01 Published:2016-10-01
  • Contact: Qingping Tong
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Tong Qingping, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

To explore the effect of quantitative feedback control of the range and the frequency of the probe pressure on the reproducibility of strain ratio (SR) measurement in real-time tissue elastography (RTE).

Methods

The interactive ultrasound elastography system was achieved by integrating compression force sensors on the L74M probe of HITACHI preirus. The real-time elastographic images were acquired and displayed on a computer. Strain images were acquired by 15 operators in 3 different methods by using an ultrasound elasticity QA phantom. Method 1 was the freehand measurement by the conventional probe. Method 2 applied a compression load of 0-80 g by the integrated probe (frequency=1.5/s). Method 3 applied a compression load of 40-120 g by the integrated probe (frequency=1.5/s). In our experiment, the three methods were tested by each of 15 operators on a single cylindrical target with the stiffness of 80 kPa, diameter of 10.4 mm and depth of 3 cm. Each operator acquired 15 strain ratios for each method.

Results

CV values had significant difference among 3 methods (F=15.853, P<0. 01) , Method 2 and Method 3 yielded lower CV values than that of Method 1 (q=4.732, 5.038, P<0. 01). CV values had no significant difference between method 2 and method 3 (q=0.625, P>0.05).

Conclusion

The interactive ultrasound elastography can improve the measurement reproducibility among different operators. The preload had limited effect on the results of elastography.

Key words: Elasticity imaging techniques, Interactive pressure feedback, Strain ratio, Coefficient of variability

Copyright © Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 010-51322630、2632、2628 Fax: 010-51322630 E-mail: csbjb@cma.org.cn
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd